- This topic has 400 replies, 23 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 7 months ago by CA renter.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 24, 2008 at 5:29 PM #176162March 24, 2008 at 6:28 PM #175753DWCAPParticipant
I kinda think that the next real reduction is that rents will fall as population does. California is already loosing people left and right to other lower cost states. However we had a huge economy going, demanding ever more cheaper and cheaper labor, so internation immigration made up more than the difference. Already crossings at the Mexico/USA border are 20-25% below previous levels. Itll get worse before it gets better. As population falls, demand for rentals falls as well. MM,clairmont, linda vista, poway, National City will take it in the ass as their base demographic disappears to other states. Sure, immigratants will want to move in, but how many are making 100k+ a year to afford a 350k house? Not many, not with a really weird recession striking at strange parts of the economy and growing stronger.
Now about rents. You can start to see small cracks forming.http://sandiego.craigslist.org/csd/apa/615920915.html
http://sandiego.craigslist.org/csd/apa/615190048.html
http://sandiego.craigslist.org/csd/apa/611756288.html(strange, just over a year after the subprime fun started and the cracks start to show. How long is a standard lease again?)
These will get snapped up in a second, but itll put the constant drumbeat of rising rents under pressure. Why should I rent your 2/2 for 1450 when I can get similar for 1200? Is it as nice. No, but then again I can actually afford a better life if I pay less. Again why pay 1200 for your 1/1 when they will take 900? Small cracks, but over time cold and water in small cracks will break up any rock.Also, I think that a small disconnect lies in the definiton of supply and demand. First demand needs to be broken up into general demand, (ie I WANT A HOUSE) and buying demand (ie, I CAN BUY THIS HOUSE). I noticed an estimate that I cant find anymore that says that the requirment of 15-20% plus a 3 month cushon, would remove ~35% of the buyers from the market. Now that was national, but itll be worse in CA, and even worse in a bubble zone like SD.
Second, supply can be artifically high due to the huge rash of foreclosures. MM is already one of the higher areas for foreclosures North of the 52. How much more junk lies in wait? How many people want to stand with their 450k morgage when the house next door is selling for 300k?
I see no reason why areas such as this wont overshoot any basic fundamental to rent or affordablity due to high supply and painfully low demand. This is long term, ie the next 2 years or so. Plus, MM will have to start competing with the slightly nicer areas like PQ and Poway and such as prices inch down there too. Every buyer is precious in a market lacking demand, and itll drag housing lower the same way people traded down to MM because they couldnt afford PQ when prices were rising.
And inflation isnt gonna get us outa this, Wage inflation would, but any recession will take care of that. Rents went up faster then income just like prices did, and theyll have to come back down to fundaments too. It just isnt ANYWHERE near the degree. I say ~15% give +/- 5% due to sevarity of recession.Also, ok. Say I am totally wrong and this is the bottom of the market. So things get ok, people feel better and banks stop failing. So what happens??? The fed raises rates to combat inflation and all of a sudden rates are up at 6.5-7% again and now what??? Damned if you do, damned if you dont. Prices reductions are the only thing that will fix this, absent huge wage inflation. I vote for wage inflation, but I have a feeling my vote doesnt really count. Damn, just like Florida sans 2000.
Asia, If your looking for a house, 1700 is the bottom of the market, and I wouldnt pay more than 1900 for a 3/2. Good luck man, I dont envy you at all. Not really looking forward to the fall. I just cant imagine that my LL wont want SOMETHING in 3 years. I dont want to pay it, I could, but I am cheap.
March 24, 2008 at 6:28 PM #176105DWCAPParticipantI kinda think that the next real reduction is that rents will fall as population does. California is already loosing people left and right to other lower cost states. However we had a huge economy going, demanding ever more cheaper and cheaper labor, so internation immigration made up more than the difference. Already crossings at the Mexico/USA border are 20-25% below previous levels. Itll get worse before it gets better. As population falls, demand for rentals falls as well. MM,clairmont, linda vista, poway, National City will take it in the ass as their base demographic disappears to other states. Sure, immigratants will want to move in, but how many are making 100k+ a year to afford a 350k house? Not many, not with a really weird recession striking at strange parts of the economy and growing stronger.
Now about rents. You can start to see small cracks forming.http://sandiego.craigslist.org/csd/apa/615920915.html
http://sandiego.craigslist.org/csd/apa/615190048.html
http://sandiego.craigslist.org/csd/apa/611756288.html(strange, just over a year after the subprime fun started and the cracks start to show. How long is a standard lease again?)
These will get snapped up in a second, but itll put the constant drumbeat of rising rents under pressure. Why should I rent your 2/2 for 1450 when I can get similar for 1200? Is it as nice. No, but then again I can actually afford a better life if I pay less. Again why pay 1200 for your 1/1 when they will take 900? Small cracks, but over time cold and water in small cracks will break up any rock.Also, I think that a small disconnect lies in the definiton of supply and demand. First demand needs to be broken up into general demand, (ie I WANT A HOUSE) and buying demand (ie, I CAN BUY THIS HOUSE). I noticed an estimate that I cant find anymore that says that the requirment of 15-20% plus a 3 month cushon, would remove ~35% of the buyers from the market. Now that was national, but itll be worse in CA, and even worse in a bubble zone like SD.
Second, supply can be artifically high due to the huge rash of foreclosures. MM is already one of the higher areas for foreclosures North of the 52. How much more junk lies in wait? How many people want to stand with their 450k morgage when the house next door is selling for 300k?
I see no reason why areas such as this wont overshoot any basic fundamental to rent or affordablity due to high supply and painfully low demand. This is long term, ie the next 2 years or so. Plus, MM will have to start competing with the slightly nicer areas like PQ and Poway and such as prices inch down there too. Every buyer is precious in a market lacking demand, and itll drag housing lower the same way people traded down to MM because they couldnt afford PQ when prices were rising.
And inflation isnt gonna get us outa this, Wage inflation would, but any recession will take care of that. Rents went up faster then income just like prices did, and theyll have to come back down to fundaments too. It just isnt ANYWHERE near the degree. I say ~15% give +/- 5% due to sevarity of recession.Also, ok. Say I am totally wrong and this is the bottom of the market. So things get ok, people feel better and banks stop failing. So what happens??? The fed raises rates to combat inflation and all of a sudden rates are up at 6.5-7% again and now what??? Damned if you do, damned if you dont. Prices reductions are the only thing that will fix this, absent huge wage inflation. I vote for wage inflation, but I have a feeling my vote doesnt really count. Damn, just like Florida sans 2000.
Asia, If your looking for a house, 1700 is the bottom of the market, and I wouldnt pay more than 1900 for a 3/2. Good luck man, I dont envy you at all. Not really looking forward to the fall. I just cant imagine that my LL wont want SOMETHING in 3 years. I dont want to pay it, I could, but I am cheap.
March 24, 2008 at 6:28 PM #176111DWCAPParticipantI kinda think that the next real reduction is that rents will fall as population does. California is already loosing people left and right to other lower cost states. However we had a huge economy going, demanding ever more cheaper and cheaper labor, so internation immigration made up more than the difference. Already crossings at the Mexico/USA border are 20-25% below previous levels. Itll get worse before it gets better. As population falls, demand for rentals falls as well. MM,clairmont, linda vista, poway, National City will take it in the ass as their base demographic disappears to other states. Sure, immigratants will want to move in, but how many are making 100k+ a year to afford a 350k house? Not many, not with a really weird recession striking at strange parts of the economy and growing stronger.
Now about rents. You can start to see small cracks forming.http://sandiego.craigslist.org/csd/apa/615920915.html
http://sandiego.craigslist.org/csd/apa/615190048.html
http://sandiego.craigslist.org/csd/apa/611756288.html(strange, just over a year after the subprime fun started and the cracks start to show. How long is a standard lease again?)
These will get snapped up in a second, but itll put the constant drumbeat of rising rents under pressure. Why should I rent your 2/2 for 1450 when I can get similar for 1200? Is it as nice. No, but then again I can actually afford a better life if I pay less. Again why pay 1200 for your 1/1 when they will take 900? Small cracks, but over time cold and water in small cracks will break up any rock.Also, I think that a small disconnect lies in the definiton of supply and demand. First demand needs to be broken up into general demand, (ie I WANT A HOUSE) and buying demand (ie, I CAN BUY THIS HOUSE). I noticed an estimate that I cant find anymore that says that the requirment of 15-20% plus a 3 month cushon, would remove ~35% of the buyers from the market. Now that was national, but itll be worse in CA, and even worse in a bubble zone like SD.
Second, supply can be artifically high due to the huge rash of foreclosures. MM is already one of the higher areas for foreclosures North of the 52. How much more junk lies in wait? How many people want to stand with their 450k morgage when the house next door is selling for 300k?
I see no reason why areas such as this wont overshoot any basic fundamental to rent or affordablity due to high supply and painfully low demand. This is long term, ie the next 2 years or so. Plus, MM will have to start competing with the slightly nicer areas like PQ and Poway and such as prices inch down there too. Every buyer is precious in a market lacking demand, and itll drag housing lower the same way people traded down to MM because they couldnt afford PQ when prices were rising.
And inflation isnt gonna get us outa this, Wage inflation would, but any recession will take care of that. Rents went up faster then income just like prices did, and theyll have to come back down to fundaments too. It just isnt ANYWHERE near the degree. I say ~15% give +/- 5% due to sevarity of recession.Also, ok. Say I am totally wrong and this is the bottom of the market. So things get ok, people feel better and banks stop failing. So what happens??? The fed raises rates to combat inflation and all of a sudden rates are up at 6.5-7% again and now what??? Damned if you do, damned if you dont. Prices reductions are the only thing that will fix this, absent huge wage inflation. I vote for wage inflation, but I have a feeling my vote doesnt really count. Damn, just like Florida sans 2000.
Asia, If your looking for a house, 1700 is the bottom of the market, and I wouldnt pay more than 1900 for a 3/2. Good luck man, I dont envy you at all. Not really looking forward to the fall. I just cant imagine that my LL wont want SOMETHING in 3 years. I dont want to pay it, I could, but I am cheap.
March 24, 2008 at 6:28 PM #176114DWCAPParticipantI kinda think that the next real reduction is that rents will fall as population does. California is already loosing people left and right to other lower cost states. However we had a huge economy going, demanding ever more cheaper and cheaper labor, so internation immigration made up more than the difference. Already crossings at the Mexico/USA border are 20-25% below previous levels. Itll get worse before it gets better. As population falls, demand for rentals falls as well. MM,clairmont, linda vista, poway, National City will take it in the ass as their base demographic disappears to other states. Sure, immigratants will want to move in, but how many are making 100k+ a year to afford a 350k house? Not many, not with a really weird recession striking at strange parts of the economy and growing stronger.
Now about rents. You can start to see small cracks forming.http://sandiego.craigslist.org/csd/apa/615920915.html
http://sandiego.craigslist.org/csd/apa/615190048.html
http://sandiego.craigslist.org/csd/apa/611756288.html(strange, just over a year after the subprime fun started and the cracks start to show. How long is a standard lease again?)
These will get snapped up in a second, but itll put the constant drumbeat of rising rents under pressure. Why should I rent your 2/2 for 1450 when I can get similar for 1200? Is it as nice. No, but then again I can actually afford a better life if I pay less. Again why pay 1200 for your 1/1 when they will take 900? Small cracks, but over time cold and water in small cracks will break up any rock.Also, I think that a small disconnect lies in the definiton of supply and demand. First demand needs to be broken up into general demand, (ie I WANT A HOUSE) and buying demand (ie, I CAN BUY THIS HOUSE). I noticed an estimate that I cant find anymore that says that the requirment of 15-20% plus a 3 month cushon, would remove ~35% of the buyers from the market. Now that was national, but itll be worse in CA, and even worse in a bubble zone like SD.
Second, supply can be artifically high due to the huge rash of foreclosures. MM is already one of the higher areas for foreclosures North of the 52. How much more junk lies in wait? How many people want to stand with their 450k morgage when the house next door is selling for 300k?
I see no reason why areas such as this wont overshoot any basic fundamental to rent or affordablity due to high supply and painfully low demand. This is long term, ie the next 2 years or so. Plus, MM will have to start competing with the slightly nicer areas like PQ and Poway and such as prices inch down there too. Every buyer is precious in a market lacking demand, and itll drag housing lower the same way people traded down to MM because they couldnt afford PQ when prices were rising.
And inflation isnt gonna get us outa this, Wage inflation would, but any recession will take care of that. Rents went up faster then income just like prices did, and theyll have to come back down to fundaments too. It just isnt ANYWHERE near the degree. I say ~15% give +/- 5% due to sevarity of recession.Also, ok. Say I am totally wrong and this is the bottom of the market. So things get ok, people feel better and banks stop failing. So what happens??? The fed raises rates to combat inflation and all of a sudden rates are up at 6.5-7% again and now what??? Damned if you do, damned if you dont. Prices reductions are the only thing that will fix this, absent huge wage inflation. I vote for wage inflation, but I have a feeling my vote doesnt really count. Damn, just like Florida sans 2000.
Asia, If your looking for a house, 1700 is the bottom of the market, and I wouldnt pay more than 1900 for a 3/2. Good luck man, I dont envy you at all. Not really looking forward to the fall. I just cant imagine that my LL wont want SOMETHING in 3 years. I dont want to pay it, I could, but I am cheap.
March 24, 2008 at 6:28 PM #176207DWCAPParticipantI kinda think that the next real reduction is that rents will fall as population does. California is already loosing people left and right to other lower cost states. However we had a huge economy going, demanding ever more cheaper and cheaper labor, so internation immigration made up more than the difference. Already crossings at the Mexico/USA border are 20-25% below previous levels. Itll get worse before it gets better. As population falls, demand for rentals falls as well. MM,clairmont, linda vista, poway, National City will take it in the ass as their base demographic disappears to other states. Sure, immigratants will want to move in, but how many are making 100k+ a year to afford a 350k house? Not many, not with a really weird recession striking at strange parts of the economy and growing stronger.
Now about rents. You can start to see small cracks forming.http://sandiego.craigslist.org/csd/apa/615920915.html
http://sandiego.craigslist.org/csd/apa/615190048.html
http://sandiego.craigslist.org/csd/apa/611756288.html(strange, just over a year after the subprime fun started and the cracks start to show. How long is a standard lease again?)
These will get snapped up in a second, but itll put the constant drumbeat of rising rents under pressure. Why should I rent your 2/2 for 1450 when I can get similar for 1200? Is it as nice. No, but then again I can actually afford a better life if I pay less. Again why pay 1200 for your 1/1 when they will take 900? Small cracks, but over time cold and water in small cracks will break up any rock.Also, I think that a small disconnect lies in the definiton of supply and demand. First demand needs to be broken up into general demand, (ie I WANT A HOUSE) and buying demand (ie, I CAN BUY THIS HOUSE). I noticed an estimate that I cant find anymore that says that the requirment of 15-20% plus a 3 month cushon, would remove ~35% of the buyers from the market. Now that was national, but itll be worse in CA, and even worse in a bubble zone like SD.
Second, supply can be artifically high due to the huge rash of foreclosures. MM is already one of the higher areas for foreclosures North of the 52. How much more junk lies in wait? How many people want to stand with their 450k morgage when the house next door is selling for 300k?
I see no reason why areas such as this wont overshoot any basic fundamental to rent or affordablity due to high supply and painfully low demand. This is long term, ie the next 2 years or so. Plus, MM will have to start competing with the slightly nicer areas like PQ and Poway and such as prices inch down there too. Every buyer is precious in a market lacking demand, and itll drag housing lower the same way people traded down to MM because they couldnt afford PQ when prices were rising.
And inflation isnt gonna get us outa this, Wage inflation would, but any recession will take care of that. Rents went up faster then income just like prices did, and theyll have to come back down to fundaments too. It just isnt ANYWHERE near the degree. I say ~15% give +/- 5% due to sevarity of recession.Also, ok. Say I am totally wrong and this is the bottom of the market. So things get ok, people feel better and banks stop failing. So what happens??? The fed raises rates to combat inflation and all of a sudden rates are up at 6.5-7% again and now what??? Damned if you do, damned if you dont. Prices reductions are the only thing that will fix this, absent huge wage inflation. I vote for wage inflation, but I have a feeling my vote doesnt really count. Damn, just like Florida sans 2000.
Asia, If your looking for a house, 1700 is the bottom of the market, and I wouldnt pay more than 1900 for a 3/2. Good luck man, I dont envy you at all. Not really looking forward to the fall. I just cant imagine that my LL wont want SOMETHING in 3 years. I dont want to pay it, I could, but I am cheap.
March 24, 2008 at 10:04 PM #175800SD RealtorParticipantHi Rus –
It is hard to say right now. In July when we can look back and see how the spring really did stack up I think we will have a better picture. The April volume figures are going to be very interesting to see. Again, I don’t see any of this activity any more then a nice little spring push and then things will come back to normal.
I absolutely do feel like more modest areas that have run down quick will bottom out quicker. One thing to note though is that these areas also have a larger inventory of REO properties to chew through. I think we are not at the bottom in Mira Mesa but I do think that there seems to be a spot where alot of homes priced in that low to mid 300k range go pretty quick if they are in decent shape. There are some pretty scrappy places thats for sure. The good thing is that hopefully the nicer places that don’t sell will start to now come down there.
Lets see the spring numbers on sales volumes. Once we get into a long hot summer hopefully we will see another leg down. It will depend on rates.
SD Realtor
March 24, 2008 at 10:04 PM #176149SD RealtorParticipantHi Rus –
It is hard to say right now. In July when we can look back and see how the spring really did stack up I think we will have a better picture. The April volume figures are going to be very interesting to see. Again, I don’t see any of this activity any more then a nice little spring push and then things will come back to normal.
I absolutely do feel like more modest areas that have run down quick will bottom out quicker. One thing to note though is that these areas also have a larger inventory of REO properties to chew through. I think we are not at the bottom in Mira Mesa but I do think that there seems to be a spot where alot of homes priced in that low to mid 300k range go pretty quick if they are in decent shape. There are some pretty scrappy places thats for sure. The good thing is that hopefully the nicer places that don’t sell will start to now come down there.
Lets see the spring numbers on sales volumes. Once we get into a long hot summer hopefully we will see another leg down. It will depend on rates.
SD Realtor
March 24, 2008 at 10:04 PM #176156SD RealtorParticipantHi Rus –
It is hard to say right now. In July when we can look back and see how the spring really did stack up I think we will have a better picture. The April volume figures are going to be very interesting to see. Again, I don’t see any of this activity any more then a nice little spring push and then things will come back to normal.
I absolutely do feel like more modest areas that have run down quick will bottom out quicker. One thing to note though is that these areas also have a larger inventory of REO properties to chew through. I think we are not at the bottom in Mira Mesa but I do think that there seems to be a spot where alot of homes priced in that low to mid 300k range go pretty quick if they are in decent shape. There are some pretty scrappy places thats for sure. The good thing is that hopefully the nicer places that don’t sell will start to now come down there.
Lets see the spring numbers on sales volumes. Once we get into a long hot summer hopefully we will see another leg down. It will depend on rates.
SD Realtor
March 24, 2008 at 10:04 PM #176160SD RealtorParticipantHi Rus –
It is hard to say right now. In July when we can look back and see how the spring really did stack up I think we will have a better picture. The April volume figures are going to be very interesting to see. Again, I don’t see any of this activity any more then a nice little spring push and then things will come back to normal.
I absolutely do feel like more modest areas that have run down quick will bottom out quicker. One thing to note though is that these areas also have a larger inventory of REO properties to chew through. I think we are not at the bottom in Mira Mesa but I do think that there seems to be a spot where alot of homes priced in that low to mid 300k range go pretty quick if they are in decent shape. There are some pretty scrappy places thats for sure. The good thing is that hopefully the nicer places that don’t sell will start to now come down there.
Lets see the spring numbers on sales volumes. Once we get into a long hot summer hopefully we will see another leg down. It will depend on rates.
SD Realtor
March 24, 2008 at 10:04 PM #176249SD RealtorParticipantHi Rus –
It is hard to say right now. In July when we can look back and see how the spring really did stack up I think we will have a better picture. The April volume figures are going to be very interesting to see. Again, I don’t see any of this activity any more then a nice little spring push and then things will come back to normal.
I absolutely do feel like more modest areas that have run down quick will bottom out quicker. One thing to note though is that these areas also have a larger inventory of REO properties to chew through. I think we are not at the bottom in Mira Mesa but I do think that there seems to be a spot where alot of homes priced in that low to mid 300k range go pretty quick if they are in decent shape. There are some pretty scrappy places thats for sure. The good thing is that hopefully the nicer places that don’t sell will start to now come down there.
Lets see the spring numbers on sales volumes. Once we get into a long hot summer hopefully we will see another leg down. It will depend on rates.
SD Realtor
March 25, 2008 at 9:38 AM #175878gnParticipantYou're speculating that these "phantom" inventory will become rental. Mira Mesa have no new housing inventory, so I don't see how these "phantom" inventory will affect rental rates. The rest of your argument are speculations as well. I don't see data to support your argument. To me, it's no better than the "we're running out of land" argument from the perma-bulls.
Here's the data from ForeclosureRadar.com 🙂 Take a look at the picture. Each one of the bubble is a "distressed property". Note on the lower right hand side: "showing 200 of 457"
[img_assist|nid=6993|title=MiraMesa|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=405]
March 25, 2008 at 9:38 AM #176229gnParticipantYou're speculating that these "phantom" inventory will become rental. Mira Mesa have no new housing inventory, so I don't see how these "phantom" inventory will affect rental rates. The rest of your argument are speculations as well. I don't see data to support your argument. To me, it's no better than the "we're running out of land" argument from the perma-bulls.
Here's the data from ForeclosureRadar.com 🙂 Take a look at the picture. Each one of the bubble is a "distressed property". Note on the lower right hand side: "showing 200 of 457"
[img_assist|nid=6993|title=MiraMesa|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=405]
March 25, 2008 at 9:38 AM #176234gnParticipantYou're speculating that these "phantom" inventory will become rental. Mira Mesa have no new housing inventory, so I don't see how these "phantom" inventory will affect rental rates. The rest of your argument are speculations as well. I don't see data to support your argument. To me, it's no better than the "we're running out of land" argument from the perma-bulls.
Here's the data from ForeclosureRadar.com 🙂 Take a look at the picture. Each one of the bubble is a "distressed property". Note on the lower right hand side: "showing 200 of 457"
[img_assist|nid=6993|title=MiraMesa|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=405]
March 25, 2008 at 9:38 AM #176241gnParticipantYou're speculating that these "phantom" inventory will become rental. Mira Mesa have no new housing inventory, so I don't see how these "phantom" inventory will affect rental rates. The rest of your argument are speculations as well. I don't see data to support your argument. To me, it's no better than the "we're running out of land" argument from the perma-bulls.
Here's the data from ForeclosureRadar.com 🙂 Take a look at the picture. Each one of the bubble is a "distressed property". Note on the lower right hand side: "showing 200 of 457"
[img_assist|nid=6993|title=MiraMesa|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=405]
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.