- This topic has 400 replies, 23 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 7 months ago by CA renter.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 24, 2008 at 3:50 PM #176057March 24, 2008 at 4:25 PM #175634EugeneParticipant
You may remember that in mid-January average conforming rates dipped below 5.5% and briefly fell as low as 5.2%. Everyone who managed to lock in those rates is rushing to buy right now. Thus a bump in pendings and closings. Not a spring bounce, but rather a low-rate bounce.
March 24, 2008 at 4:25 PM #175986EugeneParticipantYou may remember that in mid-January average conforming rates dipped below 5.5% and briefly fell as low as 5.2%. Everyone who managed to lock in those rates is rushing to buy right now. Thus a bump in pendings and closings. Not a spring bounce, but rather a low-rate bounce.
March 24, 2008 at 4:25 PM #175990EugeneParticipantYou may remember that in mid-January average conforming rates dipped below 5.5% and briefly fell as low as 5.2%. Everyone who managed to lock in those rates is rushing to buy right now. Thus a bump in pendings and closings. Not a spring bounce, but rather a low-rate bounce.
March 24, 2008 at 4:25 PM #175993EugeneParticipantYou may remember that in mid-January average conforming rates dipped below 5.5% and briefly fell as low as 5.2%. Everyone who managed to lock in those rates is rushing to buy right now. Thus a bump in pendings and closings. Not a spring bounce, but rather a low-rate bounce.
March 24, 2008 at 4:25 PM #176087EugeneParticipantYou may remember that in mid-January average conforming rates dipped below 5.5% and briefly fell as low as 5.2%. Everyone who managed to lock in those rates is rushing to buy right now. Thus a bump in pendings and closings. Not a spring bounce, but rather a low-rate bounce.
March 24, 2008 at 4:34 PM #175656anParticipantBack around Jan 23rd, 10 T-Bill dropped to around 3.28, a few weeks ago, we dipped to 3.28 again and now bounced to 3.50. Rates right now shouldn’t be that far off compare to the low of mid January. Which is why I don’t think it’s the cause for the spike in demand/pending.
March 24, 2008 at 4:34 PM #176006anParticipantBack around Jan 23rd, 10 T-Bill dropped to around 3.28, a few weeks ago, we dipped to 3.28 again and now bounced to 3.50. Rates right now shouldn’t be that far off compare to the low of mid January. Which is why I don’t think it’s the cause for the spike in demand/pending.
March 24, 2008 at 4:34 PM #176010anParticipantBack around Jan 23rd, 10 T-Bill dropped to around 3.28, a few weeks ago, we dipped to 3.28 again and now bounced to 3.50. Rates right now shouldn’t be that far off compare to the low of mid January. Which is why I don’t think it’s the cause for the spike in demand/pending.
March 24, 2008 at 4:34 PM #176013anParticipantBack around Jan 23rd, 10 T-Bill dropped to around 3.28, a few weeks ago, we dipped to 3.28 again and now bounced to 3.50. Rates right now shouldn’t be that far off compare to the low of mid January. Which is why I don’t think it’s the cause for the spike in demand/pending.
March 24, 2008 at 4:34 PM #176107anParticipantBack around Jan 23rd, 10 T-Bill dropped to around 3.28, a few weeks ago, we dipped to 3.28 again and now bounced to 3.50. Rates right now shouldn’t be that far off compare to the low of mid January. Which is why I don’t think it’s the cause for the spike in demand/pending.
March 24, 2008 at 4:41 PM #175665gnParticipantAsianautica, thanks for posting the house on 8470 Pallux Way.
With a 20% down payment, the total cost of ownership (mortgage + property tax + insurance – tax deduction) of this house is about the same as renting.
With that said, I think the following is going to occur:
1. Prices will go down a bit more & become attractive for investors to scoop them up.
2. The increase in the rental supply (b/c investors rent these houses out) will result lower rents.#1 & #2 will repeat in a vicious cycle. I think the early investors will lose money because lower rents effectively create a new “floor” for prices.
The bottom for houses like the one on Pallux Way: $200k – $250k
March 24, 2008 at 4:41 PM #176016gnParticipantAsianautica, thanks for posting the house on 8470 Pallux Way.
With a 20% down payment, the total cost of ownership (mortgage + property tax + insurance – tax deduction) of this house is about the same as renting.
With that said, I think the following is going to occur:
1. Prices will go down a bit more & become attractive for investors to scoop them up.
2. The increase in the rental supply (b/c investors rent these houses out) will result lower rents.#1 & #2 will repeat in a vicious cycle. I think the early investors will lose money because lower rents effectively create a new “floor” for prices.
The bottom for houses like the one on Pallux Way: $200k – $250k
March 24, 2008 at 4:41 PM #176020gnParticipantAsianautica, thanks for posting the house on 8470 Pallux Way.
With a 20% down payment, the total cost of ownership (mortgage + property tax + insurance – tax deduction) of this house is about the same as renting.
With that said, I think the following is going to occur:
1. Prices will go down a bit more & become attractive for investors to scoop them up.
2. The increase in the rental supply (b/c investors rent these houses out) will result lower rents.#1 & #2 will repeat in a vicious cycle. I think the early investors will lose money because lower rents effectively create a new “floor” for prices.
The bottom for houses like the one on Pallux Way: $200k – $250k
March 24, 2008 at 4:41 PM #176024gnParticipantAsianautica, thanks for posting the house on 8470 Pallux Way.
With a 20% down payment, the total cost of ownership (mortgage + property tax + insurance – tax deduction) of this house is about the same as renting.
With that said, I think the following is going to occur:
1. Prices will go down a bit more & become attractive for investors to scoop them up.
2. The increase in the rental supply (b/c investors rent these houses out) will result lower rents.#1 & #2 will repeat in a vicious cycle. I think the early investors will lose money because lower rents effectively create a new “floor” for prices.
The bottom for houses like the one on Pallux Way: $200k – $250k
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.