- This topic has 400 replies, 23 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 8 months ago by CA renter.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 25, 2008 at 9:38 AM #176332March 25, 2008 at 10:04 AM #175893anParticipant
Once again, you’re assuming all those will become rental. Do you know if they’re completely empty or do they have people living in there? If they do and IF these property does become rental, those same people will be renting those houses. So rental supply goes up but so would demand. The people who are in there right now are not in the rental demand pool. Do you get my point?
March 25, 2008 at 10:04 AM #176244anParticipantOnce again, you’re assuming all those will become rental. Do you know if they’re completely empty or do they have people living in there? If they do and IF these property does become rental, those same people will be renting those houses. So rental supply goes up but so would demand. The people who are in there right now are not in the rental demand pool. Do you get my point?
March 25, 2008 at 10:04 AM #176250anParticipantOnce again, you’re assuming all those will become rental. Do you know if they’re completely empty or do they have people living in there? If they do and IF these property does become rental, those same people will be renting those houses. So rental supply goes up but so would demand. The people who are in there right now are not in the rental demand pool. Do you get my point?
March 25, 2008 at 10:04 AM #176257anParticipantOnce again, you’re assuming all those will become rental. Do you know if they’re completely empty or do they have people living in there? If they do and IF these property does become rental, those same people will be renting those houses. So rental supply goes up but so would demand. The people who are in there right now are not in the rental demand pool. Do you get my point?
March 25, 2008 at 10:04 AM #176345anParticipantOnce again, you’re assuming all those will become rental. Do you know if they’re completely empty or do they have people living in there? If they do and IF these property does become rental, those same people will be renting those houses. So rental supply goes up but so would demand. The people who are in there right now are not in the rental demand pool. Do you get my point?
March 25, 2008 at 10:28 AM #175913gnParticipantDuring the real estate boom, there were many “pretenders”. They come in many stripes:
1. People whose incomes are so low that lenders (under normal circumstances) would not lend them money to buy anything, not even condos. These people ended up as owners of SFH, anyway. They are “renters who pretend to be homeowners”.
2. People whose incomes allow them to buy condos/town houses only. These people ended up as owners of SFH, anyway. They are “condos/town house owner who pretend to be SFH homeowners”.
3. Then there are those who can afford a small SFH in Mira Mesa. When values go up, they extract equities to buy additional properties or fancy cars or fancy vacations. They are “lower middle class folks who pretend to be able to afford the upper middle class lifestyles.”
Now, the data from ForeclosreRadar.com tells me that Mira Mesa has more than its share of “pretenders”. These “pretenders” have been living beyond their means, so now it’s time to pay the pipers.
Basically, they mortgaged their future, they spent their future earnings. This means that they won’t be able to return to their previous standard of living before the bubble. So, they won’t even be able to rent in Mira Mesa.
Now, you can say that I’m a speculator if you want. But, there is a truism that transcend time/place: All debts have to be paid π
March 25, 2008 at 10:28 AM #176264gnParticipantDuring the real estate boom, there were many “pretenders”. They come in many stripes:
1. People whose incomes are so low that lenders (under normal circumstances) would not lend them money to buy anything, not even condos. These people ended up as owners of SFH, anyway. They are “renters who pretend to be homeowners”.
2. People whose incomes allow them to buy condos/town houses only. These people ended up as owners of SFH, anyway. They are “condos/town house owner who pretend to be SFH homeowners”.
3. Then there are those who can afford a small SFH in Mira Mesa. When values go up, they extract equities to buy additional properties or fancy cars or fancy vacations. They are “lower middle class folks who pretend to be able to afford the upper middle class lifestyles.”
Now, the data from ForeclosreRadar.com tells me that Mira Mesa has more than its share of “pretenders”. These “pretenders” have been living beyond their means, so now it’s time to pay the pipers.
Basically, they mortgaged their future, they spent their future earnings. This means that they won’t be able to return to their previous standard of living before the bubble. So, they won’t even be able to rent in Mira Mesa.
Now, you can say that I’m a speculator if you want. But, there is a truism that transcend time/place: All debts have to be paid π
March 25, 2008 at 10:28 AM #176272gnParticipantDuring the real estate boom, there were many “pretenders”. They come in many stripes:
1. People whose incomes are so low that lenders (under normal circumstances) would not lend them money to buy anything, not even condos. These people ended up as owners of SFH, anyway. They are “renters who pretend to be homeowners”.
2. People whose incomes allow them to buy condos/town houses only. These people ended up as owners of SFH, anyway. They are “condos/town house owner who pretend to be SFH homeowners”.
3. Then there are those who can afford a small SFH in Mira Mesa. When values go up, they extract equities to buy additional properties or fancy cars or fancy vacations. They are “lower middle class folks who pretend to be able to afford the upper middle class lifestyles.”
Now, the data from ForeclosreRadar.com tells me that Mira Mesa has more than its share of “pretenders”. These “pretenders” have been living beyond their means, so now it’s time to pay the pipers.
Basically, they mortgaged their future, they spent their future earnings. This means that they won’t be able to return to their previous standard of living before the bubble. So, they won’t even be able to rent in Mira Mesa.
Now, you can say that I’m a speculator if you want. But, there is a truism that transcend time/place: All debts have to be paid π
March 25, 2008 at 10:28 AM #176276gnParticipantDuring the real estate boom, there were many “pretenders”. They come in many stripes:
1. People whose incomes are so low that lenders (under normal circumstances) would not lend them money to buy anything, not even condos. These people ended up as owners of SFH, anyway. They are “renters who pretend to be homeowners”.
2. People whose incomes allow them to buy condos/town houses only. These people ended up as owners of SFH, anyway. They are “condos/town house owner who pretend to be SFH homeowners”.
3. Then there are those who can afford a small SFH in Mira Mesa. When values go up, they extract equities to buy additional properties or fancy cars or fancy vacations. They are “lower middle class folks who pretend to be able to afford the upper middle class lifestyles.”
Now, the data from ForeclosreRadar.com tells me that Mira Mesa has more than its share of “pretenders”. These “pretenders” have been living beyond their means, so now it’s time to pay the pipers.
Basically, they mortgaged their future, they spent their future earnings. This means that they won’t be able to return to their previous standard of living before the bubble. So, they won’t even be able to rent in Mira Mesa.
Now, you can say that I’m a speculator if you want. But, there is a truism that transcend time/place: All debts have to be paid π
March 25, 2008 at 10:28 AM #176365gnParticipantDuring the real estate boom, there were many “pretenders”. They come in many stripes:
1. People whose incomes are so low that lenders (under normal circumstances) would not lend them money to buy anything, not even condos. These people ended up as owners of SFH, anyway. They are “renters who pretend to be homeowners”.
2. People whose incomes allow them to buy condos/town houses only. These people ended up as owners of SFH, anyway. They are “condos/town house owner who pretend to be SFH homeowners”.
3. Then there are those who can afford a small SFH in Mira Mesa. When values go up, they extract equities to buy additional properties or fancy cars or fancy vacations. They are “lower middle class folks who pretend to be able to afford the upper middle class lifestyles.”
Now, the data from ForeclosreRadar.com tells me that Mira Mesa has more than its share of “pretenders”. These “pretenders” have been living beyond their means, so now it’s time to pay the pipers.
Basically, they mortgaged their future, they spent their future earnings. This means that they won’t be able to return to their previous standard of living before the bubble. So, they won’t even be able to rent in Mira Mesa.
Now, you can say that I’m a speculator if you want. But, there is a truism that transcend time/place: All debts have to be paid π
March 25, 2008 at 10:28 AM #175921jpinpbParticipantah – you’re assuming that they will rent in Mira Mesa, or even in San Diego – or California for that matter. What if they get a job out of state and relocate. Or move in w/families maybe even midwest or back east. Crazier things are happening.
March 25, 2008 at 10:28 AM #176269jpinpbParticipantah – you’re assuming that they will rent in Mira Mesa, or even in San Diego – or California for that matter. What if they get a job out of state and relocate. Or move in w/families maybe even midwest or back east. Crazier things are happening.
March 25, 2008 at 10:28 AM #176275jpinpbParticipantah – you’re assuming that they will rent in Mira Mesa, or even in San Diego – or California for that matter. What if they get a job out of state and relocate. Or move in w/families maybe even midwest or back east. Crazier things are happening.
March 25, 2008 at 10:28 AM #176281jpinpbParticipantah – you’re assuming that they will rent in Mira Mesa, or even in San Diego – or California for that matter. What if they get a job out of state and relocate. Or move in w/families maybe even midwest or back east. Crazier things are happening.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.