Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Properties or Areas › Some questions about Stonebridge
- This topic has 270 replies, 19 voices, and was last updated 14 years ago by recordsclerk.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 27, 2010 at 6:04 AM #624202October 27, 2010 at 6:36 AM #623127ocrenterParticipant
[quote=kcal09]The Shadetree home is located directly behind power lines. That is much worse than a view into nothing.[/quote]
absolutely. this is a long time BMIT favorite:
[img_assist|nid=10433|title=transmission tower|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=320|height=227]
as localguy pointed out, there are some overpriced homes in stonebridge, and there are also some homes badly positioned next to powerlines.
potentially someone can really get screwed buying in stonebridge. but the key here is where there is risk, there is also reward. don’t wait on the MLS for a lower priced home (it is likely a short sale with a transmission tower at the front door, aka shadetree). instead, go make your own bargain. for example, localguy mentioned the homes colrich took over from cornerstone. guess what, colrich is NOT advertising AT ALL. those are prime targets for bargain seekers. another prior opportunity was the CityVenture homes that went down to essentially $750k. And prior to that the bunch of homes Davidson sold back in late 08-early 09. then there’s the occasional short sale and foreclosures. bottom line, you will not get a bargain going down the regular sale route.
October 27, 2010 at 6:36 AM #623211ocrenterParticipant[quote=kcal09]The Shadetree home is located directly behind power lines. That is much worse than a view into nothing.[/quote]
absolutely. this is a long time BMIT favorite:
[img_assist|nid=10433|title=transmission tower|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=320|height=227]
as localguy pointed out, there are some overpriced homes in stonebridge, and there are also some homes badly positioned next to powerlines.
potentially someone can really get screwed buying in stonebridge. but the key here is where there is risk, there is also reward. don’t wait on the MLS for a lower priced home (it is likely a short sale with a transmission tower at the front door, aka shadetree). instead, go make your own bargain. for example, localguy mentioned the homes colrich took over from cornerstone. guess what, colrich is NOT advertising AT ALL. those are prime targets for bargain seekers. another prior opportunity was the CityVenture homes that went down to essentially $750k. And prior to that the bunch of homes Davidson sold back in late 08-early 09. then there’s the occasional short sale and foreclosures. bottom line, you will not get a bargain going down the regular sale route.
October 27, 2010 at 6:36 AM #623773ocrenterParticipant[quote=kcal09]The Shadetree home is located directly behind power lines. That is much worse than a view into nothing.[/quote]
absolutely. this is a long time BMIT favorite:
[img_assist|nid=10433|title=transmission tower|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=320|height=227]
as localguy pointed out, there are some overpriced homes in stonebridge, and there are also some homes badly positioned next to powerlines.
potentially someone can really get screwed buying in stonebridge. but the key here is where there is risk, there is also reward. don’t wait on the MLS for a lower priced home (it is likely a short sale with a transmission tower at the front door, aka shadetree). instead, go make your own bargain. for example, localguy mentioned the homes colrich took over from cornerstone. guess what, colrich is NOT advertising AT ALL. those are prime targets for bargain seekers. another prior opportunity was the CityVenture homes that went down to essentially $750k. And prior to that the bunch of homes Davidson sold back in late 08-early 09. then there’s the occasional short sale and foreclosures. bottom line, you will not get a bargain going down the regular sale route.
October 27, 2010 at 6:36 AM #623900ocrenterParticipant[quote=kcal09]The Shadetree home is located directly behind power lines. That is much worse than a view into nothing.[/quote]
absolutely. this is a long time BMIT favorite:
[img_assist|nid=10433|title=transmission tower|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=320|height=227]
as localguy pointed out, there are some overpriced homes in stonebridge, and there are also some homes badly positioned next to powerlines.
potentially someone can really get screwed buying in stonebridge. but the key here is where there is risk, there is also reward. don’t wait on the MLS for a lower priced home (it is likely a short sale with a transmission tower at the front door, aka shadetree). instead, go make your own bargain. for example, localguy mentioned the homes colrich took over from cornerstone. guess what, colrich is NOT advertising AT ALL. those are prime targets for bargain seekers. another prior opportunity was the CityVenture homes that went down to essentially $750k. And prior to that the bunch of homes Davidson sold back in late 08-early 09. then there’s the occasional short sale and foreclosures. bottom line, you will not get a bargain going down the regular sale route.
October 27, 2010 at 6:36 AM #624217ocrenterParticipant[quote=kcal09]The Shadetree home is located directly behind power lines. That is much worse than a view into nothing.[/quote]
absolutely. this is a long time BMIT favorite:
[img_assist|nid=10433|title=transmission tower|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=320|height=227]
as localguy pointed out, there are some overpriced homes in stonebridge, and there are also some homes badly positioned next to powerlines.
potentially someone can really get screwed buying in stonebridge. but the key here is where there is risk, there is also reward. don’t wait on the MLS for a lower priced home (it is likely a short sale with a transmission tower at the front door, aka shadetree). instead, go make your own bargain. for example, localguy mentioned the homes colrich took over from cornerstone. guess what, colrich is NOT advertising AT ALL. those are prime targets for bargain seekers. another prior opportunity was the CityVenture homes that went down to essentially $750k. And prior to that the bunch of homes Davidson sold back in late 08-early 09. then there’s the occasional short sale and foreclosures. bottom line, you will not get a bargain going down the regular sale route.
October 27, 2010 at 9:07 AM #623162anParticipant[quote=bearishgurl]
AN and ocrenter,This 1990 remodel was of a mid-century design which featured very sleek kitchen cabinets. There are a LOT of cabinets in that kitchen but they are very flush and you can’t easily see them in the photo. There is also a second sink on the other side. I personally don’t like the sinks separated . . . I would prefer them together (guess a double sink is also outdated now, lol).
The bathroom shower shown in the pics is of glass block which is also a mid-century design feature.
I own an actual mid-century house (WWII box) which was remodeled to the studs in 1993 with these same mid-century design features so am familiar with them and like them. If you are used to more elaborate kitchen cabinets, this kitchen will look “spartan” to you, but it is no less valuable. There is actually nothing wrong with this kitchen except for a couple of possibly outdated wall ovens. It’s all a matter of taste.
For a “million bucks,” what you SHOULD be comparing is the 11K lot of Shadetree at Stonebridge to the 1.5 AC lot of Orchard Bend. Instead, you’re groveling over kitchen cabinets. IMO, from an investment standpoint, that’s not too smart.
You CAN’T FIX the 11K lot (w/a 5000+ sf house on it, lol) but you CAN FIX kitchen cabinets if you don’t like them!![/quote]
Again, what you like might not be what the majority like. The sold comp proves it. Even between your example vs the closed comps I provided.Congrats on being able to do the kitchen remodel yourself. I’d say you’re in the minority here. Most people don’t want to remodel, much less remodel themselves. That’s why there’s a term called sweat equity. We’re not discussing about sweat equity here. If I’m in the market to buy $1M house, I’d buy the one with the 1.5 acre as well, but I believe in sweat equity just like you. However, that majority of the buyers do not view it that way.
BTW, the Shade tree house is listed at $799-999k. We’ll see where it closes at. You’re assuming it’ll close for $999k. What if it closes for $750-799k (due to the power line)? That would put this house ~$200k less than the Orchard Bend house. Even w/ the MR, it’s still $100k less.
Also, the new of “NOTHING” you’re referring to is exactly what I’m referring to as well. Having a view of empty space is better than a view of your neighbor’s house.
October 27, 2010 at 9:07 AM #623246anParticipant[quote=bearishgurl]
AN and ocrenter,This 1990 remodel was of a mid-century design which featured very sleek kitchen cabinets. There are a LOT of cabinets in that kitchen but they are very flush and you can’t easily see them in the photo. There is also a second sink on the other side. I personally don’t like the sinks separated . . . I would prefer them together (guess a double sink is also outdated now, lol).
The bathroom shower shown in the pics is of glass block which is also a mid-century design feature.
I own an actual mid-century house (WWII box) which was remodeled to the studs in 1993 with these same mid-century design features so am familiar with them and like them. If you are used to more elaborate kitchen cabinets, this kitchen will look “spartan” to you, but it is no less valuable. There is actually nothing wrong with this kitchen except for a couple of possibly outdated wall ovens. It’s all a matter of taste.
For a “million bucks,” what you SHOULD be comparing is the 11K lot of Shadetree at Stonebridge to the 1.5 AC lot of Orchard Bend. Instead, you’re groveling over kitchen cabinets. IMO, from an investment standpoint, that’s not too smart.
You CAN’T FIX the 11K lot (w/a 5000+ sf house on it, lol) but you CAN FIX kitchen cabinets if you don’t like them!![/quote]
Again, what you like might not be what the majority like. The sold comp proves it. Even between your example vs the closed comps I provided.Congrats on being able to do the kitchen remodel yourself. I’d say you’re in the minority here. Most people don’t want to remodel, much less remodel themselves. That’s why there’s a term called sweat equity. We’re not discussing about sweat equity here. If I’m in the market to buy $1M house, I’d buy the one with the 1.5 acre as well, but I believe in sweat equity just like you. However, that majority of the buyers do not view it that way.
BTW, the Shade tree house is listed at $799-999k. We’ll see where it closes at. You’re assuming it’ll close for $999k. What if it closes for $750-799k (due to the power line)? That would put this house ~$200k less than the Orchard Bend house. Even w/ the MR, it’s still $100k less.
Also, the new of “NOTHING” you’re referring to is exactly what I’m referring to as well. Having a view of empty space is better than a view of your neighbor’s house.
October 27, 2010 at 9:07 AM #623808anParticipant[quote=bearishgurl]
AN and ocrenter,This 1990 remodel was of a mid-century design which featured very sleek kitchen cabinets. There are a LOT of cabinets in that kitchen but they are very flush and you can’t easily see them in the photo. There is also a second sink on the other side. I personally don’t like the sinks separated . . . I would prefer them together (guess a double sink is also outdated now, lol).
The bathroom shower shown in the pics is of glass block which is also a mid-century design feature.
I own an actual mid-century house (WWII box) which was remodeled to the studs in 1993 with these same mid-century design features so am familiar with them and like them. If you are used to more elaborate kitchen cabinets, this kitchen will look “spartan” to you, but it is no less valuable. There is actually nothing wrong with this kitchen except for a couple of possibly outdated wall ovens. It’s all a matter of taste.
For a “million bucks,” what you SHOULD be comparing is the 11K lot of Shadetree at Stonebridge to the 1.5 AC lot of Orchard Bend. Instead, you’re groveling over kitchen cabinets. IMO, from an investment standpoint, that’s not too smart.
You CAN’T FIX the 11K lot (w/a 5000+ sf house on it, lol) but you CAN FIX kitchen cabinets if you don’t like them!![/quote]
Again, what you like might not be what the majority like. The sold comp proves it. Even between your example vs the closed comps I provided.Congrats on being able to do the kitchen remodel yourself. I’d say you’re in the minority here. Most people don’t want to remodel, much less remodel themselves. That’s why there’s a term called sweat equity. We’re not discussing about sweat equity here. If I’m in the market to buy $1M house, I’d buy the one with the 1.5 acre as well, but I believe in sweat equity just like you. However, that majority of the buyers do not view it that way.
BTW, the Shade tree house is listed at $799-999k. We’ll see where it closes at. You’re assuming it’ll close for $999k. What if it closes for $750-799k (due to the power line)? That would put this house ~$200k less than the Orchard Bend house. Even w/ the MR, it’s still $100k less.
Also, the new of “NOTHING” you’re referring to is exactly what I’m referring to as well. Having a view of empty space is better than a view of your neighbor’s house.
October 27, 2010 at 9:07 AM #623935anParticipant[quote=bearishgurl]
AN and ocrenter,This 1990 remodel was of a mid-century design which featured very sleek kitchen cabinets. There are a LOT of cabinets in that kitchen but they are very flush and you can’t easily see them in the photo. There is also a second sink on the other side. I personally don’t like the sinks separated . . . I would prefer them together (guess a double sink is also outdated now, lol).
The bathroom shower shown in the pics is of glass block which is also a mid-century design feature.
I own an actual mid-century house (WWII box) which was remodeled to the studs in 1993 with these same mid-century design features so am familiar with them and like them. If you are used to more elaborate kitchen cabinets, this kitchen will look “spartan” to you, but it is no less valuable. There is actually nothing wrong with this kitchen except for a couple of possibly outdated wall ovens. It’s all a matter of taste.
For a “million bucks,” what you SHOULD be comparing is the 11K lot of Shadetree at Stonebridge to the 1.5 AC lot of Orchard Bend. Instead, you’re groveling over kitchen cabinets. IMO, from an investment standpoint, that’s not too smart.
You CAN’T FIX the 11K lot (w/a 5000+ sf house on it, lol) but you CAN FIX kitchen cabinets if you don’t like them!![/quote]
Again, what you like might not be what the majority like. The sold comp proves it. Even between your example vs the closed comps I provided.Congrats on being able to do the kitchen remodel yourself. I’d say you’re in the minority here. Most people don’t want to remodel, much less remodel themselves. That’s why there’s a term called sweat equity. We’re not discussing about sweat equity here. If I’m in the market to buy $1M house, I’d buy the one with the 1.5 acre as well, but I believe in sweat equity just like you. However, that majority of the buyers do not view it that way.
BTW, the Shade tree house is listed at $799-999k. We’ll see where it closes at. You’re assuming it’ll close for $999k. What if it closes for $750-799k (due to the power line)? That would put this house ~$200k less than the Orchard Bend house. Even w/ the MR, it’s still $100k less.
Also, the new of “NOTHING” you’re referring to is exactly what I’m referring to as well. Having a view of empty space is better than a view of your neighbor’s house.
October 27, 2010 at 9:07 AM #624252anParticipant[quote=bearishgurl]
AN and ocrenter,This 1990 remodel was of a mid-century design which featured very sleek kitchen cabinets. There are a LOT of cabinets in that kitchen but they are very flush and you can’t easily see them in the photo. There is also a second sink on the other side. I personally don’t like the sinks separated . . . I would prefer them together (guess a double sink is also outdated now, lol).
The bathroom shower shown in the pics is of glass block which is also a mid-century design feature.
I own an actual mid-century house (WWII box) which was remodeled to the studs in 1993 with these same mid-century design features so am familiar with them and like them. If you are used to more elaborate kitchen cabinets, this kitchen will look “spartan” to you, but it is no less valuable. There is actually nothing wrong with this kitchen except for a couple of possibly outdated wall ovens. It’s all a matter of taste.
For a “million bucks,” what you SHOULD be comparing is the 11K lot of Shadetree at Stonebridge to the 1.5 AC lot of Orchard Bend. Instead, you’re groveling over kitchen cabinets. IMO, from an investment standpoint, that’s not too smart.
You CAN’T FIX the 11K lot (w/a 5000+ sf house on it, lol) but you CAN FIX kitchen cabinets if you don’t like them!![/quote]
Again, what you like might not be what the majority like. The sold comp proves it. Even between your example vs the closed comps I provided.Congrats on being able to do the kitchen remodel yourself. I’d say you’re in the minority here. Most people don’t want to remodel, much less remodel themselves. That’s why there’s a term called sweat equity. We’re not discussing about sweat equity here. If I’m in the market to buy $1M house, I’d buy the one with the 1.5 acre as well, but I believe in sweat equity just like you. However, that majority of the buyers do not view it that way.
BTW, the Shade tree house is listed at $799-999k. We’ll see where it closes at. You’re assuming it’ll close for $999k. What if it closes for $750-799k (due to the power line)? That would put this house ~$200k less than the Orchard Bend house. Even w/ the MR, it’s still $100k less.
Also, the new of “NOTHING” you’re referring to is exactly what I’m referring to as well. Having a view of empty space is better than a view of your neighbor’s house.
October 27, 2010 at 1:31 PM #623331bearishgurlParticipant[quote=AN] . . . the Shade tree house is listed at $799-999k. We’ll see where it closes at. You’re assuming it’ll close for $999k. What if it closes for $750-799k (due to the power line)? That would put this house ~$200k less than the Orchard Bend house. Even w/ the MR, it’s still $100k less.[/quote]
[quote=bearishgurl] re: Shadetree active:
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100054326-13…
Asking price = $799K to $999K (short sale)
MR = $4400 yr * or $110K for 25 yrs (of 30) left
HOA Dues = $1728 yr
5120 sf/11,200 sf lot[/quote]I don’t think it’s likely that the lender will take $799K for Shadetree, but am not a “short-sale expert” in this area. Perhaps SDR can help us out here. Whatever it sells for, you need to add $110K for the remaining MR owed, plus $1728 yr HOA (plus potential hikes) (which Orchard Bend doesn’t have). Since Orchard Bend is a “traditional sale,” its price CAN be lowered if the owners really want to sell. You shouldn’t assume this property will sell for $959K.
[quote-AN]Also, the new of “NOTHING” you’re referring to is exactly what I’m referring to as well. Having a view of empty space is better than a view of your neighbor’s house.[/quote]
Neither of my two comparables had views of other properties’ backyards, AN. Properties in the $800K to $1M price range typically don’t have views of other properties’ backyards.
AN, I’m assuming here that you agree with me that the view on Shadetree is worth nothing and the high-power-line view is actually a detriment to its value and potential sale?
We never came to a conclusion on this thread as to whether paying MR added enough value to a property to pay for itself upon sale (over non-MR properties).
You and joec pointed out that buyers are willing to pay MR to get something they don’t feel they have to immediately remodel in order to use and is “move-in” ready. I understand this part. As I stated, “Different strokes . . .”
I guess the real question here is, “What flaws would constitute the necessity of remodeling upon move-in or even before even moving in?”
My answer to that would be, if it is structurally sound and at least one bathroom works (the only kind of property I would buy), my main priorities upon move-in would be to clean or remove the carpet, dispose of any trash, mop sweep and exterminate. The next order of the day would be to change the locks and weed pulling and/or tractor rental (to avoid poss citation/fines). Next would be to paint (if needed), then install any flooring needed. My stuff (except for bed and provisions) can be left in storage or put in the garage or outbuilding while I assess/repair the property enough to move in. I do not CARE about cond of appls. They are small potatoes in the scheme of things. I have a hot plate, micro, mini frig and countertop oven. Life will go on. So the “flaws,” for me, would be basic clean-up and repair but no remodeling until further assessment/planning is done.
IMO, this is the ONLY way to earn substantial sweat equity, especially in this market. By “substantial,” I mean $100K+ on a $350-$450K property. These “opportunities” do NOT lie in community facilities districts (read: areas saddled with MR).
The two comps I furnished here were way more than “move-in ready” in my book.
October 27, 2010 at 1:31 PM #623415bearishgurlParticipant[quote=AN] . . . the Shade tree house is listed at $799-999k. We’ll see where it closes at. You’re assuming it’ll close for $999k. What if it closes for $750-799k (due to the power line)? That would put this house ~$200k less than the Orchard Bend house. Even w/ the MR, it’s still $100k less.[/quote]
[quote=bearishgurl] re: Shadetree active:
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100054326-13…
Asking price = $799K to $999K (short sale)
MR = $4400 yr * or $110K for 25 yrs (of 30) left
HOA Dues = $1728 yr
5120 sf/11,200 sf lot[/quote]I don’t think it’s likely that the lender will take $799K for Shadetree, but am not a “short-sale expert” in this area. Perhaps SDR can help us out here. Whatever it sells for, you need to add $110K for the remaining MR owed, plus $1728 yr HOA (plus potential hikes) (which Orchard Bend doesn’t have). Since Orchard Bend is a “traditional sale,” its price CAN be lowered if the owners really want to sell. You shouldn’t assume this property will sell for $959K.
[quote-AN]Also, the new of “NOTHING” you’re referring to is exactly what I’m referring to as well. Having a view of empty space is better than a view of your neighbor’s house.[/quote]
Neither of my two comparables had views of other properties’ backyards, AN. Properties in the $800K to $1M price range typically don’t have views of other properties’ backyards.
AN, I’m assuming here that you agree with me that the view on Shadetree is worth nothing and the high-power-line view is actually a detriment to its value and potential sale?
We never came to a conclusion on this thread as to whether paying MR added enough value to a property to pay for itself upon sale (over non-MR properties).
You and joec pointed out that buyers are willing to pay MR to get something they don’t feel they have to immediately remodel in order to use and is “move-in” ready. I understand this part. As I stated, “Different strokes . . .”
I guess the real question here is, “What flaws would constitute the necessity of remodeling upon move-in or even before even moving in?”
My answer to that would be, if it is structurally sound and at least one bathroom works (the only kind of property I would buy), my main priorities upon move-in would be to clean or remove the carpet, dispose of any trash, mop sweep and exterminate. The next order of the day would be to change the locks and weed pulling and/or tractor rental (to avoid poss citation/fines). Next would be to paint (if needed), then install any flooring needed. My stuff (except for bed and provisions) can be left in storage or put in the garage or outbuilding while I assess/repair the property enough to move in. I do not CARE about cond of appls. They are small potatoes in the scheme of things. I have a hot plate, micro, mini frig and countertop oven. Life will go on. So the “flaws,” for me, would be basic clean-up and repair but no remodeling until further assessment/planning is done.
IMO, this is the ONLY way to earn substantial sweat equity, especially in this market. By “substantial,” I mean $100K+ on a $350-$450K property. These “opportunities” do NOT lie in community facilities districts (read: areas saddled with MR).
The two comps I furnished here were way more than “move-in ready” in my book.
October 27, 2010 at 1:31 PM #623979bearishgurlParticipant[quote=AN] . . . the Shade tree house is listed at $799-999k. We’ll see where it closes at. You’re assuming it’ll close for $999k. What if it closes for $750-799k (due to the power line)? That would put this house ~$200k less than the Orchard Bend house. Even w/ the MR, it’s still $100k less.[/quote]
[quote=bearishgurl] re: Shadetree active:
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100054326-13…
Asking price = $799K to $999K (short sale)
MR = $4400 yr * or $110K for 25 yrs (of 30) left
HOA Dues = $1728 yr
5120 sf/11,200 sf lot[/quote]I don’t think it’s likely that the lender will take $799K for Shadetree, but am not a “short-sale expert” in this area. Perhaps SDR can help us out here. Whatever it sells for, you need to add $110K for the remaining MR owed, plus $1728 yr HOA (plus potential hikes) (which Orchard Bend doesn’t have). Since Orchard Bend is a “traditional sale,” its price CAN be lowered if the owners really want to sell. You shouldn’t assume this property will sell for $959K.
[quote-AN]Also, the new of “NOTHING” you’re referring to is exactly what I’m referring to as well. Having a view of empty space is better than a view of your neighbor’s house.[/quote]
Neither of my two comparables had views of other properties’ backyards, AN. Properties in the $800K to $1M price range typically don’t have views of other properties’ backyards.
AN, I’m assuming here that you agree with me that the view on Shadetree is worth nothing and the high-power-line view is actually a detriment to its value and potential sale?
We never came to a conclusion on this thread as to whether paying MR added enough value to a property to pay for itself upon sale (over non-MR properties).
You and joec pointed out that buyers are willing to pay MR to get something they don’t feel they have to immediately remodel in order to use and is “move-in” ready. I understand this part. As I stated, “Different strokes . . .”
I guess the real question here is, “What flaws would constitute the necessity of remodeling upon move-in or even before even moving in?”
My answer to that would be, if it is structurally sound and at least one bathroom works (the only kind of property I would buy), my main priorities upon move-in would be to clean or remove the carpet, dispose of any trash, mop sweep and exterminate. The next order of the day would be to change the locks and weed pulling and/or tractor rental (to avoid poss citation/fines). Next would be to paint (if needed), then install any flooring needed. My stuff (except for bed and provisions) can be left in storage or put in the garage or outbuilding while I assess/repair the property enough to move in. I do not CARE about cond of appls. They are small potatoes in the scheme of things. I have a hot plate, micro, mini frig and countertop oven. Life will go on. So the “flaws,” for me, would be basic clean-up and repair but no remodeling until further assessment/planning is done.
IMO, this is the ONLY way to earn substantial sweat equity, especially in this market. By “substantial,” I mean $100K+ on a $350-$450K property. These “opportunities” do NOT lie in community facilities districts (read: areas saddled with MR).
The two comps I furnished here were way more than “move-in ready” in my book.
October 27, 2010 at 1:31 PM #624106bearishgurlParticipant[quote=AN] . . . the Shade tree house is listed at $799-999k. We’ll see where it closes at. You’re assuming it’ll close for $999k. What if it closes for $750-799k (due to the power line)? That would put this house ~$200k less than the Orchard Bend house. Even w/ the MR, it’s still $100k less.[/quote]
[quote=bearishgurl] re: Shadetree active:
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100054326-13…
Asking price = $799K to $999K (short sale)
MR = $4400 yr * or $110K for 25 yrs (of 30) left
HOA Dues = $1728 yr
5120 sf/11,200 sf lot[/quote]I don’t think it’s likely that the lender will take $799K for Shadetree, but am not a “short-sale expert” in this area. Perhaps SDR can help us out here. Whatever it sells for, you need to add $110K for the remaining MR owed, plus $1728 yr HOA (plus potential hikes) (which Orchard Bend doesn’t have). Since Orchard Bend is a “traditional sale,” its price CAN be lowered if the owners really want to sell. You shouldn’t assume this property will sell for $959K.
[quote-AN]Also, the new of “NOTHING” you’re referring to is exactly what I’m referring to as well. Having a view of empty space is better than a view of your neighbor’s house.[/quote]
Neither of my two comparables had views of other properties’ backyards, AN. Properties in the $800K to $1M price range typically don’t have views of other properties’ backyards.
AN, I’m assuming here that you agree with me that the view on Shadetree is worth nothing and the high-power-line view is actually a detriment to its value and potential sale?
We never came to a conclusion on this thread as to whether paying MR added enough value to a property to pay for itself upon sale (over non-MR properties).
You and joec pointed out that buyers are willing to pay MR to get something they don’t feel they have to immediately remodel in order to use and is “move-in” ready. I understand this part. As I stated, “Different strokes . . .”
I guess the real question here is, “What flaws would constitute the necessity of remodeling upon move-in or even before even moving in?”
My answer to that would be, if it is structurally sound and at least one bathroom works (the only kind of property I would buy), my main priorities upon move-in would be to clean or remove the carpet, dispose of any trash, mop sweep and exterminate. The next order of the day would be to change the locks and weed pulling and/or tractor rental (to avoid poss citation/fines). Next would be to paint (if needed), then install any flooring needed. My stuff (except for bed and provisions) can be left in storage or put in the garage or outbuilding while I assess/repair the property enough to move in. I do not CARE about cond of appls. They are small potatoes in the scheme of things. I have a hot plate, micro, mini frig and countertop oven. Life will go on. So the “flaws,” for me, would be basic clean-up and repair but no remodeling until further assessment/planning is done.
IMO, this is the ONLY way to earn substantial sweat equity, especially in this market. By “substantial,” I mean $100K+ on a $350-$450K property. These “opportunities” do NOT lie in community facilities districts (read: areas saddled with MR).
The two comps I furnished here were way more than “move-in ready” in my book.
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Properties or Areas’ is closed to new topics and replies.