- This topic has 235 replies, 23 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 3 months ago by
Aecetia.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 23, 2009 at 12:08 PM #448707August 23, 2009 at 12:24 PM #447927
analyst
ParticipantMost importantly, do not buy a house now unless you are confident that it is a house you will be happy with until the kids are grown and living independently (a very long time, since you are discussing having more children). While some whole areas may have bottomed (Temecula, for instance), and the lowest-end housing in many areas may have bottomed, the kind of house you will be looking for, in the areas you would look for it, are most likely to continue down for 1-2 years, and stay low for years after that. The only thing that would prevent this from being true would be government intervention on a scale dwarfing everything seen to date, in which case everybody, everywhere will be in trouble. If you are happy where you are today, there is no urgency to buy.
If you do buy now, think long and hard about how much to put down, as this money will be immediately at risk.
If you decide to be a landlord of small properties, buy locally. Distance makes everything harder, and prevents proper oversight of both tenants and property managers.
Your circumstances are better than most, so you have options others would not have. You have a serendipitous financial gain due to the real estate bubble from the sale of your former house. If you now face the prospect of a similar loss from the bursting of the real estate bubble, what is your net? Somewhere near even, I would say.
First, decide to sell the Tempe property for whatever it will bring.
Second, come to conclusion on the value of having a high credit rating. The negative effect does not last forever. And, you will have substantial resources, even after any loss is taken (if you do not put all your money in a new house).
Third, decide whether to avail yourselves of the benefits of any Arizona non-recourse laws (whose applicability is to be confirmed). These laws were enacted specifically to protect people from being taken advantage of by the highly organized real estate industry.
After all the preceding is settled, you will have a clearer view of the factors which bear on your highly personal decision about more children, and the relative importance of the income from working versus the additional time you could spend on family matters.
August 23, 2009 at 12:24 PM #448119ParticipantMost importantly, do not buy a house now unless you are confident that it is a house you will be happy with until the kids are grown and living independently (a very long time, since you are discussing having more children). While some whole areas may have bottomed (Temecula, for instance), and the lowest-end housing in many areas may have bottomed, the kind of house you will be looking for, in the areas you would look for it, are most likely to continue down for 1-2 years, and stay low for years after that. The only thing that would prevent this from being true would be government intervention on a scale dwarfing everything seen to date, in which case everybody, everywhere will be in trouble. If you are happy where you are today, there is no urgency to buy.
If you do buy now, think long and hard about how much to put down, as this money will be immediately at risk.
If you decide to be a landlord of small properties, buy locally. Distance makes everything harder, and prevents proper oversight of both tenants and property managers.
Your circumstances are better than most, so you have options others would not have. You have a serendipitous financial gain due to the real estate bubble from the sale of your former house. If you now face the prospect of a similar loss from the bursting of the real estate bubble, what is your net? Somewhere near even, I would say.
First, decide to sell the Tempe property for whatever it will bring.
Second, come to conclusion on the value of having a high credit rating. The negative effect does not last forever. And, you will have substantial resources, even after any loss is taken (if you do not put all your money in a new house).
Third, decide whether to avail yourselves of the benefits of any Arizona non-recourse laws (whose applicability is to be confirmed). These laws were enacted specifically to protect people from being taken advantage of by the highly organized real estate industry.
After all the preceding is settled, you will have a clearer view of the factors which bear on your highly personal decision about more children, and the relative importance of the income from working versus the additional time you could spend on family matters.
August 23, 2009 at 12:24 PM #448458ParticipantMost importantly, do not buy a house now unless you are confident that it is a house you will be happy with until the kids are grown and living independently (a very long time, since you are discussing having more children). While some whole areas may have bottomed (Temecula, for instance), and the lowest-end housing in many areas may have bottomed, the kind of house you will be looking for, in the areas you would look for it, are most likely to continue down for 1-2 years, and stay low for years after that. The only thing that would prevent this from being true would be government intervention on a scale dwarfing everything seen to date, in which case everybody, everywhere will be in trouble. If you are happy where you are today, there is no urgency to buy.
If you do buy now, think long and hard about how much to put down, as this money will be immediately at risk.
If you decide to be a landlord of small properties, buy locally. Distance makes everything harder, and prevents proper oversight of both tenants and property managers.
Your circumstances are better than most, so you have options others would not have. You have a serendipitous financial gain due to the real estate bubble from the sale of your former house. If you now face the prospect of a similar loss from the bursting of the real estate bubble, what is your net? Somewhere near even, I would say.
First, decide to sell the Tempe property for whatever it will bring.
Second, come to conclusion on the value of having a high credit rating. The negative effect does not last forever. And, you will have substantial resources, even after any loss is taken (if you do not put all your money in a new house).
Third, decide whether to avail yourselves of the benefits of any Arizona non-recourse laws (whose applicability is to be confirmed). These laws were enacted specifically to protect people from being taken advantage of by the highly organized real estate industry.
After all the preceding is settled, you will have a clearer view of the factors which bear on your highly personal decision about more children, and the relative importance of the income from working versus the additional time you could spend on family matters.
August 23, 2009 at 12:24 PM #448527ParticipantMost importantly, do not buy a house now unless you are confident that it is a house you will be happy with until the kids are grown and living independently (a very long time, since you are discussing having more children). While some whole areas may have bottomed (Temecula, for instance), and the lowest-end housing in many areas may have bottomed, the kind of house you will be looking for, in the areas you would look for it, are most likely to continue down for 1-2 years, and stay low for years after that. The only thing that would prevent this from being true would be government intervention on a scale dwarfing everything seen to date, in which case everybody, everywhere will be in trouble. If you are happy where you are today, there is no urgency to buy.
If you do buy now, think long and hard about how much to put down, as this money will be immediately at risk.
If you decide to be a landlord of small properties, buy locally. Distance makes everything harder, and prevents proper oversight of both tenants and property managers.
Your circumstances are better than most, so you have options others would not have. You have a serendipitous financial gain due to the real estate bubble from the sale of your former house. If you now face the prospect of a similar loss from the bursting of the real estate bubble, what is your net? Somewhere near even, I would say.
First, decide to sell the Tempe property for whatever it will bring.
Second, come to conclusion on the value of having a high credit rating. The negative effect does not last forever. And, you will have substantial resources, even after any loss is taken (if you do not put all your money in a new house).
Third, decide whether to avail yourselves of the benefits of any Arizona non-recourse laws (whose applicability is to be confirmed). These laws were enacted specifically to protect people from being taken advantage of by the highly organized real estate industry.
After all the preceding is settled, you will have a clearer view of the factors which bear on your highly personal decision about more children, and the relative importance of the income from working versus the additional time you could spend on family matters.
August 23, 2009 at 12:24 PM #448712ParticipantMost importantly, do not buy a house now unless you are confident that it is a house you will be happy with until the kids are grown and living independently (a very long time, since you are discussing having more children). While some whole areas may have bottomed (Temecula, for instance), and the lowest-end housing in many areas may have bottomed, the kind of house you will be looking for, in the areas you would look for it, are most likely to continue down for 1-2 years, and stay low for years after that. The only thing that would prevent this from being true would be government intervention on a scale dwarfing everything seen to date, in which case everybody, everywhere will be in trouble. If you are happy where you are today, there is no urgency to buy.
If you do buy now, think long and hard about how much to put down, as this money will be immediately at risk.
If you decide to be a landlord of small properties, buy locally. Distance makes everything harder, and prevents proper oversight of both tenants and property managers.
Your circumstances are better than most, so you have options others would not have. You have a serendipitous financial gain due to the real estate bubble from the sale of your former house. If you now face the prospect of a similar loss from the bursting of the real estate bubble, what is your net? Somewhere near even, I would say.
First, decide to sell the Tempe property for whatever it will bring.
Second, come to conclusion on the value of having a high credit rating. The negative effect does not last forever. And, you will have substantial resources, even after any loss is taken (if you do not put all your money in a new house).
Third, decide whether to avail yourselves of the benefits of any Arizona non-recourse laws (whose applicability is to be confirmed). These laws were enacted specifically to protect people from being taken advantage of by the highly organized real estate industry.
After all the preceding is settled, you will have a clearer view of the factors which bear on your highly personal decision about more children, and the relative importance of the income from working versus the additional time you could spend on family matters.
August 23, 2009 at 2:28 PM #447942Hobie
ParticipantDid I miss something? Family income is $215K or about $12K/mo less taxes.
Tempe rent 1K plus SD rent 2.5K totals $3500/mo
Should be plenty of money to carry the condo, even empty no rent, while providing additional tax benefits.
Not thrilled with the idea of walking and letting bank hold the bag, which ultimately costs everyone in the long run.
My suggestion is to preserve your capital by staying the course and rent the condo at a loss. You are correct it is a slow bleed, but I think it is the best direction. And was previously mentioned, try carrying the paper on a sale. For the right buyer, it may work for all.
And my final bet is that if you are making $90K part time, you have a knack or are a major type A person who will continue to work even with a family of 5. Which is that much better for your immediate cash flow.
I hope not at the expense of the kids. Not to be mean; just making a sweeping generalization.
Good Luck.
August 23, 2009 at 2:28 PM #448133ParticipantDid I miss something? Family income is $215K or about $12K/mo less taxes.
Tempe rent 1K plus SD rent 2.5K totals $3500/mo
Should be plenty of money to carry the condo, even empty no rent, while providing additional tax benefits.
Not thrilled with the idea of walking and letting bank hold the bag, which ultimately costs everyone in the long run.
My suggestion is to preserve your capital by staying the course and rent the condo at a loss. You are correct it is a slow bleed, but I think it is the best direction. And was previously mentioned, try carrying the paper on a sale. For the right buyer, it may work for all.
And my final bet is that if you are making $90K part time, you have a knack or are a major type A person who will continue to work even with a family of 5. Which is that much better for your immediate cash flow.
I hope not at the expense of the kids. Not to be mean; just making a sweeping generalization.
Good Luck.
August 23, 2009 at 2:28 PM #448472ParticipantDid I miss something? Family income is $215K or about $12K/mo less taxes.
Tempe rent 1K plus SD rent 2.5K totals $3500/mo
Should be plenty of money to carry the condo, even empty no rent, while providing additional tax benefits.
Not thrilled with the idea of walking and letting bank hold the bag, which ultimately costs everyone in the long run.
My suggestion is to preserve your capital by staying the course and rent the condo at a loss. You are correct it is a slow bleed, but I think it is the best direction. And was previously mentioned, try carrying the paper on a sale. For the right buyer, it may work for all.
And my final bet is that if you are making $90K part time, you have a knack or are a major type A person who will continue to work even with a family of 5. Which is that much better for your immediate cash flow.
I hope not at the expense of the kids. Not to be mean; just making a sweeping generalization.
Good Luck.
August 23, 2009 at 2:28 PM #448542ParticipantDid I miss something? Family income is $215K or about $12K/mo less taxes.
Tempe rent 1K plus SD rent 2.5K totals $3500/mo
Should be plenty of money to carry the condo, even empty no rent, while providing additional tax benefits.
Not thrilled with the idea of walking and letting bank hold the bag, which ultimately costs everyone in the long run.
My suggestion is to preserve your capital by staying the course and rent the condo at a loss. You are correct it is a slow bleed, but I think it is the best direction. And was previously mentioned, try carrying the paper on a sale. For the right buyer, it may work for all.
And my final bet is that if you are making $90K part time, you have a knack or are a major type A person who will continue to work even with a family of 5. Which is that much better for your immediate cash flow.
I hope not at the expense of the kids. Not to be mean; just making a sweeping generalization.
Good Luck.
August 23, 2009 at 2:28 PM #448727ParticipantDid I miss something? Family income is $215K or about $12K/mo less taxes.
Tempe rent 1K plus SD rent 2.5K totals $3500/mo
Should be plenty of money to carry the condo, even empty no rent, while providing additional tax benefits.
Not thrilled with the idea of walking and letting bank hold the bag, which ultimately costs everyone in the long run.
My suggestion is to preserve your capital by staying the course and rent the condo at a loss. You are correct it is a slow bleed, but I think it is the best direction. And was previously mentioned, try carrying the paper on a sale. For the right buyer, it may work for all.
And my final bet is that if you are making $90K part time, you have a knack or are a major type A person who will continue to work even with a family of 5. Which is that much better for your immediate cash flow.
I hope not at the expense of the kids. Not to be mean; just making a sweeping generalization.
Good Luck.
August 23, 2009 at 3:15 PM #447952Anonymous
GuestWhen considering “walk-away” option, please check the link below:
http://marcmccain.com/current-events/arizonas-anti-deficiency-laws-are-changing/81/August 23, 2009 at 3:15 PM #448143GuestWhen considering “walk-away” option, please check the link below:
http://marcmccain.com/current-events/arizonas-anti-deficiency-laws-are-changing/81/August 23, 2009 at 3:15 PM #448483GuestWhen considering “walk-away” option, please check the link below:
http://marcmccain.com/current-events/arizonas-anti-deficiency-laws-are-changing/81/August 23, 2009 at 3:15 PM #448552GuestWhen considering “walk-away” option, please check the link below:
http://marcmccain.com/current-events/arizonas-anti-deficiency-laws-are-changing/81/ -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.