Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Properties or Areas › Skyranch in Santee
- This topic has 2,185 replies, 41 voices, and was last updated 2 years, 4 months ago by gzz.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 18, 2010 at 1:36 PM #567877June 18, 2010 at 2:02 PM #566910sdrealtorParticipant
It was spur of the moment and next time I’ll clue you in. The basic strategy I am implementing is when everything seems awful and we have 2 or 3 big down days in a row its time to get back in. I never go all in and usually put 25 to 50% in case it goes even lower. If it dropped bigtime for 2 or 3 more days I would probably put more and even consider putting the rest in. Then when everyone seems complacent and happy, I’m heading for the hills. We’ll se how it works out. I’ll PM you when I’m getting the itch on way or the other.
June 18, 2010 at 2:02 PM #567006sdrealtorParticipantIt was spur of the moment and next time I’ll clue you in. The basic strategy I am implementing is when everything seems awful and we have 2 or 3 big down days in a row its time to get back in. I never go all in and usually put 25 to 50% in case it goes even lower. If it dropped bigtime for 2 or 3 more days I would probably put more and even consider putting the rest in. Then when everyone seems complacent and happy, I’m heading for the hills. We’ll se how it works out. I’ll PM you when I’m getting the itch on way or the other.
June 18, 2010 at 2:02 PM #567513sdrealtorParticipantIt was spur of the moment and next time I’ll clue you in. The basic strategy I am implementing is when everything seems awful and we have 2 or 3 big down days in a row its time to get back in. I never go all in and usually put 25 to 50% in case it goes even lower. If it dropped bigtime for 2 or 3 more days I would probably put more and even consider putting the rest in. Then when everyone seems complacent and happy, I’m heading for the hills. We’ll se how it works out. I’ll PM you when I’m getting the itch on way or the other.
June 18, 2010 at 2:02 PM #567621sdrealtorParticipantIt was spur of the moment and next time I’ll clue you in. The basic strategy I am implementing is when everything seems awful and we have 2 or 3 big down days in a row its time to get back in. I never go all in and usually put 25 to 50% in case it goes even lower. If it dropped bigtime for 2 or 3 more days I would probably put more and even consider putting the rest in. Then when everyone seems complacent and happy, I’m heading for the hills. We’ll se how it works out. I’ll PM you when I’m getting the itch on way or the other.
June 18, 2010 at 2:02 PM #567897sdrealtorParticipantIt was spur of the moment and next time I’ll clue you in. The basic strategy I am implementing is when everything seems awful and we have 2 or 3 big down days in a row its time to get back in. I never go all in and usually put 25 to 50% in case it goes even lower. If it dropped bigtime for 2 or 3 more days I would probably put more and even consider putting the rest in. Then when everyone seems complacent and happy, I’m heading for the hills. We’ll se how it works out. I’ll PM you when I’m getting the itch on way or the other.
June 18, 2010 at 2:07 PM #566915sdrealtorParticipantI knew it wasnt close to “at least 6 miles” and that 3.7 miles plus 1 mile for driving takes less than 5 minutes.
June 18, 2010 at 2:07 PM #567011sdrealtorParticipantI knew it wasnt close to “at least 6 miles” and that 3.7 miles plus 1 mile for driving takes less than 5 minutes.
June 18, 2010 at 2:07 PM #567518sdrealtorParticipantI knew it wasnt close to “at least 6 miles” and that 3.7 miles plus 1 mile for driving takes less than 5 minutes.
June 18, 2010 at 2:07 PM #567626sdrealtorParticipantI knew it wasnt close to “at least 6 miles” and that 3.7 miles plus 1 mile for driving takes less than 5 minutes.
June 18, 2010 at 2:07 PM #567902sdrealtorParticipantI knew it wasnt close to “at least 6 miles” and that 3.7 miles plus 1 mile for driving takes less than 5 minutes.
June 18, 2010 at 2:18 PM #566925PKMANParticipant[quote=kcal09][quote=joec]You also pointed out the sex offenders living in that neighborhood and I fully agree that this could be a problem when it comes to resale value. smart buyers always check these kind of info before making a descision to buy.[/quote]Sex offenders live everywhere in the greater SD. I’ve also looked at the Megan’s Law website and found that all the zip codes where I was looking (San Marcos, Rancho Bernardo, MM and Poway, etc) had sex offenders living there. It’s virtually impossible to find a populated residential area within SD where’s there’s no sex offenders.
I understand the other knocks on Santee but to pin this one on Santee just isn’t fair. If I’m a girl, there are many neighborhoods that I can think of that’s more scary to walk around after dark.
June 18, 2010 at 2:18 PM #567021PKMANParticipant[quote=kcal09][quote=joec]You also pointed out the sex offenders living in that neighborhood and I fully agree that this could be a problem when it comes to resale value. smart buyers always check these kind of info before making a descision to buy.[/quote]Sex offenders live everywhere in the greater SD. I’ve also looked at the Megan’s Law website and found that all the zip codes where I was looking (San Marcos, Rancho Bernardo, MM and Poway, etc) had sex offenders living there. It’s virtually impossible to find a populated residential area within SD where’s there’s no sex offenders.
I understand the other knocks on Santee but to pin this one on Santee just isn’t fair. If I’m a girl, there are many neighborhoods that I can think of that’s more scary to walk around after dark.
June 18, 2010 at 2:18 PM #567528PKMANParticipant[quote=kcal09][quote=joec]You also pointed out the sex offenders living in that neighborhood and I fully agree that this could be a problem when it comes to resale value. smart buyers always check these kind of info before making a descision to buy.[/quote]Sex offenders live everywhere in the greater SD. I’ve also looked at the Megan’s Law website and found that all the zip codes where I was looking (San Marcos, Rancho Bernardo, MM and Poway, etc) had sex offenders living there. It’s virtually impossible to find a populated residential area within SD where’s there’s no sex offenders.
I understand the other knocks on Santee but to pin this one on Santee just isn’t fair. If I’m a girl, there are many neighborhoods that I can think of that’s more scary to walk around after dark.
June 18, 2010 at 2:18 PM #567636PKMANParticipant[quote=kcal09][quote=joec]You also pointed out the sex offenders living in that neighborhood and I fully agree that this could be a problem when it comes to resale value. smart buyers always check these kind of info before making a descision to buy.[/quote]Sex offenders live everywhere in the greater SD. I’ve also looked at the Megan’s Law website and found that all the zip codes where I was looking (San Marcos, Rancho Bernardo, MM and Poway, etc) had sex offenders living there. It’s virtually impossible to find a populated residential area within SD where’s there’s no sex offenders.
I understand the other knocks on Santee but to pin this one on Santee just isn’t fair. If I’m a girl, there are many neighborhoods that I can think of that’s more scary to walk around after dark.
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Properties or Areas’ is closed to new topics and replies.