- This topic has 10 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 17 years, 7 months ago by
JWM in SD.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 22, 2008 at 1:26 PM #12526April 22, 2008 at 2:57 PM #192633
Ex-SD
ParticipantNote that Shiller has joined the Bail-out crowd.
Basically we’re in uncharted territory,” Shiller said. “It seems we have developed a speculative culture about housing that never existed on a national basis before.”
Many people became convinced that housing prices would increase 10 percent annually, a notion Shiller called crazy.
Shiller, who said it’s difficult to forecast prices, endorsed legislation proposed by Sen. Chris Dodd, D-Conn., and Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., that would allow the Federal Housing Administration to back as much as $300 billion in mortgages for struggling homeowners. Servicers would have to agree to take a loss on the existing loans, while borrowers would have to show they could afford to make new payments on their refinanced mortgages.
April 22, 2008 at 2:57 PM #192660Ex-SD
ParticipantNote that Shiller has joined the Bail-out crowd.
Basically we’re in uncharted territory,” Shiller said. “It seems we have developed a speculative culture about housing that never existed on a national basis before.”
Many people became convinced that housing prices would increase 10 percent annually, a notion Shiller called crazy.
Shiller, who said it’s difficult to forecast prices, endorsed legislation proposed by Sen. Chris Dodd, D-Conn., and Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., that would allow the Federal Housing Administration to back as much as $300 billion in mortgages for struggling homeowners. Servicers would have to agree to take a loss on the existing loans, while borrowers would have to show they could afford to make new payments on their refinanced mortgages.
April 22, 2008 at 2:57 PM #192689Ex-SD
ParticipantNote that Shiller has joined the Bail-out crowd.
Basically we’re in uncharted territory,” Shiller said. “It seems we have developed a speculative culture about housing that never existed on a national basis before.”
Many people became convinced that housing prices would increase 10 percent annually, a notion Shiller called crazy.
Shiller, who said it’s difficult to forecast prices, endorsed legislation proposed by Sen. Chris Dodd, D-Conn., and Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., that would allow the Federal Housing Administration to back as much as $300 billion in mortgages for struggling homeowners. Servicers would have to agree to take a loss on the existing loans, while borrowers would have to show they could afford to make new payments on their refinanced mortgages.
April 22, 2008 at 2:57 PM #192706Ex-SD
ParticipantNote that Shiller has joined the Bail-out crowd.
Basically we’re in uncharted territory,” Shiller said. “It seems we have developed a speculative culture about housing that never existed on a national basis before.”
Many people became convinced that housing prices would increase 10 percent annually, a notion Shiller called crazy.
Shiller, who said it’s difficult to forecast prices, endorsed legislation proposed by Sen. Chris Dodd, D-Conn., and Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., that would allow the Federal Housing Administration to back as much as $300 billion in mortgages for struggling homeowners. Servicers would have to agree to take a loss on the existing loans, while borrowers would have to show they could afford to make new payments on their refinanced mortgages.
April 22, 2008 at 2:57 PM #192752Ex-SD
ParticipantNote that Shiller has joined the Bail-out crowd.
Basically we’re in uncharted territory,” Shiller said. “It seems we have developed a speculative culture about housing that never existed on a national basis before.”
Many people became convinced that housing prices would increase 10 percent annually, a notion Shiller called crazy.
Shiller, who said it’s difficult to forecast prices, endorsed legislation proposed by Sen. Chris Dodd, D-Conn., and Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., that would allow the Federal Housing Administration to back as much as $300 billion in mortgages for struggling homeowners. Servicers would have to agree to take a loss on the existing loans, while borrowers would have to show they could afford to make new payments on their refinanced mortgages.
April 22, 2008 at 3:12 PM #192648JWM in SD
Participant“…that would allow the Federal Housing Administration to back as much as $300 billion in mortgages for struggling homeowners”.
Hmm, well, we will ultimately see what the bond market has to say about that. Methinks they don’t like currency dilution via monetization.
April 22, 2008 at 3:12 PM #192676JWM in SD
Participant“…that would allow the Federal Housing Administration to back as much as $300 billion in mortgages for struggling homeowners”.
Hmm, well, we will ultimately see what the bond market has to say about that. Methinks they don’t like currency dilution via monetization.
April 22, 2008 at 3:12 PM #192704JWM in SD
Participant“…that would allow the Federal Housing Administration to back as much as $300 billion in mortgages for struggling homeowners”.
Hmm, well, we will ultimately see what the bond market has to say about that. Methinks they don’t like currency dilution via monetization.
April 22, 2008 at 3:12 PM #192720JWM in SD
Participant“…that would allow the Federal Housing Administration to back as much as $300 billion in mortgages for struggling homeowners”.
Hmm, well, we will ultimately see what the bond market has to say about that. Methinks they don’t like currency dilution via monetization.
April 22, 2008 at 3:12 PM #192767JWM in SD
Participant“…that would allow the Federal Housing Administration to back as much as $300 billion in mortgages for struggling homeowners”.
Hmm, well, we will ultimately see what the bond market has to say about that. Methinks they don’t like currency dilution via monetization.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
