- This topic has 372 replies, 34 voices, and was last updated 10 years, 10 months ago by joec.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 24, 2009 at 3:12 PM #335529January 24, 2009 at 4:45 PM #335062temeculaguyParticipant
What do you think eclipxe, should I take the bait, want to see how the old guy does it or do you want a shot. It has all the classic troll warning signs (new account, no data, incorrect facts, racism, anectdotal info). There is no laker game today and no football this weekend, I’m kinda bored and tempted to bust out a can.
January 24, 2009 at 4:45 PM #335388temeculaguyParticipantWhat do you think eclipxe, should I take the bait, want to see how the old guy does it or do you want a shot. It has all the classic troll warning signs (new account, no data, incorrect facts, racism, anectdotal info). There is no laker game today and no football this weekend, I’m kinda bored and tempted to bust out a can.
January 24, 2009 at 4:45 PM #335473temeculaguyParticipantWhat do you think eclipxe, should I take the bait, want to see how the old guy does it or do you want a shot. It has all the classic troll warning signs (new account, no data, incorrect facts, racism, anectdotal info). There is no laker game today and no football this weekend, I’m kinda bored and tempted to bust out a can.
January 24, 2009 at 4:45 PM #335500temeculaguyParticipantWhat do you think eclipxe, should I take the bait, want to see how the old guy does it or do you want a shot. It has all the classic troll warning signs (new account, no data, incorrect facts, racism, anectdotal info). There is no laker game today and no football this weekend, I’m kinda bored and tempted to bust out a can.
January 24, 2009 at 4:45 PM #335585temeculaguyParticipantWhat do you think eclipxe, should I take the bait, want to see how the old guy does it or do you want a shot. It has all the classic troll warning signs (new account, no data, incorrect facts, racism, anectdotal info). There is no laker game today and no football this weekend, I’m kinda bored and tempted to bust out a can.
January 25, 2009 at 12:37 AM #335285temeculaguyParticipantOk I’m bored, time to take on the trolls. I’m not sure where this comes from, perhaps some Temeculans beat him up and took his lunch money. I’ve been here since 1991 and I was younger, drunker, stronger and meaner, maybe I did it, sorry.
#1, Cal alleges that 22% of the city is mexican and has decided the majority are illegal aliens. Show me the data on the illegal aliens. You are correct about the 22% hispanics. I’ll quote Dr. Husings demographic study from September 2008
“In 2006, the Census Bureau found that Temecula was not as diverse as the adjacent counties.
Some 61.0% of the city’s residents were White, down from 69.3% in 2000. Hispanics were
22.6% of the city residents, up from 19.0%. Asians/Pacific Islanders were 8.8%, up from 4.9%
in 2000. African-American residents were 4.2%, up from 3.2% in 2000. In Riverside County
the shares were: White (43.0%), Hispanics (42.2%) Asians/Pacific Islanders (5.3%) African-
American (5.8%). In San Diego County, they were: White (51.5%), Hispanics (30.1%), Asians/
Pacific Islanders (10.5%), African-American (4.8%).”So what does this tell us about you. You used the 22% hispanic as some sort of attack, but the data for the region actually shows it is one of the whitest town around, Riverside or San Diego. Dude, we are 60 miles from another country and this used to be Mexico 150 years ago, are your really looking for a town in So Cal with no people of hispanic origin, you will have trouble finding that on the East coast, my suggestion, you need to go to Germany, Corona isn’t going to solve it for you.
For fun, here’s Dr. Husing 109 page report.
http://www.cityoftemecula.org/NR/rdonlyres/6089BD40-13DB-409D-9A35-FC89D90479F8/0/husingreport_2008.pdfJanuary 25, 2009 at 12:37 AM #335609temeculaguyParticipantOk I’m bored, time to take on the trolls. I’m not sure where this comes from, perhaps some Temeculans beat him up and took his lunch money. I’ve been here since 1991 and I was younger, drunker, stronger and meaner, maybe I did it, sorry.
#1, Cal alleges that 22% of the city is mexican and has decided the majority are illegal aliens. Show me the data on the illegal aliens. You are correct about the 22% hispanics. I’ll quote Dr. Husings demographic study from September 2008
“In 2006, the Census Bureau found that Temecula was not as diverse as the adjacent counties.
Some 61.0% of the city’s residents were White, down from 69.3% in 2000. Hispanics were
22.6% of the city residents, up from 19.0%. Asians/Pacific Islanders were 8.8%, up from 4.9%
in 2000. African-American residents were 4.2%, up from 3.2% in 2000. In Riverside County
the shares were: White (43.0%), Hispanics (42.2%) Asians/Pacific Islanders (5.3%) African-
American (5.8%). In San Diego County, they were: White (51.5%), Hispanics (30.1%), Asians/
Pacific Islanders (10.5%), African-American (4.8%).”So what does this tell us about you. You used the 22% hispanic as some sort of attack, but the data for the region actually shows it is one of the whitest town around, Riverside or San Diego. Dude, we are 60 miles from another country and this used to be Mexico 150 years ago, are your really looking for a town in So Cal with no people of hispanic origin, you will have trouble finding that on the East coast, my suggestion, you need to go to Germany, Corona isn’t going to solve it for you.
For fun, here’s Dr. Husing 109 page report.
http://www.cityoftemecula.org/NR/rdonlyres/6089BD40-13DB-409D-9A35-FC89D90479F8/0/husingreport_2008.pdfJanuary 25, 2009 at 12:37 AM #335697temeculaguyParticipantOk I’m bored, time to take on the trolls. I’m not sure where this comes from, perhaps some Temeculans beat him up and took his lunch money. I’ve been here since 1991 and I was younger, drunker, stronger and meaner, maybe I did it, sorry.
#1, Cal alleges that 22% of the city is mexican and has decided the majority are illegal aliens. Show me the data on the illegal aliens. You are correct about the 22% hispanics. I’ll quote Dr. Husings demographic study from September 2008
“In 2006, the Census Bureau found that Temecula was not as diverse as the adjacent counties.
Some 61.0% of the city’s residents were White, down from 69.3% in 2000. Hispanics were
22.6% of the city residents, up from 19.0%. Asians/Pacific Islanders were 8.8%, up from 4.9%
in 2000. African-American residents were 4.2%, up from 3.2% in 2000. In Riverside County
the shares were: White (43.0%), Hispanics (42.2%) Asians/Pacific Islanders (5.3%) African-
American (5.8%). In San Diego County, they were: White (51.5%), Hispanics (30.1%), Asians/
Pacific Islanders (10.5%), African-American (4.8%).”So what does this tell us about you. You used the 22% hispanic as some sort of attack, but the data for the region actually shows it is one of the whitest town around, Riverside or San Diego. Dude, we are 60 miles from another country and this used to be Mexico 150 years ago, are your really looking for a town in So Cal with no people of hispanic origin, you will have trouble finding that on the East coast, my suggestion, you need to go to Germany, Corona isn’t going to solve it for you.
For fun, here’s Dr. Husing 109 page report.
http://www.cityoftemecula.org/NR/rdonlyres/6089BD40-13DB-409D-9A35-FC89D90479F8/0/husingreport_2008.pdfJanuary 25, 2009 at 12:37 AM #335725temeculaguyParticipantOk I’m bored, time to take on the trolls. I’m not sure where this comes from, perhaps some Temeculans beat him up and took his lunch money. I’ve been here since 1991 and I was younger, drunker, stronger and meaner, maybe I did it, sorry.
#1, Cal alleges that 22% of the city is mexican and has decided the majority are illegal aliens. Show me the data on the illegal aliens. You are correct about the 22% hispanics. I’ll quote Dr. Husings demographic study from September 2008
“In 2006, the Census Bureau found that Temecula was not as diverse as the adjacent counties.
Some 61.0% of the city’s residents were White, down from 69.3% in 2000. Hispanics were
22.6% of the city residents, up from 19.0%. Asians/Pacific Islanders were 8.8%, up from 4.9%
in 2000. African-American residents were 4.2%, up from 3.2% in 2000. In Riverside County
the shares were: White (43.0%), Hispanics (42.2%) Asians/Pacific Islanders (5.3%) African-
American (5.8%). In San Diego County, they were: White (51.5%), Hispanics (30.1%), Asians/
Pacific Islanders (10.5%), African-American (4.8%).”So what does this tell us about you. You used the 22% hispanic as some sort of attack, but the data for the region actually shows it is one of the whitest town around, Riverside or San Diego. Dude, we are 60 miles from another country and this used to be Mexico 150 years ago, are your really looking for a town in So Cal with no people of hispanic origin, you will have trouble finding that on the East coast, my suggestion, you need to go to Germany, Corona isn’t going to solve it for you.
For fun, here’s Dr. Husing 109 page report.
http://www.cityoftemecula.org/NR/rdonlyres/6089BD40-13DB-409D-9A35-FC89D90479F8/0/husingreport_2008.pdfJanuary 25, 2009 at 12:37 AM #335812temeculaguyParticipantOk I’m bored, time to take on the trolls. I’m not sure where this comes from, perhaps some Temeculans beat him up and took his lunch money. I’ve been here since 1991 and I was younger, drunker, stronger and meaner, maybe I did it, sorry.
#1, Cal alleges that 22% of the city is mexican and has decided the majority are illegal aliens. Show me the data on the illegal aliens. You are correct about the 22% hispanics. I’ll quote Dr. Husings demographic study from September 2008
“In 2006, the Census Bureau found that Temecula was not as diverse as the adjacent counties.
Some 61.0% of the city’s residents were White, down from 69.3% in 2000. Hispanics were
22.6% of the city residents, up from 19.0%. Asians/Pacific Islanders were 8.8%, up from 4.9%
in 2000. African-American residents were 4.2%, up from 3.2% in 2000. In Riverside County
the shares were: White (43.0%), Hispanics (42.2%) Asians/Pacific Islanders (5.3%) African-
American (5.8%). In San Diego County, they were: White (51.5%), Hispanics (30.1%), Asians/
Pacific Islanders (10.5%), African-American (4.8%).”So what does this tell us about you. You used the 22% hispanic as some sort of attack, but the data for the region actually shows it is one of the whitest town around, Riverside or San Diego. Dude, we are 60 miles from another country and this used to be Mexico 150 years ago, are your really looking for a town in So Cal with no people of hispanic origin, you will have trouble finding that on the East coast, my suggestion, you need to go to Germany, Corona isn’t going to solve it for you.
For fun, here’s Dr. Husing 109 page report.
http://www.cityoftemecula.org/NR/rdonlyres/6089BD40-13DB-409D-9A35-FC89D90479F8/0/husingreport_2008.pdfJanuary 25, 2009 at 12:57 AM #335290temeculaguyParticipant#2, you bitch about crime but then complain about cameras spying on you. I’ve never actually seen cameras spying on me, where are they again. Is the government trying to read your mind. I think this is a side effect of a medication rather than actual citywide sureveilance cameras.
#3 You forgot to bash the schools
“In 2007, 44.6% of Temecula’s high school seniors took the Scholastic Assessment Test. This ranked first among Riverside County’s major districts. Their average score was 1,526. This ranked first in the county ahead of Murrieta (1,483) and Hemet (1,461) (Exhibit 108).”
Corona actually was lower than Hemet so it didn’t get mentioned in that quote, but it’s on page 89, they averaged 1429. Temec also beat S.D. county but indivisual districts in S.D. (Poway, etc.) beat Temec. So let’s think about this, you moved to Corona because Temec sucks and Hemet beat your schools. If there was ever a reason to move, it would be because Hemet beat you in anything. If their ping pong beat mine, I’d be curled up in the fetal position swigging whisky for days.
#4 Crime
“From 1993-2007, the city’s crime rate per 1,000
residents has declined by -41.2% according to the U.S. Department of Justice (Exhibit 117-118).
In this period, the city had 1,356 more incidents (71.4%) but that was for a population that had
nearly tripled, up 63,958 or 179.8%. The violent crime rate dropped -34.5% in this period; the
property crime rate was down -39.3% (Exhibit 119-120).”You win here, Corona has the 2nd lowest violent crime rate in the county, Temecula has the 3rd lowest. Your chance of being a victim of a violent crime is 4 in 1000 in any given year. If you live here ten years, you have a 4% chance of being a victim, once in those ten years. So I guess I better get some life insurance.
January 25, 2009 at 12:57 AM #335614temeculaguyParticipant#2, you bitch about crime but then complain about cameras spying on you. I’ve never actually seen cameras spying on me, where are they again. Is the government trying to read your mind. I think this is a side effect of a medication rather than actual citywide sureveilance cameras.
#3 You forgot to bash the schools
“In 2007, 44.6% of Temecula’s high school seniors took the Scholastic Assessment Test. This ranked first among Riverside County’s major districts. Their average score was 1,526. This ranked first in the county ahead of Murrieta (1,483) and Hemet (1,461) (Exhibit 108).”
Corona actually was lower than Hemet so it didn’t get mentioned in that quote, but it’s on page 89, they averaged 1429. Temec also beat S.D. county but indivisual districts in S.D. (Poway, etc.) beat Temec. So let’s think about this, you moved to Corona because Temec sucks and Hemet beat your schools. If there was ever a reason to move, it would be because Hemet beat you in anything. If their ping pong beat mine, I’d be curled up in the fetal position swigging whisky for days.
#4 Crime
“From 1993-2007, the city’s crime rate per 1,000
residents has declined by -41.2% according to the U.S. Department of Justice (Exhibit 117-118).
In this period, the city had 1,356 more incidents (71.4%) but that was for a population that had
nearly tripled, up 63,958 or 179.8%. The violent crime rate dropped -34.5% in this period; the
property crime rate was down -39.3% (Exhibit 119-120).”You win here, Corona has the 2nd lowest violent crime rate in the county, Temecula has the 3rd lowest. Your chance of being a victim of a violent crime is 4 in 1000 in any given year. If you live here ten years, you have a 4% chance of being a victim, once in those ten years. So I guess I better get some life insurance.
January 25, 2009 at 12:57 AM #335701temeculaguyParticipant#2, you bitch about crime but then complain about cameras spying on you. I’ve never actually seen cameras spying on me, where are they again. Is the government trying to read your mind. I think this is a side effect of a medication rather than actual citywide sureveilance cameras.
#3 You forgot to bash the schools
“In 2007, 44.6% of Temecula’s high school seniors took the Scholastic Assessment Test. This ranked first among Riverside County’s major districts. Their average score was 1,526. This ranked first in the county ahead of Murrieta (1,483) and Hemet (1,461) (Exhibit 108).”
Corona actually was lower than Hemet so it didn’t get mentioned in that quote, but it’s on page 89, they averaged 1429. Temec also beat S.D. county but indivisual districts in S.D. (Poway, etc.) beat Temec. So let’s think about this, you moved to Corona because Temec sucks and Hemet beat your schools. If there was ever a reason to move, it would be because Hemet beat you in anything. If their ping pong beat mine, I’d be curled up in the fetal position swigging whisky for days.
#4 Crime
“From 1993-2007, the city’s crime rate per 1,000
residents has declined by -41.2% according to the U.S. Department of Justice (Exhibit 117-118).
In this period, the city had 1,356 more incidents (71.4%) but that was for a population that had
nearly tripled, up 63,958 or 179.8%. The violent crime rate dropped -34.5% in this period; the
property crime rate was down -39.3% (Exhibit 119-120).”You win here, Corona has the 2nd lowest violent crime rate in the county, Temecula has the 3rd lowest. Your chance of being a victim of a violent crime is 4 in 1000 in any given year. If you live here ten years, you have a 4% chance of being a victim, once in those ten years. So I guess I better get some life insurance.
January 25, 2009 at 12:57 AM #335730temeculaguyParticipant#2, you bitch about crime but then complain about cameras spying on you. I’ve never actually seen cameras spying on me, where are they again. Is the government trying to read your mind. I think this is a side effect of a medication rather than actual citywide sureveilance cameras.
#3 You forgot to bash the schools
“In 2007, 44.6% of Temecula’s high school seniors took the Scholastic Assessment Test. This ranked first among Riverside County’s major districts. Their average score was 1,526. This ranked first in the county ahead of Murrieta (1,483) and Hemet (1,461) (Exhibit 108).”
Corona actually was lower than Hemet so it didn’t get mentioned in that quote, but it’s on page 89, they averaged 1429. Temec also beat S.D. county but indivisual districts in S.D. (Poway, etc.) beat Temec. So let’s think about this, you moved to Corona because Temec sucks and Hemet beat your schools. If there was ever a reason to move, it would be because Hemet beat you in anything. If their ping pong beat mine, I’d be curled up in the fetal position swigging whisky for days.
#4 Crime
“From 1993-2007, the city’s crime rate per 1,000
residents has declined by -41.2% according to the U.S. Department of Justice (Exhibit 117-118).
In this period, the city had 1,356 more incidents (71.4%) but that was for a population that had
nearly tripled, up 63,958 or 179.8%. The violent crime rate dropped -34.5% in this period; the
property crime rate was down -39.3% (Exhibit 119-120).”You win here, Corona has the 2nd lowest violent crime rate in the county, Temecula has the 3rd lowest. Your chance of being a victim of a violent crime is 4 in 1000 in any given year. If you live here ten years, you have a 4% chance of being a victim, once in those ten years. So I guess I better get some life insurance.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.