- This topic has 460 replies, 28 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 4 months ago by briansd1.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 29, 2009 at 10:12 PM #422916June 29, 2009 at 11:46 PM #422218CA renterParticipant
We are surprised at the optimism, too.
My husband has what is considered to be one of the most secure jobs out there, and even he is looking at a possible 15% pay cut. Then there’s the very real possibility that healthcare and pension cuts are on the way, too.
Perhaps I’m too cynical, but when Obama was saying that this was going to be a long, drawn-out recession, and that it would “get worse before it gets better,” he was roundly criticized and told to be more cheerful and optimistic. All of a sudden, everyone in the MSM is seeing “green shoots” everywhere and claiming that the worst is behind us. I’m just not buying it — though admit I could very well be wrong. Something just doesn’t feel right about the whole “end of the recession” meme.
We’re still on the sidelines, but are looking at areas that haven’t fallen much yet. In the lower-end/more affordable areas, there is admittedly less risk if one should choose buying over renting.
June 29, 2009 at 11:46 PM #422447CA renterParticipantWe are surprised at the optimism, too.
My husband has what is considered to be one of the most secure jobs out there, and even he is looking at a possible 15% pay cut. Then there’s the very real possibility that healthcare and pension cuts are on the way, too.
Perhaps I’m too cynical, but when Obama was saying that this was going to be a long, drawn-out recession, and that it would “get worse before it gets better,” he was roundly criticized and told to be more cheerful and optimistic. All of a sudden, everyone in the MSM is seeing “green shoots” everywhere and claiming that the worst is behind us. I’m just not buying it — though admit I could very well be wrong. Something just doesn’t feel right about the whole “end of the recession” meme.
We’re still on the sidelines, but are looking at areas that haven’t fallen much yet. In the lower-end/more affordable areas, there is admittedly less risk if one should choose buying over renting.
June 29, 2009 at 11:46 PM #422721CA renterParticipantWe are surprised at the optimism, too.
My husband has what is considered to be one of the most secure jobs out there, and even he is looking at a possible 15% pay cut. Then there’s the very real possibility that healthcare and pension cuts are on the way, too.
Perhaps I’m too cynical, but when Obama was saying that this was going to be a long, drawn-out recession, and that it would “get worse before it gets better,” he was roundly criticized and told to be more cheerful and optimistic. All of a sudden, everyone in the MSM is seeing “green shoots” everywhere and claiming that the worst is behind us. I’m just not buying it — though admit I could very well be wrong. Something just doesn’t feel right about the whole “end of the recession” meme.
We’re still on the sidelines, but are looking at areas that haven’t fallen much yet. In the lower-end/more affordable areas, there is admittedly less risk if one should choose buying over renting.
June 29, 2009 at 11:46 PM #422789CA renterParticipantWe are surprised at the optimism, too.
My husband has what is considered to be one of the most secure jobs out there, and even he is looking at a possible 15% pay cut. Then there’s the very real possibility that healthcare and pension cuts are on the way, too.
Perhaps I’m too cynical, but when Obama was saying that this was going to be a long, drawn-out recession, and that it would “get worse before it gets better,” he was roundly criticized and told to be more cheerful and optimistic. All of a sudden, everyone in the MSM is seeing “green shoots” everywhere and claiming that the worst is behind us. I’m just not buying it — though admit I could very well be wrong. Something just doesn’t feel right about the whole “end of the recession” meme.
We’re still on the sidelines, but are looking at areas that haven’t fallen much yet. In the lower-end/more affordable areas, there is admittedly less risk if one should choose buying over renting.
June 29, 2009 at 11:46 PM #422951CA renterParticipantWe are surprised at the optimism, too.
My husband has what is considered to be one of the most secure jobs out there, and even he is looking at a possible 15% pay cut. Then there’s the very real possibility that healthcare and pension cuts are on the way, too.
Perhaps I’m too cynical, but when Obama was saying that this was going to be a long, drawn-out recession, and that it would “get worse before it gets better,” he was roundly criticized and told to be more cheerful and optimistic. All of a sudden, everyone in the MSM is seeing “green shoots” everywhere and claiming that the worst is behind us. I’m just not buying it — though admit I could very well be wrong. Something just doesn’t feel right about the whole “end of the recession” meme.
We’re still on the sidelines, but are looking at areas that haven’t fallen much yet. In the lower-end/more affordable areas, there is admittedly less risk if one should choose buying over renting.
June 30, 2009 at 4:03 AM #4222534plexownerParticipant1. what about the fact that 25% of our workforce (Baby Boomers) are going to try to retire over the next ten years?
many of them will try to downsize by selling their houses
ie, more shadow inventory
2. what about the 14 million vacant homes in America? That’s at least 10 months of supply and, according to Rich and others, there is downward price pressure anytime there is more than 8 months of supply
ie, lots of ‘have to sell’ inventory
3. what about the fact that previous real estate downturns in SoCal have been 6 to 7 years which puts a bottom in 2012 to 2014 at the earliest?
~
seems like people either aren’t aware of these little details or they are choosing to ignore/deny them
oh well, knife-catchers are part of the process …
June 30, 2009 at 4:03 AM #4224824plexownerParticipant1. what about the fact that 25% of our workforce (Baby Boomers) are going to try to retire over the next ten years?
many of them will try to downsize by selling their houses
ie, more shadow inventory
2. what about the 14 million vacant homes in America? That’s at least 10 months of supply and, according to Rich and others, there is downward price pressure anytime there is more than 8 months of supply
ie, lots of ‘have to sell’ inventory
3. what about the fact that previous real estate downturns in SoCal have been 6 to 7 years which puts a bottom in 2012 to 2014 at the earliest?
~
seems like people either aren’t aware of these little details or they are choosing to ignore/deny them
oh well, knife-catchers are part of the process …
June 30, 2009 at 4:03 AM #4227574plexownerParticipant1. what about the fact that 25% of our workforce (Baby Boomers) are going to try to retire over the next ten years?
many of them will try to downsize by selling their houses
ie, more shadow inventory
2. what about the 14 million vacant homes in America? That’s at least 10 months of supply and, according to Rich and others, there is downward price pressure anytime there is more than 8 months of supply
ie, lots of ‘have to sell’ inventory
3. what about the fact that previous real estate downturns in SoCal have been 6 to 7 years which puts a bottom in 2012 to 2014 at the earliest?
~
seems like people either aren’t aware of these little details or they are choosing to ignore/deny them
oh well, knife-catchers are part of the process …
June 30, 2009 at 4:03 AM #4228244plexownerParticipant1. what about the fact that 25% of our workforce (Baby Boomers) are going to try to retire over the next ten years?
many of them will try to downsize by selling their houses
ie, more shadow inventory
2. what about the 14 million vacant homes in America? That’s at least 10 months of supply and, according to Rich and others, there is downward price pressure anytime there is more than 8 months of supply
ie, lots of ‘have to sell’ inventory
3. what about the fact that previous real estate downturns in SoCal have been 6 to 7 years which puts a bottom in 2012 to 2014 at the earliest?
~
seems like people either aren’t aware of these little details or they are choosing to ignore/deny them
oh well, knife-catchers are part of the process …
June 30, 2009 at 4:03 AM #4229864plexownerParticipant1. what about the fact that 25% of our workforce (Baby Boomers) are going to try to retire over the next ten years?
many of them will try to downsize by selling their houses
ie, more shadow inventory
2. what about the 14 million vacant homes in America? That’s at least 10 months of supply and, according to Rich and others, there is downward price pressure anytime there is more than 8 months of supply
ie, lots of ‘have to sell’ inventory
3. what about the fact that previous real estate downturns in SoCal have been 6 to 7 years which puts a bottom in 2012 to 2014 at the earliest?
~
seems like people either aren’t aware of these little details or they are choosing to ignore/deny them
oh well, knife-catchers are part of the process …
June 30, 2009 at 6:25 AM #422273waiting for bottomParticipant[quote=4plexowner]
seems like people either aren’t aware of these little details or they are choosing to ignore/deny themoh well, knife-catchers are part of the process …[/quote]
Fully aware and not ignoring. Prices could fall another 20% where I bought. Sure, there is an opportunity cost to that but it doesn’t change the fact that I can easily afford my payment and I like my house, neighborhood, and schools.
If rates go up to 7.5% and my house declines 20%, the payment on my house will be the same as it is now. Seems like equal risk on both sides of this equation – hence time for me to buy.
June 30, 2009 at 6:25 AM #422502waiting for bottomParticipant[quote=4plexowner]
seems like people either aren’t aware of these little details or they are choosing to ignore/deny themoh well, knife-catchers are part of the process …[/quote]
Fully aware and not ignoring. Prices could fall another 20% where I bought. Sure, there is an opportunity cost to that but it doesn’t change the fact that I can easily afford my payment and I like my house, neighborhood, and schools.
If rates go up to 7.5% and my house declines 20%, the payment on my house will be the same as it is now. Seems like equal risk on both sides of this equation – hence time for me to buy.
June 30, 2009 at 6:25 AM #422776waiting for bottomParticipant[quote=4plexowner]
seems like people either aren’t aware of these little details or they are choosing to ignore/deny themoh well, knife-catchers are part of the process …[/quote]
Fully aware and not ignoring. Prices could fall another 20% where I bought. Sure, there is an opportunity cost to that but it doesn’t change the fact that I can easily afford my payment and I like my house, neighborhood, and schools.
If rates go up to 7.5% and my house declines 20%, the payment on my house will be the same as it is now. Seems like equal risk on both sides of this equation – hence time for me to buy.
June 30, 2009 at 6:25 AM #422844waiting for bottomParticipant[quote=4plexowner]
seems like people either aren’t aware of these little details or they are choosing to ignore/deny themoh well, knife-catchers are part of the process …[/quote]
Fully aware and not ignoring. Prices could fall another 20% where I bought. Sure, there is an opportunity cost to that but it doesn’t change the fact that I can easily afford my payment and I like my house, neighborhood, and schools.
If rates go up to 7.5% and my house declines 20%, the payment on my house will be the same as it is now. Seems like equal risk on both sides of this equation – hence time for me to buy.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.