- This topic has 320 replies, 30 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 3 months ago by
Jim Jones.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 9, 2009 at 3:24 PM #413576June 9, 2009 at 5:26 PM #412922
(former)FormerSanDiegan
ParticipantWhy not institute a guest worker program that requires a state permit (and maybe a federal one too while we are at it) ?
Make the state permit for CA $100 monthly for any month in which a worker is used, paid for by the company.
That’s 1200 per year per worker. If there are 4 million guest workers, this would approximately cover the $5B shortfall. If not, scale the fees up.
Make the fines for not registering a factor of 10 or 20x higher than the permit and generate additional revenue. Use this additional revenue to pay for the enforcement, e.g. through a bounty system. I am sure that some of the workers would report the employees to collect the bounty, thus forcing the employers to comply with the permit process.
June 9, 2009 at 5:26 PM #413157ParticipantWhy not institute a guest worker program that requires a state permit (and maybe a federal one too while we are at it) ?
Make the state permit for CA $100 monthly for any month in which a worker is used, paid for by the company.
That’s 1200 per year per worker. If there are 4 million guest workers, this would approximately cover the $5B shortfall. If not, scale the fees up.
Make the fines for not registering a factor of 10 or 20x higher than the permit and generate additional revenue. Use this additional revenue to pay for the enforcement, e.g. through a bounty system. I am sure that some of the workers would report the employees to collect the bounty, thus forcing the employers to comply with the permit process.
June 9, 2009 at 5:26 PM #413400ParticipantWhy not institute a guest worker program that requires a state permit (and maybe a federal one too while we are at it) ?
Make the state permit for CA $100 monthly for any month in which a worker is used, paid for by the company.
That’s 1200 per year per worker. If there are 4 million guest workers, this would approximately cover the $5B shortfall. If not, scale the fees up.
Make the fines for not registering a factor of 10 or 20x higher than the permit and generate additional revenue. Use this additional revenue to pay for the enforcement, e.g. through a bounty system. I am sure that some of the workers would report the employees to collect the bounty, thus forcing the employers to comply with the permit process.
June 9, 2009 at 5:26 PM #413466ParticipantWhy not institute a guest worker program that requires a state permit (and maybe a federal one too while we are at it) ?
Make the state permit for CA $100 monthly for any month in which a worker is used, paid for by the company.
That’s 1200 per year per worker. If there are 4 million guest workers, this would approximately cover the $5B shortfall. If not, scale the fees up.
Make the fines for not registering a factor of 10 or 20x higher than the permit and generate additional revenue. Use this additional revenue to pay for the enforcement, e.g. through a bounty system. I am sure that some of the workers would report the employees to collect the bounty, thus forcing the employers to comply with the permit process.
June 9, 2009 at 5:26 PM #413616ParticipantWhy not institute a guest worker program that requires a state permit (and maybe a federal one too while we are at it) ?
Make the state permit for CA $100 monthly for any month in which a worker is used, paid for by the company.
That’s 1200 per year per worker. If there are 4 million guest workers, this would approximately cover the $5B shortfall. If not, scale the fees up.
Make the fines for not registering a factor of 10 or 20x higher than the permit and generate additional revenue. Use this additional revenue to pay for the enforcement, e.g. through a bounty system. I am sure that some of the workers would report the employees to collect the bounty, thus forcing the employers to comply with the permit process.
June 9, 2009 at 5:28 PM #412931Participant[quote=sd_matt]Here here condogirl
We reward the lawless and punish the lawful. I got a response from Fienstien. Here’s part of it.
“Most recently, during debate of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, I voted for an amendment that prohibits all recipients of Federal funds from hiring H-1B guest workers (temporary foreign workers in specialized occupations), unless a business first proves that American workers are not able to fill the jobs. This provision was included in the final version of the Act, which President Obama signed into law on February 17, 2009 (Public Law 111-5). Additionally, the White House has estimated that this Act may create or save as many as 396,000 jobs in California, and will help our state avoid additional cuts to Medi-Cal and other critical safety net programs.”
She never addressed benefits to the undocumented.[/quote]
That’s because the response was selected from a discrete number of form letters for various issues. This form letter was probably selected based on a staff-member scan for certain keywords, related to political issues in your letter.
June 9, 2009 at 5:28 PM #413167Participant[quote=sd_matt]Here here condogirl
We reward the lawless and punish the lawful. I got a response from Fienstien. Here’s part of it.
“Most recently, during debate of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, I voted for an amendment that prohibits all recipients of Federal funds from hiring H-1B guest workers (temporary foreign workers in specialized occupations), unless a business first proves that American workers are not able to fill the jobs. This provision was included in the final version of the Act, which President Obama signed into law on February 17, 2009 (Public Law 111-5). Additionally, the White House has estimated that this Act may create or save as many as 396,000 jobs in California, and will help our state avoid additional cuts to Medi-Cal and other critical safety net programs.”
She never addressed benefits to the undocumented.[/quote]
That’s because the response was selected from a discrete number of form letters for various issues. This form letter was probably selected based on a staff-member scan for certain keywords, related to political issues in your letter.
June 9, 2009 at 5:28 PM #413410Participant[quote=sd_matt]Here here condogirl
We reward the lawless and punish the lawful. I got a response from Fienstien. Here’s part of it.
“Most recently, during debate of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, I voted for an amendment that prohibits all recipients of Federal funds from hiring H-1B guest workers (temporary foreign workers in specialized occupations), unless a business first proves that American workers are not able to fill the jobs. This provision was included in the final version of the Act, which President Obama signed into law on February 17, 2009 (Public Law 111-5). Additionally, the White House has estimated that this Act may create or save as many as 396,000 jobs in California, and will help our state avoid additional cuts to Medi-Cal and other critical safety net programs.”
She never addressed benefits to the undocumented.[/quote]
That’s because the response was selected from a discrete number of form letters for various issues. This form letter was probably selected based on a staff-member scan for certain keywords, related to political issues in your letter.
June 9, 2009 at 5:28 PM #413476Participant[quote=sd_matt]Here here condogirl
We reward the lawless and punish the lawful. I got a response from Fienstien. Here’s part of it.
“Most recently, during debate of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, I voted for an amendment that prohibits all recipients of Federal funds from hiring H-1B guest workers (temporary foreign workers in specialized occupations), unless a business first proves that American workers are not able to fill the jobs. This provision was included in the final version of the Act, which President Obama signed into law on February 17, 2009 (Public Law 111-5). Additionally, the White House has estimated that this Act may create or save as many as 396,000 jobs in California, and will help our state avoid additional cuts to Medi-Cal and other critical safety net programs.”
She never addressed benefits to the undocumented.[/quote]
That’s because the response was selected from a discrete number of form letters for various issues. This form letter was probably selected based on a staff-member scan for certain keywords, related to political issues in your letter.
June 9, 2009 at 5:28 PM #413626Participant[quote=sd_matt]Here here condogirl
We reward the lawless and punish the lawful. I got a response from Fienstien. Here’s part of it.
“Most recently, during debate of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, I voted for an amendment that prohibits all recipients of Federal funds from hiring H-1B guest workers (temporary foreign workers in specialized occupations), unless a business first proves that American workers are not able to fill the jobs. This provision was included in the final version of the Act, which President Obama signed into law on February 17, 2009 (Public Law 111-5). Additionally, the White House has estimated that this Act may create or save as many as 396,000 jobs in California, and will help our state avoid additional cuts to Medi-Cal and other critical safety net programs.”
She never addressed benefits to the undocumented.[/quote]
That’s because the response was selected from a discrete number of form letters for various issues. This form letter was probably selected based on a staff-member scan for certain keywords, related to political issues in your letter.
June 9, 2009 at 6:03 PM #412941Rt.66
Participant[quote=condogrrl]To all of you who are so sympathetic to people in the US illegally: how would you feel if your social security number were stolen and used by one of these illegals? If you don’t mind at all, then please post it here so one of us can sell it outside the local Home Depot.
Read a few stories of people who have had to try to clean up the mess of their identity after it was stolen by an illegal.[/quote]
I have a niece who had hers stolen by an illegal when she was under 16. She did not find out about it until applying for her first job. You have NO idea how much of a shitstorm this is. Basically she has to work to fix it. No help from nobody. Ain’t America great?
They told her who it is, where he lives and what he has been doing with her SS#. All good info until they tell you that they are not interested in fixing it for you, have a nice day 🙂
In a perverted kind of way its like a possesion is 9/10th kinda thing.
June 9, 2009 at 6:03 PM #413177Participant[quote=condogrrl]To all of you who are so sympathetic to people in the US illegally: how would you feel if your social security number were stolen and used by one of these illegals? If you don’t mind at all, then please post it here so one of us can sell it outside the local Home Depot.
Read a few stories of people who have had to try to clean up the mess of their identity after it was stolen by an illegal.[/quote]
I have a niece who had hers stolen by an illegal when she was under 16. She did not find out about it until applying for her first job. You have NO idea how much of a shitstorm this is. Basically she has to work to fix it. No help from nobody. Ain’t America great?
They told her who it is, where he lives and what he has been doing with her SS#. All good info until they tell you that they are not interested in fixing it for you, have a nice day 🙂
In a perverted kind of way its like a possesion is 9/10th kinda thing.
June 9, 2009 at 6:03 PM #413420Participant[quote=condogrrl]To all of you who are so sympathetic to people in the US illegally: how would you feel if your social security number were stolen and used by one of these illegals? If you don’t mind at all, then please post it here so one of us can sell it outside the local Home Depot.
Read a few stories of people who have had to try to clean up the mess of their identity after it was stolen by an illegal.[/quote]
I have a niece who had hers stolen by an illegal when she was under 16. She did not find out about it until applying for her first job. You have NO idea how much of a shitstorm this is. Basically she has to work to fix it. No help from nobody. Ain’t America great?
They told her who it is, where he lives and what he has been doing with her SS#. All good info until they tell you that they are not interested in fixing it for you, have a nice day 🙂
In a perverted kind of way its like a possesion is 9/10th kinda thing.
June 9, 2009 at 6:03 PM #413486Participant[quote=condogrrl]To all of you who are so sympathetic to people in the US illegally: how would you feel if your social security number were stolen and used by one of these illegals? If you don’t mind at all, then please post it here so one of us can sell it outside the local Home Depot.
Read a few stories of people who have had to try to clean up the mess of their identity after it was stolen by an illegal.[/quote]
I have a niece who had hers stolen by an illegal when she was under 16. She did not find out about it until applying for her first job. You have NO idea how much of a shitstorm this is. Basically she has to work to fix it. No help from nobody. Ain’t America great?
They told her who it is, where he lives and what he has been doing with her SS#. All good info until they tell you that they are not interested in fixing it for you, have a nice day 🙂
In a perverted kind of way its like a possesion is 9/10th kinda thing.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.