- This topic has 270 replies, 20 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 6 months ago by Bob.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 13, 2009 at 11:39 PM #399420May 13, 2009 at 11:43 PM #398740anParticipant
equalizer, it’s a little hard to compare US schools w/ Finnish schools and say which one did a better job. Especially since Finland has a population of ~5M and US have well over 300M people. San Diego alone has ~3M people. Secondly, what you said about “Parents nurture a love of reading among children…” is the KEY to why they might have a better school system. You can easily look at this one factor and compare Carmel Valley school vs school in El Cajon. The other differences is, Finland have a voucher system for their schools and we do not. People here in the US are stuck w/ the school around where they live, which mean they’re stuck in their social economic environment. If we implement a voucher system, students in El Cajon why want to succeed can easily go to Carmel Valley school w/out any issue. If you have a population who treasure education, they will excel in school. It all starts at home.
May 13, 2009 at 11:43 PM #398991anParticipantequalizer, it’s a little hard to compare US schools w/ Finnish schools and say which one did a better job. Especially since Finland has a population of ~5M and US have well over 300M people. San Diego alone has ~3M people. Secondly, what you said about “Parents nurture a love of reading among children…” is the KEY to why they might have a better school system. You can easily look at this one factor and compare Carmel Valley school vs school in El Cajon. The other differences is, Finland have a voucher system for their schools and we do not. People here in the US are stuck w/ the school around where they live, which mean they’re stuck in their social economic environment. If we implement a voucher system, students in El Cajon why want to succeed can easily go to Carmel Valley school w/out any issue. If you have a population who treasure education, they will excel in school. It all starts at home.
May 13, 2009 at 11:43 PM #399220anParticipantequalizer, it’s a little hard to compare US schools w/ Finnish schools and say which one did a better job. Especially since Finland has a population of ~5M and US have well over 300M people. San Diego alone has ~3M people. Secondly, what you said about “Parents nurture a love of reading among children…” is the KEY to why they might have a better school system. You can easily look at this one factor and compare Carmel Valley school vs school in El Cajon. The other differences is, Finland have a voucher system for their schools and we do not. People here in the US are stuck w/ the school around where they live, which mean they’re stuck in their social economic environment. If we implement a voucher system, students in El Cajon why want to succeed can easily go to Carmel Valley school w/out any issue. If you have a population who treasure education, they will excel in school. It all starts at home.
May 13, 2009 at 11:43 PM #399280anParticipantequalizer, it’s a little hard to compare US schools w/ Finnish schools and say which one did a better job. Especially since Finland has a population of ~5M and US have well over 300M people. San Diego alone has ~3M people. Secondly, what you said about “Parents nurture a love of reading among children…” is the KEY to why they might have a better school system. You can easily look at this one factor and compare Carmel Valley school vs school in El Cajon. The other differences is, Finland have a voucher system for their schools and we do not. People here in the US are stuck w/ the school around where they live, which mean they’re stuck in their social economic environment. If we implement a voucher system, students in El Cajon why want to succeed can easily go to Carmel Valley school w/out any issue. If you have a population who treasure education, they will excel in school. It all starts at home.
May 13, 2009 at 11:43 PM #399425anParticipantequalizer, it’s a little hard to compare US schools w/ Finnish schools and say which one did a better job. Especially since Finland has a population of ~5M and US have well over 300M people. San Diego alone has ~3M people. Secondly, what you said about “Parents nurture a love of reading among children…” is the KEY to why they might have a better school system. You can easily look at this one factor and compare Carmel Valley school vs school in El Cajon. The other differences is, Finland have a voucher system for their schools and we do not. People here in the US are stuck w/ the school around where they live, which mean they’re stuck in their social economic environment. If we implement a voucher system, students in El Cajon why want to succeed can easily go to Carmel Valley school w/out any issue. If you have a population who treasure education, they will excel in school. It all starts at home.
May 14, 2009 at 12:00 AM #398765equalizerParticipant[quote=patientrenter]afx, i’m all for the best of both worlds in between solutions. but norway is a special case. massive oil revenues and a small, homogeneous, well-educated population.
norway’s lesson for usa: reduce your population by 95%, and things will be easier for the people left.[/quote]
“Worried that welfare costs are rising as the number of taxpayers declines, state Rep. John LaBruzzo, R-Metairie, said he is studying a plan to pay poor women $1,000 to have their Fallopian tubes tied. LaBruzzo said he worries that people receiving government aid such as food stamps and publicly subsidized housing are reproducing at a faster rate than more affluent, better-educated people who presumably pay more tax revenue to the government. He said his program would be voluntary. It could involve tubal ligation, encouraging other forms of birth control or, to avoid charges of gender discrimination, vasectomies for men. It also could include tax incentives for college-educated, higher-income people to have more children, he said.”
http://www.nola.com/news/t-p/capital/index.ssf?/base/news-6/122223371288730.xml&coll=1
Indira Gandhi tried this in the 70’s but without a dictatorship, it doesn’t work too well.
“Meanwhile, the younger of her two sons, Sanjay Gandhi, started to run the country as though it were his personal fiefdom, and earned the fierce hatred of many whom his policies had victimized. He ordered the removal of slum dwellings, and in an attempt to curb India’s growing population, initiated a highly resented program of forced sterilization.”
http://www.sscnet.ucla.edu/southasia/History/Independent/Indira.html
May 14, 2009 at 12:00 AM #399017equalizerParticipant[quote=patientrenter]afx, i’m all for the best of both worlds in between solutions. but norway is a special case. massive oil revenues and a small, homogeneous, well-educated population.
norway’s lesson for usa: reduce your population by 95%, and things will be easier for the people left.[/quote]
“Worried that welfare costs are rising as the number of taxpayers declines, state Rep. John LaBruzzo, R-Metairie, said he is studying a plan to pay poor women $1,000 to have their Fallopian tubes tied. LaBruzzo said he worries that people receiving government aid such as food stamps and publicly subsidized housing are reproducing at a faster rate than more affluent, better-educated people who presumably pay more tax revenue to the government. He said his program would be voluntary. It could involve tubal ligation, encouraging other forms of birth control or, to avoid charges of gender discrimination, vasectomies for men. It also could include tax incentives for college-educated, higher-income people to have more children, he said.”
http://www.nola.com/news/t-p/capital/index.ssf?/base/news-6/122223371288730.xml&coll=1
Indira Gandhi tried this in the 70’s but without a dictatorship, it doesn’t work too well.
“Meanwhile, the younger of her two sons, Sanjay Gandhi, started to run the country as though it were his personal fiefdom, and earned the fierce hatred of many whom his policies had victimized. He ordered the removal of slum dwellings, and in an attempt to curb India’s growing population, initiated a highly resented program of forced sterilization.”
http://www.sscnet.ucla.edu/southasia/History/Independent/Indira.html
May 14, 2009 at 12:00 AM #399245equalizerParticipant[quote=patientrenter]afx, i’m all for the best of both worlds in between solutions. but norway is a special case. massive oil revenues and a small, homogeneous, well-educated population.
norway’s lesson for usa: reduce your population by 95%, and things will be easier for the people left.[/quote]
“Worried that welfare costs are rising as the number of taxpayers declines, state Rep. John LaBruzzo, R-Metairie, said he is studying a plan to pay poor women $1,000 to have their Fallopian tubes tied. LaBruzzo said he worries that people receiving government aid such as food stamps and publicly subsidized housing are reproducing at a faster rate than more affluent, better-educated people who presumably pay more tax revenue to the government. He said his program would be voluntary. It could involve tubal ligation, encouraging other forms of birth control or, to avoid charges of gender discrimination, vasectomies for men. It also could include tax incentives for college-educated, higher-income people to have more children, he said.”
http://www.nola.com/news/t-p/capital/index.ssf?/base/news-6/122223371288730.xml&coll=1
Indira Gandhi tried this in the 70’s but without a dictatorship, it doesn’t work too well.
“Meanwhile, the younger of her two sons, Sanjay Gandhi, started to run the country as though it were his personal fiefdom, and earned the fierce hatred of many whom his policies had victimized. He ordered the removal of slum dwellings, and in an attempt to curb India’s growing population, initiated a highly resented program of forced sterilization.”
http://www.sscnet.ucla.edu/southasia/History/Independent/Indira.html
May 14, 2009 at 12:00 AM #399305equalizerParticipant[quote=patientrenter]afx, i’m all for the best of both worlds in between solutions. but norway is a special case. massive oil revenues and a small, homogeneous, well-educated population.
norway’s lesson for usa: reduce your population by 95%, and things will be easier for the people left.[/quote]
“Worried that welfare costs are rising as the number of taxpayers declines, state Rep. John LaBruzzo, R-Metairie, said he is studying a plan to pay poor women $1,000 to have their Fallopian tubes tied. LaBruzzo said he worries that people receiving government aid such as food stamps and publicly subsidized housing are reproducing at a faster rate than more affluent, better-educated people who presumably pay more tax revenue to the government. He said his program would be voluntary. It could involve tubal ligation, encouraging other forms of birth control or, to avoid charges of gender discrimination, vasectomies for men. It also could include tax incentives for college-educated, higher-income people to have more children, he said.”
http://www.nola.com/news/t-p/capital/index.ssf?/base/news-6/122223371288730.xml&coll=1
Indira Gandhi tried this in the 70’s but without a dictatorship, it doesn’t work too well.
“Meanwhile, the younger of her two sons, Sanjay Gandhi, started to run the country as though it were his personal fiefdom, and earned the fierce hatred of many whom his policies had victimized. He ordered the removal of slum dwellings, and in an attempt to curb India’s growing population, initiated a highly resented program of forced sterilization.”
http://www.sscnet.ucla.edu/southasia/History/Independent/Indira.html
May 14, 2009 at 12:00 AM #399450equalizerParticipant[quote=patientrenter]afx, i’m all for the best of both worlds in between solutions. but norway is a special case. massive oil revenues and a small, homogeneous, well-educated population.
norway’s lesson for usa: reduce your population by 95%, and things will be easier for the people left.[/quote]
“Worried that welfare costs are rising as the number of taxpayers declines, state Rep. John LaBruzzo, R-Metairie, said he is studying a plan to pay poor women $1,000 to have their Fallopian tubes tied. LaBruzzo said he worries that people receiving government aid such as food stamps and publicly subsidized housing are reproducing at a faster rate than more affluent, better-educated people who presumably pay more tax revenue to the government. He said his program would be voluntary. It could involve tubal ligation, encouraging other forms of birth control or, to avoid charges of gender discrimination, vasectomies for men. It also could include tax incentives for college-educated, higher-income people to have more children, he said.”
http://www.nola.com/news/t-p/capital/index.ssf?/base/news-6/122223371288730.xml&coll=1
Indira Gandhi tried this in the 70’s but without a dictatorship, it doesn’t work too well.
“Meanwhile, the younger of her two sons, Sanjay Gandhi, started to run the country as though it were his personal fiefdom, and earned the fierce hatred of many whom his policies had victimized. He ordered the removal of slum dwellings, and in an attempt to curb India’s growing population, initiated a highly resented program of forced sterilization.”
http://www.sscnet.ucla.edu/southasia/History/Independent/Indira.html
May 14, 2009 at 12:07 AM #398775equalizerParticipant[quote=AN]equalizer, it’s a little hard to compare US schools w/ Finnish schools and say which one did a better job. Especially since Finland has a population of ~5M and US have well over 300M people. San Diego alone has ~3M people. Secondly, what you said about “Parents nurture a love of reading among children…” is the KEY to why they might have a better school system. You can easily look at this one factor and compare Carmel Valley school vs school in El Cajon. The other differences is, Finland have a voucher system for their schools and we do not. People here in the US are stuck w/ the school around where they live, which mean they’re stuck in their social economic environment. If we implement a voucher system, students in El Cajon why want to succeed can easily go to Carmel Valley school w/out any issue. If you have a population who treasure education, they will excel in school. It all starts at home.[/quote]
Yes, it was just to bring a fresh perspective to kids have to start school at 3. Sure, we cant replicate most of it since there is one only language spoken by all students there. The point is that teaching is very valued, so all the schools in Finland are homogenous in a good sense, they are all “Carmel Valley schools”.May 14, 2009 at 12:07 AM #399027equalizerParticipant[quote=AN]equalizer, it’s a little hard to compare US schools w/ Finnish schools and say which one did a better job. Especially since Finland has a population of ~5M and US have well over 300M people. San Diego alone has ~3M people. Secondly, what you said about “Parents nurture a love of reading among children…” is the KEY to why they might have a better school system. You can easily look at this one factor and compare Carmel Valley school vs school in El Cajon. The other differences is, Finland have a voucher system for their schools and we do not. People here in the US are stuck w/ the school around where they live, which mean they’re stuck in their social economic environment. If we implement a voucher system, students in El Cajon why want to succeed can easily go to Carmel Valley school w/out any issue. If you have a population who treasure education, they will excel in school. It all starts at home.[/quote]
Yes, it was just to bring a fresh perspective to kids have to start school at 3. Sure, we cant replicate most of it since there is one only language spoken by all students there. The point is that teaching is very valued, so all the schools in Finland are homogenous in a good sense, they are all “Carmel Valley schools”.May 14, 2009 at 12:07 AM #399256equalizerParticipant[quote=AN]equalizer, it’s a little hard to compare US schools w/ Finnish schools and say which one did a better job. Especially since Finland has a population of ~5M and US have well over 300M people. San Diego alone has ~3M people. Secondly, what you said about “Parents nurture a love of reading among children…” is the KEY to why they might have a better school system. You can easily look at this one factor and compare Carmel Valley school vs school in El Cajon. The other differences is, Finland have a voucher system for their schools and we do not. People here in the US are stuck w/ the school around where they live, which mean they’re stuck in their social economic environment. If we implement a voucher system, students in El Cajon why want to succeed can easily go to Carmel Valley school w/out any issue. If you have a population who treasure education, they will excel in school. It all starts at home.[/quote]
Yes, it was just to bring a fresh perspective to kids have to start school at 3. Sure, we cant replicate most of it since there is one only language spoken by all students there. The point is that teaching is very valued, so all the schools in Finland are homogenous in a good sense, they are all “Carmel Valley schools”.May 14, 2009 at 12:07 AM #399315equalizerParticipant[quote=AN]equalizer, it’s a little hard to compare US schools w/ Finnish schools and say which one did a better job. Especially since Finland has a population of ~5M and US have well over 300M people. San Diego alone has ~3M people. Secondly, what you said about “Parents nurture a love of reading among children…” is the KEY to why they might have a better school system. You can easily look at this one factor and compare Carmel Valley school vs school in El Cajon. The other differences is, Finland have a voucher system for their schools and we do not. People here in the US are stuck w/ the school around where they live, which mean they’re stuck in their social economic environment. If we implement a voucher system, students in El Cajon why want to succeed can easily go to Carmel Valley school w/out any issue. If you have a population who treasure education, they will excel in school. It all starts at home.[/quote]
Yes, it was just to bring a fresh perspective to kids have to start school at 3. Sure, we cant replicate most of it since there is one only language spoken by all students there. The point is that teaching is very valued, so all the schools in Finland are homogenous in a good sense, they are all “Carmel Valley schools”. -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.