- This topic has 120 replies, 11 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 9 months ago by gdcox.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 27, 2008 at 11:35 PM #161914February 27, 2008 at 11:47 PM #161524Deal HunterParticipant
I’m fundamentally not bothered that money is printed out of thin air. What bothers me about monetary policy is that the money is not printed “debt-free.”
Abraham Lincoln printed money out of thin air, but he provided for the borrowed money/credit to be payable in full. For example: You need to borrow $100, so the Fed prints $100 and then charges you 10% interest on the money. This means that you have to come up with $110 dollars. Well, how the hell are you going to do that when only $100 was printed???? Where do you find the other $10? Hence in the current fiat system, the debt can NEVER be repaid.
Lincoln’s method was to print $110 dollars. Give you the $100 you need to borrow and spend the other $10 in your local economy. That way you can earn the $110 by conducting your business and deploying your investments in the local economy. When you earn the $110, you pay it back and your debt-free. Ta Da!
I know, where’s the profit for central banks in Lincoln’s crazy method? Hey, here’s a bit of money trivia for y’all. There were a handful of men in our history that have tried to pioneer a debt-free money system or opposed a private central bank: George Washington, Ben Franklin, Andrew Jackson, Abraham Lincoln and John F. Kennedy. All happen to be on our money! Cool, huh?
February 27, 2008 at 11:47 PM #161818Deal HunterParticipantI’m fundamentally not bothered that money is printed out of thin air. What bothers me about monetary policy is that the money is not printed “debt-free.”
Abraham Lincoln printed money out of thin air, but he provided for the borrowed money/credit to be payable in full. For example: You need to borrow $100, so the Fed prints $100 and then charges you 10% interest on the money. This means that you have to come up with $110 dollars. Well, how the hell are you going to do that when only $100 was printed???? Where do you find the other $10? Hence in the current fiat system, the debt can NEVER be repaid.
Lincoln’s method was to print $110 dollars. Give you the $100 you need to borrow and spend the other $10 in your local economy. That way you can earn the $110 by conducting your business and deploying your investments in the local economy. When you earn the $110, you pay it back and your debt-free. Ta Da!
I know, where’s the profit for central banks in Lincoln’s crazy method? Hey, here’s a bit of money trivia for y’all. There were a handful of men in our history that have tried to pioneer a debt-free money system or opposed a private central bank: George Washington, Ben Franklin, Andrew Jackson, Abraham Lincoln and John F. Kennedy. All happen to be on our money! Cool, huh?
February 27, 2008 at 11:47 PM #161831Deal HunterParticipantI’m fundamentally not bothered that money is printed out of thin air. What bothers me about monetary policy is that the money is not printed “debt-free.”
Abraham Lincoln printed money out of thin air, but he provided for the borrowed money/credit to be payable in full. For example: You need to borrow $100, so the Fed prints $100 and then charges you 10% interest on the money. This means that you have to come up with $110 dollars. Well, how the hell are you going to do that when only $100 was printed???? Where do you find the other $10? Hence in the current fiat system, the debt can NEVER be repaid.
Lincoln’s method was to print $110 dollars. Give you the $100 you need to borrow and spend the other $10 in your local economy. That way you can earn the $110 by conducting your business and deploying your investments in the local economy. When you earn the $110, you pay it back and your debt-free. Ta Da!
I know, where’s the profit for central banks in Lincoln’s crazy method? Hey, here’s a bit of money trivia for y’all. There were a handful of men in our history that have tried to pioneer a debt-free money system or opposed a private central bank: George Washington, Ben Franklin, Andrew Jackson, Abraham Lincoln and John F. Kennedy. All happen to be on our money! Cool, huh?
February 27, 2008 at 11:47 PM #161850Deal HunterParticipantI’m fundamentally not bothered that money is printed out of thin air. What bothers me about monetary policy is that the money is not printed “debt-free.”
Abraham Lincoln printed money out of thin air, but he provided for the borrowed money/credit to be payable in full. For example: You need to borrow $100, so the Fed prints $100 and then charges you 10% interest on the money. This means that you have to come up with $110 dollars. Well, how the hell are you going to do that when only $100 was printed???? Where do you find the other $10? Hence in the current fiat system, the debt can NEVER be repaid.
Lincoln’s method was to print $110 dollars. Give you the $100 you need to borrow and spend the other $10 in your local economy. That way you can earn the $110 by conducting your business and deploying your investments in the local economy. When you earn the $110, you pay it back and your debt-free. Ta Da!
I know, where’s the profit for central banks in Lincoln’s crazy method? Hey, here’s a bit of money trivia for y’all. There were a handful of men in our history that have tried to pioneer a debt-free money system or opposed a private central bank: George Washington, Ben Franklin, Andrew Jackson, Abraham Lincoln and John F. Kennedy. All happen to be on our money! Cool, huh?
February 27, 2008 at 11:47 PM #161919Deal HunterParticipantI’m fundamentally not bothered that money is printed out of thin air. What bothers me about monetary policy is that the money is not printed “debt-free.”
Abraham Lincoln printed money out of thin air, but he provided for the borrowed money/credit to be payable in full. For example: You need to borrow $100, so the Fed prints $100 and then charges you 10% interest on the money. This means that you have to come up with $110 dollars. Well, how the hell are you going to do that when only $100 was printed???? Where do you find the other $10? Hence in the current fiat system, the debt can NEVER be repaid.
Lincoln’s method was to print $110 dollars. Give you the $100 you need to borrow and spend the other $10 in your local economy. That way you can earn the $110 by conducting your business and deploying your investments in the local economy. When you earn the $110, you pay it back and your debt-free. Ta Da!
I know, where’s the profit for central banks in Lincoln’s crazy method? Hey, here’s a bit of money trivia for y’all. There were a handful of men in our history that have tried to pioneer a debt-free money system or opposed a private central bank: George Washington, Ben Franklin, Andrew Jackson, Abraham Lincoln and John F. Kennedy. All happen to be on our money! Cool, huh?
February 28, 2008 at 12:19 AM #161554greekfireParticipant"I'm fundamentally not bothered that money is printed out of thin air. What bothers me about monetary policy is that the money is not printed "debt-free."
Are you kidding me? Abraham Lincoln printed money out of thin air because he had to fund a (Civil) war that he didn't have the funds in which to conduct without doing so.
The term "debt free" is totally relative.
February 28, 2008 at 12:19 AM #161848greekfireParticipant"I'm fundamentally not bothered that money is printed out of thin air. What bothers me about monetary policy is that the money is not printed "debt-free."
Are you kidding me? Abraham Lincoln printed money out of thin air because he had to fund a (Civil) war that he didn't have the funds in which to conduct without doing so.
The term "debt free" is totally relative.
February 28, 2008 at 12:19 AM #161862greekfireParticipant"I'm fundamentally not bothered that money is printed out of thin air. What bothers me about monetary policy is that the money is not printed "debt-free."
Are you kidding me? Abraham Lincoln printed money out of thin air because he had to fund a (Civil) war that he didn't have the funds in which to conduct without doing so.
The term "debt free" is totally relative.
February 28, 2008 at 12:19 AM #161880greekfireParticipant"I'm fundamentally not bothered that money is printed out of thin air. What bothers me about monetary policy is that the money is not printed "debt-free."
Are you kidding me? Abraham Lincoln printed money out of thin air because he had to fund a (Civil) war that he didn't have the funds in which to conduct without doing so.
The term "debt free" is totally relative.
February 28, 2008 at 12:19 AM #161949greekfireParticipant"I'm fundamentally not bothered that money is printed out of thin air. What bothers me about monetary policy is that the money is not printed "debt-free."
Are you kidding me? Abraham Lincoln printed money out of thin air because he had to fund a (Civil) war that he didn't have the funds in which to conduct without doing so.
The term "debt free" is totally relative.
February 28, 2008 at 12:37 AM #161564Deal HunterParticipantI see your point.
But…. aren’t we in a couple of wars that need a bit of funding now as well??? Is it less bothersome to expand money for Iraq? Is that less irritating than expanding money to fund a collapsing domestic economy?
I guess so.
I don’t see how debt free is a relative term in this case. If I owe you $110 and I give you $110, then I don’t owe you anything anymore. When Guido said, “Lucco Brazi sleeps with the fishes.” They were even, that should have been the end of the movie!
February 28, 2008 at 12:37 AM #161858Deal HunterParticipantI see your point.
But…. aren’t we in a couple of wars that need a bit of funding now as well??? Is it less bothersome to expand money for Iraq? Is that less irritating than expanding money to fund a collapsing domestic economy?
I guess so.
I don’t see how debt free is a relative term in this case. If I owe you $110 and I give you $110, then I don’t owe you anything anymore. When Guido said, “Lucco Brazi sleeps with the fishes.” They were even, that should have been the end of the movie!
February 28, 2008 at 12:37 AM #161873Deal HunterParticipantI see your point.
But…. aren’t we in a couple of wars that need a bit of funding now as well??? Is it less bothersome to expand money for Iraq? Is that less irritating than expanding money to fund a collapsing domestic economy?
I guess so.
I don’t see how debt free is a relative term in this case. If I owe you $110 and I give you $110, then I don’t owe you anything anymore. When Guido said, “Lucco Brazi sleeps with the fishes.” They were even, that should have been the end of the movie!
February 28, 2008 at 12:37 AM #161890Deal HunterParticipantI see your point.
But…. aren’t we in a couple of wars that need a bit of funding now as well??? Is it less bothersome to expand money for Iraq? Is that less irritating than expanding money to fund a collapsing domestic economy?
I guess so.
I don’t see how debt free is a relative term in this case. If I owe you $110 and I give you $110, then I don’t owe you anything anymore. When Guido said, “Lucco Brazi sleeps with the fishes.” They were even, that should have been the end of the movie!
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.