Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Ron Paul: Federal government ‘one giant toxic asset’
- This topic has 95 replies, 10 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 2 months ago by 4plexowner.
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 23, 2009 at 9:18 AM #460703September 23, 2009 at 9:21 AM #461049paramountParticipant
BTW, I was watching Nightline last night and lo and behold who was President Obama’s largest single contributor to his campaign? Goldman Sach’s! Here is a list of his top contributors:
University of California $1,591,395
Goldman Sachs $994,795
Harvard University $854,747
Microsoft Corp $833,617
Google Inc $803,436
Citigroup Inc $701,290
JPMorgan Chase & Co $695,132
Time Warner $590,084
Sidley Austin LLP $588,598
Stanford University $586,557
National Amusements Inc $551,683
UBS AG $543,219
Wilmerhale Llp $542,618
Skadden, Arps et al $530,839
IBM Corp $528,822
Columbia University $528,302
Morgan Stanley $514,881
General Electric $499,130
US Government $494,820
Latham & Watkins $493,835September 23, 2009 at 9:21 AM #460708paramountParticipantBTW, I was watching Nightline last night and lo and behold who was President Obama’s largest single contributor to his campaign? Goldman Sach’s! Here is a list of his top contributors:
University of California $1,591,395
Goldman Sachs $994,795
Harvard University $854,747
Microsoft Corp $833,617
Google Inc $803,436
Citigroup Inc $701,290
JPMorgan Chase & Co $695,132
Time Warner $590,084
Sidley Austin LLP $588,598
Stanford University $586,557
National Amusements Inc $551,683
UBS AG $543,219
Wilmerhale Llp $542,618
Skadden, Arps et al $530,839
IBM Corp $528,822
Columbia University $528,302
Morgan Stanley $514,881
General Electric $499,130
US Government $494,820
Latham & Watkins $493,835September 23, 2009 at 9:21 AM #461121paramountParticipantBTW, I was watching Nightline last night and lo and behold who was President Obama’s largest single contributor to his campaign? Goldman Sach’s! Here is a list of his top contributors:
University of California $1,591,395
Goldman Sachs $994,795
Harvard University $854,747
Microsoft Corp $833,617
Google Inc $803,436
Citigroup Inc $701,290
JPMorgan Chase & Co $695,132
Time Warner $590,084
Sidley Austin LLP $588,598
Stanford University $586,557
National Amusements Inc $551,683
UBS AG $543,219
Wilmerhale Llp $542,618
Skadden, Arps et al $530,839
IBM Corp $528,822
Columbia University $528,302
Morgan Stanley $514,881
General Electric $499,130
US Government $494,820
Latham & Watkins $493,835September 23, 2009 at 9:21 AM #461324paramountParticipantBTW, I was watching Nightline last night and lo and behold who was President Obama’s largest single contributor to his campaign? Goldman Sach’s! Here is a list of his top contributors:
University of California $1,591,395
Goldman Sachs $994,795
Harvard University $854,747
Microsoft Corp $833,617
Google Inc $803,436
Citigroup Inc $701,290
JPMorgan Chase & Co $695,132
Time Warner $590,084
Sidley Austin LLP $588,598
Stanford University $586,557
National Amusements Inc $551,683
UBS AG $543,219
Wilmerhale Llp $542,618
Skadden, Arps et al $530,839
IBM Corp $528,822
Columbia University $528,302
Morgan Stanley $514,881
General Electric $499,130
US Government $494,820
Latham & Watkins $493,835September 23, 2009 at 9:21 AM #460515paramountParticipantBTW, I was watching Nightline last night and lo and behold who was President Obama’s largest single contributor to his campaign? Goldman Sach’s! Here is a list of his top contributors:
University of California $1,591,395
Goldman Sachs $994,795
Harvard University $854,747
Microsoft Corp $833,617
Google Inc $803,436
Citigroup Inc $701,290
JPMorgan Chase & Co $695,132
Time Warner $590,084
Sidley Austin LLP $588,598
Stanford University $586,557
National Amusements Inc $551,683
UBS AG $543,219
Wilmerhale Llp $542,618
Skadden, Arps et al $530,839
IBM Corp $528,822
Columbia University $528,302
Morgan Stanley $514,881
General Electric $499,130
US Government $494,820
Latham & Watkins $493,835September 23, 2009 at 9:27 AM #460713smshorttimerParticipantGoldman has probably given money to lots of politicians. I’m not sure that publishing a list of contributors proves anything in of itself.
September 23, 2009 at 9:27 AM #461125smshorttimerParticipantGoldman has probably given money to lots of politicians. I’m not sure that publishing a list of contributors proves anything in of itself.
September 23, 2009 at 9:27 AM #460520smshorttimerParticipantGoldman has probably given money to lots of politicians. I’m not sure that publishing a list of contributors proves anything in of itself.
September 23, 2009 at 9:27 AM #461329smshorttimerParticipantGoldman has probably given money to lots of politicians. I’m not sure that publishing a list of contributors proves anything in of itself.
September 23, 2009 at 9:27 AM #461054smshorttimerParticipantGoldman has probably given money to lots of politicians. I’m not sure that publishing a list of contributors proves anything in of itself.
September 23, 2009 at 9:47 AM #461074paramountParticipant[quote=smshorttimer]Goldman has probably given money to lots of politicians. I’m not sure that publishing a list of contributors proves anything in of itself.[/quote]
Proof? Perhaps not. On the other hand, has Goldman Sach’s received pretty good or favorable treatment under President Obama?
Let’s see, since the Inauguration Goldman stock is up 211% Wow, that’s impressive!!
Hmmm, I wonder if there might be a connection here…?
September 23, 2009 at 9:47 AM #461349paramountParticipant[quote=smshorttimer]Goldman has probably given money to lots of politicians. I’m not sure that publishing a list of contributors proves anything in of itself.[/quote]
Proof? Perhaps not. On the other hand, has Goldman Sach’s received pretty good or favorable treatment under President Obama?
Let’s see, since the Inauguration Goldman stock is up 211% Wow, that’s impressive!!
Hmmm, I wonder if there might be a connection here…?
September 23, 2009 at 9:47 AM #460733paramountParticipant[quote=smshorttimer]Goldman has probably given money to lots of politicians. I’m not sure that publishing a list of contributors proves anything in of itself.[/quote]
Proof? Perhaps not. On the other hand, has Goldman Sach’s received pretty good or favorable treatment under President Obama?
Let’s see, since the Inauguration Goldman stock is up 211% Wow, that’s impressive!!
Hmmm, I wonder if there might be a connection here…?
September 23, 2009 at 9:47 AM #461145paramountParticipant[quote=smshorttimer]Goldman has probably given money to lots of politicians. I’m not sure that publishing a list of contributors proves anything in of itself.[/quote]
Proof? Perhaps not. On the other hand, has Goldman Sach’s received pretty good or favorable treatment under President Obama?
Let’s see, since the Inauguration Goldman stock is up 211% Wow, that’s impressive!!
Hmmm, I wonder if there might be a connection here…?
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.