- This topic has 3 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 18 years ago by .
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Robert Shiller’s conflict of interest
His name starts with “shill” does it not ?
I didn’t read the article but the way I read that excerpt he was acknowledging that the flip side of irrational exuberance could include some irrational pessimism.
Without irrationality the market wouldn’t distort very far up and it wouldn’t overcorrect too far down. Yet, those peaks and valley are what comprise the long term trendlines.
I wouldn’t say the pessimism right now is irrational, but at whatever point the price structure ventures down into undervalued territory a big factor in that will be irrational pessimism.
I read his new edition of “Irrational Exuberance” recently and what he said in the interview corresponds pretty well to what he said in the book. In the book, he gives a lot of insight on how bubbles form and how they grow. But he concludes that there’s no way of predicting where or when they will form. And there’s no way of predicting when they will pop either. It was a great book with interesting data and analysis. But, ironically, the more you analyze the data, the more you realize how uncertain the future can be. In that sense, I find Shiller’s response to be completely in line with his analysis (i.e. He acknoledges that he doesn’t REALLY know what is going to happen).