Okay I can see that, however wouldn’t you agree that the fundamental problem lies in the consumerism right? Upside down in the house, walk from the house, upside down in the car walk from car. Obviously carrying your strategy to a logical conclusion is that nobody should purchase an asset with borrowed funds correct? Obviously free market valuations will cross the “upside down enough” threshold that you spoke of.
Carrying the strategy further the extension of credit should be eliminated because perpetual appreciation of any asset is impossible right?
i had mentioned this previously but the damned house my wife likes a short sale we made an offer in early december and the house is still vacant and rotting from the rains.
if the family had elected to still be living there how coudl they be characterized as a freeloader rather than a caretaker?
i had mentioned this previously but the damned house my wife likes a short sale we made an offer in early december and the house is still vacant and rotting from the rains.
if the family had elected to still be living there how coudl they be characterized as a freeloader rather than a caretaker?
i had mentioned this previously but the damned house my wife likes a short sale we made an offer in early december and the house is still vacant and rotting from the rains.
if the family had elected to still be living there how coudl they be characterized as a freeloader rather than a caretaker?
i had mentioned this previously but the damned house my wife likes a short sale we made an offer in early december and the house is still vacant and rotting from the rains.
if the family had elected to still be living there how coudl they be characterized as a freeloader rather than a caretaker?
i had mentioned this previously but the damned house my wife likes a short sale we made an offer in early december and the house is still vacant and rotting from the rains.
if the family had elected to still be living there how coudl they be characterized as a freeloader rather than a caretaker?
not sure; i think the key word is a sustainable system. whetehr it’s environmental, finacial…anything that depends on sucking people or things or places dry is no good.
not sure; i think the key word is a sustainable system. whetehr it’s environmental, finacial…anything that depends on sucking people or things or places dry is no good.
not sure; i think the key word is a sustainable system. whetehr it’s environmental, finacial…anything that depends on sucking people or things or places dry is no good.
not sure; i think the key word is a sustainable system. whetehr it’s environmental, finacial…anything that depends on sucking people or things or places dry is no good.
not sure; i think the key word is a sustainable system. whetehr it’s environmental, finacial…anything that depends on sucking people or things or places dry is no good.
the upside down car is different because it has a shrot lfie span and no one sees it as an investment. w e don’t pay an “nvestment premium” to buy a car, indeed, it’s MUCH cheaper than renting to buy. so the upside down car is not liek the upside down house
the upside down car is different because it has a shrot lfie span and no one sees it as an investment. w e don’t pay an “nvestment premium” to buy a car, indeed, it’s MUCH cheaper than renting to buy. so the upside down car is not liek the upside down house
the upside down car is different because it has a shrot lfie span and no one sees it as an investment. w e don’t pay an “nvestment premium” to buy a car, indeed, it’s MUCH cheaper than renting to buy. so the upside down car is not liek the upside down house
the upside down car is different because it has a shrot lfie span and no one sees it as an investment. w e don’t pay an “nvestment premium” to buy a car, indeed, it’s MUCH cheaper than renting to buy. so the upside down car is not liek the upside down house
Author
Posts
Viewing 15 posts - 481 through 495 (of 1,341 total)
.
