- This topic has 1,340 replies, 28 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 7 months ago by Arraya.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 3, 2010 at 9:07 AM #536023April 3, 2010 at 9:12 AM #535080ArrayaParticipant
[quote=SD Realtor]Fantastic advice Arraya that all homeowners should walk away. So what sort of system do you propose? That we all be awarded a home for free?[/quote]
If somebody is upside down sufficiently. Absolutely, I recommend it to everybody I can.
April 3, 2010 at 9:12 AM #535210ArrayaParticipant[quote=SD Realtor]Fantastic advice Arraya that all homeowners should walk away. So what sort of system do you propose? That we all be awarded a home for free?[/quote]
If somebody is upside down sufficiently. Absolutely, I recommend it to everybody I can.
April 3, 2010 at 9:12 AM #535668ArrayaParticipant[quote=SD Realtor]Fantastic advice Arraya that all homeowners should walk away. So what sort of system do you propose? That we all be awarded a home for free?[/quote]
If somebody is upside down sufficiently. Absolutely, I recommend it to everybody I can.
April 3, 2010 at 9:12 AM #535765ArrayaParticipant[quote=SD Realtor]Fantastic advice Arraya that all homeowners should walk away. So what sort of system do you propose? That we all be awarded a home for free?[/quote]
If somebody is upside down sufficiently. Absolutely, I recommend it to everybody I can.
April 3, 2010 at 9:12 AM #536028ArrayaParticipant[quote=SD Realtor]Fantastic advice Arraya that all homeowners should walk away. So what sort of system do you propose? That we all be awarded a home for free?[/quote]
If somebody is upside down sufficiently. Absolutely, I recommend it to everybody I can.
April 3, 2010 at 9:44 AM #535095scaredyclassicParticipantwow. it’s difficult to fathom how we got here.
I compare this to BUY NOTHING DAY.
it’s a day of protest against consumer culture. t he idea is to buy nothing.
maybe there should be a comparable housing protest.
April 3, 2010 at 9:44 AM #535224scaredyclassicParticipantwow. it’s difficult to fathom how we got here.
I compare this to BUY NOTHING DAY.
it’s a day of protest against consumer culture. t he idea is to buy nothing.
maybe there should be a comparable housing protest.
April 3, 2010 at 9:44 AM #535683scaredyclassicParticipantwow. it’s difficult to fathom how we got here.
I compare this to BUY NOTHING DAY.
it’s a day of protest against consumer culture. t he idea is to buy nothing.
maybe there should be a comparable housing protest.
April 3, 2010 at 9:44 AM #535779scaredyclassicParticipantwow. it’s difficult to fathom how we got here.
I compare this to BUY NOTHING DAY.
it’s a day of protest against consumer culture. t he idea is to buy nothing.
maybe there should be a comparable housing protest.
April 3, 2010 at 9:44 AM #536043scaredyclassicParticipantwow. it’s difficult to fathom how we got here.
I compare this to BUY NOTHING DAY.
it’s a day of protest against consumer culture. t he idea is to buy nothing.
maybe there should be a comparable housing protest.
April 3, 2010 at 9:46 AM #535100SD RealtorParticipantOkay I can see that, however wouldn’t you agree that the fundamental problem lies in the consumerism right? Upside down in the house, walk from the house, upside down in the car walk from car. Obviously carrying your strategy to a logical conclusion is that nobody should purchase an asset with borrowed funds correct? Obviously free market valuations will cross the “upside down enough” threshold that you spoke of.
Carrying the strategy further the extension of credit should be eliminated because perpetual appreciation of any asset is impossible right?
April 3, 2010 at 9:46 AM #535229SD RealtorParticipantOkay I can see that, however wouldn’t you agree that the fundamental problem lies in the consumerism right? Upside down in the house, walk from the house, upside down in the car walk from car. Obviously carrying your strategy to a logical conclusion is that nobody should purchase an asset with borrowed funds correct? Obviously free market valuations will cross the “upside down enough” threshold that you spoke of.
Carrying the strategy further the extension of credit should be eliminated because perpetual appreciation of any asset is impossible right?
April 3, 2010 at 9:46 AM #535688SD RealtorParticipantOkay I can see that, however wouldn’t you agree that the fundamental problem lies in the consumerism right? Upside down in the house, walk from the house, upside down in the car walk from car. Obviously carrying your strategy to a logical conclusion is that nobody should purchase an asset with borrowed funds correct? Obviously free market valuations will cross the “upside down enough” threshold that you spoke of.
Carrying the strategy further the extension of credit should be eliminated because perpetual appreciation of any asset is impossible right?
April 3, 2010 at 9:46 AM #535784SD RealtorParticipantOkay I can see that, however wouldn’t you agree that the fundamental problem lies in the consumerism right? Upside down in the house, walk from the house, upside down in the car walk from car. Obviously carrying your strategy to a logical conclusion is that nobody should purchase an asset with borrowed funds correct? Obviously free market valuations will cross the “upside down enough” threshold that you spoke of.
Carrying the strategy further the extension of credit should be eliminated because perpetual appreciation of any asset is impossible right?
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.