- This topic has 1,340 replies, 28 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 7 months ago by
Arraya.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 3, 2010 at 9:07 AM #536023April 3, 2010 at 9:12 AM #535080
Arraya
Participant[quote=SD Realtor]Fantastic advice Arraya that all homeowners should walk away. So what sort of system do you propose? That we all be awarded a home for free?[/quote]
If somebody is upside down sufficiently. Absolutely, I recommend it to everybody I can.
April 3, 2010 at 9:12 AM #535210Arraya
Participant[quote=SD Realtor]Fantastic advice Arraya that all homeowners should walk away. So what sort of system do you propose? That we all be awarded a home for free?[/quote]
If somebody is upside down sufficiently. Absolutely, I recommend it to everybody I can.
April 3, 2010 at 9:12 AM #535668Arraya
Participant[quote=SD Realtor]Fantastic advice Arraya that all homeowners should walk away. So what sort of system do you propose? That we all be awarded a home for free?[/quote]
If somebody is upside down sufficiently. Absolutely, I recommend it to everybody I can.
April 3, 2010 at 9:12 AM #535765Arraya
Participant[quote=SD Realtor]Fantastic advice Arraya that all homeowners should walk away. So what sort of system do you propose? That we all be awarded a home for free?[/quote]
If somebody is upside down sufficiently. Absolutely, I recommend it to everybody I can.
April 3, 2010 at 9:12 AM #536028Arraya
Participant[quote=SD Realtor]Fantastic advice Arraya that all homeowners should walk away. So what sort of system do you propose? That we all be awarded a home for free?[/quote]
If somebody is upside down sufficiently. Absolutely, I recommend it to everybody I can.
April 3, 2010 at 9:44 AM #535095scaredyclassic
Participantwow. it’s difficult to fathom how we got here.
I compare this to BUY NOTHING DAY.
it’s a day of protest against consumer culture. t he idea is to buy nothing.
maybe there should be a comparable housing protest.
April 3, 2010 at 9:44 AM #535224scaredyclassic
Participantwow. it’s difficult to fathom how we got here.
I compare this to BUY NOTHING DAY.
it’s a day of protest against consumer culture. t he idea is to buy nothing.
maybe there should be a comparable housing protest.
April 3, 2010 at 9:44 AM #535683scaredyclassic
Participantwow. it’s difficult to fathom how we got here.
I compare this to BUY NOTHING DAY.
it’s a day of protest against consumer culture. t he idea is to buy nothing.
maybe there should be a comparable housing protest.
April 3, 2010 at 9:44 AM #535779scaredyclassic
Participantwow. it’s difficult to fathom how we got here.
I compare this to BUY NOTHING DAY.
it’s a day of protest against consumer culture. t he idea is to buy nothing.
maybe there should be a comparable housing protest.
April 3, 2010 at 9:44 AM #536043scaredyclassic
Participantwow. it’s difficult to fathom how we got here.
I compare this to BUY NOTHING DAY.
it’s a day of protest against consumer culture. t he idea is to buy nothing.
maybe there should be a comparable housing protest.
April 3, 2010 at 9:46 AM #535100SD Realtor
ParticipantOkay I can see that, however wouldn’t you agree that the fundamental problem lies in the consumerism right? Upside down in the house, walk from the house, upside down in the car walk from car. Obviously carrying your strategy to a logical conclusion is that nobody should purchase an asset with borrowed funds correct? Obviously free market valuations will cross the “upside down enough” threshold that you spoke of.
Carrying the strategy further the extension of credit should be eliminated because perpetual appreciation of any asset is impossible right?
April 3, 2010 at 9:46 AM #535229SD Realtor
ParticipantOkay I can see that, however wouldn’t you agree that the fundamental problem lies in the consumerism right? Upside down in the house, walk from the house, upside down in the car walk from car. Obviously carrying your strategy to a logical conclusion is that nobody should purchase an asset with borrowed funds correct? Obviously free market valuations will cross the “upside down enough” threshold that you spoke of.
Carrying the strategy further the extension of credit should be eliminated because perpetual appreciation of any asset is impossible right?
April 3, 2010 at 9:46 AM #535688SD Realtor
ParticipantOkay I can see that, however wouldn’t you agree that the fundamental problem lies in the consumerism right? Upside down in the house, walk from the house, upside down in the car walk from car. Obviously carrying your strategy to a logical conclusion is that nobody should purchase an asset with borrowed funds correct? Obviously free market valuations will cross the “upside down enough” threshold that you spoke of.
Carrying the strategy further the extension of credit should be eliminated because perpetual appreciation of any asset is impossible right?
April 3, 2010 at 9:46 AM #535784SD Realtor
ParticipantOkay I can see that, however wouldn’t you agree that the fundamental problem lies in the consumerism right? Upside down in the house, walk from the house, upside down in the car walk from car. Obviously carrying your strategy to a logical conclusion is that nobody should purchase an asset with borrowed funds correct? Obviously free market valuations will cross the “upside down enough” threshold that you spoke of.
Carrying the strategy further the extension of credit should be eliminated because perpetual appreciation of any asset is impossible right?
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
