- This topic has 70 replies, 6 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 1 month ago by donaldduckmoore.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 5, 2008 at 6:58 AM #299301November 5, 2008 at 7:10 AM #299670urbanrealtorParticipant
Here is the reassessment form.
http://arcc.co.san-diego.ca.us/docs/calrev.pdf
In my experience (and I have helped several dozen clients and friends fill these forms out) the assessor does not differentiate between land and building value unless the property is on where the land has a major value other than existing housing (eg: a farm or a vacant lot).
It may have more relevance in other contexts but the question was with regard to the reassessment.
If you send me the address (urbanrealtor (at) gmail) or post it here I will send you the current values and the most favorable comps. The whole lookup process takes me about 5 minutes I will even drop it off at the county office if you fax or email it to me. I go there a lot. I don’t charge for that.
Typically, as econprof mentioned, they like comps that are more recent. In my experience, no comps more than 6 months old should be considered.
November 5, 2008 at 7:10 AM #299681urbanrealtorParticipantHere is the reassessment form.
http://arcc.co.san-diego.ca.us/docs/calrev.pdf
In my experience (and I have helped several dozen clients and friends fill these forms out) the assessor does not differentiate between land and building value unless the property is on where the land has a major value other than existing housing (eg: a farm or a vacant lot).
It may have more relevance in other contexts but the question was with regard to the reassessment.
If you send me the address (urbanrealtor (at) gmail) or post it here I will send you the current values and the most favorable comps. The whole lookup process takes me about 5 minutes I will even drop it off at the county office if you fax or email it to me. I go there a lot. I don’t charge for that.
Typically, as econprof mentioned, they like comps that are more recent. In my experience, no comps more than 6 months old should be considered.
November 5, 2008 at 7:10 AM #299694urbanrealtorParticipantHere is the reassessment form.
http://arcc.co.san-diego.ca.us/docs/calrev.pdf
In my experience (and I have helped several dozen clients and friends fill these forms out) the assessor does not differentiate between land and building value unless the property is on where the land has a major value other than existing housing (eg: a farm or a vacant lot).
It may have more relevance in other contexts but the question was with regard to the reassessment.
If you send me the address (urbanrealtor (at) gmail) or post it here I will send you the current values and the most favorable comps. The whole lookup process takes me about 5 minutes I will even drop it off at the county office if you fax or email it to me. I go there a lot. I don’t charge for that.
Typically, as econprof mentioned, they like comps that are more recent. In my experience, no comps more than 6 months old should be considered.
November 5, 2008 at 7:10 AM #299316urbanrealtorParticipantHere is the reassessment form.
http://arcc.co.san-diego.ca.us/docs/calrev.pdf
In my experience (and I have helped several dozen clients and friends fill these forms out) the assessor does not differentiate between land and building value unless the property is on where the land has a major value other than existing housing (eg: a farm or a vacant lot).
It may have more relevance in other contexts but the question was with regard to the reassessment.
If you send me the address (urbanrealtor (at) gmail) or post it here I will send you the current values and the most favorable comps. The whole lookup process takes me about 5 minutes I will even drop it off at the county office if you fax or email it to me. I go there a lot. I don’t charge for that.
Typically, as econprof mentioned, they like comps that are more recent. In my experience, no comps more than 6 months old should be considered.
November 5, 2008 at 7:10 AM #299743urbanrealtorParticipantHere is the reassessment form.
http://arcc.co.san-diego.ca.us/docs/calrev.pdf
In my experience (and I have helped several dozen clients and friends fill these forms out) the assessor does not differentiate between land and building value unless the property is on where the land has a major value other than existing housing (eg: a farm or a vacant lot).
It may have more relevance in other contexts but the question was with regard to the reassessment.
If you send me the address (urbanrealtor (at) gmail) or post it here I will send you the current values and the most favorable comps. The whole lookup process takes me about 5 minutes I will even drop it off at the county office if you fax or email it to me. I go there a lot. I don’t charge for that.
Typically, as econprof mentioned, they like comps that are more recent. In my experience, no comps more than 6 months old should be considered.
November 5, 2008 at 8:22 AM #299813EconProfParticipantAccording to the folks at the relevant county office, the value as of last January is what counts, plus or minus 3 months. The language of the forms used stresses this.
This is understandable, since values have fallen at least 10% since January for most areas. The Assessor naturally wants to not be too generous in lowering assessed values, so will stick to their rules.
I found the clerks at the County Administration Building to be very helpful and courteous, by the way. That may not last, as they are about to get a tsunami of appeals. They are already way behind on processing their current backlog.November 5, 2008 at 8:22 AM #299386EconProfParticipantAccording to the folks at the relevant county office, the value as of last January is what counts, plus or minus 3 months. The language of the forms used stresses this.
This is understandable, since values have fallen at least 10% since January for most areas. The Assessor naturally wants to not be too generous in lowering assessed values, so will stick to their rules.
I found the clerks at the County Administration Building to be very helpful and courteous, by the way. That may not last, as they are about to get a tsunami of appeals. They are already way behind on processing their current backlog.November 5, 2008 at 8:22 AM #299741EconProfParticipantAccording to the folks at the relevant county office, the value as of last January is what counts, plus or minus 3 months. The language of the forms used stresses this.
This is understandable, since values have fallen at least 10% since January for most areas. The Assessor naturally wants to not be too generous in lowering assessed values, so will stick to their rules.
I found the clerks at the County Administration Building to be very helpful and courteous, by the way. That may not last, as they are about to get a tsunami of appeals. They are already way behind on processing their current backlog.November 5, 2008 at 8:22 AM #299750EconProfParticipantAccording to the folks at the relevant county office, the value as of last January is what counts, plus or minus 3 months. The language of the forms used stresses this.
This is understandable, since values have fallen at least 10% since January for most areas. The Assessor naturally wants to not be too generous in lowering assessed values, so will stick to their rules.
I found the clerks at the County Administration Building to be very helpful and courteous, by the way. That may not last, as they are about to get a tsunami of appeals. They are already way behind on processing their current backlog.November 5, 2008 at 8:22 AM #299766EconProfParticipantAccording to the folks at the relevant county office, the value as of last January is what counts, plus or minus 3 months. The language of the forms used stresses this.
This is understandable, since values have fallen at least 10% since January for most areas. The Assessor naturally wants to not be too generous in lowering assessed values, so will stick to their rules.
I found the clerks at the County Administration Building to be very helpful and courteous, by the way. That may not last, as they are about to get a tsunami of appeals. They are already way behind on processing their current backlog.November 5, 2008 at 8:28 AM #299823peterbParticipantDoes anyone know how fast they are processing these appeals right now? Something tell me they wont be too eager to calculate less revenue in the future.
November 5, 2008 at 8:28 AM #299776peterbParticipantDoes anyone know how fast they are processing these appeals right now? Something tell me they wont be too eager to calculate less revenue in the future.
November 5, 2008 at 8:28 AM #299760peterbParticipantDoes anyone know how fast they are processing these appeals right now? Something tell me they wont be too eager to calculate less revenue in the future.
November 5, 2008 at 8:28 AM #299749peterbParticipantDoes anyone know how fast they are processing these appeals right now? Something tell me they wont be too eager to calculate less revenue in the future.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.