Reasons I cannot vote for Trump

[svelte]

[quote=FlyerInHi]On women voters that Trump needs to win over… i wonder if women vote like their husbands or it is the other way around?

What are your experiences, married guys and gals?

For me, I wouldn’t want to have sex with someone i fundamentally disagreed with.[/quote]

Just found this.

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/dr-raj-persaud/voting-habits_b_7182488.html

[no_such_reality]

[quote=svelte]As SK and I said prior, Trump’s words were not locker room talk:

http://www.cnn.com/2016/10/10/politics/locker-room-talk-athletes-respond-trnd/index.html

And Trump has admitted he lies. Either he lied on the bus to Billy Bush, or he lied in last night’s debate when he said he didn’t do the things he said to Billy Bush. Take your pic – either path leads to a lie.[/quote]

It’s just public and private positions. 😉

Don’t waste your vote, vote third party.

[enron_by_the_sea]

[quote=no_such_reality]

Don’t waste your vote, vote third party.[/quote]

Vote for third party or not voting is also the same as voting for Donald or Hillary. You just chose to let others make that choice for you.

[SK in CV]

[quote=AN]Does it really matter what she say? She said so herself that she has a private and public position. What you hear might not be what the private bankers hear.[/quote]

She didn’t say anywhere in that line the two were different or inconsistent with each other. As she said last night, one is used to convince the masses, and another is used to convince those she meets with in small rooms. Her goal remains the same, to get the deal done.

There doesn’t appear to be anything in Clinton’s current plan to do away with stepped up basis.

[no_such_reality]

[quote=enron_by_the_sea][quote=no_such_reality]

Don’t waste your vote, vote third party.[/quote]

Vote for third party or not voting is also the same as voting for Donald or Hillary. You just chose to let others make that choice for you.[/quote]

This is California, your choice is completely irrelevant so instead of being a lemming and letting the two part system take you for granted, make your voice heard.

Or not, and in a 2024, you’ll look back thinking how good these two choices were.

[no_such_reality]

[quote=SK in CV][quote=AN]Does it really matter what she say? She said so herself that she has a private and public position. What you hear might not be what the private bankers hear.[/quote]

She didn’t say anywhere in that line the two were different or inconsistent with each other. As she said last night, one is used to convince the masses, and another is used to convince those she meets with in small rooms. Her goal remains the same, to get the deal done.

There doesn’t appear to be anything in Clinton’s current plan to do away with stepped up basis.[/quote]

Wow you really swallow the spin.

[scaredyclassic]

i wouldnt have sex with anyone who agreed with me.

my wife us cancellibg out all my votes this year. we are basically a wash.

[Anonymous]

[quote=SK in CV]She didn’t say anywhere in that line the two were different or inconsistent with each other. As she said last night, one is used to convince the masses, and another is used to convince those she meets with in small rooms. Her goal remains the same, to get the deal done. [/quote]

That’s what Romney was doing when he got caught making the “47%” speech.

It would be nice if the deal that any candidate were trying to get done was the same regardless of whether they were addressing the public vs. potential donors. But there’s a lot of things in this world that would be nice if they existed…

[scaredyclassic]

does a real estate broker speak in the same tone to her client as to the other side?

might one talk about grabbing pussy with friends in private yet not in a public forum?

[FlyerInHi]

Yes there is talk for the public.

The debate showed that the audience is low information, low education.

For example, we didn’t give Iran any money. It’s their money. We are not losing any money to China; we are getting goods in return. Hillary has not been in power for 30 years. And a senator cannot single handledly change the tax laws. Low education folks will repeat stupid shit like that; and when you correct them, they get offended.

[flu]

http://money.cnn.com/2016/10/10/news/companies/trump-taj-mahal-closed/index.html?iid=hp-stack-domhp-stack-do

Got to love Trump’s business acumen in running a profitable business….NOT….

[an]

[quote=no_such_reality][quote=enron_by_the_sea][quote=no_such_reality]

Don’t waste your vote, vote third party.[/quote]

Vote for third party or not voting is also the same as voting for Donald or Hillary. You just chose to let others make that choice for you.[/quote]

This is California, your choice is completely irrelevant so instead of being a lemming and letting the two part system take you for granted, make your voice heard.

Or not, and in a 2024, you’ll look back thinking how good these two choices were.[/quote] exactly. CA is deep blue, so it doesn’t really matter. But at least you can say you voted for who you really want.

[an]

[quote=no_such_reality][quote=SK in CV][quote=AN]Does it really matter what she say? She said so herself that she has a private and public position. What you hear might not be what the private bankers hear.[/quote]

She didn’t say anywhere in that line the two were different or inconsistent with each other. As she said last night, one is used to convince the masses, and another is used to convince those she meets with in small rooms. Her goal remains the same, to get the deal done.

There doesn’t appear to be anything in Clinton’s current plan to do away with stepped up basis.[/quote]

Wow you really swallow the spin.[/quote]lol. Like I said before, some of her supporters are just as blindly devoted as his. It’s kinda sad watching from the outside. They have no idea why majority of American don’t trust their candidate.

[SK in CV]

[quote=AN][quote=no_such_reality][quote=SK in CV][quote=AN]Does it really matter what she say? She said so herself that she has a private and public position. What you hear might not be what the private bankers hear.[/quote]

She didn’t say anywhere in that line the two were different or inconsistent with each other. As she said last night, one is used to convince the masses, and another is used to convince those she meets with in small rooms. Her goal remains the same, to get the deal done.

There doesn’t appear to be anything in Clinton’s current plan to do away with stepped up basis.[/quote]

Wow you really swallow the spin.[/quote]lol. Like I said before, some of her supporters are just as blindly devoted as his. It’s kinda sad watching from the outside. They have no idea why majority of American don’t trust their candidate.[/quote]

Why don’t you trust her? You think there was something wrong with her foundation? There wasn’t. Not even any accusations that make sense. Nothing. You think there was something wrong with her email? The two prior SOS used aol and gmail for their government email and deleted every single one of them. Never turned a single one over, not even the top secret ones. And the head of the FBI acknowledged there was not a single email on her server that was correctly marked classified and that there was no evidence it was ever hacked. Got a problem with her with Benghazi? Eight different investigations by Republicans cleared her of any wrong doing. I’ll tell you why the majority of Americans don’t trust her. Because Republicans have been running a smear campaign, first against her husband and then against her for more than 30 years. Never convicted of a crime, but dozens of books about her, including lists of the people she “murdered”. Never even charged with a crime, but the Republican nominee is ready to “lock her up” the day he is inaugurated. That shit gets old. And eventually people are convinced where there is smoke, there must be fire. But there isn’t. If there was, something would have been found on her. It never has been. Never. Not a thing.

So I’ll ask you one more time. Why don’t you trust her?

[an]

[quote=SK in CV]Why don’t you trust her? You think there was something wrong with her foundation? There wasn’t. Not even any accusations that make sense. Nothing. You think there was something wrong with her email? The two prior SOS used aol and gmail for their government email and deleted every single one of them. Never turned a single one over, not even the top secret ones. And the head of the FBI acknowledged there was not a single email on her server that was correctly marked classified and that there was no evidence it was ever hacked. Got a problem with her with Benghazi? Eight different investigations by Republicans cleared her of any wrong doing. I’ll tell you why the majority of Americans don’t trust her. Because Republicans have been running a smear campaign, first against her husband and then against her for more than 30 years. Never convicted of a crime, but dozens of books about her, including lists of the people she “murdered”. Never even charged with a crime, but the Republican nominee is ready to “lock her up” the day he is inaugurated. That shit gets old. And eventually people are convinced where there is smoke, there must be fire. But there isn’t. If there was, something would have been found on her. It never has been. Never. Not a thing.

So I’ll ask you one more time. Why don’t you trust her?[/quote]I can go point by point, but I’m sure you will ignore them all and don’t actually care. I’ll just summarize by paraphrasing what she said in her speech. She has a public position and a private position. What she say to get elected and what she intended to do can be two very different thing. So, how can I trust her when I don’t know when she’s telling the truth?

Anyways, I’ll let you enjoy your Kool-Aid, I just don’t want any part of it. There’s really no point in debating further. Just enjoy the fact that she probably would win the presidency.

[Author]

Posts