Reasons I cannot vote for Trump

[FlyerInHi]

Just to list a few changes:

Obama has improved the lives of millions of people. If you’re a freelance writer or a tattoo artist, or a waiter in a mom and pop restaurant, you now have health insurance.

If you’re Cuban American, you can now freely visit your relatives in Cuba and invest in Cuba. If you’re just plain American, you can travel more easily to Cuba. Your world has broadened.

Criminal reform is starting to treat drug offenders more kindly so your kids don’t rot in jail for small offenses.

Gays can get married thoughout the land. And even before the Supreme Court decision, legalizing gay marriage nationwide, Obama allowed gays to sponsor their foreign spouses and fully recognized marriage equality at the federal level.

Employees of federal contractors enjoy higher minimum wages.

This is off the top of my head… Oh let’s not forget millions of children and adults under DACA and DAPA

20,000 Syrian refugees to be offered asylum.

These pretty much would not have happened under a Republican president.

[FlyerInHi]

Trump will be negatively affecting Republicans down ballot. Democrats will likely regain the senate.

Arizona is turning more Hispanic, just like Nevada, so John McCain is in danger.

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/trump-latinos-mccain-222810

[an]

[quote=FlyerInHi]Trump will be negatively affecting Republicans down ballot. Democrats will likely regain the senate.

Arizona is turning more Hispanic, just like Nevada, so John McCain is in danger.

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/trump-latinos-mccain-222810%5B/quote%5D
I can’t speak for everyone, but I’m definitely one data point to contribute to this statement. I’ve been voting R or L for a long while. I’m going through and asking all Republicans whether they endorse Trump now. If they say yes, I’ll vote for someone else, even if that someone else has a D in front of their name.
Luckily, Faulkner does not endorse Trump.

[livinincali]

[quote=enron_by_the_sea]
So if I were you, I would be very worried about Trump’s first statement that he will renegotiate US debt when economy goes bad. Then two days later he basically says he will inflate his way out of debt. If the treasury markets starts believing such rhetoric (they are not believing it yet), the interest rates will go up fast and there goes all the real estate/stock/bond values.
[/quote]

Isn’t this eventually going to happen no matter who is president. It’s painfully obvious that we aren’t paying all the US debt back in full without inflating it away or defaulting on it. The only real alternative to not doing either one of those things is dramatically reducing medical care/military spending and running a budget surplus, but we just aren’t going to do either of those things with the status quo politicians. I wouldn’t worry to much about Trump telling us the truth of the economic debt situation. There’s an asset price/debt reset coming we just don’t know when it’s going to happen.

[livinincali]

[quote=AN]
I can’t speak for everyone, but I’m definitely one data point to contribute to this statement. I’ve been voting R or L for a long while. I’m going through and asking all Republicans whether they endorse Trump now. If they say yes, I’ll vote for someone else, even if that someone else has a D in front of their name.
Luckily, Faulkner does not endorse Trump.[/quote]

We live in CA it really doesn’t matter that much. Maybe at the local level or if a republican held the 52nd district.

[FlyerInHi]

[quote=livinincali] There’s an asset price/debt reset coming we just don’t know when it’s going to happen.[/quote]

I will happen because of demographics, not debt. When population decreases, housing prices will no longer increase.

I would worry about Japan, China later on. But big American cities will do fine as long as we attract immigrants, domestic and foreign. People who live in SF, LA,…. And own property they can afford will do well. They will see better appreciation than small town America where population is decreasing. Columbus, Indianapolis… University towns will be OK. Former company towns will suffer. Tourist towns like Charleston, SC will be ok.

A globalized world attracts people to big cities.

Trump has laid bare the concept of winners and losers, so let’s not feel guilty adopting it. I won’t cry for you middle America if you lose with Trump ideology.

[an]

[quote=livinincali]We live in CA it really doesn’t matter that much. Maybe at the local level or if a republican held the 52nd district.[/quote]You’re right, it probably doesn’t matter that much. However, I just want to make sure, just in case a Republican somehow was able to give Peters a run for his money.

[flyer]

Regardless of prior political achievements by either party, I think most voters just want to know if they and their children will be able to afford to live out the rest of their lives in a comfortable way–will they be able to afford their homes?–can they afford healthcare?–will they be able to retire? etc., etc., and it’s not looking good.

Although a small percentage of Americans at the top are acquiring more wealth, stats reveal that more and more people are drifting downward financially and losing ground–not just those in the middle class–especially as more and more of the population approaches their 50’s and loses their earning power for whatever reasons–so, imo, watching how those stats change for better or worse in the coming years will clearly tell us everything we need to know about the true power of either party. Because, if you can’t change what matters
most–what’s the point?

[bearishgurl]

[quote=flyer]We all have different ideas about what constitutes great political decisions/achievements historically, and, although I don’t want to argue those points, suffice it to say that, a thinking person realizes there have been pros and cons to each and every one of them. Then, of course, some would say the pros outweigh the cons, but, that again, would also be a matter of opinion.

That said, even though neither I, my family, anyone we know, nor, I’m guessing, most Piggs, will be noticeably affected by whomever is elected President (until now, we’ve always voted for the candidate we felt represented the lesser of the evils) and really never have been, it is still difficult to watch the diabolical manipulation of voters being exhibited by the candidates on both sides. (Frankly, they all look and sound insane to me every time they speak.) . . . [/quote]

[quote=flyer]I was focused and speaking from a financial/economic perspective–since that seems to be the emphasis of the empty rhetoric we are enduring from both sides–and the way candidates are reeling in desperate voters. Although my statement was clear in my mind, I can understand how it may have seemed a broad generalization with unintended inferences . . . I think most voters just want to know if they and their children will be able to afford to live out the rest of their lives in a comfortable way–will they be able to afford their homes?–can they afford healthcare?–will they be able to retire? etc., etc., and it’s not looking good.

Although a small percentage of Americans at the top are acquiring more wealth, stats reveal that more and more people are drifting downward financially and losing ground–not just those in the middle class–especially as more and more of the population approaches their 50’s and loses their earning power for whatever reasons–so, imo, watching how those stats change for better or worse in the coming years will clearly tell us everything we need to know about the true power of either party. Because, if you can’t change what matters most–what’s the point?[/quote]

flyer, by your recent posts, you sound a bit apathetic to me. My main question is, do you plan on voting in the general election this year, and if so, will you vote for one of the “presumptive nominees” or will you cast a “protest vote” for president for an American Independent, Libertarian, Peace and Freedom or Green Party candidate? I’m not asking “who?” …. only if you plan on voting for POTUS in this year’s general election.

Do you not feel that Trump will be able to bring back living wage jobs to US soil? What are YOUR thoughts on what should be done about the ACA, if anything? And do you think CA coastal-dwelling millenials should all have the “home of their dreams” for their first home or should they be okay with buying a “starter home” for their first home … like the vast majority of their parents did (the boomers)?

And what are your views on age discrimination? Do you think it can be corrected with heavy-handed enforcement (via stronger language in EEOC, FEHA laws) looming over employer’s heads (i.e. having a “quota” of “over-50” employees for different-sized businesses when most of them would rather have none, regardless of the superior knowledge talent, experience, work ethic, punctuality and attendance of the over-50 former-worker set). How do you feel businesses can legally be compel to hire older workers when the vast majority of them don’t want any in their employ? Certainly, even a part-time job working in a field most of their experience was in would help a lot of retired and semi-retired people make ends meet or at the very least, make them a little more secure with a little extra to travel with, etc.

I see that a lot of people are finally hopeful this year (NO, I don’t believe for a minute that Americans think of POTUS candidates as their “saviors”). I believe that every vote can make a small difference … YES, even in (seemingly) “sewed up” CA. Certainly, you must be aware that it’s never, ever over until the “fat lady” sings at least 4 encores. Meanwhile, if you’re “enjoying the show,” more power to ya. In the end, one of the POTUS candidates will take the helm and we will ALL have to live with it :=]

[bearishgurl]

If “boomers” comprise >20% of the US population, shouldn’t they occupy ~20% of the available jobs in the US? I mean, if a 68 or 69 (soon to be 70) year-old (the oldest boomers) are qualified to occupy the nation’s highest office, shouldn’t their “brethren” be “qualified” to occupy ~20% of ALL FT and PT jobs available …. that is, if they want or need to work?

Age discrimination in the workplace (and the horribly failed ACA) are the primary reasons why many boomers may not be able to last (financially) into old age in full retirement, IMO. In many cases, the boomers are fitter and healthier than the millenials and, to a lesser extent, Gen X and certainly able-bodied enough to work …. at least part-time.

[FlyerInHi]

[quote=flyer]Regardless of prior political achievements by either party, I think most voters just want to know if they and their children will be able to afford to live out the rest of their lives in a comfortable way–will they be able to afford their homes?–can they afford healthcare?–will they be able to retire? etc., etc., and it’s not looking good.

Although a small percentage of Americans at the top are acquiring more wealth, stats reveal that more and more people are drifting downward financially and losing ground–not just those in the middle class–especially as more and more of the population approaches their 50’s and loses their earning power for whatever reasons–so, imo, watching how those stats change for better or worse in the coming years will clearly tell us everything we need to know about the true power of either party. Because, if you can’t change what matters
most–what’s the point?[/quote]

I see that too. But supporting trump is wrong.

I know some people who are solidly middle class. Unfortunately their adult kids are adrift. They need cars, houses, health care. The grandkids need child care which is barely adorable. It’s hard in california because they can’t afford to gift down payments to their kids.
I feel for those people…. But looking at them as random voters I really want to say “Hey buddy, you’re a republican. All those years, you supported Randian policies. If your kids didn’t succeed it’s because you didn’t raise them right and you screwed up. Trump can’t do anything for you. Stop bitching and get a second job.. Loser! Trump would say.”

[joec]

[quote=FlyerInHi][quote=flyer]Regardless of prior political achievements by either party, I think most voters just want to know if they and their children will be able to afford to live out the rest of their lives in a comfortable way–will they be able to afford their homes?–can they afford healthcare?–will they be able to retire? etc., etc., and it’s not looking good.

Although a small percentage of Americans at the top are acquiring more wealth, stats reveal that more and more people are drifting downward financially and losing ground–not just those in the middle class–especially as more and more of the population approaches their 50’s and loses their earning power for whatever reasons–so, imo, watching how those stats change for better or worse in the coming years will clearly tell us everything we need to know about the true power of either party. Because, if you can’t change what matters
most–what’s the point?[/quote]

I see that too. But supporting trump is wrong.

I know some people who are solidly middle class. Unfortunately their adult kids are adrift. They need cars, houses, health care. The grandkids need child care which is barely adorable. It’s hard in california because they can’t afford to gift down payments to their kids.
I feel for those people…. But looking at them as random voters I really want to say “Hey buddy, you’re a republican. All those years, you supported Randian policies. If your kids didn’t succeed it’s because you didn’t raise them right and you screwed up. Trump can’t do anything for you. Stop bitching and get a second job.. Loser! Trump would say.”[/quote]

I agree that most people just spend and waste too much money, but since you aren’t a parent, I really think you have no clue what it is all about when you have kids and a family. Being single and managing yourself is easy. With a wife, becomes slightly harder, with kids, everything is out the window and most of your life is trying to do them the best you can.

This is all open for display when you write most anything that I read here…

As someone knowing other parents having kids who are having tough times at school now where kids are medically getting sick trying to compete, I think our problem is that EVERYONE is worried what the future holds. As it has been reported many times, I believe the trend of the standard of living will go down for most of the next generation. This is due to major problems with high educational expenses (and you might not even get a job) and healthcare. With the credits, it should help, but it can still be pricey if you aren’t super poor.

Also, given 100 people, not everyone will succeed and depending on the competition, your kid might not be the smartest/or most athletic. Since it’s not you, you can blame yourself for your failures, but if your kid fails, all the blame or pressure may have him or her just kill themselves so what do you have now?

The sad reality I think coming and why you read about high suicide rates with even wealthy/top performing areas (Palo Alto) is that everyone is stressed and concerned if they will even get to college or get a job…

For people living in life in Silicon Valley in a tech job, if that implodes, good luck trying to pay your 6k/month shared 2 bedroom apartment also.

At the end of the day, most people have very little control (like if you graduate at a poor time, it has been proven that most people NEVER catch up in wages/jobs, etc…).

Just pray you get lucky some day and best advice is don’t have kids (look at all the industrialized modern nations) until you can really afford it.

[scaredyclassic]

The Show RAISING HOPE, which my kid watches incessantly, is about happiness with lowered expectations. Son with kid lives with parents who live all together in demented great gramma’s house and watch her.. It’s a wildly funny comedy about Americans happy in relative poverty because, well, they’re close.

Tonight we had potatoes and also PBJ, not due to financial constraints, just how it played out…was fun…

[NotCranky]

Maybe it shouldn’t be illegal to keep your kids out of school anymore. We could something useful with them.

[flyer]

I realize not everyone shares my opinions, as I do not share theirs, but I do think it’s very interesting to read what others think.

BG, we haven’t decided if we’ll vote in this election. If we don’t, it would be the first time in our lives, but we have serious concerns about the presumptive nominees on many levels, so we’ll see if anything changes between now and November. In our opinion, the positive things either candidate offers is far outweighed by the negative, so we’re not apathetic, just cautious.

That said, with regard to your other questions–we don’t believe in age discrimination–and are shocked to see that happening even to people in their 40’s–would I like to see changes legislated in that regard–absolutely–but until a more noticeable majority of younger people find themselves out of a job as they age–and the trends reveal they will–with the magic number appearing to be somewhere around 50 or so–I doubt if most politicians will be compelled to act on this issue.

We also don’t believe anyone is entitled to anything–including the home of their dreams–but if people want to go for it at all costs, including possibly jeopardizing their financial future–they have the right to do so–and I don’t know enough about the ACA to make any judgment calls on that.

Regarding other questions–Yes, we do understand what it’s like to raise a family in CA. My wife and I have raised three children who have all finished college and have great careers and homes.

As far as financial success or failure in life, I really think one major reason people (especially in CA) find themselves in difficult financial positions later in life is that they may have failed to admit they lived beyond their means most of their lives–because they chose to.

Admitting one can’t afford a particular lifestyle along the way may be the lesser of the evils in the long run. That, or don’t complain if you find yourself with zero options in the final lap of life.

[Author]

Posts