- This topic has 395 replies, 33 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 6 months ago by (former)FormerSanDiegan.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 28, 2009 at 2:03 PM #407452May 28, 2009 at 2:18 PM #406759SD RealtorParticipant
JohnAlt it hurts you because you qualify for less. Prices never adjust with interest rates, they usually respond a few months AFTER the rate movement. I agree with you buying at a lower price is always better. However your buying power does get reduced unless you have a strong cash component to the purchase, strong being a relative term, because it all depends on the price range of the home you are looking at.
People with stronger cash positions will always benefit greatly from a higher interest rate environment then those that do not.
May 28, 2009 at 2:18 PM #407003SD RealtorParticipantJohnAlt it hurts you because you qualify for less. Prices never adjust with interest rates, they usually respond a few months AFTER the rate movement. I agree with you buying at a lower price is always better. However your buying power does get reduced unless you have a strong cash component to the purchase, strong being a relative term, because it all depends on the price range of the home you are looking at.
People with stronger cash positions will always benefit greatly from a higher interest rate environment then those that do not.
May 28, 2009 at 2:18 PM #407247SD RealtorParticipantJohnAlt it hurts you because you qualify for less. Prices never adjust with interest rates, they usually respond a few months AFTER the rate movement. I agree with you buying at a lower price is always better. However your buying power does get reduced unless you have a strong cash component to the purchase, strong being a relative term, because it all depends on the price range of the home you are looking at.
People with stronger cash positions will always benefit greatly from a higher interest rate environment then those that do not.
May 28, 2009 at 2:18 PM #407309SD RealtorParticipantJohnAlt it hurts you because you qualify for less. Prices never adjust with interest rates, they usually respond a few months AFTER the rate movement. I agree with you buying at a lower price is always better. However your buying power does get reduced unless you have a strong cash component to the purchase, strong being a relative term, because it all depends on the price range of the home you are looking at.
People with stronger cash positions will always benefit greatly from a higher interest rate environment then those that do not.
May 28, 2009 at 2:18 PM #407457SD RealtorParticipantJohnAlt it hurts you because you qualify for less. Prices never adjust with interest rates, they usually respond a few months AFTER the rate movement. I agree with you buying at a lower price is always better. However your buying power does get reduced unless you have a strong cash component to the purchase, strong being a relative term, because it all depends on the price range of the home you are looking at.
People with stronger cash positions will always benefit greatly from a higher interest rate environment then those that do not.
May 28, 2009 at 5:06 PM #406835AKParticipantI’d guess that rising interest rates could kill some marginal deals. We may see yet another wave of relistings in a few weeks … more inventory, but more work and more headaches for agents and buyers and sellers alike.
Of course the effect of higher rates could be balanced out by the use of Barack Bucks for FHA down payments. And I thought “refund anticipation” loans were supposed to be a bad thing … anything to reinflate the bubble I guess.
May 28, 2009 at 5:06 PM #407078AKParticipantI’d guess that rising interest rates could kill some marginal deals. We may see yet another wave of relistings in a few weeks … more inventory, but more work and more headaches for agents and buyers and sellers alike.
Of course the effect of higher rates could be balanced out by the use of Barack Bucks for FHA down payments. And I thought “refund anticipation” loans were supposed to be a bad thing … anything to reinflate the bubble I guess.
May 28, 2009 at 5:06 PM #407322AKParticipantI’d guess that rising interest rates could kill some marginal deals. We may see yet another wave of relistings in a few weeks … more inventory, but more work and more headaches for agents and buyers and sellers alike.
Of course the effect of higher rates could be balanced out by the use of Barack Bucks for FHA down payments. And I thought “refund anticipation” loans were supposed to be a bad thing … anything to reinflate the bubble I guess.
May 28, 2009 at 5:06 PM #407383AKParticipantI’d guess that rising interest rates could kill some marginal deals. We may see yet another wave of relistings in a few weeks … more inventory, but more work and more headaches for agents and buyers and sellers alike.
Of course the effect of higher rates could be balanced out by the use of Barack Bucks for FHA down payments. And I thought “refund anticipation” loans were supposed to be a bad thing … anything to reinflate the bubble I guess.
May 28, 2009 at 5:06 PM #407532AKParticipantI’d guess that rising interest rates could kill some marginal deals. We may see yet another wave of relistings in a few weeks … more inventory, but more work and more headaches for agents and buyers and sellers alike.
Of course the effect of higher rates could be balanced out by the use of Barack Bucks for FHA down payments. And I thought “refund anticipation” loans were supposed to be a bad thing … anything to reinflate the bubble I guess.
May 28, 2009 at 5:37 PM #406865ArrayaParticipanthttp://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/
Mortgage banks are going to be flooded with calls from people wanting to lock at 4.75. Sorry folks, those rates are gone.I called Mark Hanson this morning to see if there was any improvement in the mortgage. Mark said “Rates fell from 5.5 to 5.375 on intervention rumors this morning but are now back to 5.5. If rates stay in the mid 5’s, new loan applications will quickly dry up.
By the way, that 5.5% rate is pretty much for the “perfect borrower” with a FICO score of 740 or higher and a 20% down payment. Jumbos are hovering near 8% with 1.5% points.
Mortgage banks that made unhedged commitments at 4.25-4.75% are now in a position to lose substantial sums of money.
Bernanke thought it would be an easy task to keep down mortgage rates. So much for a $1.2 trillion commitment. What’s next? A $2.4 trillion commitment? Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and the FHA are the lenders of only resort yet the Fed is still struggling to rig the market.
May 28, 2009 at 5:37 PM #407108ArrayaParticipanthttp://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/
Mortgage banks are going to be flooded with calls from people wanting to lock at 4.75. Sorry folks, those rates are gone.I called Mark Hanson this morning to see if there was any improvement in the mortgage. Mark said “Rates fell from 5.5 to 5.375 on intervention rumors this morning but are now back to 5.5. If rates stay in the mid 5’s, new loan applications will quickly dry up.
By the way, that 5.5% rate is pretty much for the “perfect borrower” with a FICO score of 740 or higher and a 20% down payment. Jumbos are hovering near 8% with 1.5% points.
Mortgage banks that made unhedged commitments at 4.25-4.75% are now in a position to lose substantial sums of money.
Bernanke thought it would be an easy task to keep down mortgage rates. So much for a $1.2 trillion commitment. What’s next? A $2.4 trillion commitment? Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and the FHA are the lenders of only resort yet the Fed is still struggling to rig the market.
May 28, 2009 at 5:37 PM #407352ArrayaParticipanthttp://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/
Mortgage banks are going to be flooded with calls from people wanting to lock at 4.75. Sorry folks, those rates are gone.I called Mark Hanson this morning to see if there was any improvement in the mortgage. Mark said “Rates fell from 5.5 to 5.375 on intervention rumors this morning but are now back to 5.5. If rates stay in the mid 5’s, new loan applications will quickly dry up.
By the way, that 5.5% rate is pretty much for the “perfect borrower” with a FICO score of 740 or higher and a 20% down payment. Jumbos are hovering near 8% with 1.5% points.
Mortgage banks that made unhedged commitments at 4.25-4.75% are now in a position to lose substantial sums of money.
Bernanke thought it would be an easy task to keep down mortgage rates. So much for a $1.2 trillion commitment. What’s next? A $2.4 trillion commitment? Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and the FHA are the lenders of only resort yet the Fed is still struggling to rig the market.
May 28, 2009 at 5:37 PM #407413ArrayaParticipanthttp://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/
Mortgage banks are going to be flooded with calls from people wanting to lock at 4.75. Sorry folks, those rates are gone.I called Mark Hanson this morning to see if there was any improvement in the mortgage. Mark said “Rates fell from 5.5 to 5.375 on intervention rumors this morning but are now back to 5.5. If rates stay in the mid 5’s, new loan applications will quickly dry up.
By the way, that 5.5% rate is pretty much for the “perfect borrower” with a FICO score of 740 or higher and a 20% down payment. Jumbos are hovering near 8% with 1.5% points.
Mortgage banks that made unhedged commitments at 4.25-4.75% are now in a position to lose substantial sums of money.
Bernanke thought it would be an easy task to keep down mortgage rates. So much for a $1.2 trillion commitment. What’s next? A $2.4 trillion commitment? Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and the FHA are the lenders of only resort yet the Fed is still struggling to rig the market.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.