- This topic has 420 replies, 32 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 5 months ago by maktbone.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 18, 2009 at 8:48 AM #401742May 18, 2009 at 9:17 AM #401084daveljParticipant
[quote=dbapig]”It’s just pathetic,” said Jenkins, 53. “Investors are going out there and outbidding everyone.”
…
…[/quote]This is good, right? It suggests a couple of things:
(1) If most properties are facing the same issues (which is what we’re hearing), there’s a boatload of money out there willing to buy stuff up at the lower end. And the folks that get outbid are just moving on to other properties.
(2) Foreclosures are selling faster than they’re being created, which is why inventory is shrinking.Don’t get me wrong – as I’ve said many times – I think we’ve still got downside ahead of us. But clearly the buying activity we’re seeing at the lower end is better for the economy in general terms than if we weren’t seeing it, right?
Also, almost all of these newly-purchased REO properties will need work done: painting, new carpet, etc. And there will be lots of new furniture purchases as well. And mortgage brokers and real estate agents will get paid here (albeit a fraction of what they were making during the heyday). Again, we’re not headed back to 2005, but all of this foreclosure sale activity will put a little boost into the economy that wouldn’t have been there otherwise.
May 18, 2009 at 9:17 AM #401334daveljParticipant[quote=dbapig]”It’s just pathetic,” said Jenkins, 53. “Investors are going out there and outbidding everyone.”
…
…[/quote]This is good, right? It suggests a couple of things:
(1) If most properties are facing the same issues (which is what we’re hearing), there’s a boatload of money out there willing to buy stuff up at the lower end. And the folks that get outbid are just moving on to other properties.
(2) Foreclosures are selling faster than they’re being created, which is why inventory is shrinking.Don’t get me wrong – as I’ve said many times – I think we’ve still got downside ahead of us. But clearly the buying activity we’re seeing at the lower end is better for the economy in general terms than if we weren’t seeing it, right?
Also, almost all of these newly-purchased REO properties will need work done: painting, new carpet, etc. And there will be lots of new furniture purchases as well. And mortgage brokers and real estate agents will get paid here (albeit a fraction of what they were making during the heyday). Again, we’re not headed back to 2005, but all of this foreclosure sale activity will put a little boost into the economy that wouldn’t have been there otherwise.
May 18, 2009 at 9:17 AM #401567daveljParticipant[quote=dbapig]”It’s just pathetic,” said Jenkins, 53. “Investors are going out there and outbidding everyone.”
…
…[/quote]This is good, right? It suggests a couple of things:
(1) If most properties are facing the same issues (which is what we’re hearing), there’s a boatload of money out there willing to buy stuff up at the lower end. And the folks that get outbid are just moving on to other properties.
(2) Foreclosures are selling faster than they’re being created, which is why inventory is shrinking.Don’t get me wrong – as I’ve said many times – I think we’ve still got downside ahead of us. But clearly the buying activity we’re seeing at the lower end is better for the economy in general terms than if we weren’t seeing it, right?
Also, almost all of these newly-purchased REO properties will need work done: painting, new carpet, etc. And there will be lots of new furniture purchases as well. And mortgage brokers and real estate agents will get paid here (albeit a fraction of what they were making during the heyday). Again, we’re not headed back to 2005, but all of this foreclosure sale activity will put a little boost into the economy that wouldn’t have been there otherwise.
May 18, 2009 at 9:17 AM #401624daveljParticipant[quote=dbapig]”It’s just pathetic,” said Jenkins, 53. “Investors are going out there and outbidding everyone.”
…
…[/quote]This is good, right? It suggests a couple of things:
(1) If most properties are facing the same issues (which is what we’re hearing), there’s a boatload of money out there willing to buy stuff up at the lower end. And the folks that get outbid are just moving on to other properties.
(2) Foreclosures are selling faster than they’re being created, which is why inventory is shrinking.Don’t get me wrong – as I’ve said many times – I think we’ve still got downside ahead of us. But clearly the buying activity we’re seeing at the lower end is better for the economy in general terms than if we weren’t seeing it, right?
Also, almost all of these newly-purchased REO properties will need work done: painting, new carpet, etc. And there will be lots of new furniture purchases as well. And mortgage brokers and real estate agents will get paid here (albeit a fraction of what they were making during the heyday). Again, we’re not headed back to 2005, but all of this foreclosure sale activity will put a little boost into the economy that wouldn’t have been there otherwise.
May 18, 2009 at 9:17 AM #401772daveljParticipant[quote=dbapig]”It’s just pathetic,” said Jenkins, 53. “Investors are going out there and outbidding everyone.”
…
…[/quote]This is good, right? It suggests a couple of things:
(1) If most properties are facing the same issues (which is what we’re hearing), there’s a boatload of money out there willing to buy stuff up at the lower end. And the folks that get outbid are just moving on to other properties.
(2) Foreclosures are selling faster than they’re being created, which is why inventory is shrinking.Don’t get me wrong – as I’ve said many times – I think we’ve still got downside ahead of us. But clearly the buying activity we’re seeing at the lower end is better for the economy in general terms than if we weren’t seeing it, right?
Also, almost all of these newly-purchased REO properties will need work done: painting, new carpet, etc. And there will be lots of new furniture purchases as well. And mortgage brokers and real estate agents will get paid here (albeit a fraction of what they were making during the heyday). Again, we’re not headed back to 2005, but all of this foreclosure sale activity will put a little boost into the economy that wouldn’t have been there otherwise.
May 18, 2009 at 9:32 AM #401119carlsbadworkerParticipantAs much as I disagree with investors’ maths in claiming that this is the best time to buy, I do believe that risk-taking is what is needed to improve our standard of living over the long run. It is very easy to sit back and laugh at others, but these risk-taking investors are helping to put properties in better shape as a shelter for people who couldn’t afford to buy. They are doing the society a favor unlike bankers who sucked away trillions of tax payer dollars yet ran away with huge bonus checks.
May 18, 2009 at 9:32 AM #401369carlsbadworkerParticipantAs much as I disagree with investors’ maths in claiming that this is the best time to buy, I do believe that risk-taking is what is needed to improve our standard of living over the long run. It is very easy to sit back and laugh at others, but these risk-taking investors are helping to put properties in better shape as a shelter for people who couldn’t afford to buy. They are doing the society a favor unlike bankers who sucked away trillions of tax payer dollars yet ran away with huge bonus checks.
May 18, 2009 at 9:32 AM #401602carlsbadworkerParticipantAs much as I disagree with investors’ maths in claiming that this is the best time to buy, I do believe that risk-taking is what is needed to improve our standard of living over the long run. It is very easy to sit back and laugh at others, but these risk-taking investors are helping to put properties in better shape as a shelter for people who couldn’t afford to buy. They are doing the society a favor unlike bankers who sucked away trillions of tax payer dollars yet ran away with huge bonus checks.
May 18, 2009 at 9:32 AM #401659carlsbadworkerParticipantAs much as I disagree with investors’ maths in claiming that this is the best time to buy, I do believe that risk-taking is what is needed to improve our standard of living over the long run. It is very easy to sit back and laugh at others, but these risk-taking investors are helping to put properties in better shape as a shelter for people who couldn’t afford to buy. They are doing the society a favor unlike bankers who sucked away trillions of tax payer dollars yet ran away with huge bonus checks.
May 18, 2009 at 9:32 AM #401806carlsbadworkerParticipantAs much as I disagree with investors’ maths in claiming that this is the best time to buy, I do believe that risk-taking is what is needed to improve our standard of living over the long run. It is very easy to sit back and laugh at others, but these risk-taking investors are helping to put properties in better shape as a shelter for people who couldn’t afford to buy. They are doing the society a favor unlike bankers who sucked away trillions of tax payer dollars yet ran away with huge bonus checks.
May 18, 2009 at 10:27 AM #401154peterbParticipantFrom an investment aspect, this is extremely risky. RE is a highly leveraged and illiquid investment. It changes trends very slowly and is easily identifiable when it’s starting.
It is much safer to wait until RE shows a solid YOY rise and other fundamental economic factors turn positive. Sure, you dont get in at the bottom, but far more importantly, you dont get in before the bottom. Because no one knows where it is until there’s a solid and consistant rise.May 18, 2009 at 10:27 AM #401404peterbParticipantFrom an investment aspect, this is extremely risky. RE is a highly leveraged and illiquid investment. It changes trends very slowly and is easily identifiable when it’s starting.
It is much safer to wait until RE shows a solid YOY rise and other fundamental economic factors turn positive. Sure, you dont get in at the bottom, but far more importantly, you dont get in before the bottom. Because no one knows where it is until there’s a solid and consistant rise.May 18, 2009 at 10:27 AM #401637peterbParticipantFrom an investment aspect, this is extremely risky. RE is a highly leveraged and illiquid investment. It changes trends very slowly and is easily identifiable when it’s starting.
It is much safer to wait until RE shows a solid YOY rise and other fundamental economic factors turn positive. Sure, you dont get in at the bottom, but far more importantly, you dont get in before the bottom. Because no one knows where it is until there’s a solid and consistant rise.May 18, 2009 at 10:27 AM #401694peterbParticipantFrom an investment aspect, this is extremely risky. RE is a highly leveraged and illiquid investment. It changes trends very slowly and is easily identifiable when it’s starting.
It is much safer to wait until RE shows a solid YOY rise and other fundamental economic factors turn positive. Sure, you dont get in at the bottom, but far more importantly, you dont get in before the bottom. Because no one knows where it is until there’s a solid and consistant rise. -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.