- This topic has 420 replies, 32 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 5 months ago by maktbone.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 19, 2009 at 2:47 PM #403019May 19, 2009 at 3:25 PM #402356peterbParticipant
Well, this thread is concerning “investor” behavior. You’ve made several assumptions that would be incorrect for me. Sounds like Chris as well as some others. I come here to get a feel for how the more conservative buyer is thinking and behaving. For me it’s not price that’s a motivator for purchasing. It’s whether or not it’s going up in value and how quickly… that would cause me to buy again.
May 19, 2009 at 3:25 PM #402608peterbParticipantWell, this thread is concerning “investor” behavior. You’ve made several assumptions that would be incorrect for me. Sounds like Chris as well as some others. I come here to get a feel for how the more conservative buyer is thinking and behaving. For me it’s not price that’s a motivator for purchasing. It’s whether or not it’s going up in value and how quickly… that would cause me to buy again.
May 19, 2009 at 3:25 PM #402840peterbParticipantWell, this thread is concerning “investor” behavior. You’ve made several assumptions that would be incorrect for me. Sounds like Chris as well as some others. I come here to get a feel for how the more conservative buyer is thinking and behaving. For me it’s not price that’s a motivator for purchasing. It’s whether or not it’s going up in value and how quickly… that would cause me to buy again.
May 19, 2009 at 3:25 PM #402901peterbParticipantWell, this thread is concerning “investor” behavior. You’ve made several assumptions that would be incorrect for me. Sounds like Chris as well as some others. I come here to get a feel for how the more conservative buyer is thinking and behaving. For me it’s not price that’s a motivator for purchasing. It’s whether or not it’s going up in value and how quickly… that would cause me to buy again.
May 19, 2009 at 3:25 PM #403049peterbParticipantWell, this thread is concerning “investor” behavior. You’ve made several assumptions that would be incorrect for me. Sounds like Chris as well as some others. I come here to get a feel for how the more conservative buyer is thinking and behaving. For me it’s not price that’s a motivator for purchasing. It’s whether or not it’s going up in value and how quickly… that would cause me to buy again.
May 19, 2009 at 3:33 PM #402361NotCrankyParticipantWhich is more aggravating the herd mentality or the know-it-all posts?( I know I have done some of both)Can we check the calendar and determine who was a “herd’ buyer?
It isn’t necessarily easy to understand a play from the outside. I know when people ask me when was it that I bought in Jamul, and I tell them 2004, they automatically assume the worst. Not at all. From both family satisfaction and family finance points of view it has been a boon.
I think it is fair to say that housing “market timing” is somewhat more of a toss up judgment call at this point on average. Obviously, people are weighting potential outcomes differently. No one bats a thousand and no guts no glory.
There are caveats on both side of the equation now and I believe they will nearly cancel out.At least the remainder of potential slides could reasonably be seen as within a comfortable margin of error(on a case by case basis).OOPS put me in the corral. Maybe it is just hard to get over sticker shock but this is also cyclical?
May 19, 2009 at 3:33 PM #402613NotCrankyParticipantWhich is more aggravating the herd mentality or the know-it-all posts?( I know I have done some of both)Can we check the calendar and determine who was a “herd’ buyer?
It isn’t necessarily easy to understand a play from the outside. I know when people ask me when was it that I bought in Jamul, and I tell them 2004, they automatically assume the worst. Not at all. From both family satisfaction and family finance points of view it has been a boon.
I think it is fair to say that housing “market timing” is somewhat more of a toss up judgment call at this point on average. Obviously, people are weighting potential outcomes differently. No one bats a thousand and no guts no glory.
There are caveats on both side of the equation now and I believe they will nearly cancel out.At least the remainder of potential slides could reasonably be seen as within a comfortable margin of error(on a case by case basis).OOPS put me in the corral. Maybe it is just hard to get over sticker shock but this is also cyclical?
May 19, 2009 at 3:33 PM #402845NotCrankyParticipantWhich is more aggravating the herd mentality or the know-it-all posts?( I know I have done some of both)Can we check the calendar and determine who was a “herd’ buyer?
It isn’t necessarily easy to understand a play from the outside. I know when people ask me when was it that I bought in Jamul, and I tell them 2004, they automatically assume the worst. Not at all. From both family satisfaction and family finance points of view it has been a boon.
I think it is fair to say that housing “market timing” is somewhat more of a toss up judgment call at this point on average. Obviously, people are weighting potential outcomes differently. No one bats a thousand and no guts no glory.
There are caveats on both side of the equation now and I believe they will nearly cancel out.At least the remainder of potential slides could reasonably be seen as within a comfortable margin of error(on a case by case basis).OOPS put me in the corral. Maybe it is just hard to get over sticker shock but this is also cyclical?
May 19, 2009 at 3:33 PM #402906NotCrankyParticipantWhich is more aggravating the herd mentality or the know-it-all posts?( I know I have done some of both)Can we check the calendar and determine who was a “herd’ buyer?
It isn’t necessarily easy to understand a play from the outside. I know when people ask me when was it that I bought in Jamul, and I tell them 2004, they automatically assume the worst. Not at all. From both family satisfaction and family finance points of view it has been a boon.
I think it is fair to say that housing “market timing” is somewhat more of a toss up judgment call at this point on average. Obviously, people are weighting potential outcomes differently. No one bats a thousand and no guts no glory.
There are caveats on both side of the equation now and I believe they will nearly cancel out.At least the remainder of potential slides could reasonably be seen as within a comfortable margin of error(on a case by case basis).OOPS put me in the corral. Maybe it is just hard to get over sticker shock but this is also cyclical?
May 19, 2009 at 3:33 PM #403054NotCrankyParticipantWhich is more aggravating the herd mentality or the know-it-all posts?( I know I have done some of both)Can we check the calendar and determine who was a “herd’ buyer?
It isn’t necessarily easy to understand a play from the outside. I know when people ask me when was it that I bought in Jamul, and I tell them 2004, they automatically assume the worst. Not at all. From both family satisfaction and family finance points of view it has been a boon.
I think it is fair to say that housing “market timing” is somewhat more of a toss up judgment call at this point on average. Obviously, people are weighting potential outcomes differently. No one bats a thousand and no guts no glory.
There are caveats on both side of the equation now and I believe they will nearly cancel out.At least the remainder of potential slides could reasonably be seen as within a comfortable margin of error(on a case by case basis).OOPS put me in the corral. Maybe it is just hard to get over sticker shock but this is also cyclical?
May 19, 2009 at 4:03 PM #402376carlsbadworkerParticipant[quote=peterb]Well, this thread is concerning “investor” behavior. You’ve made several assumptions that would be incorrect for me. Sounds like Chris as well as some others. I come here to get a feel for how the more conservative buyer is thinking and behaving. For me it’s not price that’s a motivator for purchasing. It’s whether or not it’s going up in value and how quickly… that would cause me to buy again. [/quote]
But the people who bought (TG included) are only buying for their primary residence. Agree that price is not a motivator for purchasing to an investor. That is why for me, I am only looking to be a RE investor at least 5-7 years from now.
May 19, 2009 at 4:03 PM #402628carlsbadworkerParticipant[quote=peterb]Well, this thread is concerning “investor” behavior. You’ve made several assumptions that would be incorrect for me. Sounds like Chris as well as some others. I come here to get a feel for how the more conservative buyer is thinking and behaving. For me it’s not price that’s a motivator for purchasing. It’s whether or not it’s going up in value and how quickly… that would cause me to buy again. [/quote]
But the people who bought (TG included) are only buying for their primary residence. Agree that price is not a motivator for purchasing to an investor. That is why for me, I am only looking to be a RE investor at least 5-7 years from now.
May 19, 2009 at 4:03 PM #402860carlsbadworkerParticipant[quote=peterb]Well, this thread is concerning “investor” behavior. You’ve made several assumptions that would be incorrect for me. Sounds like Chris as well as some others. I come here to get a feel for how the more conservative buyer is thinking and behaving. For me it’s not price that’s a motivator for purchasing. It’s whether or not it’s going up in value and how quickly… that would cause me to buy again. [/quote]
But the people who bought (TG included) are only buying for their primary residence. Agree that price is not a motivator for purchasing to an investor. That is why for me, I am only looking to be a RE investor at least 5-7 years from now.
May 19, 2009 at 4:03 PM #402921carlsbadworkerParticipant[quote=peterb]Well, this thread is concerning “investor” behavior. You’ve made several assumptions that would be incorrect for me. Sounds like Chris as well as some others. I come here to get a feel for how the more conservative buyer is thinking and behaving. For me it’s not price that’s a motivator for purchasing. It’s whether or not it’s going up in value and how quickly… that would cause me to buy again. [/quote]
But the people who bought (TG included) are only buying for their primary residence. Agree that price is not a motivator for purchasing to an investor. That is why for me, I am only looking to be a RE investor at least 5-7 years from now.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.