- This topic has 245 replies, 22 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 1 month ago by peterb.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 15, 2008 at 12:45 PM #287971October 15, 2008 at 2:58 PM #287653patientlywaitingParticipant
23109VC, even if you were to refinance and have a recourse mortgage, as I understand it, the lender can only obtain a deficiency judgment though legal foreclosure (and not trustee’s sale).
So lenders who foreclose through trustees’ sales (the normal way of foreclosing in CA) actually give up recourse, regardless of whether the loans were purchase money or not.
Of course, if there are other recourse debts, those lenders could go to court and obtain deficiency judgments. But would they want to spend good money trying to get blood out of a turnip?
October 15, 2008 at 2:58 PM #287955patientlywaitingParticipant23109VC, even if you were to refinance and have a recourse mortgage, as I understand it, the lender can only obtain a deficiency judgment though legal foreclosure (and not trustee’s sale).
So lenders who foreclose through trustees’ sales (the normal way of foreclosing in CA) actually give up recourse, regardless of whether the loans were purchase money or not.
Of course, if there are other recourse debts, those lenders could go to court and obtain deficiency judgments. But would they want to spend good money trying to get blood out of a turnip?
October 15, 2008 at 2:58 PM #287969patientlywaitingParticipant23109VC, even if you were to refinance and have a recourse mortgage, as I understand it, the lender can only obtain a deficiency judgment though legal foreclosure (and not trustee’s sale).
So lenders who foreclose through trustees’ sales (the normal way of foreclosing in CA) actually give up recourse, regardless of whether the loans were purchase money or not.
Of course, if there are other recourse debts, those lenders could go to court and obtain deficiency judgments. But would they want to spend good money trying to get blood out of a turnip?
October 15, 2008 at 2:58 PM #287997patientlywaitingParticipant23109VC, even if you were to refinance and have a recourse mortgage, as I understand it, the lender can only obtain a deficiency judgment though legal foreclosure (and not trustee’s sale).
So lenders who foreclose through trustees’ sales (the normal way of foreclosing in CA) actually give up recourse, regardless of whether the loans were purchase money or not.
Of course, if there are other recourse debts, those lenders could go to court and obtain deficiency judgments. But would they want to spend good money trying to get blood out of a turnip?
October 15, 2008 at 2:58 PM #288001patientlywaitingParticipant23109VC, even if you were to refinance and have a recourse mortgage, as I understand it, the lender can only obtain a deficiency judgment though legal foreclosure (and not trustee’s sale).
So lenders who foreclose through trustees’ sales (the normal way of foreclosing in CA) actually give up recourse, regardless of whether the loans were purchase money or not.
Of course, if there are other recourse debts, those lenders could go to court and obtain deficiency judgments. But would they want to spend good money trying to get blood out of a turnip?
October 15, 2008 at 3:00 PM #287658SD RealtorParticipant“What this means to homeowners facing foreclosure is that they may not even owe their bank any money, and the lender is trying to take the home to pay an illegal contract.”
Why would this apply only to homeowners facing foreclosure?
Why wouldn’t this apply to every single homeowner because in essence, no lender has “consideration” do they?
October 15, 2008 at 3:00 PM #287960SD RealtorParticipant“What this means to homeowners facing foreclosure is that they may not even owe their bank any money, and the lender is trying to take the home to pay an illegal contract.”
Why would this apply only to homeowners facing foreclosure?
Why wouldn’t this apply to every single homeowner because in essence, no lender has “consideration” do they?
October 15, 2008 at 3:00 PM #287974SD RealtorParticipant“What this means to homeowners facing foreclosure is that they may not even owe their bank any money, and the lender is trying to take the home to pay an illegal contract.”
Why would this apply only to homeowners facing foreclosure?
Why wouldn’t this apply to every single homeowner because in essence, no lender has “consideration” do they?
October 15, 2008 at 3:00 PM #288002SD RealtorParticipant“What this means to homeowners facing foreclosure is that they may not even owe their bank any money, and the lender is trying to take the home to pay an illegal contract.”
Why would this apply only to homeowners facing foreclosure?
Why wouldn’t this apply to every single homeowner because in essence, no lender has “consideration” do they?
October 15, 2008 at 3:00 PM #288006SD RealtorParticipant“What this means to homeowners facing foreclosure is that they may not even owe their bank any money, and the lender is trying to take the home to pay an illegal contract.”
Why would this apply only to homeowners facing foreclosure?
Why wouldn’t this apply to every single homeowner because in essence, no lender has “consideration” do they?
October 15, 2008 at 3:20 PM #287663ArrayaParticipantWhy wouldn’t this apply to every single homeowner because in essence, no lender has “consideration” do they?
That’s right. Kind of a trip when you think about it. Now just think about the huge wave of defaults on mortgages and other debts that is starting. All was created out of thin air from the privately run Federal Reserve and it’s web of commercial banks around it.
A small group of people is going to own everything when this tsunami is done. All from something that is imaginary, created with a keystroke, electrons on a screen. If one wanted to look at this as a huge scam one could. Because the guys who caused this mess are going to own it all in the end and leave us all debt slaves to their imaginary money. Ironically, we will give them things of real value for the fake money they created. Fundamentally our monetary system is modern day wizardry and smoke and mirrors.
Tom Jefferson understood the endgame.
“I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies . . . If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around [the banks] . . . will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered . . . The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs.” — Thomas Jefferson — The Debate Over The Recharter Of The Bank Bill, (1809)
October 15, 2008 at 3:20 PM #287965ArrayaParticipantWhy wouldn’t this apply to every single homeowner because in essence, no lender has “consideration” do they?
That’s right. Kind of a trip when you think about it. Now just think about the huge wave of defaults on mortgages and other debts that is starting. All was created out of thin air from the privately run Federal Reserve and it’s web of commercial banks around it.
A small group of people is going to own everything when this tsunami is done. All from something that is imaginary, created with a keystroke, electrons on a screen. If one wanted to look at this as a huge scam one could. Because the guys who caused this mess are going to own it all in the end and leave us all debt slaves to their imaginary money. Ironically, we will give them things of real value for the fake money they created. Fundamentally our monetary system is modern day wizardry and smoke and mirrors.
Tom Jefferson understood the endgame.
“I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies . . . If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around [the banks] . . . will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered . . . The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs.” — Thomas Jefferson — The Debate Over The Recharter Of The Bank Bill, (1809)
October 15, 2008 at 3:20 PM #287980ArrayaParticipantWhy wouldn’t this apply to every single homeowner because in essence, no lender has “consideration” do they?
That’s right. Kind of a trip when you think about it. Now just think about the huge wave of defaults on mortgages and other debts that is starting. All was created out of thin air from the privately run Federal Reserve and it’s web of commercial banks around it.
A small group of people is going to own everything when this tsunami is done. All from something that is imaginary, created with a keystroke, electrons on a screen. If one wanted to look at this as a huge scam one could. Because the guys who caused this mess are going to own it all in the end and leave us all debt slaves to their imaginary money. Ironically, we will give them things of real value for the fake money they created. Fundamentally our monetary system is modern day wizardry and smoke and mirrors.
Tom Jefferson understood the endgame.
“I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies . . . If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around [the banks] . . . will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered . . . The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs.” — Thomas Jefferson — The Debate Over The Recharter Of The Bank Bill, (1809)
October 15, 2008 at 3:20 PM #288007ArrayaParticipantWhy wouldn’t this apply to every single homeowner because in essence, no lender has “consideration” do they?
That’s right. Kind of a trip when you think about it. Now just think about the huge wave of defaults on mortgages and other debts that is starting. All was created out of thin air from the privately run Federal Reserve and it’s web of commercial banks around it.
A small group of people is going to own everything when this tsunami is done. All from something that is imaginary, created with a keystroke, electrons on a screen. If one wanted to look at this as a huge scam one could. Because the guys who caused this mess are going to own it all in the end and leave us all debt slaves to their imaginary money. Ironically, we will give them things of real value for the fake money they created. Fundamentally our monetary system is modern day wizardry and smoke and mirrors.
Tom Jefferson understood the endgame.
“I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies . . . If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around [the banks] . . . will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered . . . The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs.” — Thomas Jefferson — The Debate Over The Recharter Of The Bank Bill, (1809)
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.