- This topic has 165 replies, 16 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 10 months ago by sd_matt.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 10, 2009 at 8:18 PM #493720December 10, 2009 at 8:22 PM #492852blahblahblahParticipant
…agressive interpretation (but not fraudulent) of tax codes.
I wonder how those “agressive interpretations” would withstand an audit?
December 10, 2009 at 8:22 PM #493014blahblahblahParticipant…agressive interpretation (but not fraudulent) of tax codes.
I wonder how those “agressive interpretations” would withstand an audit?
December 10, 2009 at 8:22 PM #493398blahblahblahParticipant…agressive interpretation (but not fraudulent) of tax codes.
I wonder how those “agressive interpretations” would withstand an audit?
December 10, 2009 at 8:22 PM #493488blahblahblahParticipant…agressive interpretation (but not fraudulent) of tax codes.
I wonder how those “agressive interpretations” would withstand an audit?
December 10, 2009 at 8:22 PM #493725blahblahblahParticipant…agressive interpretation (but not fraudulent) of tax codes.
I wonder how those “agressive interpretations” would withstand an audit?
December 10, 2009 at 9:16 PM #492867sdrealtorParticipantTax fraud at epidemic propotions around here? I would guess it is much lower here than other population centers which are far more dominated by family owned small businesses. It seems like most retail businesses around here are chain stores. My guess is income tax fraud is far more prevalent in places like NYC, Boston, Philly, Baltimore, Miami, Chicago etc than in SoCal.
December 10, 2009 at 9:16 PM #493029sdrealtorParticipantTax fraud at epidemic propotions around here? I would guess it is much lower here than other population centers which are far more dominated by family owned small businesses. It seems like most retail businesses around here are chain stores. My guess is income tax fraud is far more prevalent in places like NYC, Boston, Philly, Baltimore, Miami, Chicago etc than in SoCal.
December 10, 2009 at 9:16 PM #493414sdrealtorParticipantTax fraud at epidemic propotions around here? I would guess it is much lower here than other population centers which are far more dominated by family owned small businesses. It seems like most retail businesses around here are chain stores. My guess is income tax fraud is far more prevalent in places like NYC, Boston, Philly, Baltimore, Miami, Chicago etc than in SoCal.
December 10, 2009 at 9:16 PM #493503sdrealtorParticipantTax fraud at epidemic propotions around here? I would guess it is much lower here than other population centers which are far more dominated by family owned small businesses. It seems like most retail businesses around here are chain stores. My guess is income tax fraud is far more prevalent in places like NYC, Boston, Philly, Baltimore, Miami, Chicago etc than in SoCal.
December 10, 2009 at 9:16 PM #493740sdrealtorParticipantTax fraud at epidemic propotions around here? I would guess it is much lower here than other population centers which are far more dominated by family owned small businesses. It seems like most retail businesses around here are chain stores. My guess is income tax fraud is far more prevalent in places like NYC, Boston, Philly, Baltimore, Miami, Chicago etc than in SoCal.
December 11, 2009 at 3:24 AM #492936EugeneParticipant[quote=sdrealtor]40K social security? Thats way too high. My aunt never worked a day. He sold his business and retired at 55. I think he gets about 1800/month.[/quote]
That’s why. Two people working six-figure jobs and retiring at 70 would be potentially collecting as much as 70k/year.
December 11, 2009 at 3:24 AM #493098EugeneParticipant[quote=sdrealtor]40K social security? Thats way too high. My aunt never worked a day. He sold his business and retired at 55. I think he gets about 1800/month.[/quote]
That’s why. Two people working six-figure jobs and retiring at 70 would be potentially collecting as much as 70k/year.
December 11, 2009 at 3:24 AM #493483EugeneParticipant[quote=sdrealtor]40K social security? Thats way too high. My aunt never worked a day. He sold his business and retired at 55. I think he gets about 1800/month.[/quote]
That’s why. Two people working six-figure jobs and retiring at 70 would be potentially collecting as much as 70k/year.
December 11, 2009 at 3:24 AM #493573EugeneParticipant[quote=sdrealtor]40K social security? Thats way too high. My aunt never worked a day. He sold his business and retired at 55. I think he gets about 1800/month.[/quote]
That’s why. Two people working six-figure jobs and retiring at 70 would be potentially collecting as much as 70k/year.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.