- This topic has 168 replies, 29 voices, and was last updated 17 years, 3 months ago by Dukehorn.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 15, 2007 at 11:44 AM #75811August 15, 2007 at 5:04 PM #75905eyePodParticipant
Alex does indeed seem to have a split personality. Both in his attitude toward housing prices and in how he treats people. For instance, he can’t stand people making predictions and yet he seems to be argumentative about whether prices can go down very much or not. That to me seems to be an obstinate way to make a prediction. Or maybe he just wants to argue. Or maybe he is just cynical.
August 15, 2007 at 5:04 PM #76024eyePodParticipantAlex does indeed seem to have a split personality. Both in his attitude toward housing prices and in how he treats people. For instance, he can’t stand people making predictions and yet he seems to be argumentative about whether prices can go down very much or not. That to me seems to be an obstinate way to make a prediction. Or maybe he just wants to argue. Or maybe he is just cynical.
August 15, 2007 at 5:04 PM #76028eyePodParticipantAlex does indeed seem to have a split personality. Both in his attitude toward housing prices and in how he treats people. For instance, he can’t stand people making predictions and yet he seems to be argumentative about whether prices can go down very much or not. That to me seems to be an obstinate way to make a prediction. Or maybe he just wants to argue. Or maybe he is just cynical.
August 15, 2007 at 5:45 PM #75923Diego MamaniParticipantIn think that Alex makes a good point regarding predictions: It is really silly to say that the market will bottom in 2012 – why not 2011? Or 2014? No one really knows. And the same is true for the % drop in inflation-adjusted prices from peak to trough: will it be 20% or 60%? How fast will prices drop over this period? Most of it up front in 2007-08? Or evenly over the long downturn period?
We know where the market is headed, but we just don’t know the details regarding years or exact % price drops.
That said, however, I think that Alex’s true colors come through when he made this fallacious argument that we often hear from RE industry shills:
What is someone with the money and large family going to do? Rent for 5 years until 2012? Hell no. people need to live life today and not wait for something they have no idea will ever happen.
Once I read that, I stopped taking him seriously.
August 15, 2007 at 5:45 PM #76042Diego MamaniParticipantIn think that Alex makes a good point regarding predictions: It is really silly to say that the market will bottom in 2012 – why not 2011? Or 2014? No one really knows. And the same is true for the % drop in inflation-adjusted prices from peak to trough: will it be 20% or 60%? How fast will prices drop over this period? Most of it up front in 2007-08? Or evenly over the long downturn period?
We know where the market is headed, but we just don’t know the details regarding years or exact % price drops.
That said, however, I think that Alex’s true colors come through when he made this fallacious argument that we often hear from RE industry shills:
What is someone with the money and large family going to do? Rent for 5 years until 2012? Hell no. people need to live life today and not wait for something they have no idea will ever happen.
Once I read that, I stopped taking him seriously.
August 15, 2007 at 5:45 PM #76045Diego MamaniParticipantIn think that Alex makes a good point regarding predictions: It is really silly to say that the market will bottom in 2012 – why not 2011? Or 2014? No one really knows. And the same is true for the % drop in inflation-adjusted prices from peak to trough: will it be 20% or 60%? How fast will prices drop over this period? Most of it up front in 2007-08? Or evenly over the long downturn period?
We know where the market is headed, but we just don’t know the details regarding years or exact % price drops.
That said, however, I think that Alex’s true colors come through when he made this fallacious argument that we often hear from RE industry shills:
What is someone with the money and large family going to do? Rent for 5 years until 2012? Hell no. people need to live life today and not wait for something they have no idea will ever happen.
Once I read that, I stopped taking him seriously.
August 15, 2007 at 5:50 PM #75928JWM in SDParticipant“When people were buying in 2004-2005 did people call them dumb at the time?”
I did…but I’m just that kind of guy…as you well know by now..looks like I was right.
August 15, 2007 at 5:50 PM #76048JWM in SDParticipant“When people were buying in 2004-2005 did people call them dumb at the time?”
I did…but I’m just that kind of guy…as you well know by now..looks like I was right.
August 15, 2007 at 5:50 PM #76052JWM in SDParticipant“When people were buying in 2004-2005 did people call them dumb at the time?”
I did…but I’m just that kind of guy…as you well know by now..looks like I was right.
August 15, 2007 at 5:52 PM #75931JWM in SDParticipantNot if they go bankrupt first AA. LMFAO…ATM fees going to save CFC from their REO portfolio..bwhahahaha….
August 15, 2007 at 5:52 PM #76051JWM in SDParticipantNot if they go bankrupt first AA. LMFAO…ATM fees going to save CFC from their REO portfolio..bwhahahaha….
August 15, 2007 at 5:52 PM #76055JWM in SDParticipantNot if they go bankrupt first AA. LMFAO…ATM fees going to save CFC from their REO portfolio..bwhahahaha….
August 15, 2007 at 6:12 PM #75934rocket scienceParticipantAfter seeing Alex’s Graph I couldn’t resist.
BTW, love the log scale to minimize the effect.First let me admit that I do not know the pedigree of the housing data in the graph but believe it to be accurate as it came from a spreadsheet that I downloaded a while back in May of 2007 from a link from a previous thread.(as best I can remember). THe ‘Alex” data is a few points eyeballed off of his graph and approximated in between but gets the basic shape.
That said, just put together a quick picture of the data and some curves assuming 6.2% (that appears to be what Alex used) and even a generous 5% growth in value and then a 4% growth rate. The anchor point for the ‘growth’ data is the first available point I picked off of the ‘Alex’ data.
Some observations, not to be taken as fact:
Although I think 5% is generous it is curious that it basically intersects the bottom of the last correction in the mid 90s.So if one were to ASSUME the 5% growth rate is what houses should expect to appreciate over a long period of time, the prices should decrease approximately the following amounts for the “bottom” to occur in the following years.
2008 48%
2009 45%
2010 43%
2011 40%
2012 37%
2013 34%And if the “growth” is at ~5.5% it matches the 2017 prediction in one of his “A Bubble Primer” post on when per capita income divided by the median-priced home meets the historical average based on prices remaining constant and income increases at an annual rate of 4.6%
Again, just observations but it looks like the fall may be with us a while.
rsAugust 15, 2007 at 6:12 PM #76054rocket scienceParticipantAfter seeing Alex’s Graph I couldn’t resist.
BTW, love the log scale to minimize the effect.First let me admit that I do not know the pedigree of the housing data in the graph but believe it to be accurate as it came from a spreadsheet that I downloaded a while back in May of 2007 from a link from a previous thread.(as best I can remember). THe ‘Alex” data is a few points eyeballed off of his graph and approximated in between but gets the basic shape.
That said, just put together a quick picture of the data and some curves assuming 6.2% (that appears to be what Alex used) and even a generous 5% growth in value and then a 4% growth rate. The anchor point for the ‘growth’ data is the first available point I picked off of the ‘Alex’ data.
Some observations, not to be taken as fact:
Although I think 5% is generous it is curious that it basically intersects the bottom of the last correction in the mid 90s.So if one were to ASSUME the 5% growth rate is what houses should expect to appreciate over a long period of time, the prices should decrease approximately the following amounts for the “bottom” to occur in the following years.
2008 48%
2009 45%
2010 43%
2011 40%
2012 37%
2013 34%And if the “growth” is at ~5.5% it matches the 2017 prediction in one of his “A Bubble Primer” post on when per capita income divided by the median-priced home meets the historical average based on prices remaining constant and income increases at an annual rate of 4.6%
Again, just observations but it looks like the fall may be with us a while.
rs -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.