- This topic has 168 replies, 29 voices, and was last updated 17 years, 4 months ago by Dukehorn.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 15, 2007 at 9:44 PM #76177August 16, 2007 at 9:43 AM #76269(former)FormerSanDieganParticipant
Rocket science – I think you were referring to my graph. Not Alex’s. Pleeze don’t confuse me with him.
I pulled the chart from a discussion we had a couple months ago. In that discussion I plotted both on linear and logarithmic scales. (linear plot below).
In that discussion someone asked what “normal” growth rates are. Well, that’s anyone’s guess. FOr these plots I tried to put a growth rate that intersected the bottom of the market in 1996-1997.
I made a half-assed projection based on the same percentage decline as the last housing bust, then extending it for several years further at the peak rate of decline.
I came up with an optimistic correction of a nominal 20% decline through 2012. Adding about 3% inflation that is a 41% real decline. This is the optimistic range of what I expect. When take more conservative growth rates (e.g. 5% from a “fair value” price in 1998) it’s a bit worse as you indicate in the 40-50% range, depending on how quickly it happens.
Sorry I didn’t have the entire explanation. I was too lazy to look up the entire thread. Just wanted to show Alex that some of our guesses on the market are based on analysis rather than being pulled completely out of thin air.
As a rocket scientist you should appreciate the log scale. A constant growth (or decline) rate shows up as a line on a log scale. Some people have a problem seeing the linear scale go exponential.
[img_assist|nid=3596|title=another half-a$$ed projection|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=349]
August 16, 2007 at 9:43 AM #76388(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantRocket science – I think you were referring to my graph. Not Alex’s. Pleeze don’t confuse me with him.
I pulled the chart from a discussion we had a couple months ago. In that discussion I plotted both on linear and logarithmic scales. (linear plot below).
In that discussion someone asked what “normal” growth rates are. Well, that’s anyone’s guess. FOr these plots I tried to put a growth rate that intersected the bottom of the market in 1996-1997.
I made a half-assed projection based on the same percentage decline as the last housing bust, then extending it for several years further at the peak rate of decline.
I came up with an optimistic correction of a nominal 20% decline through 2012. Adding about 3% inflation that is a 41% real decline. This is the optimistic range of what I expect. When take more conservative growth rates (e.g. 5% from a “fair value” price in 1998) it’s a bit worse as you indicate in the 40-50% range, depending on how quickly it happens.
Sorry I didn’t have the entire explanation. I was too lazy to look up the entire thread. Just wanted to show Alex that some of our guesses on the market are based on analysis rather than being pulled completely out of thin air.
As a rocket scientist you should appreciate the log scale. A constant growth (or decline) rate shows up as a line on a log scale. Some people have a problem seeing the linear scale go exponential.
[img_assist|nid=3596|title=another half-a$$ed projection|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=349]
August 16, 2007 at 9:43 AM #76390(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantRocket science – I think you were referring to my graph. Not Alex’s. Pleeze don’t confuse me with him.
I pulled the chart from a discussion we had a couple months ago. In that discussion I plotted both on linear and logarithmic scales. (linear plot below).
In that discussion someone asked what “normal” growth rates are. Well, that’s anyone’s guess. FOr these plots I tried to put a growth rate that intersected the bottom of the market in 1996-1997.
I made a half-assed projection based on the same percentage decline as the last housing bust, then extending it for several years further at the peak rate of decline.
I came up with an optimistic correction of a nominal 20% decline through 2012. Adding about 3% inflation that is a 41% real decline. This is the optimistic range of what I expect. When take more conservative growth rates (e.g. 5% from a “fair value” price in 1998) it’s a bit worse as you indicate in the 40-50% range, depending on how quickly it happens.
Sorry I didn’t have the entire explanation. I was too lazy to look up the entire thread. Just wanted to show Alex that some of our guesses on the market are based on analysis rather than being pulled completely out of thin air.
As a rocket scientist you should appreciate the log scale. A constant growth (or decline) rate shows up as a line on a log scale. Some people have a problem seeing the linear scale go exponential.
[img_assist|nid=3596|title=another half-a$$ed projection|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=349]
August 16, 2007 at 9:58 AM #76317lendingbubblecontinuesParticipant“I predict that Alex_angel won’t be back until at least 8/16/07.
Nostradumbass”
It seems I was right…Alex_angel has reappeared in the “contrarian view of CFC” topic. Today’s date: 8/16/07.
Could this be an accurate foretelling of the future or merely a coincidence? I will never tell.
Nostradumbass’s’s’s’s’s’s’s’
August 16, 2007 at 9:58 AM #76437lendingbubblecontinuesParticipant“I predict that Alex_angel won’t be back until at least 8/16/07.
Nostradumbass”
It seems I was right…Alex_angel has reappeared in the “contrarian view of CFC” topic. Today’s date: 8/16/07.
Could this be an accurate foretelling of the future or merely a coincidence? I will never tell.
Nostradumbass’s’s’s’s’s’s’s’
August 16, 2007 at 9:58 AM #76462lendingbubblecontinuesParticipant“I predict that Alex_angel won’t be back until at least 8/16/07.
Nostradumbass”
It seems I was right…Alex_angel has reappeared in the “contrarian view of CFC” topic. Today’s date: 8/16/07.
Could this be an accurate foretelling of the future or merely a coincidence? I will never tell.
Nostradumbass’s’s’s’s’s’s’s’
August 16, 2007 at 12:24 PM #76433Alex_angelParticipantCan you feel the love tonighhhhht. Where is the love. Ha. I love how you are calling each other NostraDumbasses. I didn’t go that low. I just called you guys NostraDomus’s. I’m glad the juvenile crowd took it upon themselves to insult the piggington members that post here. For shame. Tsk Tsk.
Here is my prediction.
None of you are happy. Your life sucks so you hope the same on others. You pray for the crash to affect people so that you can laugh at their lost and beleive that is makes your worthless existence mean something. Pathetic people!
August 16, 2007 at 12:24 PM #76554Alex_angelParticipantCan you feel the love tonighhhhht. Where is the love. Ha. I love how you are calling each other NostraDumbasses. I didn’t go that low. I just called you guys NostraDomus’s. I’m glad the juvenile crowd took it upon themselves to insult the piggington members that post here. For shame. Tsk Tsk.
Here is my prediction.
None of you are happy. Your life sucks so you hope the same on others. You pray for the crash to affect people so that you can laugh at their lost and beleive that is makes your worthless existence mean something. Pathetic people!
August 16, 2007 at 12:24 PM #76579Alex_angelParticipantCan you feel the love tonighhhhht. Where is the love. Ha. I love how you are calling each other NostraDumbasses. I didn’t go that low. I just called you guys NostraDomus’s. I’m glad the juvenile crowd took it upon themselves to insult the piggington members that post here. For shame. Tsk Tsk.
Here is my prediction.
None of you are happy. Your life sucks so you hope the same on others. You pray for the crash to affect people so that you can laugh at their lost and beleive that is makes your worthless existence mean something. Pathetic people!
August 16, 2007 at 12:58 PM #76463gnParticipantHere is my prediction:
As a consequence of Alex’s lack of real estate knowledge/understanding, he will become increasingly baffled by the housing market.
Alex will become increasingly confused and exhibit a split personality, bordering on schizophrenia.
Eventually, he will give up & pull the trigger (buy a house). He will end up being a “knife catcher” & got cut badly π
August 16, 2007 at 12:58 PM #76584gnParticipantHere is my prediction:
As a consequence of Alex’s lack of real estate knowledge/understanding, he will become increasingly baffled by the housing market.
Alex will become increasingly confused and exhibit a split personality, bordering on schizophrenia.
Eventually, he will give up & pull the trigger (buy a house). He will end up being a “knife catcher” & got cut badly π
August 16, 2007 at 12:58 PM #76610gnParticipantHere is my prediction:
As a consequence of Alex’s lack of real estate knowledge/understanding, he will become increasingly baffled by the housing market.
Alex will become increasingly confused and exhibit a split personality, bordering on schizophrenia.
Eventually, he will give up & pull the trigger (buy a house). He will end up being a “knife catcher” & got cut badly π
August 16, 2007 at 12:59 PM #76466SD RealtorParticipantAlex, some of us replied to your post in a rational manner with no name calling. I agree with you that name calling is not appropriate.
Would you care to address my response to your post?
SD Realtor
August 16, 2007 at 12:59 PM #76587SD RealtorParticipantAlex, some of us replied to your post in a rational manner with no name calling. I agree with you that name calling is not appropriate.
Would you care to address my response to your post?
SD Realtor
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.