Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Buying and Selling RE › Question about my Realtor
- This topic has 135 replies, 12 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 4 months ago by sdrealtor.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 31, 2010 at 3:02 PM #599148August 31, 2010 at 3:09 PM #598091briansd1Guest
[quote=DWCAP]
Sucks for you. I understand your frustration. Nice houses at good prices are rare gems right now.[/quote]I think that sobmaz was wondering why the agent didn’t call her to see if she wanted to put in an offer. That’s the least the agent could have done for a loyal customer. Then the ball would have been in sobmaz’s court.
Getting sobmaz involved in the offer would also have better represented the interests of the seller who might have gotten a better price, had sobmaz’ bid been higher.
I’m thinking that, for some reason, the agent (who was also the listing agent) wanted to sell the house to the other party. Why? we don’t know.
I agree with xbox. The agent screwed both the seller and sobmaz at the same time.
August 31, 2010 at 3:09 PM #598185briansd1Guest[quote=DWCAP]
Sucks for you. I understand your frustration. Nice houses at good prices are rare gems right now.[/quote]I think that sobmaz was wondering why the agent didn’t call her to see if she wanted to put in an offer. That’s the least the agent could have done for a loyal customer. Then the ball would have been in sobmaz’s court.
Getting sobmaz involved in the offer would also have better represented the interests of the seller who might have gotten a better price, had sobmaz’ bid been higher.
I’m thinking that, for some reason, the agent (who was also the listing agent) wanted to sell the house to the other party. Why? we don’t know.
I agree with xbox. The agent screwed both the seller and sobmaz at the same time.
August 31, 2010 at 3:09 PM #598730briansd1Guest[quote=DWCAP]
Sucks for you. I understand your frustration. Nice houses at good prices are rare gems right now.[/quote]I think that sobmaz was wondering why the agent didn’t call her to see if she wanted to put in an offer. That’s the least the agent could have done for a loyal customer. Then the ball would have been in sobmaz’s court.
Getting sobmaz involved in the offer would also have better represented the interests of the seller who might have gotten a better price, had sobmaz’ bid been higher.
I’m thinking that, for some reason, the agent (who was also the listing agent) wanted to sell the house to the other party. Why? we don’t know.
I agree with xbox. The agent screwed both the seller and sobmaz at the same time.
August 31, 2010 at 3:09 PM #598836briansd1Guest[quote=DWCAP]
Sucks for you. I understand your frustration. Nice houses at good prices are rare gems right now.[/quote]I think that sobmaz was wondering why the agent didn’t call her to see if she wanted to put in an offer. That’s the least the agent could have done for a loyal customer. Then the ball would have been in sobmaz’s court.
Getting sobmaz involved in the offer would also have better represented the interests of the seller who might have gotten a better price, had sobmaz’ bid been higher.
I’m thinking that, for some reason, the agent (who was also the listing agent) wanted to sell the house to the other party. Why? we don’t know.
I agree with xbox. The agent screwed both the seller and sobmaz at the same time.
August 31, 2010 at 3:09 PM #599153briansd1Guest[quote=DWCAP]
Sucks for you. I understand your frustration. Nice houses at good prices are rare gems right now.[/quote]I think that sobmaz was wondering why the agent didn’t call her to see if she wanted to put in an offer. That’s the least the agent could have done for a loyal customer. Then the ball would have been in sobmaz’s court.
Getting sobmaz involved in the offer would also have better represented the interests of the seller who might have gotten a better price, had sobmaz’ bid been higher.
I’m thinking that, for some reason, the agent (who was also the listing agent) wanted to sell the house to the other party. Why? we don’t know.
I agree with xbox. The agent screwed both the seller and sobmaz at the same time.
August 31, 2010 at 3:14 PM #598101sdrealtorParticipantSounds a bit funky to me too. The commission on short sale should be at least 5%. Sometimes the lender will lower it if same agent represents both sides but all she needed to do was to have a colleague represent you to ensure full commission paid. Then she could throw the colleague a small bone for their time and each aprty would have separate representation which is better any way.
I think you should probably have that talk with your agent. I wouldnt be accusitory but I would want to know what happened. There could be a perfectly good reason. For her sake there better be…
August 31, 2010 at 3:14 PM #598195sdrealtorParticipantSounds a bit funky to me too. The commission on short sale should be at least 5%. Sometimes the lender will lower it if same agent represents both sides but all she needed to do was to have a colleague represent you to ensure full commission paid. Then she could throw the colleague a small bone for their time and each aprty would have separate representation which is better any way.
I think you should probably have that talk with your agent. I wouldnt be accusitory but I would want to know what happened. There could be a perfectly good reason. For her sake there better be…
August 31, 2010 at 3:14 PM #598740sdrealtorParticipantSounds a bit funky to me too. The commission on short sale should be at least 5%. Sometimes the lender will lower it if same agent represents both sides but all she needed to do was to have a colleague represent you to ensure full commission paid. Then she could throw the colleague a small bone for their time and each aprty would have separate representation which is better any way.
I think you should probably have that talk with your agent. I wouldnt be accusitory but I would want to know what happened. There could be a perfectly good reason. For her sake there better be…
August 31, 2010 at 3:14 PM #598846sdrealtorParticipantSounds a bit funky to me too. The commission on short sale should be at least 5%. Sometimes the lender will lower it if same agent represents both sides but all she needed to do was to have a colleague represent you to ensure full commission paid. Then she could throw the colleague a small bone for their time and each aprty would have separate representation which is better any way.
I think you should probably have that talk with your agent. I wouldnt be accusitory but I would want to know what happened. There could be a perfectly good reason. For her sake there better be…
August 31, 2010 at 3:14 PM #599163sdrealtorParticipantSounds a bit funky to me too. The commission on short sale should be at least 5%. Sometimes the lender will lower it if same agent represents both sides but all she needed to do was to have a colleague represent you to ensure full commission paid. Then she could throw the colleague a small bone for their time and each aprty would have separate representation which is better any way.
I think you should probably have that talk with your agent. I wouldnt be accusitory but I would want to know what happened. There could be a perfectly good reason. For her sake there better be…
August 31, 2010 at 3:16 PM #598106briansd1GuestMaybe the buyer was a good friend or relative of the agent?
August 31, 2010 at 3:16 PM #598200briansd1GuestMaybe the buyer was a good friend or relative of the agent?
August 31, 2010 at 3:16 PM #598745briansd1GuestMaybe the buyer was a good friend or relative of the agent?
August 31, 2010 at 3:16 PM #598851briansd1GuestMaybe the buyer was a good friend or relative of the agent?
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Buying and Selling RE’ is closed to new topics and replies.