Proposition 23

[sreeb]

[quote=no_such_reality]Are you reducing your electricity consumption by 40%? That’s one of the assumptions of AB32, that the goals can be met by consumers reducing their demand through purchasing higher efficiency items.[/quote]

I have already cut my consumption by over 40%. I no longer have any low hanging fruit on my electricity tree. There are no more lights to be replaced. No more old and inefficient appliances. I would need bigger change like filling in my pool (which already has a high efficiency pump and controller). If another 40% is needed it won’t come from me.

[BigGovernmentIsGood]

I’ve grown weary of arguing with 80-year-old, logically impaired, closed-minded idealogues. That, and the fact that the polls show that proposition 23 is going to get crushed along with the amazing success of the calling parties I’ve participated in has convinced me that this thread is a waste of time. It’s amazing how quickly people pledge to vote no as soon as they learn that 98% of the funding for Proposition 23 is coming from out-of-state oil companies. The amount of voter rage out there against BigOilBigPollution is incredibly high.

I shall make my triumphant return to this thread after Prop 23 gets crushed in the actual voting. Until then, I encourage the pro-prop-23 crowd to continue to make up ‘facts’ and convince each other how bad prop 23 is going to be. Most of the public-at-large knows that you are full of BS.

Oh, and please continue to bring up Chevron. If any of you dinosaurs knew how to use Google, you would know that Chevron is actually neutral on Proposition 23:

http://articles.sfgate.com/2010-10-07/business/24115250_1_chevron-ceo-prop-natural-gas

[BigGovernmentIsGood]

I’ve grown weary of arguing with 80-year-old, logically impaired, closed-minded idealogues. That, and the fact that the polls show that proposition 23 is going to get crushed along with the amazing success of the calling parties I’ve participated in has convinced me that this thread is a waste of time. It’s amazing how quickly people pledge to vote no as soon as they learn that 98% of the funding for Proposition 23 is coming from out-of-state oil companies. The amount of voter rage out there against BigOilBigPollution is incredibly high.

I shall make my triumphant return to this thread after Prop 23 gets crushed in the actual voting. Until then, I encourage the pro-prop-23 crowd to continue to make up ‘facts’ and convince each other how bad prop 23 is going to be. Most of the public-at-large knows that you are full of BS.

Oh, and please continue to bring up Chevron. If any of you dinosaurs knew how to use Google, you would know that Chevron is actually neutral on Proposition 23:

http://articles.sfgate.com/2010-10-07/business/24115250_1_chevron-ceo-prop-natural-gas

[BigGovernmentIsGood]

I’ve grown weary of arguing with 80-year-old, logically impaired, closed-minded idealogues. That, and the fact that the polls show that proposition 23 is going to get crushed along with the amazing success of the calling parties I’ve participated in has convinced me that this thread is a waste of time. It’s amazing how quickly people pledge to vote no as soon as they learn that 98% of the funding for Proposition 23 is coming from out-of-state oil companies. The amount of voter rage out there against BigOilBigPollution is incredibly high.

I shall make my triumphant return to this thread after Prop 23 gets crushed in the actual voting. Until then, I encourage the pro-prop-23 crowd to continue to make up ‘facts’ and convince each other how bad prop 23 is going to be. Most of the public-at-large knows that you are full of BS.

Oh, and please continue to bring up Chevron. If any of you dinosaurs knew how to use Google, you would know that Chevron is actually neutral on Proposition 23:

http://articles.sfgate.com/2010-10-07/business/24115250_1_chevron-ceo-prop-natural-gas

[BigGovernmentIsGood]

I’ve grown weary of arguing with 80-year-old, logically impaired, closed-minded idealogues. That, and the fact that the polls show that proposition 23 is going to get crushed along with the amazing success of the calling parties I’ve participated in has convinced me that this thread is a waste of time. It’s amazing how quickly people pledge to vote no as soon as they learn that 98% of the funding for Proposition 23 is coming from out-of-state oil companies. The amount of voter rage out there against BigOilBigPollution is incredibly high.

I shall make my triumphant return to this thread after Prop 23 gets crushed in the actual voting. Until then, I encourage the pro-prop-23 crowd to continue to make up ‘facts’ and convince each other how bad prop 23 is going to be. Most of the public-at-large knows that you are full of BS.

Oh, and please continue to bring up Chevron. If any of you dinosaurs knew how to use Google, you would know that Chevron is actually neutral on Proposition 23:

http://articles.sfgate.com/2010-10-07/business/24115250_1_chevron-ceo-prop-natural-gas

[BigGovernmentIsGood]

I’ve grown weary of arguing with 80-year-old, logically impaired, closed-minded idealogues. That, and the fact that the polls show that proposition 23 is going to get crushed along with the amazing success of the calling parties I’ve participated in has convinced me that this thread is a waste of time. It’s amazing how quickly people pledge to vote no as soon as they learn that 98% of the funding for Proposition 23 is coming from out-of-state oil companies. The amount of voter rage out there against BigOilBigPollution is incredibly high.

I shall make my triumphant return to this thread after Prop 23 gets crushed in the actual voting. Until then, I encourage the pro-prop-23 crowd to continue to make up ‘facts’ and convince each other how bad prop 23 is going to be. Most of the public-at-large knows that you are full of BS.

Oh, and please continue to bring up Chevron. If any of you dinosaurs knew how to use Google, you would know that Chevron is actually neutral on Proposition 23:

http://articles.sfgate.com/2010-10-07/business/24115250_1_chevron-ceo-prop-natural-gas

[Coronita]

[quote=BigGovernmentIsGood]I’ve grown weary of arguing with 80-year-old, logically impaired, closed-minded idealogues. That, and the fact that the polls show that proposition 23 is going to get crushed along with the amazing success of the calling parties I’ve participated in has convinced me that this thread is a waste of time. It’s amazing how quickly people pledge to vote no as soon as they learn that 98% of the funding for Proposition 23 is coming from out-of-state oil companies. The amount of voter rage out there against BigOilBigPollution is incredibly high.

I shall make my triumphant return to this thread after Prop 23 gets crushed in the actual voting. Until then, I encourage the pro-prop-23 crowd to continue to make up ‘facts’ and convince each other how bad prop 23 is going to be. Most of the public-at-large knows that you are full of BS.

Oh, and please continue to bring up Chevron. If any of you dinosaurs knew how to use Google, you would know that Chevron is actually neutral on Proposition 23:

http://articles.sfgate.com/2010-10-07/business/24115250_1_chevron-ceo-prop-natural-gas%5B/quote%5D

Well, observing from this thread, I still don’t see you answering EconProf and Allan’s questions.. Where’s your proof of the 500k green jobs? And if there’s anything to say about them, I’m sure if you ping “equalizer”, he as a few choice words about the “green job scam”…..

Growing weary, or just don’t have data? Why don’t you just fess up that you don’t have any data to back those numbers….

[Coronita]

[quote=BigGovernmentIsGood]I’ve grown weary of arguing with 80-year-old, logically impaired, closed-minded idealogues. That, and the fact that the polls show that proposition 23 is going to get crushed along with the amazing success of the calling parties I’ve participated in has convinced me that this thread is a waste of time. It’s amazing how quickly people pledge to vote no as soon as they learn that 98% of the funding for Proposition 23 is coming from out-of-state oil companies. The amount of voter rage out there against BigOilBigPollution is incredibly high.

I shall make my triumphant return to this thread after Prop 23 gets crushed in the actual voting. Until then, I encourage the pro-prop-23 crowd to continue to make up ‘facts’ and convince each other how bad prop 23 is going to be. Most of the public-at-large knows that you are full of BS.

Oh, and please continue to bring up Chevron. If any of you dinosaurs knew how to use Google, you would know that Chevron is actually neutral on Proposition 23:

http://articles.sfgate.com/2010-10-07/business/24115250_1_chevron-ceo-prop-natural-gas%5B/quote%5D

Well, observing from this thread, I still don’t see you answering EconProf and Allan’s questions.. Where’s your proof of the 500k green jobs? And if there’s anything to say about them, I’m sure if you ping “equalizer”, he as a few choice words about the “green job scam”…..

Growing weary, or just don’t have data? Why don’t you just fess up that you don’t have any data to back those numbers….

[Coronita]

[quote=BigGovernmentIsGood]I’ve grown weary of arguing with 80-year-old, logically impaired, closed-minded idealogues. That, and the fact that the polls show that proposition 23 is going to get crushed along with the amazing success of the calling parties I’ve participated in has convinced me that this thread is a waste of time. It’s amazing how quickly people pledge to vote no as soon as they learn that 98% of the funding for Proposition 23 is coming from out-of-state oil companies. The amount of voter rage out there against BigOilBigPollution is incredibly high.

I shall make my triumphant return to this thread after Prop 23 gets crushed in the actual voting. Until then, I encourage the pro-prop-23 crowd to continue to make up ‘facts’ and convince each other how bad prop 23 is going to be. Most of the public-at-large knows that you are full of BS.

Oh, and please continue to bring up Chevron. If any of you dinosaurs knew how to use Google, you would know that Chevron is actually neutral on Proposition 23:

http://articles.sfgate.com/2010-10-07/business/24115250_1_chevron-ceo-prop-natural-gas%5B/quote%5D

Well, observing from this thread, I still don’t see you answering EconProf and Allan’s questions.. Where’s your proof of the 500k green jobs? And if there’s anything to say about them, I’m sure if you ping “equalizer”, he as a few choice words about the “green job scam”…..

Growing weary, or just don’t have data? Why don’t you just fess up that you don’t have any data to back those numbers….

[Coronita]

[quote=BigGovernmentIsGood]I’ve grown weary of arguing with 80-year-old, logically impaired, closed-minded idealogues. That, and the fact that the polls show that proposition 23 is going to get crushed along with the amazing success of the calling parties I’ve participated in has convinced me that this thread is a waste of time. It’s amazing how quickly people pledge to vote no as soon as they learn that 98% of the funding for Proposition 23 is coming from out-of-state oil companies. The amount of voter rage out there against BigOilBigPollution is incredibly high.

I shall make my triumphant return to this thread after Prop 23 gets crushed in the actual voting. Until then, I encourage the pro-prop-23 crowd to continue to make up ‘facts’ and convince each other how bad prop 23 is going to be. Most of the public-at-large knows that you are full of BS.

Oh, and please continue to bring up Chevron. If any of you dinosaurs knew how to use Google, you would know that Chevron is actually neutral on Proposition 23:

http://articles.sfgate.com/2010-10-07/business/24115250_1_chevron-ceo-prop-natural-gas%5B/quote%5D

Well, observing from this thread, I still don’t see you answering EconProf and Allan’s questions.. Where’s your proof of the 500k green jobs? And if there’s anything to say about them, I’m sure if you ping “equalizer”, he as a few choice words about the “green job scam”…..

Growing weary, or just don’t have data? Why don’t you just fess up that you don’t have any data to back those numbers….

[Coronita]

[quote=BigGovernmentIsGood]I’ve grown weary of arguing with 80-year-old, logically impaired, closed-minded idealogues. That, and the fact that the polls show that proposition 23 is going to get crushed along with the amazing success of the calling parties I’ve participated in has convinced me that this thread is a waste of time. It’s amazing how quickly people pledge to vote no as soon as they learn that 98% of the funding for Proposition 23 is coming from out-of-state oil companies. The amount of voter rage out there against BigOilBigPollution is incredibly high.

I shall make my triumphant return to this thread after Prop 23 gets crushed in the actual voting. Until then, I encourage the pro-prop-23 crowd to continue to make up ‘facts’ and convince each other how bad prop 23 is going to be. Most of the public-at-large knows that you are full of BS.

Oh, and please continue to bring up Chevron. If any of you dinosaurs knew how to use Google, you would know that Chevron is actually neutral on Proposition 23:

http://articles.sfgate.com/2010-10-07/business/24115250_1_chevron-ceo-prop-natural-gas%5B/quote%5D

Well, observing from this thread, I still don’t see you answering EconProf and Allan’s questions.. Where’s your proof of the 500k green jobs? And if there’s anything to say about them, I’m sure if you ping “equalizer”, he as a few choice words about the “green job scam”…..

Growing weary, or just don’t have data? Why don’t you just fess up that you don’t have any data to back those numbers….

[Allan from Fallbrook]

FLU: 500,000 green jobs? What 500,000 green jobs? No, no, no: According to BigGubment, this has always been about Prop 23 (which none of us were for, if he’d actually bothered to read the replies).

He can’t provide the data, so, like the rest of his Bolshevik co-religionists, he ignores the questions. He knows that, like Prop. 23, he’d get crushed in a fair fight where he actually had to rely on facts and data.

Aside from Prop. 23, I think we also know what’s going to get crushed in the mid-terms. Like IForget and TheBreeze before him, he’ll retreat back to his home under the bridge.

[Allan from Fallbrook]

FLU: 500,000 green jobs? What 500,000 green jobs? No, no, no: According to BigGubment, this has always been about Prop 23 (which none of us were for, if he’d actually bothered to read the replies).

He can’t provide the data, so, like the rest of his Bolshevik co-religionists, he ignores the questions. He knows that, like Prop. 23, he’d get crushed in a fair fight where he actually had to rely on facts and data.

Aside from Prop. 23, I think we also know what’s going to get crushed in the mid-terms. Like IForget and TheBreeze before him, he’ll retreat back to his home under the bridge.

[Allan from Fallbrook]

FLU: 500,000 green jobs? What 500,000 green jobs? No, no, no: According to BigGubment, this has always been about Prop 23 (which none of us were for, if he’d actually bothered to read the replies).

He can’t provide the data, so, like the rest of his Bolshevik co-religionists, he ignores the questions. He knows that, like Prop. 23, he’d get crushed in a fair fight where he actually had to rely on facts and data.

Aside from Prop. 23, I think we also know what’s going to get crushed in the mid-terms. Like IForget and TheBreeze before him, he’ll retreat back to his home under the bridge.

[Allan from Fallbrook]

FLU: 500,000 green jobs? What 500,000 green jobs? No, no, no: According to BigGubment, this has always been about Prop 23 (which none of us were for, if he’d actually bothered to read the replies).

He can’t provide the data, so, like the rest of his Bolshevik co-religionists, he ignores the questions. He knows that, like Prop. 23, he’d get crushed in a fair fight where he actually had to rely on facts and data.

Aside from Prop. 23, I think we also know what’s going to get crushed in the mid-terms. Like IForget and TheBreeze before him, he’ll retreat back to his home under the bridge.

[Author]

Posts