Proposed quarry near Temecula/Fallbrook and home values?

[Anonymous]

years ago, when i was too obstinate to listen, a very wise friend told me that if two people have shared VALUES – which, unlike INTERESTS and BELIEFS – are not apt to change, find each other attractive, compatible and can be good friends – will be more successful at the marriage game than those who are just looking for a hot body and/or a meal ticket.

Dharma, I agee with the above but am of the opinion that values and a belief system is often blurred. Attractiveness and compatibility are also very important. Physical attractiveness much less so because when/if love kicks in, that perception is no longer static. Compatibility being at the top of the list because if two people can’t get along it doesn’t matter what else they share.

About marriage, although it’s something I presently think I’d like to do, it’s still scary to me. I like to think positive in terms of it being something I can do in the future, but as I said before it can be a hard thing.

All in all, if compatibility in most things are present, I guess it depends on how much two people want to do it. When the sex is hot that helps, right? haha! 🙂

Really going off topic here, but somehow we got off on marriage and relationships. One comment about physical appearance. In any relationship between a man a woman, people will change, wrinkles and men lose hair. So someone getting less attractive in terms of physical appearance should be something that you cope with. However, some things for me would be hard to cope with. For instance if a man becomes a “balloon”. This may be a little crass, but I’m going to be direct: I can’t handle 300 pounds on top of me. In that situation I’ll still love the person, but…

[Anonymous]

…but he had almost nothing when they married. her trust owns everything. if she dies before him (unlikely), he would be able to live in HER house and drive his car (owned by her) until he dies.

What’s wrong with this picture?..

Dharma, your best friend’s hubby didn’t even have a CAR when he married her?? No wonder she needed a trust.

[Anonymous]

…but he had almost nothing when they married. her trust owns everything. if she dies before him (unlikely), he would be able to live in HER house and drive his car (owned by her) until he dies.

What’s wrong with this picture?..

Dharma, your best friend’s hubby didn’t even have a CAR when he married her?? No wonder she needed a trust.

[Anonymous]

…but he had almost nothing when they married. her trust owns everything. if she dies before him (unlikely), he would be able to live in HER house and drive his car (owned by her) until he dies.

What’s wrong with this picture?..

Dharma, your best friend’s hubby didn’t even have a CAR when he married her?? No wonder she needed a trust.

[Anonymous]

…but he had almost nothing when they married. her trust owns everything. if she dies before him (unlikely), he would be able to live in HER house and drive his car (owned by her) until he dies.

What’s wrong with this picture?..

Dharma, your best friend’s hubby didn’t even have a CAR when he married her?? No wonder she needed a trust.

[Anonymous]

…but he had almost nothing when they married. her trust owns everything. if she dies before him (unlikely), he would be able to live in HER house and drive his car (owned by her) until he dies.

What’s wrong with this picture?..

Dharma, your best friend’s hubby didn’t even have a CAR when he married her?? No wonder she needed a trust.

[waiting hawk]

“I used that time to rebuild and get reacquainted with myself. ”

Do tell 😉

[waiting hawk]

“I used that time to rebuild and get reacquainted with myself. ”

Do tell 😉

[waiting hawk]

“I used that time to rebuild and get reacquainted with myself. ”

Do tell 😉

[waiting hawk]

“I used that time to rebuild and get reacquainted with myself. ”

Do tell 😉

[waiting hawk]

“I used that time to rebuild and get reacquainted with myself. ”

Do tell 😉

[dharmagirl]

Of course, he had a car. And a job. He’s a great guy. He just happens to be a totally regular guy who met a very wealthy, savvy woman.

They’ve been married for more than a decade – very happily. At the risk of sounding totally corny, I think they ‘complete’ each other. Whatever it is, it seems to work for them. I dont typically quiz other people on their personal financial arrangements.

My point to the post was that people with assets can protect themselves and still play well with others.

If you are a woman with children, and you marry someone who has kids from previous marital entanglements, it only makes sense to protect the property that you might want to leave to your own heirs someday.

[dharmagirl]

Of course, he had a car. And a job. He’s a great guy. He just happens to be a totally regular guy who met a very wealthy, savvy woman.

They’ve been married for more than a decade – very happily. At the risk of sounding totally corny, I think they ‘complete’ each other. Whatever it is, it seems to work for them. I dont typically quiz other people on their personal financial arrangements.

My point to the post was that people with assets can protect themselves and still play well with others.

If you are a woman with children, and you marry someone who has kids from previous marital entanglements, it only makes sense to protect the property that you might want to leave to your own heirs someday.

[dharmagirl]

Of course, he had a car. And a job. He’s a great guy. He just happens to be a totally regular guy who met a very wealthy, savvy woman.

They’ve been married for more than a decade – very happily. At the risk of sounding totally corny, I think they ‘complete’ each other. Whatever it is, it seems to work for them. I dont typically quiz other people on their personal financial arrangements.

My point to the post was that people with assets can protect themselves and still play well with others.

If you are a woman with children, and you marry someone who has kids from previous marital entanglements, it only makes sense to protect the property that you might want to leave to your own heirs someday.

[dharmagirl]

Of course, he had a car. And a job. He’s a great guy. He just happens to be a totally regular guy who met a very wealthy, savvy woman.

They’ve been married for more than a decade – very happily. At the risk of sounding totally corny, I think they ‘complete’ each other. Whatever it is, it seems to work for them. I dont typically quiz other people on their personal financial arrangements.

My point to the post was that people with assets can protect themselves and still play well with others.

If you are a woman with children, and you marry someone who has kids from previous marital entanglements, it only makes sense to protect the property that you might want to leave to your own heirs someday.

[Author]

Posts