Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Properties or Areas › Price increase in Santaluz!
- This topic has 35 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 4 months ago by
NotCranky.
-
AuthorPosts
-
-
November 21, 2007 at 5:23 AM #10966
-
November 21, 2007 at 7:36 AM #102323
ocrenter
Participantquestion is when did this seller buy his home and how much did he buy it for and how was it financed?
assuming a flip situation. this flipper is looking at the fact that he has been holding on with very high carrying cost. as the home stays on the market past 100 days, that’s 3 additional months of carrying cost. who should bear the burden of these cost? obviously not the flipper in question. so he decides in his infinate wisdom to pass it on to the would be buyer.
-
November 21, 2007 at 7:39 AM #102328
NotCranky
ParticipantRaptorduck, I thought you were goingot quit looking for 6 months or more? What has made you change your mind?
Thanks -
November 21, 2007 at 7:39 AM #102404
NotCranky
ParticipantRaptorduck, I thought you were goingot quit looking for 6 months or more? What has made you change your mind?
Thanks -
November 21, 2007 at 7:39 AM #102416
NotCranky
ParticipantRaptorduck, I thought you were goingot quit looking for 6 months or more? What has made you change your mind?
Thanks -
November 21, 2007 at 7:39 AM #102440
NotCranky
ParticipantRaptorduck, I thought you were goingot quit looking for 6 months or more? What has made you change your mind?
Thanks -
November 21, 2007 at 7:39 AM #102468
NotCranky
ParticipantRaptorduck, I thought you were goingot quit looking for 6 months or more? What has made you change your mind?
Thanks -
November 21, 2007 at 9:05 AM #102377
raptorduck
Participantocrenter, the home was bought in late 2005 for just under the new asking price (above the previous asking price).
I have no idea if the buyer was a flipper.
-
November 21, 2007 at 12:13 PM #102513
ocrenter
Participantthe home was bought in late 2005 for just under the new asking price (above the previous asking price).
i see, the magical 2 year reset! I thought the Governator is going to bail him out from the reset???
-
November 21, 2007 at 2:47 PM #102583
NotCranky
ParticipantThanks Raptorduck, I agree that it is all about having your finger on the pulse of your target areas and the broader market situation as well, good for you.
-
November 21, 2007 at 2:47 PM #102658
NotCranky
ParticipantThanks Raptorduck, I agree that it is all about having your finger on the pulse of your target areas and the broader market situation as well, good for you.
-
November 21, 2007 at 2:47 PM #102671
NotCranky
ParticipantThanks Raptorduck, I agree that it is all about having your finger on the pulse of your target areas and the broader market situation as well, good for you.
-
November 21, 2007 at 2:47 PM #102695
NotCranky
ParticipantThanks Raptorduck, I agree that it is all about having your finger on the pulse of your target areas and the broader market situation as well, good for you.
-
November 21, 2007 at 2:47 PM #102724
NotCranky
ParticipantThanks Raptorduck, I agree that it is all about having your finger on the pulse of your target areas and the broader market situation as well, good for you.
-
November 21, 2007 at 12:13 PM #102587
ocrenter
Participantthe home was bought in late 2005 for just under the new asking price (above the previous asking price).
i see, the magical 2 year reset! I thought the Governator is going to bail him out from the reset???
-
November 21, 2007 at 12:13 PM #102601
ocrenter
Participantthe home was bought in late 2005 for just under the new asking price (above the previous asking price).
i see, the magical 2 year reset! I thought the Governator is going to bail him out from the reset???
-
November 21, 2007 at 12:13 PM #102625
ocrenter
Participantthe home was bought in late 2005 for just under the new asking price (above the previous asking price).
i see, the magical 2 year reset! I thought the Governator is going to bail him out from the reset???
-
November 21, 2007 at 12:13 PM #102654
ocrenter
Participantthe home was bought in late 2005 for just under the new asking price (above the previous asking price).
i see, the magical 2 year reset! I thought the Governator is going to bail him out from the reset???
-
-
November 21, 2007 at 9:05 AM #102454
raptorduck
Participantocrenter, the home was bought in late 2005 for just under the new asking price (above the previous asking price).
I have no idea if the buyer was a flipper.
-
November 21, 2007 at 9:05 AM #102466
raptorduck
Participantocrenter, the home was bought in late 2005 for just under the new asking price (above the previous asking price).
I have no idea if the buyer was a flipper.
-
November 21, 2007 at 9:05 AM #102490
raptorduck
Participantocrenter, the home was bought in late 2005 for just under the new asking price (above the previous asking price).
I have no idea if the buyer was a flipper.
-
November 21, 2007 at 9:05 AM #102517
raptorduck
Participantocrenter, the home was bought in late 2005 for just under the new asking price (above the previous asking price).
I have no idea if the buyer was a flipper.
-
November 21, 2007 at 9:11 AM #102382
raptorduck
ParticipantRustico. I have not changed my mind. I have not been down there to tour any houses since my last trip and do not plan to tour houses until the Spring.
However, I am certainly still collecting data on the market down there to further arm myself with information. My agent is doing the same.
We are tracking every house we have toured and even a few we have not toured. A few of those may be of interest if they are still on the market in the Spring. Those are ones we put on a list of “priority” tracking and include the one that is the subject of this post. Due to the price increase, that house is off our “priority” list, but we still plan to track it. We are being more diligent about tracking homes on that list, so want it to be manageble.
-
November 21, 2007 at 10:30 AM #102457
Bugs
ParticipantYou’re being smart in look at other properties besides just the ones you’re interested in. They aren’t alternatives for you but they are alternatives for some of the buyers and sellers competing with the properties you are interested in. Thus, they provide context and background for your decision process.
-
November 21, 2007 at 10:30 AM #102534
Bugs
ParticipantYou’re being smart in look at other properties besides just the ones you’re interested in. They aren’t alternatives for you but they are alternatives for some of the buyers and sellers competing with the properties you are interested in. Thus, they provide context and background for your decision process.
-
November 21, 2007 at 10:30 AM #102546
Bugs
ParticipantYou’re being smart in look at other properties besides just the ones you’re interested in. They aren’t alternatives for you but they are alternatives for some of the buyers and sellers competing with the properties you are interested in. Thus, they provide context and background for your decision process.
-
November 21, 2007 at 10:30 AM #102570
Bugs
ParticipantYou’re being smart in look at other properties besides just the ones you’re interested in. They aren’t alternatives for you but they are alternatives for some of the buyers and sellers competing with the properties you are interested in. Thus, they provide context and background for your decision process.
-
November 21, 2007 at 10:30 AM #102599
Bugs
ParticipantYou’re being smart in look at other properties besides just the ones you’re interested in. They aren’t alternatives for you but they are alternatives for some of the buyers and sellers competing with the properties you are interested in. Thus, they provide context and background for your decision process.
-
-
November 21, 2007 at 9:11 AM #102459
raptorduck
ParticipantRustico. I have not changed my mind. I have not been down there to tour any houses since my last trip and do not plan to tour houses until the Spring.
However, I am certainly still collecting data on the market down there to further arm myself with information. My agent is doing the same.
We are tracking every house we have toured and even a few we have not toured. A few of those may be of interest if they are still on the market in the Spring. Those are ones we put on a list of “priority” tracking and include the one that is the subject of this post. Due to the price increase, that house is off our “priority” list, but we still plan to track it. We are being more diligent about tracking homes on that list, so want it to be manageble.
-
November 21, 2007 at 9:11 AM #102471
raptorduck
ParticipantRustico. I have not changed my mind. I have not been down there to tour any houses since my last trip and do not plan to tour houses until the Spring.
However, I am certainly still collecting data on the market down there to further arm myself with information. My agent is doing the same.
We are tracking every house we have toured and even a few we have not toured. A few of those may be of interest if they are still on the market in the Spring. Those are ones we put on a list of “priority” tracking and include the one that is the subject of this post. Due to the price increase, that house is off our “priority” list, but we still plan to track it. We are being more diligent about tracking homes on that list, so want it to be manageble.
-
November 21, 2007 at 9:11 AM #102495
raptorduck
ParticipantRustico. I have not changed my mind. I have not been down there to tour any houses since my last trip and do not plan to tour houses until the Spring.
However, I am certainly still collecting data on the market down there to further arm myself with information. My agent is doing the same.
We are tracking every house we have toured and even a few we have not toured. A few of those may be of interest if they are still on the market in the Spring. Those are ones we put on a list of “priority” tracking and include the one that is the subject of this post. Due to the price increase, that house is off our “priority” list, but we still plan to track it. We are being more diligent about tracking homes on that list, so want it to be manageble.
-
November 21, 2007 at 9:11 AM #102522
raptorduck
ParticipantRustico. I have not changed my mind. I have not been down there to tour any houses since my last trip and do not plan to tour houses until the Spring.
However, I am certainly still collecting data on the market down there to further arm myself with information. My agent is doing the same.
We are tracking every house we have toured and even a few we have not toured. A few of those may be of interest if they are still on the market in the Spring. Those are ones we put on a list of “priority” tracking and include the one that is the subject of this post. Due to the price increase, that house is off our “priority” list, but we still plan to track it. We are being more diligent about tracking homes on that list, so want it to be manageble.
-
-
November 21, 2007 at 7:36 AM #102399
ocrenter
Participantquestion is when did this seller buy his home and how much did he buy it for and how was it financed?
assuming a flip situation. this flipper is looking at the fact that he has been holding on with very high carrying cost. as the home stays on the market past 100 days, that’s 3 additional months of carrying cost. who should bear the burden of these cost? obviously not the flipper in question. so he decides in his infinate wisdom to pass it on to the would be buyer.
-
November 21, 2007 at 7:36 AM #102411
ocrenter
Participantquestion is when did this seller buy his home and how much did he buy it for and how was it financed?
assuming a flip situation. this flipper is looking at the fact that he has been holding on with very high carrying cost. as the home stays on the market past 100 days, that’s 3 additional months of carrying cost. who should bear the burden of these cost? obviously not the flipper in question. so he decides in his infinate wisdom to pass it on to the would be buyer.
-
November 21, 2007 at 7:36 AM #102435
ocrenter
Participantquestion is when did this seller buy his home and how much did he buy it for and how was it financed?
assuming a flip situation. this flipper is looking at the fact that he has been holding on with very high carrying cost. as the home stays on the market past 100 days, that’s 3 additional months of carrying cost. who should bear the burden of these cost? obviously not the flipper in question. so he decides in his infinate wisdom to pass it on to the would be buyer.
-
November 21, 2007 at 7:36 AM #102463
ocrenter
Participantquestion is when did this seller buy his home and how much did he buy it for and how was it financed?
assuming a flip situation. this flipper is looking at the fact that he has been holding on with very high carrying cost. as the home stays on the market past 100 days, that’s 3 additional months of carrying cost. who should bear the burden of these cost? obviously not the flipper in question. so he decides in his infinate wisdom to pass it on to the would be buyer.
-
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.