Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Properties or Areas › Price increase in Santaluz!
- This topic has 35 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 5 months ago by
NotCranky.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 21, 2007 at 5:23 AM #10966November 21, 2007 at 7:36 AM #102323
ocrenter
Participantquestion is when did this seller buy his home and how much did he buy it for and how was it financed?
assuming a flip situation. this flipper is looking at the fact that he has been holding on with very high carrying cost. as the home stays on the market past 100 days, that’s 3 additional months of carrying cost. who should bear the burden of these cost? obviously not the flipper in question. so he decides in his infinate wisdom to pass it on to the would be buyer.
November 21, 2007 at 7:36 AM #102399Participantquestion is when did this seller buy his home and how much did he buy it for and how was it financed?
assuming a flip situation. this flipper is looking at the fact that he has been holding on with very high carrying cost. as the home stays on the market past 100 days, that’s 3 additional months of carrying cost. who should bear the burden of these cost? obviously not the flipper in question. so he decides in his infinate wisdom to pass it on to the would be buyer.
November 21, 2007 at 7:36 AM #102411Participantquestion is when did this seller buy his home and how much did he buy it for and how was it financed?
assuming a flip situation. this flipper is looking at the fact that he has been holding on with very high carrying cost. as the home stays on the market past 100 days, that’s 3 additional months of carrying cost. who should bear the burden of these cost? obviously not the flipper in question. so he decides in his infinate wisdom to pass it on to the would be buyer.
November 21, 2007 at 7:36 AM #102435Participantquestion is when did this seller buy his home and how much did he buy it for and how was it financed?
assuming a flip situation. this flipper is looking at the fact that he has been holding on with very high carrying cost. as the home stays on the market past 100 days, that’s 3 additional months of carrying cost. who should bear the burden of these cost? obviously not the flipper in question. so he decides in his infinate wisdom to pass it on to the would be buyer.
November 21, 2007 at 7:36 AM #102463Participantquestion is when did this seller buy his home and how much did he buy it for and how was it financed?
assuming a flip situation. this flipper is looking at the fact that he has been holding on with very high carrying cost. as the home stays on the market past 100 days, that’s 3 additional months of carrying cost. who should bear the burden of these cost? obviously not the flipper in question. so he decides in his infinate wisdom to pass it on to the would be buyer.
November 21, 2007 at 7:39 AM #102328NotCranky
ParticipantRaptorduck, I thought you were goingot quit looking for 6 months or more? What has made you change your mind?
ThanksNovember 21, 2007 at 7:39 AM #102404ParticipantRaptorduck, I thought you were goingot quit looking for 6 months or more? What has made you change your mind?
ThanksNovember 21, 2007 at 7:39 AM #102416ParticipantRaptorduck, I thought you were goingot quit looking for 6 months or more? What has made you change your mind?
ThanksNovember 21, 2007 at 7:39 AM #102440ParticipantRaptorduck, I thought you were goingot quit looking for 6 months or more? What has made you change your mind?
ThanksNovember 21, 2007 at 7:39 AM #102468ParticipantRaptorduck, I thought you were goingot quit looking for 6 months or more? What has made you change your mind?
ThanksNovember 21, 2007 at 9:05 AM #102377raptorduck
Participantocrenter, the home was bought in late 2005 for just under the new asking price (above the previous asking price).
I have no idea if the buyer was a flipper.
November 21, 2007 at 9:05 AM #102454Participantocrenter, the home was bought in late 2005 for just under the new asking price (above the previous asking price).
I have no idea if the buyer was a flipper.
November 21, 2007 at 9:05 AM #102466Participantocrenter, the home was bought in late 2005 for just under the new asking price (above the previous asking price).
I have no idea if the buyer was a flipper.
November 21, 2007 at 9:05 AM #102490Participantocrenter, the home was bought in late 2005 for just under the new asking price (above the previous asking price).
I have no idea if the buyer was a flipper.
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Properties or Areas’ is closed to new topics and replies.