Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Properties or Areas › price collapse in Chula Vista
- This topic has 487 replies, 37 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 2 months ago by sdrealtor.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 6, 2007 at 10:00 PM #111155December 6, 2007 at 10:00 PM #111180equalizerParticipant
I’m missing the pun joebaduba, do you mean that its no longer listed?
Are there any realtors from Chula Vista area that can comment on this street/neighborhood? Would SD/sdrealtor peruse few listing to check sales prices from 2005? Thanks
December 6, 2007 at 10:30 PM #111023CoronitaParticipantJust curious, I did a property tax search on 1308 SILVER HAWK.
Tax records says the assessed value is 850,000, and was 9/1/06 (perhaps it was reassessed down). Also, according to the tax records, this is no home owner exemption on this property (maybe an investement property???)
December 6, 2007 at 10:30 PM #111138CoronitaParticipantJust curious, I did a property tax search on 1308 SILVER HAWK.
Tax records says the assessed value is 850,000, and was 9/1/06 (perhaps it was reassessed down). Also, according to the tax records, this is no home owner exemption on this property (maybe an investement property???)
December 6, 2007 at 10:30 PM #111172CoronitaParticipantJust curious, I did a property tax search on 1308 SILVER HAWK.
Tax records says the assessed value is 850,000, and was 9/1/06 (perhaps it was reassessed down). Also, according to the tax records, this is no home owner exemption on this property (maybe an investement property???)
December 6, 2007 at 10:30 PM #111189CoronitaParticipantJust curious, I did a property tax search on 1308 SILVER HAWK.
Tax records says the assessed value is 850,000, and was 9/1/06 (perhaps it was reassessed down). Also, according to the tax records, this is no home owner exemption on this property (maybe an investement property???)
December 6, 2007 at 10:30 PM #111214CoronitaParticipantJust curious, I did a property tax search on 1308 SILVER HAWK.
Tax records says the assessed value is 850,000, and was 9/1/06 (perhaps it was reassessed down). Also, according to the tax records, this is no home owner exemption on this property (maybe an investement property???)
December 7, 2007 at 6:54 AM #111206tugg49ParticipantRules for qualifying are that you get out of all payments before you buy and then load up afterwards because you’re IN!
In 1990 I moved from the midwest and a 9 buck an hour job to San Diego and lived in a North Park 1 bedroom. It sucked but I got rid of the payments and was in a house within a year. Then I bought all the toys. San Diego rules are the real estate pays for the toys. It’s always been that way….just don’t get caught when the music stops.December 7, 2007 at 6:54 AM #111323tugg49ParticipantRules for qualifying are that you get out of all payments before you buy and then load up afterwards because you’re IN!
In 1990 I moved from the midwest and a 9 buck an hour job to San Diego and lived in a North Park 1 bedroom. It sucked but I got rid of the payments and was in a house within a year. Then I bought all the toys. San Diego rules are the real estate pays for the toys. It’s always been that way….just don’t get caught when the music stops.December 7, 2007 at 6:54 AM #111357tugg49ParticipantRules for qualifying are that you get out of all payments before you buy and then load up afterwards because you’re IN!
In 1990 I moved from the midwest and a 9 buck an hour job to San Diego and lived in a North Park 1 bedroom. It sucked but I got rid of the payments and was in a house within a year. Then I bought all the toys. San Diego rules are the real estate pays for the toys. It’s always been that way….just don’t get caught when the music stops.December 7, 2007 at 6:54 AM #111373tugg49ParticipantRules for qualifying are that you get out of all payments before you buy and then load up afterwards because you’re IN!
In 1990 I moved from the midwest and a 9 buck an hour job to San Diego and lived in a North Park 1 bedroom. It sucked but I got rid of the payments and was in a house within a year. Then I bought all the toys. San Diego rules are the real estate pays for the toys. It’s always been that way….just don’t get caught when the music stops.December 7, 2007 at 6:54 AM #111399tugg49ParticipantRules for qualifying are that you get out of all payments before you buy and then load up afterwards because you’re IN!
In 1990 I moved from the midwest and a 9 buck an hour job to San Diego and lived in a North Park 1 bedroom. It sucked but I got rid of the payments and was in a house within a year. Then I bought all the toys. San Diego rules are the real estate pays for the toys. It’s always been that way….just don’t get caught when the music stops.December 7, 2007 at 10:53 AM #111391joebadubaParticipantpun is… California once was a part of Mexico. I’ll leave it at that.
I live in the “older but nicer” part of Chula Vista west of 805, but it slips as every year goes by.
Sure, this house is in a nicer part of eastern CV, but unless it is really some impressive spread, which this is not, I can’t believe homes went for 7 figures anywhere down here.
December 7, 2007 at 10:53 AM #111509joebadubaParticipantpun is… California once was a part of Mexico. I’ll leave it at that.
I live in the “older but nicer” part of Chula Vista west of 805, but it slips as every year goes by.
Sure, this house is in a nicer part of eastern CV, but unless it is really some impressive spread, which this is not, I can’t believe homes went for 7 figures anywhere down here.
December 7, 2007 at 10:53 AM #111542joebadubaParticipantpun is… California once was a part of Mexico. I’ll leave it at that.
I live in the “older but nicer” part of Chula Vista west of 805, but it slips as every year goes by.
Sure, this house is in a nicer part of eastern CV, but unless it is really some impressive spread, which this is not, I can’t believe homes went for 7 figures anywhere down here.
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Properties or Areas’ is closed to new topics and replies.