Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Properties or Areas › price collapse in Chula Vista
- This topic has 487 replies, 37 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 2 months ago by sdrealtor.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 20, 2008 at 4:07 PM #226080June 20, 2008 at 4:07 PM #226110EugeneParticipant
Did some more research on Quintessa.
Their plan is to sell 98 homes. Out of 98, 55 have been definitively sold; 3 appear to be finished but I can’t find any records of their sales; 6 are being built right now; 3 are models; and the remaining 31 lots are empty.
Most houses were sold during ’06. I only see two original sales since August ’07. Either they suddenly ran out of buyers, or online records are updated with serious time lag (or maybe both).
Overall Quintessa looks “frozen”. There’s not much distress: 3 NODs, one guy behind on his property taxes, and one REO. One house is listed for sale for 1199k (good luck with that).
Median prices paid are 1100k for plan 1, 1200k for plan 2, and 1300k for plan 3.
Castillian next door is a lot more interesting. (I wonder why: they were selling at the same time) I see 8 defaults, 3 REOs, 2 short sales, and 5 knife-catchers. All this distress is causing major downward price pressure on the whole neighborhood. That’s probably why McMillin is introducing new smaller plans – it must be hard to compete with all the distressed 4000 sf inventory, so they are exploring a new niche.
Current median market value in the neighborhood seems to be around 800k. We’re almost through the spring bounce and I expect a second round of declines to begin shortly.
June 20, 2008 at 4:07 PM #226126EugeneParticipantDid some more research on Quintessa.
Their plan is to sell 98 homes. Out of 98, 55 have been definitively sold; 3 appear to be finished but I can’t find any records of their sales; 6 are being built right now; 3 are models; and the remaining 31 lots are empty.
Most houses were sold during ’06. I only see two original sales since August ’07. Either they suddenly ran out of buyers, or online records are updated with serious time lag (or maybe both).
Overall Quintessa looks “frozen”. There’s not much distress: 3 NODs, one guy behind on his property taxes, and one REO. One house is listed for sale for 1199k (good luck with that).
Median prices paid are 1100k for plan 1, 1200k for plan 2, and 1300k for plan 3.
Castillian next door is a lot more interesting. (I wonder why: they were selling at the same time) I see 8 defaults, 3 REOs, 2 short sales, and 5 knife-catchers. All this distress is causing major downward price pressure on the whole neighborhood. That’s probably why McMillin is introducing new smaller plans – it must be hard to compete with all the distressed 4000 sf inventory, so they are exploring a new niche.
Current median market value in the neighborhood seems to be around 800k. We’re almost through the spring bounce and I expect a second round of declines to begin shortly.
June 20, 2008 at 4:09 PM #225959recordsclerkParticipantI wonder if it had to do with the preferred lender for both Castillian and Quintessa. They are both very similar products. Lennar was going to build some homes in the neighborhood, but ended up selling the lots to one of the other builders and sold the Three models they built.
June 20, 2008 at 4:09 PM #226069recordsclerkParticipantI wonder if it had to do with the preferred lender for both Castillian and Quintessa. They are both very similar products. Lennar was going to build some homes in the neighborhood, but ended up selling the lots to one of the other builders and sold the Three models they built.
June 20, 2008 at 4:09 PM #226085recordsclerkParticipantI wonder if it had to do with the preferred lender for both Castillian and Quintessa. They are both very similar products. Lennar was going to build some homes in the neighborhood, but ended up selling the lots to one of the other builders and sold the Three models they built.
June 20, 2008 at 4:09 PM #226115recordsclerkParticipantI wonder if it had to do with the preferred lender for both Castillian and Quintessa. They are both very similar products. Lennar was going to build some homes in the neighborhood, but ended up selling the lots to one of the other builders and sold the Three models they built.
June 20, 2008 at 4:09 PM #226131recordsclerkParticipantI wonder if it had to do with the preferred lender for both Castillian and Quintessa. They are both very similar products. Lennar was going to build some homes in the neighborhood, but ended up selling the lots to one of the other builders and sold the Three models they built.
June 20, 2008 at 5:11 PM #225991EugeneParticipantI don’t see any patterns in lenders. In Castillian, out of 11 defaults and REOs, 7 were purchased with zero down, two guys put some money down but later refinanced, the remaining two are going to lose 40k and 100k.
ForeclosureRadar does not tell me anything mortgages that are still current. Maybe homeowners in Castillian have more 2/28’s and 5/1’s and homeowners in Quintessa have more neg-ams.
June 20, 2008 at 5:11 PM #226099EugeneParticipantI don’t see any patterns in lenders. In Castillian, out of 11 defaults and REOs, 7 were purchased with zero down, two guys put some money down but later refinanced, the remaining two are going to lose 40k and 100k.
ForeclosureRadar does not tell me anything mortgages that are still current. Maybe homeowners in Castillian have more 2/28’s and 5/1’s and homeowners in Quintessa have more neg-ams.
June 20, 2008 at 5:11 PM #226117EugeneParticipantI don’t see any patterns in lenders. In Castillian, out of 11 defaults and REOs, 7 were purchased with zero down, two guys put some money down but later refinanced, the remaining two are going to lose 40k and 100k.
ForeclosureRadar does not tell me anything mortgages that are still current. Maybe homeowners in Castillian have more 2/28’s and 5/1’s and homeowners in Quintessa have more neg-ams.
June 20, 2008 at 5:11 PM #226148EugeneParticipantI don’t see any patterns in lenders. In Castillian, out of 11 defaults and REOs, 7 were purchased with zero down, two guys put some money down but later refinanced, the remaining two are going to lose 40k and 100k.
ForeclosureRadar does not tell me anything mortgages that are still current. Maybe homeowners in Castillian have more 2/28’s and 5/1’s and homeowners in Quintessa have more neg-ams.
June 20, 2008 at 5:11 PM #226160EugeneParticipantI don’t see any patterns in lenders. In Castillian, out of 11 defaults and REOs, 7 were purchased with zero down, two guys put some money down but later refinanced, the remaining two are going to lose 40k and 100k.
ForeclosureRadar does not tell me anything mortgages that are still current. Maybe homeowners in Castillian have more 2/28’s and 5/1’s and homeowners in Quintessa have more neg-ams.
September 18, 2010 at 5:46 PM #606295sunny88ParticipantThere are tons of homes in CV now selling at 40% less than 4 years ago and there are no buyers… Is it possible that the prices will go down further, perhaps even another 20%?
September 18, 2010 at 5:46 PM #606383sunny88ParticipantThere are tons of homes in CV now selling at 40% less than 4 years ago and there are no buyers… Is it possible that the prices will go down further, perhaps even another 20%?
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Properties or Areas’ is closed to new topics and replies.