- This topic has 120 replies, 15 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 3 months ago by
an.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 21, 2009 at 9:52 PM #371769March 21, 2009 at 9:58 PM #371163
SD Realtor
ParticipantChris you brought up a very good point. It seems that this is a pretty crucial crossroads for our nation. If anything we really need the confidence of our creditors to stand behind us. For the life of me, if I was a creditor and I saw that the person who owed me money was drastically increasing expenditures rather then reducing them I would have to plan for an eventual default to protect myself.
It seems to me that this is about the worst time possible to have an ambitious spending plan.
March 21, 2009 at 9:58 PM #371452ParticipantChris you brought up a very good point. It seems that this is a pretty crucial crossroads for our nation. If anything we really need the confidence of our creditors to stand behind us. For the life of me, if I was a creditor and I saw that the person who owed me money was drastically increasing expenditures rather then reducing them I would have to plan for an eventual default to protect myself.
It seems to me that this is about the worst time possible to have an ambitious spending plan.
March 21, 2009 at 9:58 PM #371620ParticipantChris you brought up a very good point. It seems that this is a pretty crucial crossroads for our nation. If anything we really need the confidence of our creditors to stand behind us. For the life of me, if I was a creditor and I saw that the person who owed me money was drastically increasing expenditures rather then reducing them I would have to plan for an eventual default to protect myself.
It seems to me that this is about the worst time possible to have an ambitious spending plan.
March 21, 2009 at 9:58 PM #371663ParticipantChris you brought up a very good point. It seems that this is a pretty crucial crossroads for our nation. If anything we really need the confidence of our creditors to stand behind us. For the life of me, if I was a creditor and I saw that the person who owed me money was drastically increasing expenditures rather then reducing them I would have to plan for an eventual default to protect myself.
It seems to me that this is about the worst time possible to have an ambitious spending plan.
March 21, 2009 at 9:58 PM #371778ParticipantChris you brought up a very good point. It seems that this is a pretty crucial crossroads for our nation. If anything we really need the confidence of our creditors to stand behind us. For the life of me, if I was a creditor and I saw that the person who owed me money was drastically increasing expenditures rather then reducing them I would have to plan for an eventual default to protect myself.
It seems to me that this is about the worst time possible to have an ambitious spending plan.
March 21, 2009 at 11:16 PM #371173Veritas
Participant“Those who ignore history are doomed to repeat it.”
–George SantayanaMarch 21, 2009 at 11:16 PM #371462Participant“Those who ignore history are doomed to repeat it.”
–George SantayanaMarch 21, 2009 at 11:16 PM #371630Participant“Those who ignore history are doomed to repeat it.”
–George SantayanaMarch 21, 2009 at 11:16 PM #371673Participant“Those who ignore history are doomed to repeat it.”
–George SantayanaMarch 21, 2009 at 11:16 PM #371788Participant“Those who ignore history are doomed to repeat it.”
–George SantayanaMarch 22, 2009 at 8:47 AM #371228no_such_reality
ParticipantI just watched the idiots on Meet the Press compare the AIG bonuses to 0.001% of the GNP to illustrate how trivial it is.
Really? You’re comparing the bonuses of 73 people at a failed insurance/investment house to the output of the ENTIRE COUNTRY and rationalize it as being trivial?
March 22, 2009 at 8:47 AM #371516ParticipantI just watched the idiots on Meet the Press compare the AIG bonuses to 0.001% of the GNP to illustrate how trivial it is.
Really? You’re comparing the bonuses of 73 people at a failed insurance/investment house to the output of the ENTIRE COUNTRY and rationalize it as being trivial?
March 22, 2009 at 8:47 AM #371686ParticipantI just watched the idiots on Meet the Press compare the AIG bonuses to 0.001% of the GNP to illustrate how trivial it is.
Really? You’re comparing the bonuses of 73 people at a failed insurance/investment house to the output of the ENTIRE COUNTRY and rationalize it as being trivial?
March 22, 2009 at 8:47 AM #371730ParticipantI just watched the idiots on Meet the Press compare the AIG bonuses to 0.001% of the GNP to illustrate how trivial it is.
Really? You’re comparing the bonuses of 73 people at a failed insurance/investment house to the output of the ENTIRE COUNTRY and rationalize it as being trivial?
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.