Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Properties or Areas › Point Loma reducing a little
- This topic has 1,393 replies, 26 voices, and was last updated 12 years, 7 months ago by
briansd1.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 5, 2011 at 12:04 PM #649255January 5, 2011 at 5:39 PM #648237
jstoesz
Participant[quote=pemeliza]”That house is amazing, and for 300k I would jump all over it.”
If the house was listed at 299k, jstoesz would be all over it at 200k 🙂
All jokes aside, the high-end in PL got torched last year and this listing on Curtis may be a squishdown.[/quote]
Haha, true true. But if it were 300 there must be something wrong with it. Hence the need for 200.
January 5, 2011 at 5:39 PM #648308Participant[quote=pemeliza]”That house is amazing, and for 300k I would jump all over it.”
If the house was listed at 299k, jstoesz would be all over it at 200k 🙂
All jokes aside, the high-end in PL got torched last year and this listing on Curtis may be a squishdown.[/quote]
Haha, true true. But if it were 300 there must be something wrong with it. Hence the need for 200.
January 5, 2011 at 5:39 PM #648894Participant[quote=pemeliza]”That house is amazing, and for 300k I would jump all over it.”
If the house was listed at 299k, jstoesz would be all over it at 200k 🙂
All jokes aside, the high-end in PL got torched last year and this listing on Curtis may be a squishdown.[/quote]
Haha, true true. But if it were 300 there must be something wrong with it. Hence the need for 200.
January 5, 2011 at 5:39 PM #649031Participant[quote=pemeliza]”That house is amazing, and for 300k I would jump all over it.”
If the house was listed at 299k, jstoesz would be all over it at 200k 🙂
All jokes aside, the high-end in PL got torched last year and this listing on Curtis may be a squishdown.[/quote]
Haha, true true. But if it were 300 there must be something wrong with it. Hence the need for 200.
January 5, 2011 at 5:39 PM #649355Participant[quote=pemeliza]”That house is amazing, and for 300k I would jump all over it.”
If the house was listed at 299k, jstoesz would be all over it at 200k 🙂
All jokes aside, the high-end in PL got torched last year and this listing on Curtis may be a squishdown.[/quote]
Haha, true true. But if it were 300 there must be something wrong with it. Hence the need for 200.
January 6, 2011 at 10:49 AM #648417javatestcase
ParticipantWell, an offer was accepted on the Curtis and it now contingent, so I guess we will see what the bank will accept.
January 6, 2011 at 10:49 AM #648488ParticipantWell, an offer was accepted on the Curtis and it now contingent, so I guess we will see what the bank will accept.
January 6, 2011 at 10:49 AM #649074ParticipantWell, an offer was accepted on the Curtis and it now contingent, so I guess we will see what the bank will accept.
January 6, 2011 at 10:49 AM #649211ParticipantWell, an offer was accepted on the Curtis and it now contingent, so I guess we will see what the bank will accept.
January 6, 2011 at 10:49 AM #649536ParticipantWell, an offer was accepted on the Curtis and it now contingent, so I guess we will see what the bank will accept.
January 6, 2011 at 12:23 PM #648422sdrealtor
ParticipantIt will be interesting because it is basically for land value whatever that is. When I went back to look at the prior sale it was advertised as a complete fixer and selling for land value. It did say it was possible the lot could be split. It doesnt appear any substantial work was ever done while the current owners had it.
January 6, 2011 at 12:23 PM #648493ParticipantIt will be interesting because it is basically for land value whatever that is. When I went back to look at the prior sale it was advertised as a complete fixer and selling for land value. It did say it was possible the lot could be split. It doesnt appear any substantial work was ever done while the current owners had it.
January 6, 2011 at 12:23 PM #649079ParticipantIt will be interesting because it is basically for land value whatever that is. When I went back to look at the prior sale it was advertised as a complete fixer and selling for land value. It did say it was possible the lot could be split. It doesnt appear any substantial work was ever done while the current owners had it.
January 6, 2011 at 12:23 PM #649216ParticipantIt will be interesting because it is basically for land value whatever that is. When I went back to look at the prior sale it was advertised as a complete fixer and selling for land value. It did say it was possible the lot could be split. It doesnt appear any substantial work was ever done while the current owners had it.
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Properties or Areas’ is closed to new topics and replies.