- This topic has 640 replies, 30 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 12 months ago by scaredyclassic.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 22, 2009 at 2:32 PM #497350December 22, 2009 at 3:06 PM #496496briansd1Guest
In the 18th century, men married for estate planning and social advancement, not love. Old maids needed husbands before they got too old and are forced to enter the convent.
Ben Franklin is telling his friend: “stop wasting time and money on the young mistresses. Marry a mature woman who will take care of you and secure your future as a respectable man. Transgressions are perfectly acceptable so if you tire of your wife, find yourself a mistress.”
Ben was just pragmatic of the mores of the time.
There are plenty of “old” bitter middle age, single or divorced women of the me generation, in SD, who can’t find husbands. Time will tell if they age gracefully. I doubt it.
I think that modern women have it wrong. They want social advancement and financial protection plus they want romantic love. It usually doesn’t work out that way.
18th century women were more realistic of what they could get out of marriage.
December 22, 2009 at 3:06 PM #496649briansd1GuestIn the 18th century, men married for estate planning and social advancement, not love. Old maids needed husbands before they got too old and are forced to enter the convent.
Ben Franklin is telling his friend: “stop wasting time and money on the young mistresses. Marry a mature woman who will take care of you and secure your future as a respectable man. Transgressions are perfectly acceptable so if you tire of your wife, find yourself a mistress.”
Ben was just pragmatic of the mores of the time.
There are plenty of “old” bitter middle age, single or divorced women of the me generation, in SD, who can’t find husbands. Time will tell if they age gracefully. I doubt it.
I think that modern women have it wrong. They want social advancement and financial protection plus they want romantic love. It usually doesn’t work out that way.
18th century women were more realistic of what they could get out of marriage.
December 22, 2009 at 3:06 PM #497029briansd1GuestIn the 18th century, men married for estate planning and social advancement, not love. Old maids needed husbands before they got too old and are forced to enter the convent.
Ben Franklin is telling his friend: “stop wasting time and money on the young mistresses. Marry a mature woman who will take care of you and secure your future as a respectable man. Transgressions are perfectly acceptable so if you tire of your wife, find yourself a mistress.”
Ben was just pragmatic of the mores of the time.
There are plenty of “old” bitter middle age, single or divorced women of the me generation, in SD, who can’t find husbands. Time will tell if they age gracefully. I doubt it.
I think that modern women have it wrong. They want social advancement and financial protection plus they want romantic love. It usually doesn’t work out that way.
18th century women were more realistic of what they could get out of marriage.
December 22, 2009 at 3:06 PM #497117briansd1GuestIn the 18th century, men married for estate planning and social advancement, not love. Old maids needed husbands before they got too old and are forced to enter the convent.
Ben Franklin is telling his friend: “stop wasting time and money on the young mistresses. Marry a mature woman who will take care of you and secure your future as a respectable man. Transgressions are perfectly acceptable so if you tire of your wife, find yourself a mistress.”
Ben was just pragmatic of the mores of the time.
There are plenty of “old” bitter middle age, single or divorced women of the me generation, in SD, who can’t find husbands. Time will tell if they age gracefully. I doubt it.
I think that modern women have it wrong. They want social advancement and financial protection plus they want romantic love. It usually doesn’t work out that way.
18th century women were more realistic of what they could get out of marriage.
December 22, 2009 at 3:06 PM #497360briansd1GuestIn the 18th century, men married for estate planning and social advancement, not love. Old maids needed husbands before they got too old and are forced to enter the convent.
Ben Franklin is telling his friend: “stop wasting time and money on the young mistresses. Marry a mature woman who will take care of you and secure your future as a respectable man. Transgressions are perfectly acceptable so if you tire of your wife, find yourself a mistress.”
Ben was just pragmatic of the mores of the time.
There are plenty of “old” bitter middle age, single or divorced women of the me generation, in SD, who can’t find husbands. Time will tell if they age gracefully. I doubt it.
I think that modern women have it wrong. They want social advancement and financial protection plus they want romantic love. It usually doesn’t work out that way.
18th century women were more realistic of what they could get out of marriage.
December 22, 2009 at 3:24 PM #496501NoobParticipantWow, reading comprehension is very low amongst the piggs today.
But if you will not take this Counsel, and persist in thinking that Commerce with the Sex is inevitable, then I repeat my former Advice that in your Amours you should prefer old Women to young ones.
Ben is clearly advising the reader to marry, but if you’re not going to do that, have your fun with an older woman.
He is NOT saying to marry an older woman, nor marry and then get a mistress, of any age.
December 22, 2009 at 3:24 PM #496654NoobParticipantWow, reading comprehension is very low amongst the piggs today.
But if you will not take this Counsel, and persist in thinking that Commerce with the Sex is inevitable, then I repeat my former Advice that in your Amours you should prefer old Women to young ones.
Ben is clearly advising the reader to marry, but if you’re not going to do that, have your fun with an older woman.
He is NOT saying to marry an older woman, nor marry and then get a mistress, of any age.
December 22, 2009 at 3:24 PM #497034NoobParticipantWow, reading comprehension is very low amongst the piggs today.
But if you will not take this Counsel, and persist in thinking that Commerce with the Sex is inevitable, then I repeat my former Advice that in your Amours you should prefer old Women to young ones.
Ben is clearly advising the reader to marry, but if you’re not going to do that, have your fun with an older woman.
He is NOT saying to marry an older woman, nor marry and then get a mistress, of any age.
December 22, 2009 at 3:24 PM #497122NoobParticipantWow, reading comprehension is very low amongst the piggs today.
But if you will not take this Counsel, and persist in thinking that Commerce with the Sex is inevitable, then I repeat my former Advice that in your Amours you should prefer old Women to young ones.
Ben is clearly advising the reader to marry, but if you’re not going to do that, have your fun with an older woman.
He is NOT saying to marry an older woman, nor marry and then get a mistress, of any age.
December 22, 2009 at 3:24 PM #497365NoobParticipantWow, reading comprehension is very low amongst the piggs today.
But if you will not take this Counsel, and persist in thinking that Commerce with the Sex is inevitable, then I repeat my former Advice that in your Amours you should prefer old Women to young ones.
Ben is clearly advising the reader to marry, but if you’re not going to do that, have your fun with an older woman.
He is NOT saying to marry an older woman, nor marry and then get a mistress, of any age.
December 22, 2009 at 3:39 PM #496516briansd1Guest[quote=Noob]
He is NOT saying to marry an older woman, nor marry and then get a mistress, of any age.[/quote]Ben Franklin didn’t say not to get a mistress after getting married either.
Mistresses were perfectly acceptable back then and a wife would often encourage, consent and cover up her husband’s transgressions just to protect the reputation of the family.
I read between the lines and provided a modern translation. Back then, people were very subtle in their writing.
Back then, in order to be respectable you needed to be of “good” family and upbringing and own land. Ben Franklin was advising his friend to become “respectable” and marriage was just part of the deal. Nothing to do with the modern concepts of romantic love, mutual respect and self-fulfillment.
December 22, 2009 at 3:39 PM #496669briansd1Guest[quote=Noob]
He is NOT saying to marry an older woman, nor marry and then get a mistress, of any age.[/quote]Ben Franklin didn’t say not to get a mistress after getting married either.
Mistresses were perfectly acceptable back then and a wife would often encourage, consent and cover up her husband’s transgressions just to protect the reputation of the family.
I read between the lines and provided a modern translation. Back then, people were very subtle in their writing.
Back then, in order to be respectable you needed to be of “good” family and upbringing and own land. Ben Franklin was advising his friend to become “respectable” and marriage was just part of the deal. Nothing to do with the modern concepts of romantic love, mutual respect and self-fulfillment.
December 22, 2009 at 3:39 PM #497049briansd1Guest[quote=Noob]
He is NOT saying to marry an older woman, nor marry and then get a mistress, of any age.[/quote]Ben Franklin didn’t say not to get a mistress after getting married either.
Mistresses were perfectly acceptable back then and a wife would often encourage, consent and cover up her husband’s transgressions just to protect the reputation of the family.
I read between the lines and provided a modern translation. Back then, people were very subtle in their writing.
Back then, in order to be respectable you needed to be of “good” family and upbringing and own land. Ben Franklin was advising his friend to become “respectable” and marriage was just part of the deal. Nothing to do with the modern concepts of romantic love, mutual respect and self-fulfillment.
December 22, 2009 at 3:39 PM #497137briansd1Guest[quote=Noob]
He is NOT saying to marry an older woman, nor marry and then get a mistress, of any age.[/quote]Ben Franklin didn’t say not to get a mistress after getting married either.
Mistresses were perfectly acceptable back then and a wife would often encourage, consent and cover up her husband’s transgressions just to protect the reputation of the family.
I read between the lines and provided a modern translation. Back then, people were very subtle in their writing.
Back then, in order to be respectable you needed to be of “good” family and upbringing and own land. Ben Franklin was advising his friend to become “respectable” and marriage was just part of the deal. Nothing to do with the modern concepts of romantic love, mutual respect and self-fulfillment.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.