- This topic has 270 replies, 23 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 6 months ago by atr.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 23, 2008 at 6:05 AM #210529May 23, 2008 at 6:41 AM #210381CoronitaParticipant
Another point is I don't want the schools to educate my kids about money, that's my job. It takes enough of my time to deprogram them from the few non academic things the schools do engage in (politics, religion, etc.). I just don't need more to deal with, I can see the word problems now…."Jose is an undoccumented ctizen and he exercised his right as a non citizen to take an interest only neg am loan for 700k based on his stated income from picking avacados for a house he shares with 37 people, how much should the government subsidize to renegotiate his loan?"
Can I just have "four times seven" or something involving jack having seven apples and wanting to give jill some apples, raising children is hard enough without the schools "helping."
Will "the people for a perfect world" stop wringing their hands for a few minutes and stop trying to help, please.
LOL. TG's post is an excellent example of why most public schools don't teach this. While some of us think financial education in public school would be a good thing…Some parents don't want this to be taught in school, because they feel finance/money isn't just about math. It has a "family values" aspect to it.(just like religion/politics/etc).
Schools can teach the technical mechanisms but can't teach the "value" aspect of it, because that part is subjective, unless your school has a more specific charter. I respect that, and probably from an educator's perspective, that's the sort of the reason why these curriculums don't exist.
Personally, I wouldn't want my kid have to go through countless brainwashing on religion in school. So I can understand this. While I feel some folks would benefit from formal financial education in school, it's difficult to do in a consistent way that would get all parents to agree on what is acceptable without getting to touchy/feely about things.
TG brings up good points: why should you care if someone else goes broke or goes knee deep in debt? Perhaps it's not important in one family when it is in another (though I just wish the gov wouldn't be trying to bailout those that do now that they are). This reminds me of an article I read about a teacher that one time told a student "If you don't take your academics seriously, you're going to end up being a trash collector". The kid replied "what's wrong with be a trash collector, it's an honest living and beat being a dope dealer?" Ah, kids these days. They're much smarter than you and I think.
[img_assist|nid=5962|title=selfportrait|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=80]
—– Sour grapes for everyone!
May 23, 2008 at 6:41 AM #210449CoronitaParticipantAnother point is I don't want the schools to educate my kids about money, that's my job. It takes enough of my time to deprogram them from the few non academic things the schools do engage in (politics, religion, etc.). I just don't need more to deal with, I can see the word problems now…."Jose is an undoccumented ctizen and he exercised his right as a non citizen to take an interest only neg am loan for 700k based on his stated income from picking avacados for a house he shares with 37 people, how much should the government subsidize to renegotiate his loan?"
Can I just have "four times seven" or something involving jack having seven apples and wanting to give jill some apples, raising children is hard enough without the schools "helping."
Will "the people for a perfect world" stop wringing their hands for a few minutes and stop trying to help, please.
LOL. TG's post is an excellent example of why most public schools don't teach this. While some of us think financial education in public school would be a good thing…Some parents don't want this to be taught in school, because they feel finance/money isn't just about math. It has a "family values" aspect to it.(just like religion/politics/etc).
Schools can teach the technical mechanisms but can't teach the "value" aspect of it, because that part is subjective, unless your school has a more specific charter. I respect that, and probably from an educator's perspective, that's the sort of the reason why these curriculums don't exist.
Personally, I wouldn't want my kid have to go through countless brainwashing on religion in school. So I can understand this. While I feel some folks would benefit from formal financial education in school, it's difficult to do in a consistent way that would get all parents to agree on what is acceptable without getting to touchy/feely about things.
TG brings up good points: why should you care if someone else goes broke or goes knee deep in debt? Perhaps it's not important in one family when it is in another (though I just wish the gov wouldn't be trying to bailout those that do now that they are). This reminds me of an article I read about a teacher that one time told a student "If you don't take your academics seriously, you're going to end up being a trash collector". The kid replied "what's wrong with be a trash collector, it's an honest living and beat being a dope dealer?" Ah, kids these days. They're much smarter than you and I think.
[img_assist|nid=5962|title=selfportrait|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=80]
—– Sour grapes for everyone!
May 23, 2008 at 6:41 AM #210478CoronitaParticipantAnother point is I don't want the schools to educate my kids about money, that's my job. It takes enough of my time to deprogram them from the few non academic things the schools do engage in (politics, religion, etc.). I just don't need more to deal with, I can see the word problems now…."Jose is an undoccumented ctizen and he exercised his right as a non citizen to take an interest only neg am loan for 700k based on his stated income from picking avacados for a house he shares with 37 people, how much should the government subsidize to renegotiate his loan?"
Can I just have "four times seven" or something involving jack having seven apples and wanting to give jill some apples, raising children is hard enough without the schools "helping."
Will "the people for a perfect world" stop wringing their hands for a few minutes and stop trying to help, please.
LOL. TG's post is an excellent example of why most public schools don't teach this. While some of us think financial education in public school would be a good thing…Some parents don't want this to be taught in school, because they feel finance/money isn't just about math. It has a "family values" aspect to it.(just like religion/politics/etc).
Schools can teach the technical mechanisms but can't teach the "value" aspect of it, because that part is subjective, unless your school has a more specific charter. I respect that, and probably from an educator's perspective, that's the sort of the reason why these curriculums don't exist.
Personally, I wouldn't want my kid have to go through countless brainwashing on religion in school. So I can understand this. While I feel some folks would benefit from formal financial education in school, it's difficult to do in a consistent way that would get all parents to agree on what is acceptable without getting to touchy/feely about things.
TG brings up good points: why should you care if someone else goes broke or goes knee deep in debt? Perhaps it's not important in one family when it is in another (though I just wish the gov wouldn't be trying to bailout those that do now that they are). This reminds me of an article I read about a teacher that one time told a student "If you don't take your academics seriously, you're going to end up being a trash collector". The kid replied "what's wrong with be a trash collector, it's an honest living and beat being a dope dealer?" Ah, kids these days. They're much smarter than you and I think.
[img_assist|nid=5962|title=selfportrait|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=80]
—– Sour grapes for everyone!
May 23, 2008 at 6:41 AM #210499CoronitaParticipantAnother point is I don't want the schools to educate my kids about money, that's my job. It takes enough of my time to deprogram them from the few non academic things the schools do engage in (politics, religion, etc.). I just don't need more to deal with, I can see the word problems now…."Jose is an undoccumented ctizen and he exercised his right as a non citizen to take an interest only neg am loan for 700k based on his stated income from picking avacados for a house he shares with 37 people, how much should the government subsidize to renegotiate his loan?"
Can I just have "four times seven" or something involving jack having seven apples and wanting to give jill some apples, raising children is hard enough without the schools "helping."
Will "the people for a perfect world" stop wringing their hands for a few minutes and stop trying to help, please.
LOL. TG's post is an excellent example of why most public schools don't teach this. While some of us think financial education in public school would be a good thing…Some parents don't want this to be taught in school, because they feel finance/money isn't just about math. It has a "family values" aspect to it.(just like religion/politics/etc).
Schools can teach the technical mechanisms but can't teach the "value" aspect of it, because that part is subjective, unless your school has a more specific charter. I respect that, and probably from an educator's perspective, that's the sort of the reason why these curriculums don't exist.
Personally, I wouldn't want my kid have to go through countless brainwashing on religion in school. So I can understand this. While I feel some folks would benefit from formal financial education in school, it's difficult to do in a consistent way that would get all parents to agree on what is acceptable without getting to touchy/feely about things.
TG brings up good points: why should you care if someone else goes broke or goes knee deep in debt? Perhaps it's not important in one family when it is in another (though I just wish the gov wouldn't be trying to bailout those that do now that they are). This reminds me of an article I read about a teacher that one time told a student "If you don't take your academics seriously, you're going to end up being a trash collector". The kid replied "what's wrong with be a trash collector, it's an honest living and beat being a dope dealer?" Ah, kids these days. They're much smarter than you and I think.
[img_assist|nid=5962|title=selfportrait|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=80]
—– Sour grapes for everyone!
May 23, 2008 at 6:41 AM #210534CoronitaParticipantAnother point is I don't want the schools to educate my kids about money, that's my job. It takes enough of my time to deprogram them from the few non academic things the schools do engage in (politics, religion, etc.). I just don't need more to deal with, I can see the word problems now…."Jose is an undoccumented ctizen and he exercised his right as a non citizen to take an interest only neg am loan for 700k based on his stated income from picking avacados for a house he shares with 37 people, how much should the government subsidize to renegotiate his loan?"
Can I just have "four times seven" or something involving jack having seven apples and wanting to give jill some apples, raising children is hard enough without the schools "helping."
Will "the people for a perfect world" stop wringing their hands for a few minutes and stop trying to help, please.
LOL. TG's post is an excellent example of why most public schools don't teach this. While some of us think financial education in public school would be a good thing…Some parents don't want this to be taught in school, because they feel finance/money isn't just about math. It has a "family values" aspect to it.(just like religion/politics/etc).
Schools can teach the technical mechanisms but can't teach the "value" aspect of it, because that part is subjective, unless your school has a more specific charter. I respect that, and probably from an educator's perspective, that's the sort of the reason why these curriculums don't exist.
Personally, I wouldn't want my kid have to go through countless brainwashing on religion in school. So I can understand this. While I feel some folks would benefit from formal financial education in school, it's difficult to do in a consistent way that would get all parents to agree on what is acceptable without getting to touchy/feely about things.
TG brings up good points: why should you care if someone else goes broke or goes knee deep in debt? Perhaps it's not important in one family when it is in another (though I just wish the gov wouldn't be trying to bailout those that do now that they are). This reminds me of an article I read about a teacher that one time told a student "If you don't take your academics seriously, you're going to end up being a trash collector". The kid replied "what's wrong with be a trash collector, it's an honest living and beat being a dope dealer?" Ah, kids these days. They're much smarter than you and I think.
[img_assist|nid=5962|title=selfportrait|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=80]
—– Sour grapes for everyone!
May 23, 2008 at 7:02 AM #210386La Jolla RenterParticipantOh god. Please don't say you're going to spend $200 on a "board game" just because it has Robert K's name on it to teach your kids about money.
Oh God, Sour Grapes, don't get your panties in wad… I don't even have kids yet.
I know how everyone feels about Kiyosaki. I am asking if anyone has really sat down with kids and played his board game. Even a blind squearl finds a nut now and then.
Temecguy, I've always loved that line from caddyshack!!! I've used it a 100 times in the last 20 years.
May 23, 2008 at 7:02 AM #210455La Jolla RenterParticipantOh god. Please don't say you're going to spend $200 on a "board game" just because it has Robert K's name on it to teach your kids about money.
Oh God, Sour Grapes, don't get your panties in wad… I don't even have kids yet.
I know how everyone feels about Kiyosaki. I am asking if anyone has really sat down with kids and played his board game. Even a blind squearl finds a nut now and then.
Temecguy, I've always loved that line from caddyshack!!! I've used it a 100 times in the last 20 years.
May 23, 2008 at 7:02 AM #210482La Jolla RenterParticipantOh god. Please don't say you're going to spend $200 on a "board game" just because it has Robert K's name on it to teach your kids about money.
Oh God, Sour Grapes, don't get your panties in wad… I don't even have kids yet.
I know how everyone feels about Kiyosaki. I am asking if anyone has really sat down with kids and played his board game. Even a blind squearl finds a nut now and then.
Temecguy, I've always loved that line from caddyshack!!! I've used it a 100 times in the last 20 years.
May 23, 2008 at 7:02 AM #210502La Jolla RenterParticipantOh god. Please don't say you're going to spend $200 on a "board game" just because it has Robert K's name on it to teach your kids about money.
Oh God, Sour Grapes, don't get your panties in wad… I don't even have kids yet.
I know how everyone feels about Kiyosaki. I am asking if anyone has really sat down with kids and played his board game. Even a blind squearl finds a nut now and then.
Temecguy, I've always loved that line from caddyshack!!! I've used it a 100 times in the last 20 years.
May 23, 2008 at 7:02 AM #210539La Jolla RenterParticipantOh god. Please don't say you're going to spend $200 on a "board game" just because it has Robert K's name on it to teach your kids about money.
Oh God, Sour Grapes, don't get your panties in wad… I don't even have kids yet.
I know how everyone feels about Kiyosaki. I am asking if anyone has really sat down with kids and played his board game. Even a blind squearl finds a nut now and then.
Temecguy, I've always loved that line from caddyshack!!! I've used it a 100 times in the last 20 years.
May 23, 2008 at 8:44 AM #210431Trojan4LifeParticipantThis has become the responsibility of the parent(s), and with the knuckleheads out there today with kids and serious debt, we’re in huge trouble!
We teach our children (9 yrs old and 7 yrs old) about the value of money and why it’s important to save a portion of their money for the proverbial “rainy day.” My 9 yr old has over $6K in the bank, my 7 yr old over $4k. We’ve saved every penny they’ve ever received as a gift and we have a policy of dropping $100 in their accounts on birthdays and Christmas.
My kids wear clothes my wife buys for them at garage sales, which are high-quality clothes that we pay next to nothing for. I mean, my daughter wears Roxy stuff and we typically pay .25 or .50 per item. My son isn’t into labels, so he wears cargo shorts and t-shirts. My wife shops at Target for herself and I buy my work clothes at Ross. I really can’t see a discernable difference in how I look compared to anyone else in the office. I’m wearing Pierre Cardin and other name brands at 1/4th the price of main stores. My kids have these values now as well. My kids will see the way something is priced brand new and say “That’s a rip off.”
It all comes from the parents. Some of you may be 180 degrees out from either a radically conservative or liberal spender, but I would suspect you learned a lesson from their radical ways and decided not to follow their example.
Trojan4life
May 23, 2008 at 8:44 AM #210500Trojan4LifeParticipantThis has become the responsibility of the parent(s), and with the knuckleheads out there today with kids and serious debt, we’re in huge trouble!
We teach our children (9 yrs old and 7 yrs old) about the value of money and why it’s important to save a portion of their money for the proverbial “rainy day.” My 9 yr old has over $6K in the bank, my 7 yr old over $4k. We’ve saved every penny they’ve ever received as a gift and we have a policy of dropping $100 in their accounts on birthdays and Christmas.
My kids wear clothes my wife buys for them at garage sales, which are high-quality clothes that we pay next to nothing for. I mean, my daughter wears Roxy stuff and we typically pay .25 or .50 per item. My son isn’t into labels, so he wears cargo shorts and t-shirts. My wife shops at Target for herself and I buy my work clothes at Ross. I really can’t see a discernable difference in how I look compared to anyone else in the office. I’m wearing Pierre Cardin and other name brands at 1/4th the price of main stores. My kids have these values now as well. My kids will see the way something is priced brand new and say “That’s a rip off.”
It all comes from the parents. Some of you may be 180 degrees out from either a radically conservative or liberal spender, but I would suspect you learned a lesson from their radical ways and decided not to follow their example.
Trojan4life
May 23, 2008 at 8:44 AM #210527Trojan4LifeParticipantThis has become the responsibility of the parent(s), and with the knuckleheads out there today with kids and serious debt, we’re in huge trouble!
We teach our children (9 yrs old and 7 yrs old) about the value of money and why it’s important to save a portion of their money for the proverbial “rainy day.” My 9 yr old has over $6K in the bank, my 7 yr old over $4k. We’ve saved every penny they’ve ever received as a gift and we have a policy of dropping $100 in their accounts on birthdays and Christmas.
My kids wear clothes my wife buys for them at garage sales, which are high-quality clothes that we pay next to nothing for. I mean, my daughter wears Roxy stuff and we typically pay .25 or .50 per item. My son isn’t into labels, so he wears cargo shorts and t-shirts. My wife shops at Target for herself and I buy my work clothes at Ross. I really can’t see a discernable difference in how I look compared to anyone else in the office. I’m wearing Pierre Cardin and other name brands at 1/4th the price of main stores. My kids have these values now as well. My kids will see the way something is priced brand new and say “That’s a rip off.”
It all comes from the parents. Some of you may be 180 degrees out from either a radically conservative or liberal spender, but I would suspect you learned a lesson from their radical ways and decided not to follow their example.
Trojan4life
May 23, 2008 at 8:44 AM #210547Trojan4LifeParticipantThis has become the responsibility of the parent(s), and with the knuckleheads out there today with kids and serious debt, we’re in huge trouble!
We teach our children (9 yrs old and 7 yrs old) about the value of money and why it’s important to save a portion of their money for the proverbial “rainy day.” My 9 yr old has over $6K in the bank, my 7 yr old over $4k. We’ve saved every penny they’ve ever received as a gift and we have a policy of dropping $100 in their accounts on birthdays and Christmas.
My kids wear clothes my wife buys for them at garage sales, which are high-quality clothes that we pay next to nothing for. I mean, my daughter wears Roxy stuff and we typically pay .25 or .50 per item. My son isn’t into labels, so he wears cargo shorts and t-shirts. My wife shops at Target for herself and I buy my work clothes at Ross. I really can’t see a discernable difference in how I look compared to anyone else in the office. I’m wearing Pierre Cardin and other name brands at 1/4th the price of main stores. My kids have these values now as well. My kids will see the way something is priced brand new and say “That’s a rip off.”
It all comes from the parents. Some of you may be 180 degrees out from either a radically conservative or liberal spender, but I would suspect you learned a lesson from their radical ways and decided not to follow their example.
Trojan4life
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.