- This topic has 148 replies, 25 voices, and was last updated 17 years, 4 months ago by
unbiasedobserver.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 9, 2007 at 10:41 PM #98147November 9, 2007 at 10:41 PM #98148
patientrenter
ParticipantI think many of these now overextended young people with apparently limited career prospects who became no-money-down buyers of multiple properties were doing a very smart thing. Dumb lenders allowed them to buy valuable options on house prices for free, or for very little. All they had to lose was a few years’ worth of good credit. Not a big price to pay for someone with no money and limited prospects.
Let’s say the monetary value of poor credit for a few years for such a person is $20,000. That’s their downside. If they bought 8 properties worth $300K each, and the properties went up by 50% over 3 years (not unusual in recent times) they probably netted almost a million. No one could know the future, and the gamble for recent buyers is turning out badly, but it was a gamble heavily loaded in favor of the ‘dumb’ buyer.
Patient renter in OC
November 10, 2007 at 7:28 AM #98130Fearful
ParticipantThere are all degrees of speculator. The house I rent is owned by a nice guy, a physician who moved with his family to Chicago. I calculated the numbers on this place and reckon he is absorbing $1,400 a month negative cash flow. Ouch.
November 10, 2007 at 7:28 AM #98196Fearful
ParticipantThere are all degrees of speculator. The house I rent is owned by a nice guy, a physician who moved with his family to Chicago. I calculated the numbers on this place and reckon he is absorbing $1,400 a month negative cash flow. Ouch.
November 10, 2007 at 7:28 AM #98202Fearful
ParticipantThere are all degrees of speculator. The house I rent is owned by a nice guy, a physician who moved with his family to Chicago. I calculated the numbers on this place and reckon he is absorbing $1,400 a month negative cash flow. Ouch.
November 10, 2007 at 7:28 AM #98203Fearful
ParticipantThere are all degrees of speculator. The house I rent is owned by a nice guy, a physician who moved with his family to Chicago. I calculated the numbers on this place and reckon he is absorbing $1,400 a month negative cash flow. Ouch.
November 10, 2007 at 8:52 AM #98169sandiego
ParticipantWell, based on where prices are trending, everyone who owns a house in California (me included) is losing more than $1,400 a month ($17,200 a year) on homes that they actually occupy.
November 10, 2007 at 8:52 AM #98235sandiego
ParticipantWell, based on where prices are trending, everyone who owns a house in California (me included) is losing more than $1,400 a month ($17,200 a year) on homes that they actually occupy.
November 10, 2007 at 8:52 AM #98242sandiego
ParticipantWell, based on where prices are trending, everyone who owns a house in California (me included) is losing more than $1,400 a month ($17,200 a year) on homes that they actually occupy.
November 10, 2007 at 8:52 AM #98244sandiego
ParticipantWell, based on where prices are trending, everyone who owns a house in California (me included) is losing more than $1,400 a month ($17,200 a year) on homes that they actually occupy.
November 10, 2007 at 9:30 AM #98181sdrealtor
ParticipantHow can I lose money I never had?
November 10, 2007 at 9:30 AM #98247sdrealtor
ParticipantHow can I lose money I never had?
November 10, 2007 at 9:30 AM #98253sdrealtor
ParticipantHow can I lose money I never had?
November 10, 2007 at 9:30 AM #98255sdrealtor
ParticipantHow can I lose money I never had?
November 10, 2007 at 9:36 AM #98185sandiego
ParticipantIf you actually put a 10-20% down payment, you are losing it on a daily basis.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.