- This topic has 170 replies, 13 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 6 months ago by mike92104.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 25, 2010 at 10:33 PM #555104May 25, 2010 at 10:36 PM #554142KSMountainParticipant
[quote=Arraya]Also, lots of good discussion by engineers and industry experts here on the technical difficulties of the procedure.
http://www.theoildrum.com/%5B/quote%5D
Awesome link Arraya. The best I’ve seen.
May 25, 2010 at 10:36 PM #554249KSMountainParticipant[quote=Arraya]Also, lots of good discussion by engineers and industry experts here on the technical difficulties of the procedure.
http://www.theoildrum.com/%5B/quote%5D
Awesome link Arraya. The best I’ve seen.
May 25, 2010 at 10:36 PM #554736KSMountainParticipant[quote=Arraya]Also, lots of good discussion by engineers and industry experts here on the technical difficulties of the procedure.
http://www.theoildrum.com/%5B/quote%5D
Awesome link Arraya. The best I’ve seen.
May 25, 2010 at 10:36 PM #554835KSMountainParticipant[quote=Arraya]Also, lots of good discussion by engineers and industry experts here on the technical difficulties of the procedure.
http://www.theoildrum.com/%5B/quote%5D
Awesome link Arraya. The best I’ve seen.
May 25, 2010 at 10:36 PM #555109KSMountainParticipant[quote=Arraya]Also, lots of good discussion by engineers and industry experts here on the technical difficulties of the procedure.
http://www.theoildrum.com/%5B/quote%5D
Awesome link Arraya. The best I’ve seen.
May 25, 2010 at 10:44 PM #554147KSMountainParticipantSpecifically, this was the sublink I really liked:
http://www.theoildrum.com/node/6505#moreReally gives a more detailed insight into what they’re trying to do down there.
May 25, 2010 at 10:44 PM #554254KSMountainParticipantSpecifically, this was the sublink I really liked:
http://www.theoildrum.com/node/6505#moreReally gives a more detailed insight into what they’re trying to do down there.
May 25, 2010 at 10:44 PM #554741KSMountainParticipantSpecifically, this was the sublink I really liked:
http://www.theoildrum.com/node/6505#moreReally gives a more detailed insight into what they’re trying to do down there.
May 25, 2010 at 10:44 PM #554840KSMountainParticipantSpecifically, this was the sublink I really liked:
http://www.theoildrum.com/node/6505#moreReally gives a more detailed insight into what they’re trying to do down there.
May 25, 2010 at 10:44 PM #555114KSMountainParticipantSpecifically, this was the sublink I really liked:
http://www.theoildrum.com/node/6505#moreReally gives a more detailed insight into what they’re trying to do down there.
May 26, 2010 at 7:39 AM #554228HobieParticipant[quote=edna_mode]The Russians have used a nuclear bomb to stop oil leaks five times in the past:
http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=ru&tl=en&u=http://www.kp.ru/daily/24482/640124/
http://trueslant.com/juliaioffe/2010/05/04/nuke-that-slick/
Of course, context for technical solutions is everything. Don’t know the geological differences.
When is hurricane season again?[/quote]
Back in the day they actually considered using a nuclear explosion to speed construction of the 405 freeway through the Sepulveda pass in Los Angeles.
Can’t see the logic using any explosives much less an nuke to ‘cave’ in this well. If anything it would cause millions of small rock fractures all of which could seep oil and gas resulting in a epic disaster.
May 26, 2010 at 7:39 AM #554333HobieParticipant[quote=edna_mode]The Russians have used a nuclear bomb to stop oil leaks five times in the past:
http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=ru&tl=en&u=http://www.kp.ru/daily/24482/640124/
http://trueslant.com/juliaioffe/2010/05/04/nuke-that-slick/
Of course, context for technical solutions is everything. Don’t know the geological differences.
When is hurricane season again?[/quote]
Back in the day they actually considered using a nuclear explosion to speed construction of the 405 freeway through the Sepulveda pass in Los Angeles.
Can’t see the logic using any explosives much less an nuke to ‘cave’ in this well. If anything it would cause millions of small rock fractures all of which could seep oil and gas resulting in a epic disaster.
May 26, 2010 at 7:39 AM #554821HobieParticipant[quote=edna_mode]The Russians have used a nuclear bomb to stop oil leaks five times in the past:
http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=ru&tl=en&u=http://www.kp.ru/daily/24482/640124/
http://trueslant.com/juliaioffe/2010/05/04/nuke-that-slick/
Of course, context for technical solutions is everything. Don’t know the geological differences.
When is hurricane season again?[/quote]
Back in the day they actually considered using a nuclear explosion to speed construction of the 405 freeway through the Sepulveda pass in Los Angeles.
Can’t see the logic using any explosives much less an nuke to ‘cave’ in this well. If anything it would cause millions of small rock fractures all of which could seep oil and gas resulting in a epic disaster.
May 26, 2010 at 7:39 AM #554920HobieParticipant[quote=edna_mode]The Russians have used a nuclear bomb to stop oil leaks five times in the past:
http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=ru&tl=en&u=http://www.kp.ru/daily/24482/640124/
http://trueslant.com/juliaioffe/2010/05/04/nuke-that-slick/
Of course, context for technical solutions is everything. Don’t know the geological differences.
When is hurricane season again?[/quote]
Back in the day they actually considered using a nuclear explosion to speed construction of the 405 freeway through the Sepulveda pass in Los Angeles.
Can’t see the logic using any explosives much less an nuke to ‘cave’ in this well. If anything it would cause millions of small rock fractures all of which could seep oil and gas resulting in a epic disaster.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.