- This topic has 200 replies, 18 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 7 months ago by briansd1.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 17, 2011 at 11:54 PM #679379March 18, 2011 at 12:09 AM #678253EugeneParticipant
From what I read, the US has no intention of getting into that one. It’s mostly locals such as France.
Overall, Americans are probably better off with Qaddafi in charge. If rebels take over, that might mean 5 years of civil war and unpredictable interruptions in oil supplies.
March 18, 2011 at 12:09 AM #678310EugeneParticipantFrom what I read, the US has no intention of getting into that one. It’s mostly locals such as France.
Overall, Americans are probably better off with Qaddafi in charge. If rebels take over, that might mean 5 years of civil war and unpredictable interruptions in oil supplies.
March 18, 2011 at 12:09 AM #678909EugeneParticipantFrom what I read, the US has no intention of getting into that one. It’s mostly locals such as France.
Overall, Americans are probably better off with Qaddafi in charge. If rebels take over, that might mean 5 years of civil war and unpredictable interruptions in oil supplies.
March 18, 2011 at 12:09 AM #679046EugeneParticipantFrom what I read, the US has no intention of getting into that one. It’s mostly locals such as France.
Overall, Americans are probably better off with Qaddafi in charge. If rebels take over, that might mean 5 years of civil war and unpredictable interruptions in oil supplies.
March 18, 2011 at 12:09 AM #679388EugeneParticipantFrom what I read, the US has no intention of getting into that one. It’s mostly locals such as France.
Overall, Americans are probably better off with Qaddafi in charge. If rebels take over, that might mean 5 years of civil war and unpredictable interruptions in oil supplies.
March 18, 2011 at 6:24 AM #678282DataAgentParticipantI agree Eugene. And it looks like Gadhafi may have blinked:
http://www.cnn.com/2011/WORLD/africa/03/18/libya.civil.war/index.html?hpt=C1March 18, 2011 at 6:24 AM #678337DataAgentParticipantI agree Eugene. And it looks like Gadhafi may have blinked:
http://www.cnn.com/2011/WORLD/africa/03/18/libya.civil.war/index.html?hpt=C1March 18, 2011 at 6:24 AM #678938DataAgentParticipantI agree Eugene. And it looks like Gadhafi may have blinked:
http://www.cnn.com/2011/WORLD/africa/03/18/libya.civil.war/index.html?hpt=C1March 18, 2011 at 6:24 AM #679072DataAgentParticipantI agree Eugene. And it looks like Gadhafi may have blinked:
http://www.cnn.com/2011/WORLD/africa/03/18/libya.civil.war/index.html?hpt=C1March 18, 2011 at 6:24 AM #679417DataAgentParticipantI agree Eugene. And it looks like Gadhafi may have blinked:
http://www.cnn.com/2011/WORLD/africa/03/18/libya.civil.war/index.html?hpt=C1March 18, 2011 at 7:21 AM #678312ocrenterParticipantThis intervention is different than going in and taking out a dictator. here we have a people rising up and ultimately hoping help would arrive once they do rise up. So the intervention is important.
But we definitely can’t own this one, we just can’t afford it.
I think the US knew we have the upper hand in forcing the Europeans to take charge for once. The Europeans were faced with a tidal wave of refugees. let’s just assume eastern libya has a population of 2 million, if kadafi takes over, the majority will try to escape, mostly across the border to egypt, but a large amount across to Italy and France. and then we will have to deal with a huge refugee camp much like the gaza strip except on egyptian soil. where are those going to end up? right across to Italy and France over the next 10 years.
The Europeans were forced to act, they own this and they should.
I think we played this one beautifully.
March 18, 2011 at 7:21 AM #678366ocrenterParticipantThis intervention is different than going in and taking out a dictator. here we have a people rising up and ultimately hoping help would arrive once they do rise up. So the intervention is important.
But we definitely can’t own this one, we just can’t afford it.
I think the US knew we have the upper hand in forcing the Europeans to take charge for once. The Europeans were faced with a tidal wave of refugees. let’s just assume eastern libya has a population of 2 million, if kadafi takes over, the majority will try to escape, mostly across the border to egypt, but a large amount across to Italy and France. and then we will have to deal with a huge refugee camp much like the gaza strip except on egyptian soil. where are those going to end up? right across to Italy and France over the next 10 years.
The Europeans were forced to act, they own this and they should.
I think we played this one beautifully.
March 18, 2011 at 7:21 AM #678968ocrenterParticipantThis intervention is different than going in and taking out a dictator. here we have a people rising up and ultimately hoping help would arrive once they do rise up. So the intervention is important.
But we definitely can’t own this one, we just can’t afford it.
I think the US knew we have the upper hand in forcing the Europeans to take charge for once. The Europeans were faced with a tidal wave of refugees. let’s just assume eastern libya has a population of 2 million, if kadafi takes over, the majority will try to escape, mostly across the border to egypt, but a large amount across to Italy and France. and then we will have to deal with a huge refugee camp much like the gaza strip except on egyptian soil. where are those going to end up? right across to Italy and France over the next 10 years.
The Europeans were forced to act, they own this and they should.
I think we played this one beautifully.
March 18, 2011 at 7:21 AM #679102ocrenterParticipantThis intervention is different than going in and taking out a dictator. here we have a people rising up and ultimately hoping help would arrive once they do rise up. So the intervention is important.
But we definitely can’t own this one, we just can’t afford it.
I think the US knew we have the upper hand in forcing the Europeans to take charge for once. The Europeans were faced with a tidal wave of refugees. let’s just assume eastern libya has a population of 2 million, if kadafi takes over, the majority will try to escape, mostly across the border to egypt, but a large amount across to Italy and France. and then we will have to deal with a huge refugee camp much like the gaza strip except on egyptian soil. where are those going to end up? right across to Italy and France over the next 10 years.
The Europeans were forced to act, they own this and they should.
I think we played this one beautifully.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.