- This topic has 117 replies, 19 voices, and was last updated 12 years, 2 months ago by
bobby.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 31, 2011 at 7:16 AM #701284May 31, 2011 at 8:24 AM #700102
bake
ParticipantSad to say, but there are a lot of racists in America, for example something like 44% of the population voted for McCain/Palin in ’08. I don’t think they voted that way because they thought McCain was honest and Palin was bright!
May 31, 2011 at 8:24 AM #700199ParticipantSad to say, but there are a lot of racists in America, for example something like 44% of the population voted for McCain/Palin in ’08. I don’t think they voted that way because they thought McCain was honest and Palin was bright!
May 31, 2011 at 8:24 AM #700787ParticipantSad to say, but there are a lot of racists in America, for example something like 44% of the population voted for McCain/Palin in ’08. I don’t think they voted that way because they thought McCain was honest and Palin was bright!
May 31, 2011 at 8:24 AM #700934ParticipantSad to say, but there are a lot of racists in America, for example something like 44% of the population voted for McCain/Palin in ’08. I don’t think they voted that way because they thought McCain was honest and Palin was bright!
May 31, 2011 at 8:24 AM #701294ParticipantSad to say, but there are a lot of racists in America, for example something like 44% of the population voted for McCain/Palin in ’08. I don’t think they voted that way because they thought McCain was honest and Palin was bright!
May 31, 2011 at 11:51 AM #700161UCGal
Participant[quote=GH]Most of these workers ARE illegal and if homeowners thought that legal action even seizure of their homes was a good possibility they would hire legitimate contractors and pay prevailing rates.[/quote]
How do you know the general contractor wasn’t legitimate? The homeowner hires a contractor, does due diligence by checking the license, etc… but cannot control what sub-contractors or day laborers are brought onsite by that contractor. The homeowner should be in the clear in this case.
The contractor, however, is at risk for hiring illegals – if they were illegals.
Not all people speaking spanish with brown skin are here illegally.May 31, 2011 at 11:51 AM #700259Participant[quote=GH]Most of these workers ARE illegal and if homeowners thought that legal action even seizure of their homes was a good possibility they would hire legitimate contractors and pay prevailing rates.[/quote]
How do you know the general contractor wasn’t legitimate? The homeowner hires a contractor, does due diligence by checking the license, etc… but cannot control what sub-contractors or day laborers are brought onsite by that contractor. The homeowner should be in the clear in this case.
The contractor, however, is at risk for hiring illegals – if they were illegals.
Not all people speaking spanish with brown skin are here illegally.May 31, 2011 at 11:51 AM #700847Participant[quote=GH]Most of these workers ARE illegal and if homeowners thought that legal action even seizure of their homes was a good possibility they would hire legitimate contractors and pay prevailing rates.[/quote]
How do you know the general contractor wasn’t legitimate? The homeowner hires a contractor, does due diligence by checking the license, etc… but cannot control what sub-contractors or day laborers are brought onsite by that contractor. The homeowner should be in the clear in this case.
The contractor, however, is at risk for hiring illegals – if they were illegals.
Not all people speaking spanish with brown skin are here illegally.May 31, 2011 at 11:51 AM #700995Participant[quote=GH]Most of these workers ARE illegal and if homeowners thought that legal action even seizure of their homes was a good possibility they would hire legitimate contractors and pay prevailing rates.[/quote]
How do you know the general contractor wasn’t legitimate? The homeowner hires a contractor, does due diligence by checking the license, etc… but cannot control what sub-contractors or day laborers are brought onsite by that contractor. The homeowner should be in the clear in this case.
The contractor, however, is at risk for hiring illegals – if they were illegals.
Not all people speaking spanish with brown skin are here illegally.May 31, 2011 at 11:51 AM #701354Participant[quote=GH]Most of these workers ARE illegal and if homeowners thought that legal action even seizure of their homes was a good possibility they would hire legitimate contractors and pay prevailing rates.[/quote]
How do you know the general contractor wasn’t legitimate? The homeowner hires a contractor, does due diligence by checking the license, etc… but cannot control what sub-contractors or day laborers are brought onsite by that contractor. The homeowner should be in the clear in this case.
The contractor, however, is at risk for hiring illegals – if they were illegals.
Not all people speaking spanish with brown skin are here illegally.May 31, 2011 at 12:21 PM #700171briansd1
GuestI got more details.
Turns out that the guy who came over and asked the construction workers for paperwork is the son-in-law of a neighbor.
He works for Homeland Security and lives in Temecula
The neighbor came over and apologized for her son-in-law’s behavior. She only knows that the son-in-law works for Homeland Security, but she doesn’t know in what capacity (TSA, Border Patrol, desk job, or whatever). The neighbor said the tries to keep out of son-in-law’s business, maybe because he’s a little wacko.
Can an off-duty Homeland Security employee ask people for paperwork like that? Sounds outrageous to me.
May 31, 2011 at 12:21 PM #700269GuestI got more details.
Turns out that the guy who came over and asked the construction workers for paperwork is the son-in-law of a neighbor.
He works for Homeland Security and lives in Temecula
The neighbor came over and apologized for her son-in-law’s behavior. She only knows that the son-in-law works for Homeland Security, but she doesn’t know in what capacity (TSA, Border Patrol, desk job, or whatever). The neighbor said the tries to keep out of son-in-law’s business, maybe because he’s a little wacko.
Can an off-duty Homeland Security employee ask people for paperwork like that? Sounds outrageous to me.
May 31, 2011 at 12:21 PM #700857GuestI got more details.
Turns out that the guy who came over and asked the construction workers for paperwork is the son-in-law of a neighbor.
He works for Homeland Security and lives in Temecula
The neighbor came over and apologized for her son-in-law’s behavior. She only knows that the son-in-law works for Homeland Security, but she doesn’t know in what capacity (TSA, Border Patrol, desk job, or whatever). The neighbor said the tries to keep out of son-in-law’s business, maybe because he’s a little wacko.
Can an off-duty Homeland Security employee ask people for paperwork like that? Sounds outrageous to me.
May 31, 2011 at 12:21 PM #701005GuestI got more details.
Turns out that the guy who came over and asked the construction workers for paperwork is the son-in-law of a neighbor.
He works for Homeland Security and lives in Temecula
The neighbor came over and apologized for her son-in-law’s behavior. She only knows that the son-in-law works for Homeland Security, but she doesn’t know in what capacity (TSA, Border Patrol, desk job, or whatever). The neighbor said the tries to keep out of son-in-law’s business, maybe because he’s a little wacko.
Can an off-duty Homeland Security employee ask people for paperwork like that? Sounds outrageous to me.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.