- This topic has 335 replies, 42 voices, and was last updated 8 years, 11 months ago by paramount.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 15, 2012 at 2:11 PM #20384December 15, 2012 at 2:51 PM #756330NotCrankyParticipant
So, is it correct to call it an epidemic at this point in time?
December 15, 2012 at 3:13 PM #756332SK in CVParticipantWouldn’t it be nice if there was something….anything…that could be done to reduce the likelihood of these kinds of events happening. I can’t imagine what it might be. But whatever it might be, we can’t ever dare mention the elephant in the room.
December 15, 2012 at 3:19 PM #756333paramountParticipant[quote=Blogstar]So, is it correct to call it an epidemic at this point in time?[/quote]
I’m no expert, but I think it’s correct – and I haven’t heard that mentioned by the media BTW.
Having said that, most children are hurt by someone they know.
December 15, 2012 at 3:32 PM #756334NotCrankyParticipant[quote=paramount][quote=Blogstar]So, is it correct to call it an epidemic at this point in time?[/quote]
I’m no expert, but I think it’s correct – and I haven’t heard that mentioned by the media BTW.
Having said that, most children are hurt by someone they know.[/quote]
Those children being hurt by people they know could be part of the epidemic. Same as ghetto violence. It’s all violence.
I think this; When greed and violence are condoned in all “legitimate” entities in a society, how can we expect the ignorant and unstable to buffer it in themselves?
December 15, 2012 at 4:54 PM #756341flyerParticipantSpeaking of “epidemics.” IMHO, there seems to be “epidemic” of insanity at the core of these horrific acts. I have many opinions as to why this “mind or mindless set” is escalating within society, but I’ll leave that discussion to the experts.
This growing “insanity factor” makes these occurences all the more frightening, since there is really very little we can do to control this type of wild card as a society–confirming the “Safety is an Illusion” premise of the OP.
December 15, 2012 at 5:43 PM #756345jpinpbParticipantThere’s a lot of mentally ill and seriously troubled people out there that are not receiving proper healthcare/treatment.
December 15, 2012 at 6:40 PM #756351paramountParticipantFrom Morgan Freeman on the Sandy Hook Tragedy
“You want to know why. This may sound cynical, but here’s why.
It’s because of the way the media reports it. Flip on the news and watch how we treat the Batman theater shooter and the Oregon mall shooter like celebrities. Dylan Klebold and Eric Harris are household names, but do you know the name of a single *victim* of Columbine? Disturbed people who would otherwise just off themselves in their basements see the news and want to top it by doing something worse, and going out in a memorable way. Why a grade school? Why children? Because he’ll be remembered as a horrible monster, instead of a sad nobody.
CNN’s article says that if the body count “holds up”, this will rank as the second deadliest shooting behind Virginia Tech, as if statistics somehow make one shooting worse than another. Then they post a video interview of third-graders for all the details of what they saw and heard while the shootings were happening. Fox News has plastered the killer’s face on all their reports for hours. Any articles or news stories yet that focus on the victims and ignore the killer’s identity? None that I’ve seen yet. Because they don’t sell. So congratulations, sensationalist media, you’ve just lit the fire for someone to top this and knock off a day care center or a maternity ward next.
You can help by forgetting you ever read this man’s name, and remembering the name of at least one victim. You can help by donating to mental health research instead of pointing to gun control as the problem. You can help by turning off the news.”
December 15, 2012 at 6:50 PM #756352FormerOwnerParticipantI wonder how many of these recent mass-murderers WERE being treated and were taking prescription anti-depressants. I know several people that are on them (some since childhood) and I think some anti-depresants can CAUSE people to have crazy irrational thoughts and possibly even permanentaly alter the brain. You will never hear anything about this in the mainstream media since the pharma companies are MAJOR advertisers. There is a good Frontline episode entitled “The Medicated Child” that goes into some of this but really focuses on young children. What happens when they become adults though? There is a lot of information on the web about this – such as:
Take This Antidepressant, and You Too May Have a Violent Psychotic Break
December 15, 2012 at 9:32 PM #756356Allan from FallbrookParticipant[quote=SK in CV]Wouldn’t it be nice if there was something….anything…that could be done to reduce the likelihood of these kinds of events happening. I can’t imagine what it might be. But whatever it might be, we can’t ever dare mention the elephant in the room.[/quote]
SK: I’m presuming you mean gun control? How would a gun ban have prevented this? The .223 Bushmaster he used was a pre-ban weapon acquired legally in 1993.
Metro cities like NYC and Chicago that have extremely stringent gun laws still unfortunately have high rates of gun violence (because the criminal element is acquiring the guns elsewhere.). Which would mean a nationwide ban on ALL guns, which I’m guessing is that proverbial elephant in the room.
December 15, 2012 at 10:07 PM #756357paramountParticipantThe issues surrounding these atrocities are difficult, I was recalling today that the gov’t used a type of tank to incinerate more than 20 children in Waco, Texas in 1993.
December 15, 2012 at 10:07 PM #756358ltsdddParticipantGuns sure make it a lot deadlier and more efficient at killing people. On the same day this happened, a crazy man in China stabbed 22 children. Same intent, different weapons, different results.
December 15, 2012 at 10:45 PM #756361KIBUParticipantWhen the FDA withdraw medications because of its adverse effect to a very small number of people/cases…American don’t go to congress and lobby to get back that medication for their rights to treat their justified indication. When the guns while serving the “liberty” purpose, the “self defense” purpose, the hobby and entertainment purpose, but also have the side effects of accidental deaths, mass massacre, murders by gun….nobody dares talking about a “recall” or a “withdrawal” like the FDA can…even when many more people died by gun in this country than all the side effects of medications could ever kill people.
There are differences between the two, yes. But the analogy shows how we look at and solve things differently independently of how many people die. Our cost/benefit analysis is out of whack.
December 15, 2012 at 11:14 PM #756363AnonymousGuestThere are many facets to this issue, and simplifying it to a presumed desire to ” ban guns” is one reason it rages on, in my opinion and deep sadness. As n example, see
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/12/15/1170462/-It-s-not-just-a-few-mass-killers-who-are-sick-and-twisted-Some-gun-manufacturers-are-worseDecember 16, 2012 at 1:03 AM #756366paramountParticipantNo rise in mass killings, but their impact is huge
By HELEN O’NEILL | Associated Press – 13 hrs agoGrant Duwe, a criminologist with the Minnesota Department of Corrections who has written a history of mass murders in America, said that while mass shootings rose between the 1960s and the 1990s, they actually dropped in the 2000s. And mass killings actually reached their peak in 1929, according to his data. He estimates that there were 32 in the 1980s, 42 in the 1990s and 26 in the first decade of the century.
Chances of being killed in a mass shooting, he says, are probably no greater than being struck by lightning.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.