- This topic has 455 replies, 15 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 6 months ago by
njtosd.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 18, 2010 at 7:11 PM #552283May 18, 2010 at 7:13 PM #551557
briansd1
GuestBristol Palin is now getting $15,000 to $30,000 to talk about abstinence.
She should be promoting birth control. Obviously she wasn’t able to abstain.
May 18, 2010 at 7:13 PM #551664briansd1
GuestBristol Palin is now getting $15,000 to $30,000 to talk about abstinence.
She should be promoting birth control. Obviously she wasn’t able to abstain.
May 18, 2010 at 7:13 PM #552151briansd1
GuestBristol Palin is now getting $15,000 to $30,000 to talk about abstinence.
She should be promoting birth control. Obviously she wasn’t able to abstain.
May 18, 2010 at 7:13 PM #552250briansd1
GuestBristol Palin is now getting $15,000 to $30,000 to talk about abstinence.
She should be promoting birth control. Obviously she wasn’t able to abstain.
May 18, 2010 at 7:13 PM #552528briansd1
GuestBristol Palin is now getting $15,000 to $30,000 to talk about abstinence.
She should be promoting birth control. Obviously she wasn’t able to abstain.
August 25, 2010 at 11:21 PM #596601briansd1
Guest[quote=davelj]I must admit, I enjoy salacious stories about purportedly “Great Men” (Clinton, Spitzer, etc.) that turn out to be cheating womanizers, so of course I enjoyed this Bob Rubin story.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/iris-mack/bob-rubin-just-wants-to-b_b_557621.html
Reminds me of a quote I read that goes something like, “There are no great men; only great reputations waiting to be tarnished.”
To expand on one of my favorite topics, my very crude breakdown of married men is as follows:
40% cheat (to greatly varying degrees)
50% want to cheat but can’t (unattractive, too busy, etc.)
3% gay
2% swingers
5% other – don’t cheat and don’t have any interest in cheatingWhat I’ve found is that the 93% in the top three groups spend much of their married lives trying to convince their families that they’re in the 5% “other” category.
This article probably isn’t helping Rubin with the case he’s been laying out to his family for ‘lo these many years.[/quote]
The 3% gay seems low, especially among the moralizers.
This one here is too good not to post.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/08/25/bill-maher-ken-mehlman-gay-larry-king_n_695072.html
CNN transcript controversy
Comedian Bill Maher referred to Mehlman as a closeted gay man in a November 8, 2006, appearance on CNN’s Larry King Live. It became a controversy when CNN edited out Maher’s comments in later taped editions of the appearance and removed the reference to Mehlman’s sexuality from the transcript of the show. Faced with prior rumors of his sexuality, Mehlman denied that he was gay in May 2006. “I’m not gay,” Mehlman told the New York Daily News, “but those stories did a number on my dating life for six months.”[18] Mehlman announced he would step down from his Chairman post the day after Maher’s appearance (although reports said that his resignation had been expected for some time).
August 25, 2010 at 11:21 PM #596694briansd1
Guest[quote=davelj]I must admit, I enjoy salacious stories about purportedly “Great Men” (Clinton, Spitzer, etc.) that turn out to be cheating womanizers, so of course I enjoyed this Bob Rubin story.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/iris-mack/bob-rubin-just-wants-to-b_b_557621.html
Reminds me of a quote I read that goes something like, “There are no great men; only great reputations waiting to be tarnished.”
To expand on one of my favorite topics, my very crude breakdown of married men is as follows:
40% cheat (to greatly varying degrees)
50% want to cheat but can’t (unattractive, too busy, etc.)
3% gay
2% swingers
5% other – don’t cheat and don’t have any interest in cheatingWhat I’ve found is that the 93% in the top three groups spend much of their married lives trying to convince their families that they’re in the 5% “other” category.
This article probably isn’t helping Rubin with the case he’s been laying out to his family for ‘lo these many years.[/quote]
The 3% gay seems low, especially among the moralizers.
This one here is too good not to post.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/08/25/bill-maher-ken-mehlman-gay-larry-king_n_695072.html
CNN transcript controversy
Comedian Bill Maher referred to Mehlman as a closeted gay man in a November 8, 2006, appearance on CNN’s Larry King Live. It became a controversy when CNN edited out Maher’s comments in later taped editions of the appearance and removed the reference to Mehlman’s sexuality from the transcript of the show. Faced with prior rumors of his sexuality, Mehlman denied that he was gay in May 2006. “I’m not gay,” Mehlman told the New York Daily News, “but those stories did a number on my dating life for six months.”[18] Mehlman announced he would step down from his Chairman post the day after Maher’s appearance (although reports said that his resignation had been expected for some time).
August 25, 2010 at 11:21 PM #597235briansd1
Guest[quote=davelj]I must admit, I enjoy salacious stories about purportedly “Great Men” (Clinton, Spitzer, etc.) that turn out to be cheating womanizers, so of course I enjoyed this Bob Rubin story.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/iris-mack/bob-rubin-just-wants-to-b_b_557621.html
Reminds me of a quote I read that goes something like, “There are no great men; only great reputations waiting to be tarnished.”
To expand on one of my favorite topics, my very crude breakdown of married men is as follows:
40% cheat (to greatly varying degrees)
50% want to cheat but can’t (unattractive, too busy, etc.)
3% gay
2% swingers
5% other – don’t cheat and don’t have any interest in cheatingWhat I’ve found is that the 93% in the top three groups spend much of their married lives trying to convince their families that they’re in the 5% “other” category.
This article probably isn’t helping Rubin with the case he’s been laying out to his family for ‘lo these many years.[/quote]
The 3% gay seems low, especially among the moralizers.
This one here is too good not to post.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/08/25/bill-maher-ken-mehlman-gay-larry-king_n_695072.html
CNN transcript controversy
Comedian Bill Maher referred to Mehlman as a closeted gay man in a November 8, 2006, appearance on CNN’s Larry King Live. It became a controversy when CNN edited out Maher’s comments in later taped editions of the appearance and removed the reference to Mehlman’s sexuality from the transcript of the show. Faced with prior rumors of his sexuality, Mehlman denied that he was gay in May 2006. “I’m not gay,” Mehlman told the New York Daily News, “but those stories did a number on my dating life for six months.”[18] Mehlman announced he would step down from his Chairman post the day after Maher’s appearance (although reports said that his resignation had been expected for some time).
August 25, 2010 at 11:21 PM #597347briansd1
Guest[quote=davelj]I must admit, I enjoy salacious stories about purportedly “Great Men” (Clinton, Spitzer, etc.) that turn out to be cheating womanizers, so of course I enjoyed this Bob Rubin story.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/iris-mack/bob-rubin-just-wants-to-b_b_557621.html
Reminds me of a quote I read that goes something like, “There are no great men; only great reputations waiting to be tarnished.”
To expand on one of my favorite topics, my very crude breakdown of married men is as follows:
40% cheat (to greatly varying degrees)
50% want to cheat but can’t (unattractive, too busy, etc.)
3% gay
2% swingers
5% other – don’t cheat and don’t have any interest in cheatingWhat I’ve found is that the 93% in the top three groups spend much of their married lives trying to convince their families that they’re in the 5% “other” category.
This article probably isn’t helping Rubin with the case he’s been laying out to his family for ‘lo these many years.[/quote]
The 3% gay seems low, especially among the moralizers.
This one here is too good not to post.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/08/25/bill-maher-ken-mehlman-gay-larry-king_n_695072.html
CNN transcript controversy
Comedian Bill Maher referred to Mehlman as a closeted gay man in a November 8, 2006, appearance on CNN’s Larry King Live. It became a controversy when CNN edited out Maher’s comments in later taped editions of the appearance and removed the reference to Mehlman’s sexuality from the transcript of the show. Faced with prior rumors of his sexuality, Mehlman denied that he was gay in May 2006. “I’m not gay,” Mehlman told the New York Daily News, “but those stories did a number on my dating life for six months.”[18] Mehlman announced he would step down from his Chairman post the day after Maher’s appearance (although reports said that his resignation had been expected for some time).
August 25, 2010 at 11:21 PM #597663briansd1
Guest[quote=davelj]I must admit, I enjoy salacious stories about purportedly “Great Men” (Clinton, Spitzer, etc.) that turn out to be cheating womanizers, so of course I enjoyed this Bob Rubin story.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/iris-mack/bob-rubin-just-wants-to-b_b_557621.html
Reminds me of a quote I read that goes something like, “There are no great men; only great reputations waiting to be tarnished.”
To expand on one of my favorite topics, my very crude breakdown of married men is as follows:
40% cheat (to greatly varying degrees)
50% want to cheat but can’t (unattractive, too busy, etc.)
3% gay
2% swingers
5% other – don’t cheat and don’t have any interest in cheatingWhat I’ve found is that the 93% in the top three groups spend much of their married lives trying to convince their families that they’re in the 5% “other” category.
This article probably isn’t helping Rubin with the case he’s been laying out to his family for ‘lo these many years.[/quote]
The 3% gay seems low, especially among the moralizers.
This one here is too good not to post.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/08/25/bill-maher-ken-mehlman-gay-larry-king_n_695072.html
CNN transcript controversy
Comedian Bill Maher referred to Mehlman as a closeted gay man in a November 8, 2006, appearance on CNN’s Larry King Live. It became a controversy when CNN edited out Maher’s comments in later taped editions of the appearance and removed the reference to Mehlman’s sexuality from the transcript of the show. Faced with prior rumors of his sexuality, Mehlman denied that he was gay in May 2006. “I’m not gay,” Mehlman told the New York Daily News, “but those stories did a number on my dating life for six months.”[18] Mehlman announced he would step down from his Chairman post the day after Maher’s appearance (although reports said that his resignation had been expected for some time).
August 26, 2010 at 8:57 AM #596631meadandale
Participant[quote=briansd1]Bristol Palin is now getting $15,000 to $30,000 to talk about abstinence.
She should be promoting birth control. Obviously she wasn’t able to abstain.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_people_bristol_palin%5B/quote%5D
So, according to your perspective, former (reformed) drug users are inappropriate role models to discuss the dangers of drugs to kids?
I’d argue that the MOST appropriate person to discuss abstinence is someone like Bristol; “see, this is what can happen if you are sexually active EVEN WITH birth control–which is not 100% effective”
August 26, 2010 at 8:57 AM #596725meadandale
Participant[quote=briansd1]Bristol Palin is now getting $15,000 to $30,000 to talk about abstinence.
She should be promoting birth control. Obviously she wasn’t able to abstain.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_people_bristol_palin%5B/quote%5D
So, according to your perspective, former (reformed) drug users are inappropriate role models to discuss the dangers of drugs to kids?
I’d argue that the MOST appropriate person to discuss abstinence is someone like Bristol; “see, this is what can happen if you are sexually active EVEN WITH birth control–which is not 100% effective”
August 26, 2010 at 8:57 AM #597265meadandale
Participant[quote=briansd1]Bristol Palin is now getting $15,000 to $30,000 to talk about abstinence.
She should be promoting birth control. Obviously she wasn’t able to abstain.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_people_bristol_palin%5B/quote%5D
So, according to your perspective, former (reformed) drug users are inappropriate role models to discuss the dangers of drugs to kids?
I’d argue that the MOST appropriate person to discuss abstinence is someone like Bristol; “see, this is what can happen if you are sexually active EVEN WITH birth control–which is not 100% effective”
August 26, 2010 at 8:57 AM #597376meadandale
Participant[quote=briansd1]Bristol Palin is now getting $15,000 to $30,000 to talk about abstinence.
She should be promoting birth control. Obviously she wasn’t able to abstain.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_people_bristol_palin%5B/quote%5D
So, according to your perspective, former (reformed) drug users are inappropriate role models to discuss the dangers of drugs to kids?
I’d argue that the MOST appropriate person to discuss abstinence is someone like Bristol; “see, this is what can happen if you are sexually active EVEN WITH birth control–which is not 100% effective”
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
