- This topic has 45 replies, 8 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 8 months ago by
CBad.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 1, 2009 at 9:48 PM #423679July 1, 2009 at 10:11 PM #424441
PCinSD
GuestI’ve never handled a dog bite case. I just googled it and came up with what appears to have some info you should read:
http://www.dogbitelaw.com/PAGES/civil.htm
Based on the facts you’ve given you may have a valid defense.
July 1, 2009 at 10:11 PM #423929PCinSD
GuestI’ve never handled a dog bite case. I just googled it and came up with what appears to have some info you should read:
http://www.dogbitelaw.com/PAGES/civil.htm
Based on the facts you’ve given you may have a valid defense.
July 1, 2009 at 10:11 PM #424209PCinSD
GuestI’ve never handled a dog bite case. I just googled it and came up with what appears to have some info you should read:
http://www.dogbitelaw.com/PAGES/civil.htm
Based on the facts you’ve given you may have a valid defense.
July 1, 2009 at 10:11 PM #423698PCinSD
GuestI’ve never handled a dog bite case. I just googled it and came up with what appears to have some info you should read:
http://www.dogbitelaw.com/PAGES/civil.htm
Based on the facts you’ve given you may have a valid defense.
July 1, 2009 at 10:11 PM #424278PCinSD
GuestI’ve never handled a dog bite case. I just googled it and came up with what appears to have some info you should read:
http://www.dogbitelaw.com/PAGES/civil.htm
Based on the facts you’ve given you may have a valid defense.
July 1, 2009 at 10:47 PM #423954Hatfield
ParticipantI worry about this too. I have two rental units. Tenants in one unit do have dogs, and I wonder if I should ever rent to dog owners again. I have a $3M umbrella policy in addition to the regular homeowner & fire insurance policies.
Lately I’ve been reading up on real estate LLCs. In theory an LLC looks like an ideal liability limitation vehicle, it’s just really unfortunate that the California limited liability tax is $800/yr and applies to all corporations and LLCs.
July 1, 2009 at 10:47 PM #424466Hatfield
ParticipantI worry about this too. I have two rental units. Tenants in one unit do have dogs, and I wonder if I should ever rent to dog owners again. I have a $3M umbrella policy in addition to the regular homeowner & fire insurance policies.
Lately I’ve been reading up on real estate LLCs. In theory an LLC looks like an ideal liability limitation vehicle, it’s just really unfortunate that the California limited liability tax is $800/yr and applies to all corporations and LLCs.
July 1, 2009 at 10:47 PM #424234Hatfield
ParticipantI worry about this too. I have two rental units. Tenants in one unit do have dogs, and I wonder if I should ever rent to dog owners again. I have a $3M umbrella policy in addition to the regular homeowner & fire insurance policies.
Lately I’ve been reading up on real estate LLCs. In theory an LLC looks like an ideal liability limitation vehicle, it’s just really unfortunate that the California limited liability tax is $800/yr and applies to all corporations and LLCs.
July 1, 2009 at 10:47 PM #423723Hatfield
ParticipantI worry about this too. I have two rental units. Tenants in one unit do have dogs, and I wonder if I should ever rent to dog owners again. I have a $3M umbrella policy in addition to the regular homeowner & fire insurance policies.
Lately I’ve been reading up on real estate LLCs. In theory an LLC looks like an ideal liability limitation vehicle, it’s just really unfortunate that the California limited liability tax is $800/yr and applies to all corporations and LLCs.
July 1, 2009 at 10:47 PM #424302Hatfield
ParticipantI worry about this too. I have two rental units. Tenants in one unit do have dogs, and I wonder if I should ever rent to dog owners again. I have a $3M umbrella policy in addition to the regular homeowner & fire insurance policies.
Lately I’ve been reading up on real estate LLCs. In theory an LLC looks like an ideal liability limitation vehicle, it’s just really unfortunate that the California limited liability tax is $800/yr and applies to all corporations and LLCs.
July 1, 2009 at 11:01 PM #424244equalizer
Participant[quote=Hatfield]I worry about this too. I have two rental units. Tenants in one unit do have dogs, and I wonder if I should ever rent to dog owners again. I have a $3M umbrella policy in addition to the regular homeowner & fire insurance policies.
Lately I’ve been reading up on real estate LLCs. In theory an LLC looks like an ideal liability limitation vehicle, it’s just really unfortunate that the California limited liability tax is $800/yr and applies to all corporations and LLCs. [/quote]
All dogs should be on special rider policies like expensive jewelry, etc. Most dogs will bite so it is a foreseeable event (strict definition of insurance) which should be exluded from coverage.
A relative had several dogs and after 6 years one of the dogs bit their son and son ended up in hospital with minor injury. Know someone whose small dog bit a kid right in front of him. Insurance company saw emergency room picture and immmediately wrote check for some crazy figure like 50K for minor scar.So most insurance companies only ban certain breeds while they cap water claims at super low 5K(AAA). Water leak is generally not a foreseeable event, and they cap at ridiculous 5K??? Only explanation is that all insurance execs are big dogs owners?
Purely business, why rent to pet owners? Is it that difficult to find decent tenants?
July 1, 2009 at 11:01 PM #424476equalizer
Participant[quote=Hatfield]I worry about this too. I have two rental units. Tenants in one unit do have dogs, and I wonder if I should ever rent to dog owners again. I have a $3M umbrella policy in addition to the regular homeowner & fire insurance policies.
Lately I’ve been reading up on real estate LLCs. In theory an LLC looks like an ideal liability limitation vehicle, it’s just really unfortunate that the California limited liability tax is $800/yr and applies to all corporations and LLCs. [/quote]
All dogs should be on special rider policies like expensive jewelry, etc. Most dogs will bite so it is a foreseeable event (strict definition of insurance) which should be exluded from coverage.
A relative had several dogs and after 6 years one of the dogs bit their son and son ended up in hospital with minor injury. Know someone whose small dog bit a kid right in front of him. Insurance company saw emergency room picture and immmediately wrote check for some crazy figure like 50K for minor scar.So most insurance companies only ban certain breeds while they cap water claims at super low 5K(AAA). Water leak is generally not a foreseeable event, and they cap at ridiculous 5K??? Only explanation is that all insurance execs are big dogs owners?
Purely business, why rent to pet owners? Is it that difficult to find decent tenants?
July 1, 2009 at 11:01 PM #424312equalizer
Participant[quote=Hatfield]I worry about this too. I have two rental units. Tenants in one unit do have dogs, and I wonder if I should ever rent to dog owners again. I have a $3M umbrella policy in addition to the regular homeowner & fire insurance policies.
Lately I’ve been reading up on real estate LLCs. In theory an LLC looks like an ideal liability limitation vehicle, it’s just really unfortunate that the California limited liability tax is $800/yr and applies to all corporations and LLCs. [/quote]
All dogs should be on special rider policies like expensive jewelry, etc. Most dogs will bite so it is a foreseeable event (strict definition of insurance) which should be exluded from coverage.
A relative had several dogs and after 6 years one of the dogs bit their son and son ended up in hospital with minor injury. Know someone whose small dog bit a kid right in front of him. Insurance company saw emergency room picture and immmediately wrote check for some crazy figure like 50K for minor scar.So most insurance companies only ban certain breeds while they cap water claims at super low 5K(AAA). Water leak is generally not a foreseeable event, and they cap at ridiculous 5K??? Only explanation is that all insurance execs are big dogs owners?
Purely business, why rent to pet owners? Is it that difficult to find decent tenants?
July 1, 2009 at 11:01 PM #423964equalizer
Participant[quote=Hatfield]I worry about this too. I have two rental units. Tenants in one unit do have dogs, and I wonder if I should ever rent to dog owners again. I have a $3M umbrella policy in addition to the regular homeowner & fire insurance policies.
Lately I’ve been reading up on real estate LLCs. In theory an LLC looks like an ideal liability limitation vehicle, it’s just really unfortunate that the California limited liability tax is $800/yr and applies to all corporations and LLCs. [/quote]
All dogs should be on special rider policies like expensive jewelry, etc. Most dogs will bite so it is a foreseeable event (strict definition of insurance) which should be exluded from coverage.
A relative had several dogs and after 6 years one of the dogs bit their son and son ended up in hospital with minor injury. Know someone whose small dog bit a kid right in front of him. Insurance company saw emergency room picture and immmediately wrote check for some crazy figure like 50K for minor scar.So most insurance companies only ban certain breeds while they cap water claims at super low 5K(AAA). Water leak is generally not a foreseeable event, and they cap at ridiculous 5K??? Only explanation is that all insurance execs are big dogs owners?
Purely business, why rent to pet owners? Is it that difficult to find decent tenants?
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.