- This topic has 1,770 replies, 36 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 5 months ago by GH.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 12, 2011 at 10:52 AM #696030May 12, 2011 at 11:02 AM #694843scaredyclassicParticipant
Beware the undertoad
May 12, 2011 at 11:02 AM #694930scaredyclassicParticipantBeware the undertoad
May 12, 2011 at 11:02 AM #695533scaredyclassicParticipantBeware the undertoad
May 12, 2011 at 11:02 AM #695680scaredyclassicParticipantBeware the undertoad
May 12, 2011 at 11:02 AM #696035scaredyclassicParticipantBeware the undertoad
May 12, 2011 at 12:45 PM #694883sdrealtorParticipantI’m sure CAR has a good justification for this. Something like there are lots of people who would want the job but how many can actually do the job while looking that good in red trunks?
May 12, 2011 at 12:45 PM #694970sdrealtorParticipantI’m sure CAR has a good justification for this. Something like there are lots of people who would want the job but how many can actually do the job while looking that good in red trunks?
May 12, 2011 at 12:45 PM #695573sdrealtorParticipantI’m sure CAR has a good justification for this. Something like there are lots of people who would want the job but how many can actually do the job while looking that good in red trunks?
May 12, 2011 at 12:45 PM #695721sdrealtorParticipantI’m sure CAR has a good justification for this. Something like there are lots of people who would want the job but how many can actually do the job while looking that good in red trunks?
May 12, 2011 at 12:45 PM #696075sdrealtorParticipantI’m sure CAR has a good justification for this. Something like there are lots of people who would want the job but how many can actually do the job while looking that good in red trunks?
May 12, 2011 at 1:18 PM #694898CA renterParticipantAs usual, it’s a sensationalized heading, and very light on facts.
From the article:
The lifeguards in question are part of a 13-person management team; by contrast, the towers are staffed by 200 or so seasonal guards who make about $20 an hour, give or take.
In both cities, overtime pay was a big factor, often reaching into the tens of thousands of dollars. [In other words, this is NOT base pay, and they don’t specify how their pay breaks down per hour, as usual. Makes it look more “shocking” that way. -CAR]
I noted that these full-time lifeguards aren’t staffing the towers, and Kiff replied that while that’s true, they must train their subordinates and must be capable of such rescues.
In addition, they have more than 200 seasonal lifeguards under their command. “That’s a lot of people to supervise,” Kiff said.
————–While the compensation does seem to be excessive, these are *management* positions in public safety, they are NOT “lifeguards.” We also don’t know how the pay is broken down, so can’t really make a determination as to whether or not they are actually overpaid.
One thing that I’ll repeat (again): I’ve never agreed with the 3% pension formula for any public workers. That was excessive from the beginning, and I’ve never wavered on my stance there.
May 12, 2011 at 1:18 PM #694985CA renterParticipantAs usual, it’s a sensationalized heading, and very light on facts.
From the article:
The lifeguards in question are part of a 13-person management team; by contrast, the towers are staffed by 200 or so seasonal guards who make about $20 an hour, give or take.
In both cities, overtime pay was a big factor, often reaching into the tens of thousands of dollars. [In other words, this is NOT base pay, and they don’t specify how their pay breaks down per hour, as usual. Makes it look more “shocking” that way. -CAR]
I noted that these full-time lifeguards aren’t staffing the towers, and Kiff replied that while that’s true, they must train their subordinates and must be capable of such rescues.
In addition, they have more than 200 seasonal lifeguards under their command. “That’s a lot of people to supervise,” Kiff said.
————–While the compensation does seem to be excessive, these are *management* positions in public safety, they are NOT “lifeguards.” We also don’t know how the pay is broken down, so can’t really make a determination as to whether or not they are actually overpaid.
One thing that I’ll repeat (again): I’ve never agreed with the 3% pension formula for any public workers. That was excessive from the beginning, and I’ve never wavered on my stance there.
May 12, 2011 at 1:18 PM #695588CA renterParticipantAs usual, it’s a sensationalized heading, and very light on facts.
From the article:
The lifeguards in question are part of a 13-person management team; by contrast, the towers are staffed by 200 or so seasonal guards who make about $20 an hour, give or take.
In both cities, overtime pay was a big factor, often reaching into the tens of thousands of dollars. [In other words, this is NOT base pay, and they don’t specify how their pay breaks down per hour, as usual. Makes it look more “shocking” that way. -CAR]
I noted that these full-time lifeguards aren’t staffing the towers, and Kiff replied that while that’s true, they must train their subordinates and must be capable of such rescues.
In addition, they have more than 200 seasonal lifeguards under their command. “That’s a lot of people to supervise,” Kiff said.
————–While the compensation does seem to be excessive, these are *management* positions in public safety, they are NOT “lifeguards.” We also don’t know how the pay is broken down, so can’t really make a determination as to whether or not they are actually overpaid.
One thing that I’ll repeat (again): I’ve never agreed with the 3% pension formula for any public workers. That was excessive from the beginning, and I’ve never wavered on my stance there.
May 12, 2011 at 1:18 PM #695737CA renterParticipantAs usual, it’s a sensationalized heading, and very light on facts.
From the article:
The lifeguards in question are part of a 13-person management team; by contrast, the towers are staffed by 200 or so seasonal guards who make about $20 an hour, give or take.
In both cities, overtime pay was a big factor, often reaching into the tens of thousands of dollars. [In other words, this is NOT base pay, and they don’t specify how their pay breaks down per hour, as usual. Makes it look more “shocking” that way. -CAR]
I noted that these full-time lifeguards aren’t staffing the towers, and Kiff replied that while that’s true, they must train their subordinates and must be capable of such rescues.
In addition, they have more than 200 seasonal lifeguards under their command. “That’s a lot of people to supervise,” Kiff said.
————–While the compensation does seem to be excessive, these are *management* positions in public safety, they are NOT “lifeguards.” We also don’t know how the pay is broken down, so can’t really make a determination as to whether or not they are actually overpaid.
One thing that I’ll repeat (again): I’ve never agreed with the 3% pension formula for any public workers. That was excessive from the beginning, and I’ve never wavered on my stance there.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.