- This topic has 706 replies, 41 voices, and was last updated 8 years ago by scaredyclassic.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 26, 2016 at 10:49 AM #795006February 26, 2016 at 12:05 PM #795010bearishgurlParticipant
[quote=FlyerInHi]BG, I think people in border towns don’t want a wall. They would prefer ease of travel so they can go back and forth. Let see how they vote.[/quote]
They’ll still be able to have “ease of travel” with a wall (if they are properly documented). The existence of a wall is not going to affect the officer-controlled checkpoints which are already in existence (~24 at the SD/Tijuana border crossing).The wall will specifically be to prohibit foot traffic across the border in all areas except those which are part of the existing checkpoints.
February 26, 2016 at 12:12 PM #795011FlyerInHiGuestI watched the entire republican debate last night. I like Kasich but he looked hunchback and unpolished. I like Carson’s health plan. Cruz is consistently conservative. Rubio is very corporate republican.
Trump won. Does not matter what the press thinks. Republicans seem to love trump’s hardass CEO style of shutting up people. The other guys looked incredulous at what Trump gets away with.
So today Trumps get Christie’s endorsement.
February 26, 2016 at 12:27 PM #795012bearishgurlParticipant[quote=FlyerInHi]I watched the entire republican debate last night. I like Kasich but he looked hunchback and unpolished. I like Carson’s health plan. Cruz is consistently conservative. Rubio is very corporate republican.
Trump won. Does not matter what the press thinks. Republicans seem to love trump’s hardass CEO style of shutting up people. The other guys looked incredulous at what Trump gets away with.
So today Trumps get Christie’s endorsement.[/quote]LOL, I missed all that. I’ll have to catch up tonight. I’ve got more folks coming over for help to find out why they were bumped from their CC plans after paying their February premium. One just found out at the doctor’s office this morning. These people are just two of many thousands out there :=0
I checked my CC acct just now and I am apparently still covered as of today. However, I was bumped off my plan twice during my last long (3600+ mile) road trip ending mid-November. I didn’t find out about it until I arrived back home and got my mail. It would have been disastrous for me had something happened to me on my road trip and my Blue Shield membership card was no longer good.
My premium is automatically deducted on the 1st of every month, as are 95% of CC participants.
February 26, 2016 at 12:27 PM #795013AnonymousGuestIf it comes down to Donald vs. Hillary it will really come down to Trump vs. Mrs. Bill Clinton.
Trump has it easy now because other Republicans have to play nice and can’t bring up his long history of … well … being Donald Trump.
The negative campaign ads will be interesting.
February 26, 2016 at 12:42 PM #795014bearishgurlParticipant[quote=harvey]If it comes down to Donald vs. Hillary it will really come down to Trump vs. Mrs. Bill Clinton.
Trump has it easy now because other Republicans have to play nice and can’t bring up his long history of … well … being Donald Trump.
The negative campaign ads will be interesting.[/quote]Um, it’s “legal” to have had three wives (and to prefer a much-younger eastern European spouse). It’s actually quite common for someone in his age group (rich or poor). He supported (and is still supporting one) all of his children (private school) and sent them all to college. Whatever Cruz and Rubio can come up with … more power to them.
Edit: oh, and he “created” (executive) jobs for three of his children and is likely still supporting the fourth in college.
February 26, 2016 at 12:54 PM #795016FlyerInHiGuestWhy didn’t trump marry native women? He imported his wives.
BG, I’m not defending all of obamacare. I would prefer VA or Medicare for all.
But I know at least 20 people who now have health care. They went without before.Despite your problems, ACA is an incremental improvement for all.
February 26, 2016 at 1:40 PM #795020bearishgurlParticipant[quote=FlyerInHi]Why didn’t trump marry native women? He imported his wives.
BG, I’m not defending all of obamacare. I would prefer VA or Medicare for all.
But I know at least 20 people who now have health care. They went without before.Despite your problems, ACA is an incremental improvement for all.[/quote]FIH, Trump’s second spouse was from GA, USA. He didn’t have to “import” his first and third spouse as they were both already present in NY when he met them. However, they both eventually became US citizens due to marrying him.
I know an older plumber and also a cabinetmaker in his late forties (both Americans) who “imported” their latest spouses from Russia and they seem to be very happy. It’s not only the “rich” who do this.
CC is specifically targeting heads of households and single filers who are over the age of 55 for forced Medi-Cal placement. It doesn’t matter what income they reported or what the nature of their income is (ie W-2, 1099, etc). It doesn’t matter if they have an income $15K or $20K above the Medi-Cal threshold, their tax returns show this to be true and they proved it last year and the year before. They must prove it every year and often two or three times per year on very short notice or they can be bumped off their healthplan arbitrarily (yes, after paying their premium for that month). Our great state of CA has been “lawyering up” for nearly six months now to begin massive collection efforts for the purposes Medi-Cal recovery on the estates of the “over-55” set. I cannot emphasize enough here that CA wants EVERYBODY they can possibly get who is over 55 on Medi-Cal ASAP so they can start running up their estate tabs with mandatory ~$625 month Medi-Cal premiums, whether they ever go to the doctor or not.
THOUSANDS of CC enrollees have already gotten Medi-Cal cards in the mail that they never applied for only to call their carrier and find out they have been bumped from their plans.
CC and Social Service agencies of CA’s 58 counties have access to the the CA EDD computer and Franchise Tax Board records of CC participants. For example, if a CC participant is a Realtor who makes $8K in commissions one month and then doesn’t make any money for four months and then makes $34K the next month in commissions, they could find themselves force-placed into Medi-Cal. Unlike CC, Medi-Cal does not use annual income and does not recognize military pensions as “income.” (I know a military retiree whose pension is over $4K month.) Medi-Cal only uses MONTHLY income to determine eligibility. If you have months where no income is reported to the EDD or don’t have legitimate documentation to prove when income was paid to you, you could easily be bumped into Medi-Cal. I doesn’t matter if your income for the year was over $40K. If you reside in CA, are receiving a subsidy to pay your premium (however small) and you are over 55, you are a moving target for forced Medi-Cal placement behind your back. You will find yourself “proving your income” to CC over and over and over again and will be given very little notice to do so before being bumped. Their personnel doesn’t have the expertise to properly read the numbers on your tax return and doesn’t have access to your backup documents from entities which paid you income. You could have an income of $45K (or $65K if a couple) and have an AGI on Line 37 of your tax return) of $15K or $20k due to writeoffs and they don’t understand how you got to that number and want to know all the particulars … all the time.
If you are over 55, my advice to EVERYONE is to STAY OFF CC and get your healthplan elsewhere if you want to preserve your estate. It’s NOT WORTH IT!!!
February 26, 2016 at 1:51 PM #795021spdrunParticipantbearishgurl — the Covered California thing doesn’t make sense. At least in NY, you can buy insurance through the exchange WITHOUT asking for a subsidy. At that point, they don’t really care about your income.
Also, with the realtor example, aren’t most salesmen paid on 1099? That’s not reported till the end of the year, not reported monthly.
Trump’s wives — I’m much happier dating 1st and 2nd generation people. That’s all I can say. Mail-order would be a bit of a stretch, but it’s easy to meet women who aren’t American in a city like NY or LA.
February 26, 2016 at 3:16 PM #795023FlyerInHiGuestBG, Trump will get a pass from his supporters because he’s a billionaire… But his life is not at all wholesome American apple pie. How come his kids speak Czech and Slovenian? Wouldn’t English only be better if the goal is complete assimilation?
On ACA… if I remember well, all the state stuff is concessions to Republicans who didn’t want national plans and public options.
February 26, 2016 at 3:31 PM #795024enron_by_the_seaParticipant[quote=spdrun]bearishgurl — the Covered California thing doesn’t make sense. At least in NY, you can buy insurance through the exchange WITHOUT asking for a subsidy. At that point, they don’t really care about your income.
[/quote]
Apparently even covered california allows you to apply for private insurance without Medi-cal or subsidies.
This is from their website:
“When you apply for coverage through Covered California, your application is automatically checked to see if your family is eligible for financial help through Covered California or for free or low-cost Medi-Cal. If you are not interested in financial help, Covered California also has a separate application you can use, for consumers who do not want financial assistance for a Covered California health insurance plan or coverage through Medi-Cal. Most consumers choose to apply for financial assistance to help pay for health coverage.
http://www.coveredca.com/individuals-and-families/getting-covered/application-process/
Also, covered california is NOT the only place where you can buy health insurance. “off-the-exchange” personal health insurance plans are allowed under ACA and widely used. Here is one example:
https://www.ehealthinsurance.com/
https://www.healthinsurance.org/obamacare/off-exchange-plans/February 26, 2016 at 3:59 PM #795025La Jolla RenterParticipantChris Christie endorses Donald Trump for Republican party nomination.
Any sliver of hope Rubio thought he picked up in the debate last night, just got erased.
Like him or not, Trump sure knows how to play the game.
http://www.nj.com/politics/index.ssf/2016/02/christie_endorses_donald_trump.html
February 26, 2016 at 4:42 PM #795028CoronitaParticipantI can’t wait for someone that looked into trump corporations using illegal aliens also uncover his corporations used the h1b system or , worse, abused it.
It’s not a question of if they find out. Its a matter of when.
February 26, 2016 at 5:17 PM #795030bearishgurlParticipantOkay, my peeps (both over 55) are gone now and had documentation in their CC accounts that they had proved their (W-2) incomes to CC in January and early February and have been reinstated … for now, retroactive back to 2/1. CC had bumped them off their plans without even reading their uploads, which is typical.
CC has access to both of their tax return numbers until 2020 and has had that access since the beginning of last year.
However, one of them is likely going to have to “re-prove” her income to CC come June or July. We’ll see what happens. She’s going to check her CC account the 2nd business day of every month (after her premium is paid) to make sure her plan is still active.
enron, yes, the people who create an account on CC and state they are not seeking a subsidy and purchase a CC plan without a subsidy don’t have any problems. But why would anyone want to go thru a bureaucratic gubment middleman (CC) to buy a healthplan if they weren’t eligible for subsidy? What would be the purpose of doing that? They could just log onto a carrier’s website or “ehealthinsurance” as you listed here and probably get the same plan for $14-15 month less because the plan isn’t paying any monthly “commissions” to CC!
I know about all those ways to purchase healthplans off the exchange and will be doing so myself for 2017. I actually purchased my former (“grandfathered”) healthplan online in 2004 but they bumped me off the plan at the end of 2013 when they left CA’s individual market (with 5 other large carriers) because they refused to offer “ACA compliant” plans in CA.
[quote=spdrun] . . . Also, with the realtor example, aren’t most salesmen paid on 1099? That’s not reported till the end of the year, not reported monthly. . . . [/quote]If a CC enrollee who is accepting a subsidy is over 55 and DID NOT prove their income last year with W2’s, then they will likely find themselves having to prove their income several times annually to keep their subsidy. If any of their reported income was through commissions, then yes, they wouldn’t get that 1099 until the following January and CC knows this. The commissioned salesperson over 55 years of age will be required to prove when they were paid commissions by scanning and uploading their (dated) commission stmts or checkstubs into the CC website.
An “over-55” CC enrollees’ CC file is automatically sent electronically to their County SS Dept who will “work it up” for Medi-Cal eligibility at the same time the enrollee is covered with a subsidy helping to pay their premiums. County Medi-Cal workers have the authority to go into a CC enrollee’s CC case and change their income numbers as they see fit, without informing the enrollee and often do. (For instance, remove military retirement income, adjust interest or dividend income or a remove a deduction they don’t feel qualifies for MAGI, etc). For those who have reported W-2 income in the previous year and/or listed it in their current income on CalHEERS, the Medi-Cal worker in their county will cull the state EDD index beginning one month after every quarter (4/30, 7/31, 10/31 and 1/31, after employers have reported earnings) to try to match CC enrollees’ reported or projected earnings with what their employer reported. If employers reported less monthly earnings than the Medi-Cal threshold for the enrollee’s filing status (or in any months leading up to the current month), that is cause for Medi-Cal forced placement. It doesn’t matter if the employee may have been on FML or ran out of leave and that is why their paycheck(s) were short for that month or a period of months. It only matters that their gross pay for one or more months fell below 138% of the “poverty level,” rendering them “Medi-Cal eligible.”
CC enrollees below 55 years of age aren’t scrutinized as closely and their tax returns (usually reporting W-2 income) are accepted at face value because for them, their Medi-Cal premium may cost just as much or more than the subsidy they are receiving and more importantly, the law does not provide for Medi-Cal estate recovery for CC enrollees under the age of 55. There is little incentive for CC or County SS Depts to go through all that extra work of constantly monitoring younger CC enrollees’ CC accounts and hassling them for proof of income when the state wouldn’t be allowed to place any liens on them for the cost of Medi-Cal managed care premiums. In most cases, it’s cheaper to give them a subsidy if they have an easily proveable W-2 income within $15K annually of the Medi-Cal threshold.
Boomers are an absolute cash cow for states who adopted expanded Medicaid under the ACA and CA is wasting no time making sure they are going to get their cut. Our homes and other properties are sitting ducks for attachment and the state is chomping at the bit to obtain the right to start their tab running and lay claim on them.
February 26, 2016 at 5:31 PM #795031svelteParticipantMan.
Now Rubio says that Trump “wet his pants”.
Not very presidential. He just joined Trump in the gutter.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.