- This topic has 115 replies, 12 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 6 months ago by
bubba99.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 24, 2010 at 12:50 PM #554299May 25, 2010 at 8:50 AM #553523
poorgradstudent
ParticipantWasn’t Obama supposed to pull us out of Iraq? That would save us a lot of $$$$.
I like the guy, but just sayin’, we need to start pulling out of Iraq along with closing old bases in Germany and other places in Europe. “Obamacare” is a drop in the bucket compared to those kinds of potential savings!
May 25, 2010 at 8:50 AM #553630poorgradstudent
ParticipantWasn’t Obama supposed to pull us out of Iraq? That would save us a lot of $$$$.
I like the guy, but just sayin’, we need to start pulling out of Iraq along with closing old bases in Germany and other places in Europe. “Obamacare” is a drop in the bucket compared to those kinds of potential savings!
May 25, 2010 at 8:50 AM #554118poorgradstudent
ParticipantWasn’t Obama supposed to pull us out of Iraq? That would save us a lot of $$$$.
I like the guy, but just sayin’, we need to start pulling out of Iraq along with closing old bases in Germany and other places in Europe. “Obamacare” is a drop in the bucket compared to those kinds of potential savings!
May 25, 2010 at 8:50 AM #554216poorgradstudent
ParticipantWasn’t Obama supposed to pull us out of Iraq? That would save us a lot of $$$$.
I like the guy, but just sayin’, we need to start pulling out of Iraq along with closing old bases in Germany and other places in Europe. “Obamacare” is a drop in the bucket compared to those kinds of potential savings!
May 25, 2010 at 8:50 AM #554493poorgradstudent
ParticipantWasn’t Obama supposed to pull us out of Iraq? That would save us a lot of $$$$.
I like the guy, but just sayin’, we need to start pulling out of Iraq along with closing old bases in Germany and other places in Europe. “Obamacare” is a drop in the bucket compared to those kinds of potential savings!
May 25, 2010 at 10:10 AM #553553briansd1
Guest[quote=poorgradstudent]Wasn’t Obama supposed to pull us out of Iraq? That would save us a lot of $$$$.
[/quote]That’s supposed to be 2011. If Obama doesn’t pull out before the 2012 elections, he’ll have a lot of disappointed constituents who will not vote for him.
May 25, 2010 at 10:10 AM #553659briansd1
Guest[quote=poorgradstudent]Wasn’t Obama supposed to pull us out of Iraq? That would save us a lot of $$$$.
[/quote]That’s supposed to be 2011. If Obama doesn’t pull out before the 2012 elections, he’ll have a lot of disappointed constituents who will not vote for him.
May 25, 2010 at 10:10 AM #554148briansd1
Guest[quote=poorgradstudent]Wasn’t Obama supposed to pull us out of Iraq? That would save us a lot of $$$$.
[/quote]That’s supposed to be 2011. If Obama doesn’t pull out before the 2012 elections, he’ll have a lot of disappointed constituents who will not vote for him.
May 25, 2010 at 10:10 AM #554246briansd1
Guest[quote=poorgradstudent]Wasn’t Obama supposed to pull us out of Iraq? That would save us a lot of $$$$.
[/quote]That’s supposed to be 2011. If Obama doesn’t pull out before the 2012 elections, he’ll have a lot of disappointed constituents who will not vote for him.
May 25, 2010 at 10:10 AM #554522briansd1
Guest[quote=poorgradstudent]Wasn’t Obama supposed to pull us out of Iraq? That would save us a lot of $$$$.
[/quote]That’s supposed to be 2011. If Obama doesn’t pull out before the 2012 elections, he’ll have a lot of disappointed constituents who will not vote for him.
May 25, 2010 at 10:59 AM #553588SK in CV
Participant[quote=poorgradstudent]Wasn’t Obama supposed to pull us out of Iraq? That would save us a lot of $$$$.
[/quote]
Combat forces are scheduled to be out by Aug. 31 this year. Depending on the violence and relative stability, that date could be delayed. But unless there has been recent news that I’ve missed, that agreement, at the insistence of the Iraqi government, is still in place. 50,000 noncombat troops will remain. Most, if not all of withdrawn troops are expected to be redeployed in Afghanistan.
May 25, 2010 at 10:59 AM #553694SK in CV
Participant[quote=poorgradstudent]Wasn’t Obama supposed to pull us out of Iraq? That would save us a lot of $$$$.
[/quote]
Combat forces are scheduled to be out by Aug. 31 this year. Depending on the violence and relative stability, that date could be delayed. But unless there has been recent news that I’ve missed, that agreement, at the insistence of the Iraqi government, is still in place. 50,000 noncombat troops will remain. Most, if not all of withdrawn troops are expected to be redeployed in Afghanistan.
May 25, 2010 at 10:59 AM #554182SK in CV
Participant[quote=poorgradstudent]Wasn’t Obama supposed to pull us out of Iraq? That would save us a lot of $$$$.
[/quote]
Combat forces are scheduled to be out by Aug. 31 this year. Depending on the violence and relative stability, that date could be delayed. But unless there has been recent news that I’ve missed, that agreement, at the insistence of the Iraqi government, is still in place. 50,000 noncombat troops will remain. Most, if not all of withdrawn troops are expected to be redeployed in Afghanistan.
May 25, 2010 at 10:59 AM #554280SK in CV
Participant[quote=poorgradstudent]Wasn’t Obama supposed to pull us out of Iraq? That would save us a lot of $$$$.
[/quote]
Combat forces are scheduled to be out by Aug. 31 this year. Depending on the violence and relative stability, that date could be delayed. But unless there has been recent news that I’ve missed, that agreement, at the insistence of the Iraqi government, is still in place. 50,000 noncombat troops will remain. Most, if not all of withdrawn troops are expected to be redeployed in Afghanistan.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
