Home › Forums › Other › OT: NYT article on, among other things, the limits of our ability to acknowledge what we don’t know
- This topic has 395 replies, 22 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 2 months ago by bearishgurl.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 26, 2010 at 1:54 PM #572898June 26, 2010 at 1:55 PM #571893jpinpbParticipant
[quote=eavesdropper]Reminds me of one of my favorite StarTrek exchanges (from the original series):
Spock: “Random chance seems to have operated in our favor”.
McCoy: “In plain, non-Vulcan English: We’ve been lucky.”
Spock: “I believe I said that, Doctor”.
[/quote]Sorry, but I can’t resist the infamous quote:
Do you feel lucky? Well, do ya, punk?
June 26, 2010 at 1:55 PM #571991jpinpbParticipant[quote=eavesdropper]Reminds me of one of my favorite StarTrek exchanges (from the original series):
Spock: “Random chance seems to have operated in our favor”.
McCoy: “In plain, non-Vulcan English: We’ve been lucky.”
Spock: “I believe I said that, Doctor”.
[/quote]Sorry, but I can’t resist the infamous quote:
Do you feel lucky? Well, do ya, punk?
June 26, 2010 at 1:55 PM #572505jpinpbParticipant[quote=eavesdropper]Reminds me of one of my favorite StarTrek exchanges (from the original series):
Spock: “Random chance seems to have operated in our favor”.
McCoy: “In plain, non-Vulcan English: We’ve been lucky.”
Spock: “I believe I said that, Doctor”.
[/quote]Sorry, but I can’t resist the infamous quote:
Do you feel lucky? Well, do ya, punk?
June 26, 2010 at 1:55 PM #572612jpinpbParticipant[quote=eavesdropper]Reminds me of one of my favorite StarTrek exchanges (from the original series):
Spock: “Random chance seems to have operated in our favor”.
McCoy: “In plain, non-Vulcan English: We’ve been lucky.”
Spock: “I believe I said that, Doctor”.
[/quote]Sorry, but I can’t resist the infamous quote:
Do you feel lucky? Well, do ya, punk?
June 26, 2010 at 1:55 PM #572902jpinpbParticipant[quote=eavesdropper]Reminds me of one of my favorite StarTrek exchanges (from the original series):
Spock: “Random chance seems to have operated in our favor”.
McCoy: “In plain, non-Vulcan English: We’ve been lucky.”
Spock: “I believe I said that, Doctor”.
[/quote]Sorry, but I can’t resist the infamous quote:
Do you feel lucky? Well, do ya, punk?
June 26, 2010 at 1:56 PM #571898jpinpbParticipant[quote=Arraya]Good article
Social anosognosia is when a group of people, perhaps even society at large, devolve into a state of destructive cluelessness.
are we there yet?[/quote]
I really LOL.
June 26, 2010 at 1:56 PM #571996jpinpbParticipant[quote=Arraya]Good article
Social anosognosia is when a group of people, perhaps even society at large, devolve into a state of destructive cluelessness.
are we there yet?[/quote]
I really LOL.
June 26, 2010 at 1:56 PM #572510jpinpbParticipant[quote=Arraya]Good article
Social anosognosia is when a group of people, perhaps even society at large, devolve into a state of destructive cluelessness.
are we there yet?[/quote]
I really LOL.
June 26, 2010 at 1:56 PM #572617jpinpbParticipant[quote=Arraya]Good article
Social anosognosia is when a group of people, perhaps even society at large, devolve into a state of destructive cluelessness.
are we there yet?[/quote]
I really LOL.
June 26, 2010 at 1:56 PM #572907jpinpbParticipant[quote=Arraya]Good article
Social anosognosia is when a group of people, perhaps even society at large, devolve into a state of destructive cluelessness.
are we there yet?[/quote]
I really LOL.
June 26, 2010 at 6:22 PM #571944daveljParticipant[quote=jpinpb][quote=Arraya]Good article
Social anosognosia is when a group of people, perhaps even society at large, devolve into a state of destructive cluelessness.
are we there yet?[/quote]
I really LOL.[/quote]
I don’t think society is any more clueless than it’s ever been, but… only since the proliferation of WMDs and an intertwined, highly-complex financial system over the last 70 years have we been able to add the “destructive” element to our cluelessness. I’d say we’re there. I think we can reverse course (to some degree) – that is, I don’t think we’re HOPELESSLY destructively clueless – but it’s gonna take some work and a lot of pain, neither of which is popular with humans.
June 26, 2010 at 6:22 PM #572042daveljParticipant[quote=jpinpb][quote=Arraya]Good article
Social anosognosia is when a group of people, perhaps even society at large, devolve into a state of destructive cluelessness.
are we there yet?[/quote]
I really LOL.[/quote]
I don’t think society is any more clueless than it’s ever been, but… only since the proliferation of WMDs and an intertwined, highly-complex financial system over the last 70 years have we been able to add the “destructive” element to our cluelessness. I’d say we’re there. I think we can reverse course (to some degree) – that is, I don’t think we’re HOPELESSLY destructively clueless – but it’s gonna take some work and a lot of pain, neither of which is popular with humans.
June 26, 2010 at 6:22 PM #572554daveljParticipant[quote=jpinpb][quote=Arraya]Good article
Social anosognosia is when a group of people, perhaps even society at large, devolve into a state of destructive cluelessness.
are we there yet?[/quote]
I really LOL.[/quote]
I don’t think society is any more clueless than it’s ever been, but… only since the proliferation of WMDs and an intertwined, highly-complex financial system over the last 70 years have we been able to add the “destructive” element to our cluelessness. I’d say we’re there. I think we can reverse course (to some degree) – that is, I don’t think we’re HOPELESSLY destructively clueless – but it’s gonna take some work and a lot of pain, neither of which is popular with humans.
June 26, 2010 at 6:22 PM #572661daveljParticipant[quote=jpinpb][quote=Arraya]Good article
Social anosognosia is when a group of people, perhaps even society at large, devolve into a state of destructive cluelessness.
are we there yet?[/quote]
I really LOL.[/quote]
I don’t think society is any more clueless than it’s ever been, but… only since the proliferation of WMDs and an intertwined, highly-complex financial system over the last 70 years have we been able to add the “destructive” element to our cluelessness. I’d say we’re there. I think we can reverse course (to some degree) – that is, I don’t think we’re HOPELESSLY destructively clueless – but it’s gonna take some work and a lot of pain, neither of which is popular with humans.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.