- This topic has 115 replies, 20 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 5 months ago by ucodegen.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 16, 2009 at 12:01 PM #417059June 16, 2009 at 12:10 PM #416340peterbParticipant
Look at the graphs. Spending is exactly the problem. State and locally. Parties over. Tax revenue is falling off a cliff. They will try to change this regardless of the economic contraction we are now experiencing.
Pandering to unions with jobs and comp package increases can no longer be done. And the private sector does not want more taxation. I’d say the politicians in office right now will have a hard time getting re-elected in the next round.
June 16, 2009 at 12:10 PM #416578peterbParticipantLook at the graphs. Spending is exactly the problem. State and locally. Parties over. Tax revenue is falling off a cliff. They will try to change this regardless of the economic contraction we are now experiencing.
Pandering to unions with jobs and comp package increases can no longer be done. And the private sector does not want more taxation. I’d say the politicians in office right now will have a hard time getting re-elected in the next round.
June 16, 2009 at 12:10 PM #416839peterbParticipantLook at the graphs. Spending is exactly the problem. State and locally. Parties over. Tax revenue is falling off a cliff. They will try to change this regardless of the economic contraction we are now experiencing.
Pandering to unions with jobs and comp package increases can no longer be done. And the private sector does not want more taxation. I’d say the politicians in office right now will have a hard time getting re-elected in the next round.
June 16, 2009 at 12:10 PM #416905peterbParticipantLook at the graphs. Spending is exactly the problem. State and locally. Parties over. Tax revenue is falling off a cliff. They will try to change this regardless of the economic contraction we are now experiencing.
Pandering to unions with jobs and comp package increases can no longer be done. And the private sector does not want more taxation. I’d say the politicians in office right now will have a hard time getting re-elected in the next round.
June 16, 2009 at 12:10 PM #417064peterbParticipantLook at the graphs. Spending is exactly the problem. State and locally. Parties over. Tax revenue is falling off a cliff. They will try to change this regardless of the economic contraction we are now experiencing.
Pandering to unions with jobs and comp package increases can no longer be done. And the private sector does not want more taxation. I’d say the politicians in office right now will have a hard time getting re-elected in the next round.
June 16, 2009 at 12:23 PM #416345ArrayaParticipantEventually, in the near future, the USG will be in the same position. That is when the fun starts….
June 16, 2009 at 12:23 PM #416583ArrayaParticipantEventually, in the near future, the USG will be in the same position. That is when the fun starts….
June 16, 2009 at 12:23 PM #416844ArrayaParticipantEventually, in the near future, the USG will be in the same position. That is when the fun starts….
June 16, 2009 at 12:23 PM #416910ArrayaParticipantEventually, in the near future, the USG will be in the same position. That is when the fun starts….
June 16, 2009 at 12:23 PM #417069ArrayaParticipantEventually, in the near future, the USG will be in the same position. That is when the fun starts….
June 16, 2009 at 1:10 PM #416370SD RealtorParticipantPeter you and I don’t agree on much but you absolutely nailed it. If people don’t think that 1% property tax on what is clearly the most overinflated housing market in possibly the world is enough then they just don’t get it.
The state legislation simply does not understand the concept of a balanced budget.
It really isn’t that challenging of a concept.
June 16, 2009 at 1:10 PM #416608SD RealtorParticipantPeter you and I don’t agree on much but you absolutely nailed it. If people don’t think that 1% property tax on what is clearly the most overinflated housing market in possibly the world is enough then they just don’t get it.
The state legislation simply does not understand the concept of a balanced budget.
It really isn’t that challenging of a concept.
June 16, 2009 at 1:10 PM #416869SD RealtorParticipantPeter you and I don’t agree on much but you absolutely nailed it. If people don’t think that 1% property tax on what is clearly the most overinflated housing market in possibly the world is enough then they just don’t get it.
The state legislation simply does not understand the concept of a balanced budget.
It really isn’t that challenging of a concept.
June 16, 2009 at 1:10 PM #416935SD RealtorParticipantPeter you and I don’t agree on much but you absolutely nailed it. If people don’t think that 1% property tax on what is clearly the most overinflated housing market in possibly the world is enough then they just don’t get it.
The state legislation simply does not understand the concept of a balanced budget.
It really isn’t that challenging of a concept.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.