- This topic has 90 replies, 8 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 9 months ago by Allan from Fallbrook.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 3, 2010 at 1:26 PM #508649February 3, 2010 at 1:34 PM #509160briansd1Guest
[quote=pri_dk]
I do think the population will eventually wise up to the scale of defense spending and tire of paying more than half their taxes for protection from vague, nonspecific threats (e.g. the latest CIA announcement).
Doesn’t look like it will happen any time soon though.[/quote]
It’s either that or the system will collapse of it’s own weight.
The military and social entitlements are our largest burdens.
We’ll see if we have the courage to fix what ails us before we become a sick society. We still have a few decades before things go to crap if we continue at the same pace.
February 3, 2010 at 1:34 PM #509412briansd1Guest[quote=pri_dk]
I do think the population will eventually wise up to the scale of defense spending and tire of paying more than half their taxes for protection from vague, nonspecific threats (e.g. the latest CIA announcement).
Doesn’t look like it will happen any time soon though.[/quote]
It’s either that or the system will collapse of it’s own weight.
The military and social entitlements are our largest burdens.
We’ll see if we have the courage to fix what ails us before we become a sick society. We still have a few decades before things go to crap if we continue at the same pace.
February 3, 2010 at 1:34 PM #508505briansd1Guest[quote=pri_dk]
I do think the population will eventually wise up to the scale of defense spending and tire of paying more than half their taxes for protection from vague, nonspecific threats (e.g. the latest CIA announcement).
Doesn’t look like it will happen any time soon though.[/quote]
It’s either that or the system will collapse of it’s own weight.
The military and social entitlements are our largest burdens.
We’ll see if we have the courage to fix what ails us before we become a sick society. We still have a few decades before things go to crap if we continue at the same pace.
February 3, 2010 at 1:34 PM #508654briansd1Guest[quote=pri_dk]
I do think the population will eventually wise up to the scale of defense spending and tire of paying more than half their taxes for protection from vague, nonspecific threats (e.g. the latest CIA announcement).
Doesn’t look like it will happen any time soon though.[/quote]
It’s either that or the system will collapse of it’s own weight.
The military and social entitlements are our largest burdens.
We’ll see if we have the courage to fix what ails us before we become a sick society. We still have a few decades before things go to crap if we continue at the same pace.
February 3, 2010 at 1:34 PM #509066briansd1Guest[quote=pri_dk]
I do think the population will eventually wise up to the scale of defense spending and tire of paying more than half their taxes for protection from vague, nonspecific threats (e.g. the latest CIA announcement).
Doesn’t look like it will happen any time soon though.[/quote]
It’s either that or the system will collapse of it’s own weight.
The military and social entitlements are our largest burdens.
We’ll see if we have the courage to fix what ails us before we become a sick society. We still have a few decades before things go to crap if we continue at the same pace.
February 3, 2010 at 1:37 PM #509417jameswennParticipantThe reason why we have such a large budget is to keep military bases open, which are the economic drivers of many communities, like San Diego.
It’s going to be real tough for a congressman to let a base close in his backyard.
February 3, 2010 at 1:37 PM #509165jameswennParticipantThe reason why we have such a large budget is to keep military bases open, which are the economic drivers of many communities, like San Diego.
It’s going to be real tough for a congressman to let a base close in his backyard.
February 3, 2010 at 1:37 PM #508510jameswennParticipantThe reason why we have such a large budget is to keep military bases open, which are the economic drivers of many communities, like San Diego.
It’s going to be real tough for a congressman to let a base close in his backyard.
February 3, 2010 at 1:37 PM #508659jameswennParticipantThe reason why we have such a large budget is to keep military bases open, which are the economic drivers of many communities, like San Diego.
It’s going to be real tough for a congressman to let a base close in his backyard.
February 3, 2010 at 1:37 PM #509071jameswennParticipantThe reason why we have such a large budget is to keep military bases open, which are the economic drivers of many communities, like San Diego.
It’s going to be real tough for a congressman to let a base close in his backyard.
February 3, 2010 at 1:46 PM #509170ArrayaParticipant[quote=pri_dk] provided a pretty good return on investment back then (ethical issues aside…) I don’t think we are seeing the same kind of returns these days.[/quote]
Returns to whom. A small group of people always make immense returns.
Also, It’s no secret that they thought Iraq’s oil would pay for the war. They were mapping it out long before the invasion in Cheney’s “Energy Task Force” meetings. They also had congressional hearings about a pipeline through Afghanistan in the late 90s. Another project put on hold due to a myriad circumstances on the ground.
February 3, 2010 at 1:46 PM #509422ArrayaParticipant[quote=pri_dk] provided a pretty good return on investment back then (ethical issues aside…) I don’t think we are seeing the same kind of returns these days.[/quote]
Returns to whom. A small group of people always make immense returns.
Also, It’s no secret that they thought Iraq’s oil would pay for the war. They were mapping it out long before the invasion in Cheney’s “Energy Task Force” meetings. They also had congressional hearings about a pipeline through Afghanistan in the late 90s. Another project put on hold due to a myriad circumstances on the ground.
February 3, 2010 at 1:46 PM #508664ArrayaParticipant[quote=pri_dk] provided a pretty good return on investment back then (ethical issues aside…) I don’t think we are seeing the same kind of returns these days.[/quote]
Returns to whom. A small group of people always make immense returns.
Also, It’s no secret that they thought Iraq’s oil would pay for the war. They were mapping it out long before the invasion in Cheney’s “Energy Task Force” meetings. They also had congressional hearings about a pipeline through Afghanistan in the late 90s. Another project put on hold due to a myriad circumstances on the ground.
February 3, 2010 at 1:46 PM #508515ArrayaParticipant[quote=pri_dk] provided a pretty good return on investment back then (ethical issues aside…) I don’t think we are seeing the same kind of returns these days.[/quote]
Returns to whom. A small group of people always make immense returns.
Also, It’s no secret that they thought Iraq’s oil would pay for the war. They were mapping it out long before the invasion in Cheney’s “Energy Task Force” meetings. They also had congressional hearings about a pipeline through Afghanistan in the late 90s. Another project put on hold due to a myriad circumstances on the ground.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.