- This topic has 290 replies, 22 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 9 months ago by Anonymous.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 9, 2008 at 1:28 PM #150768February 9, 2008 at 1:28 PM #150415BugsParticipant
There’s opposition to a candidate’s politics and then there’s opposition to the candidate’s persona.
Regardless of how fair it is, the reason H. Clinton draws the level of opposition she does is because she is widely perceived by many on the right as being dishonest and hypocritical – more so than even most other polticians. There are a lot of people who believe that the only true allegience she has is to gaining office and wielding power. Everything else is for sale.
I don’t think its any exagerration to say that she is the only candidate who will prompt an increase in the number of voters who participate in the General Election. Even among an apathetic elctorage, she is the only candidate that some voters will go out of their way to vote against, and that has little to do with her voting record as a Senator.
No matter what, California’s electoral votes will all go to whichever of the two candidates the Democratic Party puts forth. We just had all the say we’re going have in this election last week when we voted in the primaries.
February 9, 2008 at 1:28 PM #150673BugsParticipantThere’s opposition to a candidate’s politics and then there’s opposition to the candidate’s persona.
Regardless of how fair it is, the reason H. Clinton draws the level of opposition she does is because she is widely perceived by many on the right as being dishonest and hypocritical – more so than even most other polticians. There are a lot of people who believe that the only true allegience she has is to gaining office and wielding power. Everything else is for sale.
I don’t think its any exagerration to say that she is the only candidate who will prompt an increase in the number of voters who participate in the General Election. Even among an apathetic elctorage, she is the only candidate that some voters will go out of their way to vote against, and that has little to do with her voting record as a Senator.
No matter what, California’s electoral votes will all go to whichever of the two candidates the Democratic Party puts forth. We just had all the say we’re going have in this election last week when we voted in the primaries.
February 9, 2008 at 1:28 PM #150686BugsParticipantThere’s opposition to a candidate’s politics and then there’s opposition to the candidate’s persona.
Regardless of how fair it is, the reason H. Clinton draws the level of opposition she does is because she is widely perceived by many on the right as being dishonest and hypocritical – more so than even most other polticians. There are a lot of people who believe that the only true allegience she has is to gaining office and wielding power. Everything else is for sale.
I don’t think its any exagerration to say that she is the only candidate who will prompt an increase in the number of voters who participate in the General Election. Even among an apathetic elctorage, she is the only candidate that some voters will go out of their way to vote against, and that has little to do with her voting record as a Senator.
No matter what, California’s electoral votes will all go to whichever of the two candidates the Democratic Party puts forth. We just had all the say we’re going have in this election last week when we voted in the primaries.
February 9, 2008 at 1:28 PM #150702BugsParticipantThere’s opposition to a candidate’s politics and then there’s opposition to the candidate’s persona.
Regardless of how fair it is, the reason H. Clinton draws the level of opposition she does is because she is widely perceived by many on the right as being dishonest and hypocritical – more so than even most other polticians. There are a lot of people who believe that the only true allegience she has is to gaining office and wielding power. Everything else is for sale.
I don’t think its any exagerration to say that she is the only candidate who will prompt an increase in the number of voters who participate in the General Election. Even among an apathetic elctorage, she is the only candidate that some voters will go out of their way to vote against, and that has little to do with her voting record as a Senator.
No matter what, California’s electoral votes will all go to whichever of the two candidates the Democratic Party puts forth. We just had all the say we’re going have in this election last week when we voted in the primaries.
February 9, 2008 at 1:28 PM #150773BugsParticipantThere’s opposition to a candidate’s politics and then there’s opposition to the candidate’s persona.
Regardless of how fair it is, the reason H. Clinton draws the level of opposition she does is because she is widely perceived by many on the right as being dishonest and hypocritical – more so than even most other polticians. There are a lot of people who believe that the only true allegience she has is to gaining office and wielding power. Everything else is for sale.
I don’t think its any exagerration to say that she is the only candidate who will prompt an increase in the number of voters who participate in the General Election. Even among an apathetic elctorage, she is the only candidate that some voters will go out of their way to vote against, and that has little to do with her voting record as a Senator.
No matter what, California’s electoral votes will all go to whichever of the two candidates the Democratic Party puts forth. We just had all the say we’re going have in this election last week when we voted in the primaries.
February 9, 2008 at 1:30 PM #150420ArtyParticipantTalk about who should be in prison. First, both Regan and Bush sr. should be in prison because they literally funneled cracks into our ghettos to fund a war. Bush Jr. invaded a nation with out congressional approval and under faulty pretenses. Hillary is guilty, too, for been part of the inner political circle.
Obama is relatively new to the D.C. circle, so it will be hard to pin anything on him.
Regardless who will be President, if American public still keeps on spending like no tomorrow, one day we will all be regretting our decisions. Of course, we will not realized what a mistake that we made until it’s too late.
If McCain win, so what, he will probably go see St. Peter two year into his term due to old age. Therefore, I think who he choices to be his vice-president will be a very big factor at least for winning hard right-wingers.
February 9, 2008 at 1:30 PM #150678ArtyParticipantTalk about who should be in prison. First, both Regan and Bush sr. should be in prison because they literally funneled cracks into our ghettos to fund a war. Bush Jr. invaded a nation with out congressional approval and under faulty pretenses. Hillary is guilty, too, for been part of the inner political circle.
Obama is relatively new to the D.C. circle, so it will be hard to pin anything on him.
Regardless who will be President, if American public still keeps on spending like no tomorrow, one day we will all be regretting our decisions. Of course, we will not realized what a mistake that we made until it’s too late.
If McCain win, so what, he will probably go see St. Peter two year into his term due to old age. Therefore, I think who he choices to be his vice-president will be a very big factor at least for winning hard right-wingers.
February 9, 2008 at 1:30 PM #150692ArtyParticipantTalk about who should be in prison. First, both Regan and Bush sr. should be in prison because they literally funneled cracks into our ghettos to fund a war. Bush Jr. invaded a nation with out congressional approval and under faulty pretenses. Hillary is guilty, too, for been part of the inner political circle.
Obama is relatively new to the D.C. circle, so it will be hard to pin anything on him.
Regardless who will be President, if American public still keeps on spending like no tomorrow, one day we will all be regretting our decisions. Of course, we will not realized what a mistake that we made until it’s too late.
If McCain win, so what, he will probably go see St. Peter two year into his term due to old age. Therefore, I think who he choices to be his vice-president will be a very big factor at least for winning hard right-wingers.
February 9, 2008 at 1:30 PM #150707ArtyParticipantTalk about who should be in prison. First, both Regan and Bush sr. should be in prison because they literally funneled cracks into our ghettos to fund a war. Bush Jr. invaded a nation with out congressional approval and under faulty pretenses. Hillary is guilty, too, for been part of the inner political circle.
Obama is relatively new to the D.C. circle, so it will be hard to pin anything on him.
Regardless who will be President, if American public still keeps on spending like no tomorrow, one day we will all be regretting our decisions. Of course, we will not realized what a mistake that we made until it’s too late.
If McCain win, so what, he will probably go see St. Peter two year into his term due to old age. Therefore, I think who he choices to be his vice-president will be a very big factor at least for winning hard right-wingers.
February 9, 2008 at 1:30 PM #150778ArtyParticipantTalk about who should be in prison. First, both Regan and Bush sr. should be in prison because they literally funneled cracks into our ghettos to fund a war. Bush Jr. invaded a nation with out congressional approval and under faulty pretenses. Hillary is guilty, too, for been part of the inner political circle.
Obama is relatively new to the D.C. circle, so it will be hard to pin anything on him.
Regardless who will be President, if American public still keeps on spending like no tomorrow, one day we will all be regretting our decisions. Of course, we will not realized what a mistake that we made until it’s too late.
If McCain win, so what, he will probably go see St. Peter two year into his term due to old age. Therefore, I think who he choices to be his vice-president will be a very big factor at least for winning hard right-wingers.
February 9, 2008 at 2:25 PM #150455CoronitaParticipantIf McCain win, so what, he will probably go see St. Peter two year into his term due to old age. Therefore, I think who he choices to be his vice-president will be a very big factor at least for winning hard right-wingers.
Any chances of a McCain/Ron Paul Ticket ? π
Yes, yes I know. They're at odds end with the war issue.Β
[img_assist|nid=5962|title=selfportrait|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=80]
—– Sour grapes for everyone!
February 9, 2008 at 2:25 PM #150713CoronitaParticipantIf McCain win, so what, he will probably go see St. Peter two year into his term due to old age. Therefore, I think who he choices to be his vice-president will be a very big factor at least for winning hard right-wingers.
Any chances of a McCain/Ron Paul Ticket ? π
Yes, yes I know. They're at odds end with the war issue.Β
[img_assist|nid=5962|title=selfportrait|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=80]
—– Sour grapes for everyone!
February 9, 2008 at 2:25 PM #150727CoronitaParticipantIf McCain win, so what, he will probably go see St. Peter two year into his term due to old age. Therefore, I think who he choices to be his vice-president will be a very big factor at least for winning hard right-wingers.
Any chances of a McCain/Ron Paul Ticket ? π
Yes, yes I know. They're at odds end with the war issue.Β
[img_assist|nid=5962|title=selfportrait|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=80]
—– Sour grapes for everyone!
February 9, 2008 at 2:25 PM #150742CoronitaParticipantIf McCain win, so what, he will probably go see St. Peter two year into his term due to old age. Therefore, I think who he choices to be his vice-president will be a very big factor at least for winning hard right-wingers.
Any chances of a McCain/Ron Paul Ticket ? π
Yes, yes I know. They're at odds end with the war issue.Β
[img_assist|nid=5962|title=selfportrait|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=80]
—– Sour grapes for everyone!
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.